Cuomo did not mention that, or any of the changes
in pension requirements Bloomberg wants.
Not exact matches
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected
in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered
in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases
in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest
in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions
in the industries and markets
in which we operate
in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations
in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain
in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance
requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on
pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes on
pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both
in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes
in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction
in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco
in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations
in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.
significant changes
in discount rates, rates of return on
pension assets, mortality tables and other factors could adversely affect our earnings and equity and increase our
pension funding
requirements;
At the time of the change
in residence
requirements, it was hoped that Canada would enter into social security agreements with countries that were the source of immigration so that partial payments of social security
pensions would be received by adult immigrants to Canada.
These risks and uncertainties include competition and other economic conditions including fragmentation of the media landscape and competition from other media alternatives; changes
in advertising demand, circulation levels and audience shares; the Company's ability to develop and grow its online businesses; the Company's reliance on revenue from printing and distributing third - party publications; changes
in newsprint prices; macroeconomic trends and conditions; the Company's ability to adapt to technological changes; the Company's ability to realize benefits or synergies from acquisitions or divestitures or to operate its businesses effectively following acquisitions or divestitures; the Company's success
in implementing expense mitigation efforts; the Company's reliance on third - party vendors for various services; adverse results from litigation, governmental investigations or tax - related proceedings or audits; the Company's ability to attract and retain employees; the Company's ability to satisfy
pension and other postretirement employee benefit obligations; changes
in accounting standards; the effect of labor strikes, lockouts and labor negotiations; regulatory and judicial rulings; the Company's indebtedness and ability to comply with debt covenants applicable to its debt facilities; the Company's ability to satisfy future capital and liquidity
requirements; the Company's ability to access the credit and capital markets at the times and
in the amounts needed and on acceptable terms; and other events beyond the Company's control that may result
in unexpected adverse operating results.
There are more administrative and regulatory
requirements in a
pension plan, so some employers may prefer the group RSP / DPSP (deferred profit sharing plan) approach, said Saulnier.
OTA lobbied the Senate Health, Education, Labor &
Pensions Committee staff and several Senate offices to include language
in the Produce Safety Rule prohibiting any new regulations from contradicting or duplicating the
requirements of the U.S. Department of Agriculture's National Organic Program (NOP).
Before the establishment of survivors» benefits, needy widowed mothers with children had to rely on state - run Mother's
Pension programs.56 These programs scrutinized beneficiaries closely and were often administered to deny aid to women of color or women with objectionable morals or lifestyles.57
In contrast to discretionary (and often discriminatory) mother's
pensions, survivors» benefits uniformly extended coverage to widows of insured workers who were caring for a child under the age of 18.58 There was no
requirement of economic need.
There are also policy actions which we have to take - investment climate reforms to improve business and economic competitiveness, focus on developing MSMEs, deepening long term savings through
pensions, insurance and sovereign savings, land reform to eliminate constraints
in time and cost around land transactions (including a review of the governor's consent
requirement), and actions to reduce inflation, interest rates and business operating costs.
· Allowing counties an option to modify how they fund state mandated
pension contributions · Providing counties more audit authority
in the special education preschool program · Improving government efficiency and streamlining state and local legislative operations by removing the need for counties to pursue home rule legislative requests every two years with the state legislature
in order to extend current local sales tax authority · Reducing administrative and reporting
requirements for counties under Article 6 public health programs · Reforming the Workers Compensation system · Renewing Binding Arbitration, which is scheduled to sunset
in June 2013, with a new definition of «ability to pay» for municipalities under fiscal distress, making it subject to the property tax cap (does not apply to NYC) where «ability to pay» will be defined as no more than 2 percent growth
in the contract.
Thursday night, word began circulating of a «framework» agreement reached between the so - called «three men
in a room» — Gov. Andrew Cuomo, Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie and Senate Majority Leader John Flanagan — that would satisfy at least the minimum
requirements for both: The Democratic - dominated Assembly would agree to the first passage of legislation paving the way for a constitutional amendment that would allow for the stripping of public
pensions from elected officials and other top officials convicted of public corruption, and the Republican - led Senate would approve a one - year extension of mayoral control of New York City's schools.
