To be engaged
in practical theology, to be a professional church leader, simply is to be doing theology «professionally» on Hough and Cobb's description of theology.
For ten years previously he was the Dean of the Uniting Church's Theological Hall and Lecturer
in Practical Theology in the United Faculty of Theology in Melbourne.
Schleiermacher had proposed that educating people to engage in relevant critical inquiry could provide a foundation for their engaging
in practical theology.
While I owe much to the stimulating ideas of Don Browning, David Tracy and James Fowler
in Practical Theology, I wish to attempt a small, constructive personal contribution rather than to enter into dialogue with them.
Thus
in practical theology the socially indispensable practice of church leadership is given cognitive and theoretical foundation by Wissenschaft (historical and philosophical theology).
In both of these strictures, the role of theological ethics or moral theology
in practical theology was minimized, and the idea that practical theology dealt with the church's attempt to influence the order of the public world subsided.
The recent interest
in practical theology may help to spark that creativity in the seminaries, where the discussion has been centered, and in the churches, where the conversation needs to be continued.
The current interest
in practical theology may be seen as a return to the earlier effort to develop a comprehensive, integrated understanding of the life of faith in contemporary society.
Since then pastoral counseling, greatly assisted by the clinical training pattern, has developed into a dominant area of ministry, mounting to its present ascendency
in practical theology.
Not exact matches
My first
practical response was to work with others at the School of
Theology at Claremont to organize a conference in April 1970 to relate theology to thi
Theology at Claremont to organize a conference
in April 1970 to relate
theology to thi
theology to this issue.
In my class, we talk about the arc of
practical theology.
Indeed,
in a complex society where no one can grasp more than a few of the details, some of the most important
practical theology will have to be done by specialists
in medicine, law or business, or by theologians and ethicists whose training equips them for specialized roles
in those institutions.
Carl is the Assistant Professor of
Practical Theology at Redeemer Seminary
in Dallas, TX, Associate Pastor of Cultural Apologetics at New City Fellowship,
in Chattanooga, TN, and serves as adjunct faculty at Westminster Theological Seminary
in Philadelphia, PA..
What
practical theology must provide is an understanding of how faith can guide action
in contemporary circumstances.
This vision of doxological
theology is at odds with the standard fourfold division of seminary education
in the West, which keeps «Bible,» «church history,» «
theology» and «
practical ministry» cordoned off from one another, For the Orthodox,
theology is simply commentary upon the saints» commentary on scripture for the sake of the church's worship.
These objectives are often very important, but few who measure
practical theology in terms of pastoral skills recognize how much knowledge is required to do any of these things
in ways that will yield more than short - term success.
The principal critics of
practical theology therefore advocate a radical rejection of modern questions about reason and practice
in favor of a discussion
in which the most important questions about the meaning and validity of the Christian message are assumed, precisely so that the details can be intelligently debated.
To the extent that these details are lost
in large - scale theoretical constructions, the relevance to the actual life of faith that
practical theology seeks is diminished.
The author works from the premise that all
theology must be
practical theology in that it must enable individual faith to be effectively connected to social context.
Unlike Wood's scheme, this one does not make a point of separating «moral
theology» as a distinct inquiry
in its own right; here it is a mode of «critical
practical theology.»
Wendy is the author of
Practical Theology for Women: How Knowing God Makes a Difference in Our Daily Lives, and she spent four years teaching theology to women at Mars Hill Church in
Theology for Women: How Knowing God Makes a Difference
in Our Daily Lives, and she spent four years teaching
theology to women at Mars Hill Church in
theology to women at Mars Hill Church
in Seattle.
In these pages I will (1) provide an overview of communication scholarship trends, (2) offer some reflections concerning the impact of new technologies that promote human interaction and cooperative alliances, and (3) make some
practical suggestions that can enrich our communication -
theology integration.
Of course, there are new questions
in dogmatic and moral
theology, which have been discussed more openly at and after the Council and which have not yet been solved, among them questions of great importance also for the
practical life.
The suggestion here is that the dominant interest unifying every course
in a theological curriculum ought to be the interest guiding one of the three sorts of
theology (constructive, critical
practical, or apologetic), that is, interest reflected
in one of the three ranges of questions congregations invite about their construals of the Christian thing (What is it?
Professor David Wilkinson, Professor of
Theology, Principal of St John's College, Durham University, said: «CODEC is unique
in combining research on the digital environment within a world class University with
practical outputs to serve the Church.
In nineteenth - century philosophies elaborating the evolutionary theory it appears as an overtone of agnosticism, as in Herbert Spencer's reference to the Unknowable.5 Even in modernist theologies like that of Shailer Mathews one senses this agnostic note accompanying the formulation of its practical or functional rationale, as when he wrot
In nineteenth - century philosophies elaborating the evolutionary theory it appears as an overtone of agnosticism, as
in Herbert Spencer's reference to the Unknowable.5 Even in modernist theologies like that of Shailer Mathews one senses this agnostic note accompanying the formulation of its practical or functional rationale, as when he wrot
in Herbert Spencer's reference to the Unknowable.5 Even
in modernist theologies like that of Shailer Mathews one senses this agnostic note accompanying the formulation of its practical or functional rationale, as when he wrot
in modernist
theologies like that of Shailer Mathews one senses this agnostic note accompanying the formulation of its
practical or functional rationale, as when he wrote,
But one sometimes wonders if Farley fully realizes how far we must yet travel before we arrive at a thoroughly
practical theology critical and philosophical enough to fit
in the university and fine - tuned enough actually to give direction to the church's ministries
in the public world.
