While the Transition Movement has, so far, been careful to avoid party politics, it seems obvious that as a community - lead response to coming challenges, it has little choice but to engage
in political debate as its influence grows.
Although D'Agostino doesn't need to go through the confirmation process again, his office is certain to be a lightning rod
in the political debates as the Administration tries to negotiate arms control and non-proliferation treaties while preserving the viability of the country's current stockpile.
Not exact matches
Meanwhile,
as various pundits and historians across the globe
debate if and how Trump's surprising
political ascendancy will shift the overall tone of U.S. politics going forward, the candidate himself feels like only a win
in November will make a difference.
Recently we've seen a surge
in enquiries which, I suspect, is due to the high profile publicity surrounding companies such
as Burger King who have already undertaken inversion and the top - level
political debate.
In the eight months since Benghazi, the debate about what happened in Benghazi has become deeply political, as Republicans continue to challenge the White House's actions during and after the attacks, which left four Americans, including U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens, dea
In the eight months since Benghazi, the
debate about what happened
in Benghazi has become deeply political, as Republicans continue to challenge the White House's actions during and after the attacks, which left four Americans, including U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens, dea
in Benghazi has become deeply
political,
as Republicans continue to challenge the White House's actions during and after the attacks, which left four Americans, including U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens, dead.
As environmental issues and concerns become a center issue
in political debates around the world, it's becoming apparent that 2017 is the year that green initiatives will have the opportunity to become more than what crunchy granola hippies talk about and become fully mainstream.
Despite the fact that Trump was widely viewed
as having lost the recent
debate with Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton, and that the election itself is just over a month away, the candidate chose to tweet not about the
political issues
in the campaign but about his dislike of former Miss Universe contestant Alicia Machado.
Trump, known for his use of Twitter to drive
political debate, tweeted about an Indiana air conditioner maker he featured
in his election campaign
as an emblem of trade deals he said were unfavorable to American workers.
And while the coming
debate over the guaranteed income will inevitably focus on
political and economic viability,
in the end the authors believe we will embrace it,
as we embraced those others, because it is the right thing to do.
In the upcoming months
as the
political debate unfolds, any economic policy proposed by any
political party, to be financed from the rather small projected surpluses, should be judged, at a minimum, on how it will strengthen economic growth and job creation.
It's much dodgier for conventional news reporters to treat this year's
political debate as one between «normal» and «abnormal,»
as the Vox editor
in chief Ezra Klein put it recently.
Again, religious groups are well advised,
as a general rule, to avoid
political partisanship — but not because the Constitution prohibits their active engagement
in public
debate, nor because they might get
in trouble with the IRS.
What will it mean for both sides
in this
debate — at least
as it takes place among believers,
in and for the church — to move beyond
political ideologies and culture wars and stand together under God's word of law and gospel?
As recent events
in New York show, the marriage
debate in America takes place amid serious
political and legal fault lines.
In its more common contemporary use, it contrasts with
political «conservatism,» such that contemporary American
political discussion is often largely understood
as a
debate between the two.
The willingness to classify
political views which should be respected, such
as leaving or staying
in the EU,
as «extreme», shows the danger of focusing the extremism
debate on beliefs we may find uncomfortable or disagree with, rather than on actions that threaten lives.»
According to this understanding, the role of religion
in political debate is not so much to supply these norms,
as if they could not be known by non-believers — still less to propose concrete
political solutions, which would lie altogether outside the competence of religion — but rather to help purify and shed light upon the application of reason to the discovery of objective moral principles.
The upshot is the suppression of
political debate about the common good, which is why thorough - going libertarians are such a destructive force
in our
political culture, perhaps
as much so
as contemporary liberals whose main vice is the serene smugness that assumes that all we have left is administration because everybody worth talking to already agrees with them about first principles.
Their discomfort with cultural issues is reflected
in their protests that matters such
as partial - birth abortion, school prayer, or same - sex marriage are not proper items for
political debate; they are rather «wedge issues» that conservatives illegitimately bring into the public arena
in order to divide the nation (read:
in order to cost Democrats votes).
Childless and independent, with far more interest
in the latest
political and theological
debates than trends
in cloth diapering, I, like so many others, dismissed «mommy blogging»
as trivial, jejune.
It was inevitable, perhaps, that the «culture wars» — the
debate that continues to rage over the impact of
political correctness, multiculturalism, and their allied ideologies — would spawn a genre of liberal apologetics designed to exonerate liberalism itself from its role
in abetting the establishment of radical doctrine
as a mandatory standard of judgment
in mainstream cultural life.
Hence Nelson rightly pays careful attention to the
debates over
political principles
in the American founding,
as well
as the innovations those
debates produced.
Certainly some evangelical groups — the Signpost Research Centre, for example — have engaged the
political debate in South Africa
in such a way
as advertently or inadvertently to lend support to the morally odious system of apartheid.
This event is usually a rather sedate affair, with scholars
debating such recondite subjects
as «Bayesian approaches to
political research» and «The
political?theological problem
in Xenophon's thought.»
He said: «We're going to need to change by virtue a humanised
political debate over exactly what we want to see
in our country, that means changing the law, it is also changing the culture so people view abortion
as what it is, destruction of an unborn child.»
Fellow legislator Senator Angus King, an independent from Maine, referred to the ongoing
debate over immigration
in Congress
as «a unique opportunity for us to carry out our moral and ethical responsibilities at the same time
as we carry out our legal and
political responsibilities.»