In fact GASB 45 is a recent accounting requirement put in place because private sector employers routinely under funded and misstated their own pension and health insurance obligation
In fact GASB 45 is a recent accounting
requirement put
in place because private sector employers routinely under funded and misstated their own pension and health insurance obligation
in place because private sector employers routinely under funded and misstated their own
pension and health insurance obligations.
Frank Field is one of these people who lots of people say is great until he is actually given any power, he manages both to agitate Labour MPs favourable towards welfare by coming out with solutions to time limit benefits and add workfare
requirements, equally he is constantly saying that JSA rates are far too low as well as demanding
pensions at high rates for all, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown both came to the conclusion that his proposals on the State
Pension would have been hugely expensive - his pension plans could not all be funded by savings on the unemployed and would probably lead to a huge swelling in the welfare
Pension would have been hugely expensive - his
pension plans could not all be funded by savings on the unemployed and would probably lead to a huge swelling in the welfare
pension plans could not all be funded by savings on the unemployed and would probably lead to a huge swelling
in the welfare budget.
In one instance, we are paying an additional twenty - six thousand dollars per year, each and every year, on just one employee's pension because of the massive amount of overtime that was factored in to his final salary, because of contractual seniority requirement
In one instance, we are paying an additional twenty - six thousand dollars per year, each and every year, on just one employee's
pension because of the massive amount of overtime that was factored
in to his final salary, because of contractual seniority requirement
in to his final salary, because of contractual seniority
requirements.
In order to qualify for a
pension, teachers must meet certain service or vesting
requirements.
And
in 19 states where charter schools are exempt from state
pension participation
requirements, charter schools are offering their teachers more portable and flexible retirement benefits.
Service
requirements, known as «vesting» rules, require teachers to stay a certain number of years
in the classroom
in order to qualify for a
pension.
Conceptually, a teacher facing a 10 - year vesting
requirement likely does not say to herself,
in her 3rd year of teaching, «well, I don't like teaching here very much, but if I just stick this out for seven more years, at least I'll qualify for a minimal
pension!»
States have not paid for
pension costs on an honest accounting basis, and they have accrued billions of dollars
in pension debt that avoids so - called «balanced budget»
requirements.
In order to cut costs and recover from the recent recession, New York City recently lengthened the vesting requirement, the time period employees need to stay in order to qualify for even a minimum pension, from five years to te
In order to cut costs and recover from the recent recession, New York City recently lengthened the vesting
requirement, the time period employees need to stay
in order to qualify for even a minimum pension, from five years to te
in order to qualify for even a minimum
pension, from five years to ten.
In 2010, faced with the one of the largest pension deficits in the country, Illinois created a new, less generous pension plan for new teachers that lengthened the vesting requirement from five years to te
In 2010, faced with the one of the largest
pension deficits
in the country, Illinois created a new, less generous pension plan for new teachers that lengthened the vesting requirement from five years to te
in the country, Illinois created a new, less generous
pension plan for new teachers that lengthened the vesting
requirement from five years to ten.
As discussed
in Bellwether's recent paper, 24 states and the District of Columbia have a vesting
requirement of five years and another 17 states require a teacher to stay 10 years before qualifying for a
pension.
In order to be eligible for a
pension, teachers must meet a minimum number of employment years or a «vesting»
requirement before they receive rights to a
pension.
Even the union's chief lobbyist, Ginger Gold Schnitzer, said the challenges couldn't be steeper for the 190,000 - member union, with rollbacks
in teacher
pensions and benefits, and new
requirements for teacher tenure and evaluation.
It stayed that way until 2011, when the
pension fund was
in such dire financial straits that the legislature increased the minimum service
requirements back to 10 years to reduce costs at the expense of teachers.
In the article Governor Malloy finally addresses the special provision allowing Steven Adamowski to add to his
pension even though he failed to meet the most basic
requirements.
Put
in relation to the state
pension's 10 year service
requirement, a teacher could work for up to nine years and then leave the system before qualifying for a
pension.
Under federal regulations, public sector
pensions are allowed to set vesting
requirements that far exceed what's required
in the private sector.