In varying degrees, most of them want practical theology to become more critical and philosophical, more public (in the sense of being more oriented toward the church's ministry to the world rather than simply preoccupied with the needs of its own internal life), and more related to an analysis of the various situations and contexts of theolog
In varying degrees, most of them want
practical theology to become more critical and philosophical, more public (
in the sense of being more oriented toward the church's ministry to the world rather than simply preoccupied with the needs of its own internal life), and more related to an analysis of the various situations and contexts of theolog
in the sense of being more oriented toward the church's ministry to the world rather than simply preoccupied with the needs of its own internal life), and more related to an analysis of the various situations and contexts of
theology.
Life
in God: John Calvin,
Practical Formation, and the Future of Protestant
Theology by Matthew Boulton Eerdmans, 242 pages, $ 28
As Don S. Browning notes below, several scholars are currently doing creative work
in the area of
practical theology.
John Westerhoff
in his Building God's People
in a Materialistic Society (Seabury, 1983), after making the standard distinction between fundamental, systematic and
practical theology, further differentiates
practical theology into the liturgical, moral, spiritual, pastoral and catechetical.
In brief, I would like to see Farley do more with what I have been calling
practical theology as procedure.
When I wrote Blessed Rage for Order, I did state that even if the arguments for the public character of fundamental
theology in that book were sound, those arguments could not determine the distinctive form of publicness proper to systematic
theology or that proper to
practical theology.
In Germany, under the leadership of Rolf Zerfass and Norbet Mette, there has been an important revival of practical theology But a very powerful recent statement pointing to its revival can he found in Edward Fancy's recent book, Theologia: The Fragmentation and Unity of Theological Educati
In Germany, under the leadership of Rolf Zerfass and Norbet Mette, there has been an important revival of
practical theology But a very powerful recent statement pointing to its revival can he found
in Edward Fancy's recent book, Theologia: The Fragmentation and Unity of Theological Educati
in Edward Fancy's recent book, Theologia: The Fragmentation and Unity of Theological Education
In the old fourfold model,
practical theology was confessional, applicational, parochial and clerical.
He is simply interested
in bringing theologia as a
practical enterprise into all the traditional regions of
practical theology — education, care, worship, preaching, spirituality, etc..
There is also variance on the centrality of theological ethics for
practical theology and,
in addition, there are different ideas about how theological ethics should be conceived.
Farley's work points
in the right direction, but more work needs to be done to establish
practical theology as procedure and as method before it can become the center of theological education.
From its inception
in 1879, the Church of Christ, Scientist has had but one agenda: the
practical implementing of a
theology in which the healing of sin is primary and the healing of disease indispensable.
Although Thomas Groome
in his widely celebrated Christian Religious Education (Harper & Row, 1980) does not actually use the term, he does
in fact present a powerful
practical theology of Christian education that constitutes the major reason for the book's success.
A
practical theology of virtue and character must be supplemented and supported by a
practical theology of procedure and one, I believe, that also builds an important role for ethical principles
in theological reflection.
But theological ethics as principle and procedure is crucial if
practical theology is to equip the church to take a thoroughly critical role
in public life.
In this way Wood honors the concern of the sort of position illustrated by Hough and Cobb to stress
theology's public and
practical character against the apparent privatizing and interiorizing of it by the position illustrated by Farley.
Administrators worry that doctoral students increasingly will be trained
in the history of religion or comparative religions rather than
in Bible,
theology, ethics, church history and
practical studies — the traditional fields of theological education.
I understand
theology to be a
practical discipline — not
in the sense that
theology is concerned to provide solutions to particular problems, but
in the sense that the grammar of Christian discourse takes its cue from the ways
in which lives are formed.
A book on
practical theology now preoccupies me
in the same way that an earlier struggle for public criteria
in fundamental
theology concerned me
in the early «70s and the struggle for criteria of meaning and truth
in the disclosures of the beautiful and the holy
in the classic works of art and religion preoccupied me
in the late «70s.
In general, I wondered about Boulton's emphasis on the «practical»: If proper theology and proper Christian formation go hand - in - hand, which «speculative» (rather than strictly «practical») theologian would disagre
In general, I wondered about Boulton's emphasis on the «
practical»: If proper
theology and proper Christian formation go hand -
in - hand, which «speculative» (rather than strictly «practical») theologian would disagre
in - hand, which «speculative» (rather than strictly «
practical») theologian would disagree?
I have argued that
practical theology can and should be the center of theological studies (both
in the seminary and the university) and that this
practical theology needs a clear understanding of the nature of
practical moral thinking (
practical reason).
And most of them want
practical theology to continue its close relation with the social sciences, but to do this
in such a way as not to become overidentified with these secular disciplines.
In fact, it is precisely in Farley's discussion of theologia as dialectic that one can see how Farley is trying both to bury the old practical theology of the fourfold pattern and to replace it with a practical theology of an entirely different kin
In fact, it is precisely
in Farley's discussion of theologia as dialectic that one can see how Farley is trying both to bury the old practical theology of the fourfold pattern and to replace it with a practical theology of an entirely different kin
in Farley's discussion of theologia as dialectic that one can see how Farley is trying both to bury the old
practical theology of the fourfold pattern and to replace it with a
practical theology of an entirely different kind.