It is significant that the terms of the
debate about faith
in the world are deemed to have been set by people like Richards Dawkins, just
as it is significant that the
debate is seen
as a «
political and secular», rather than a religious, one.
As I thought about how to apply these teachings practically, a lot of strategies came to mind — putting the needs of others before my own, buying less and giving more, humbling myself when engaged
in political or theological
debates, embracing rather than complaining about those «one - way relationships,» praying for others more sincerely, saying «yes» a little more often, working on that ubiquitous sense of entitlement and pride that keeps me from going the extra mile.
As the divine right monarchy came increasingly
in the eighteenth century to defend its positions on the grounds of administrative reason and enlightened reform, the discourse of those resisting its rule also relied less on traditional religious appeals and more on secular ones, but the religious roots of all sides of the
political and social
debate were only obscured, never severed.
... some Catholic liberals who saw John Paul II
as overly conservative have suggested that his cause is being fast - tracked
in order to score
political points
in internal Catholic
debates.
Now, more than ever, we need you to stay loud,
as political debate about live export intensifies
in the lead up to the election.
Yes, this is a man who lists «walking» and «listening to
political debate»
as hobbies — can't see him thumbing through the back pages of the Sun or tuning
in to radio 5 Talksport for his entertainment.
Food for thought Mrs. Q's blog benefited from good
political timing: School lunches have been
in the spotlight
as Congress
debated reauthorizing the Child Nutrition Act.
Building on her role
as de facto leader of the out - of - work and out - of - luck on James Turner Street, Dee has emerged
as something of a spokesman for the many people whose voice is rarely heard
in the national
political debate.
Paladino also praised a man he just recently was quoted
as calling a «degenerate idiot» — former Gov. George Pataki — saying his fellow Republican «put his own
political best interests aside for the public good» by insisting
in 2002 that the minor party gubernatorial candidates be included
in debates along with his Democratic opponent, then - state Comptroller H. Carl McCall.
As the government seeks to move the
political realm further into the religious sphere through the current Equality Bill, this is likely to be a major area of
debate in the coming years.
Since 2008 - 9, however, most
political debate has focused on restoring the UK economy to «business
as usual»: Although the power of government was used to stabilise the financial system through bailouts and nationalisations,
in stark contrast to the 1930s New Deal era, there is no apparent enthusiasm for entrusting the state with new powers and responsibilities.
In short, the continued possibility of independence may frame political debate within in the UK in negative and corrosive terms, with Scotland's interests understood as distinct from, and potentially in tension with, those of the rest of the U
In short, the continued possibility of independence may frame
political debate within
in the UK in negative and corrosive terms, with Scotland's interests understood as distinct from, and potentially in tension with, those of the rest of the U
in the UK
in negative and corrosive terms, with Scotland's interests understood as distinct from, and potentially in tension with, those of the rest of the U
in negative and corrosive terms, with Scotland's interests understood
as distinct from, and potentially
in tension with, those of the rest of the U
in tension with, those of the rest of the UK.
Over the past couple of weeks,
as the referendum campaign reached its climax
in Scotland, a concept has suddenly started springing up all over the place
in English
political debate: the idea of a constitutional convention.
Third, it was not possible to attain a financial model which ended a system regarded
as unjust (quantified
as between 7 % and 10 % of Catalonia's GDP, figures that led to the use of the term «fiscal despoliation»
in political debates), nor respect for the «ordinal principle» once the territorial transfers have been made.
With a few honourable exceptions, MPs on the Finance Bill Public Bill Committee take little part
in proceedings; such
debate as there is, can often be characterised by
political knock - about rather than diligent technical scrutiny.
With this scenario
in mind, the
debates in the EU Parliament have highlighted severe fractures between
political groups,
as well
as between Romanian MEPs.
Unsurprisingly, this leads to no small degree of social and
political concern, and the UK is currently engaged
in an emotive
debate as to how best we might balance individual rights to protection from legal but «harmful» online content against rights to sexual freedom and freedom of information or expression.
The current proposals are bound to meet a largely partisan reception, and will be depicted by some
as a politically motivated attempt to create difficulties for a future Labour administration (though it should be noted that Labour's catastrophic performance
in Scotland
in the general election alters the territorial
political dynamic that underpinned
debates about EVEL quite considerably), and by others
as an attempt to diminish the role of Scottish MPs.
McMillan came to national attention
as a
political novelty for his performance
in a 2010 gubernatorial
debate, which was subsequently lampooned on Saturday Night Live.
Throughout the campaign for the 7 May elections, Miliband insisted that David Cameron should
debate him one on one
as part of a televised election broadcast [104]
in order to highlight differences
in policies between the two major parties, but this was never to happen, with the pair instead being interviewed separately by Jeremy Paxman
as part of the first major televised
political broadcast of the election involving multiple parties.
As your own post reflects, there are plenty more aspects of David Laws» actions
in the
political sphere that are far more worthy of comment,
debate and disagreement than this.
Whilst the economic circumstances might make it more difficult to actually implement the New Labour mantra of increased investment
in public services funded by a growing economy, there's little to suggest that the terms of
debate in the
political centre ground have undergone a paradigm shift such
as the one experienced
in the post-Thatcherite era.
As Jessica Kimpell has charted
in her earlier article
in this
debate, this was the period of tension between virtue and commerce, between republican language and
political economic language [3].
The less obvious but potentially equally devastating factor is that voters may look to the terms of
political debate in countries such
as France and conclude that austerity is more of a lifestyle choice than an economic imperative.