(
In the case of state and local government
pensions, the waiver
requirement, if any, varies by state.
Keeping the
requirements of customers
in mind mutual funds have also started to offer
pension schemes which have a hybrid nature and can be invested
in both equity and debt component.
If you're 65 or over and self - employed, already
in receipt of CPP benefits, and want to opt out of the
requirement to pay CPP, you must complete the «Election to stop contributing to the Canada
Pension Plan,» which is included on Schedule 8 of your personal tax return.
There is no
requirement for how you fund the Personal
Pension, but the more you put
in, the more income you'll get
in retirement.
The new law requires that the application be reviewed by the Treasury Department,
in consultation with the
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) and the Department of Labor, to determine if it meets the
requirements set by Congress.
Developing expertise with QDROs is a natural lead -
in to the broader service area of divorce taxation for CPAs because of their familiarity with
pension requirements for both financial reporting and taxation.
The minimum
pension requirement would not be satisfied
in the relevant year and the trustee would need to demonstrate that matters outside of their control affected their ability to meet the minimum
pension requirements.
No, for a trustee to meet the minimum
pension payment standards they must meet the payment
requirements both
in form and effect.
A trustee will need to write
in and outline why they did not meet the minimum
pension payment
requirements for us to consider their entitlement to the exception, where either — they have:
Once an account - based
pension commences, there is an ongoing
requirement for you, as trustee of a complying superannuation fund, to ensure the
pension standards
in the super laws are satisfied.
In all other cases the trustee will need to write in and outline why they did not meet the minimum pension payment requirement
In all other cases the trustee will need to write
in and outline why they did not meet the minimum pension payment requirement
in and outline why they did not meet the minimum
pension payment
requirements.
The trustee does not meet the minimum
pension requirements for the year ending 30 June due to a transposition error which resulted
in a small underpayment
If a fund fails to meet the minimum
pension payment
requirements in an income year, the super income stream will be taken to have ceased at the start of that income year for income tax purposes.
What if the trustees have failed to meet the minimum
pension payments
in one year but
in a subsequent year are prepared to meet the minimum
pension requirements as required under the SIS Regulations?
The question to be referred is whether the Directive precluded the imposition
in national law of a
requirement that a person must also be unmarried
in order to qualify for a state
pension, where a gender change occurred.
It seems safe to say that Brexit is unlikely to have a major impact on UK
pensions legislation as many of the EU
requirements already embedded
in UK law are beneficial, such as equalisation of benefits.
One of the
requirements of a qualifying
pension scheme is that no new joiner may be asked to make a choice or provide any information
in order to join the scheme as an active member.
The legal
requirements when dealing with a property held
in a Self Invested Personal
Pension (SIPP) or Small Self Administered Scheme (SSAS) or seeking to be bought by a SIPP or SSAS can be complex.
The team at ARC not only conveyed the
requirements and operation of the law on
pensions but also understood the dynamics of the business and its operations as well as the needs, interest and constraints of the other stakeholders — instilling confidence
in the directors and senior managers of the Company.
The Supreme Court unanimously held the
requirement in the Local Government
Pension Scheme (Benefits, Membership and Contributions) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2009 that unmarried co-habiting partners must be nominated in order to be eligible for a survivor's pension, was interference with the appellant's right to property under article 1 of Protocol 1 to the ECHR that could not be «objectively justified» for the purposes of
Pension Scheme (Benefits, Membership and Contributions) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2009 that unmarried co-habiting partners must be nominated
in order to be eligible for a survivor's
pension, was interference with the appellant's right to property under article 1 of Protocol 1 to the ECHR that could not be «objectively justified» for the purposes of
pension, was interference with the appellant's right to property under article 1 of Protocol 1 to the ECHR that could not be «objectively justified» for the purposes of art 14.
It held that the
requirement in the Gender Recognition Act 2004 to obtain a Gender Recognition Certificate as a condition for claiming a state
requirement pension in one's acquired gender was compatible with Council Directive 79 / 7 / EEC on equal treatment
in matters of social security.
Grow -
in rights refer to plans providing enhanced early retirement benefits, often an unreduced
pension, even though an employee doesn't meet age or service
requirements when the plan winds up.