Sentences with phrase «in precise comparisons»

Not exact matches

More precise instruments are being installed at the moment, such as the SPRESSO that would be operational in 2016 at the Very Large Telescope in Chile with an accuracy of 10 centimeters per second (for comparison, the gravitational pull of the Earth over the Sun causes an attraction of 9 centimeters per second).

While there is still no universal agreement on a precise clinical presentation encompassing CFS illness, defining patient characteristics in studies of CFS etiology or pathogenesis remains crucial for making comparisons across various research conclusions.

In other words, average performance across ten cities provides a more precise and therefore more informative estimate of the underlying truth of the matter than do noisy individual city - by - city comparisons.

Although it is difficult to make precise comparisons between then and now, the regional and racial disparities of today in education inputs are probably quite similar to those Coleman reported in 1966.

More than half of the voucher students tested below the national average in reading, math and language and overall performed below their peers in public schools though it is not a precise comparison because the law allows voucher schools to select their own national tests.

In comparison with a flasher built with a few semi-conductors: They're bigger in size, more prone to failure, and probably more expensive, considering their relatively complex and precise mechanical constructioIn comparison with a flasher built with a few semi-conductors: They're bigger in size, more prone to failure, and probably more expensive, considering their relatively complex and precise mechanical constructioin size, more prone to failure, and probably more expensive, considering their relatively complex and precise mechanical construction.

It is taut, precise, and tidy in comparison to the Buick's soft curves and squished proportions.

The Competition Pack adds a more precise feel through the steering and controls that renders the basic M3 a little lifeless in comparison.

The most noticeable change is a slightly cleaner, more precise look to the textures - the 360 version definitely comes across a touch grainier in comparison.

Gavin disparaged my role in the matter, again attributing the precise diagnosis to NASA (though it was me who had spotted the change in data sets) and denying that I had had to do «reverse engineering» to figure out the problem — even though that was precisely what I had had to do (in the form of patient comparison of multiple versions of different data sets):

- ARAMATE (The reconstruction of ecosystem and climate variability in the north Atlantic region using annually resolved archives of marine and terrestrial ecosystems)- CLIM - ARCH-DATE (Integration of high resolution climate archives with archaeological and documentary evidence for the precise dating of maritime cultural and climatic events)- CLIVASH2k (Climate variability in Antarctica and Southern Hemisphere in the past 2000 years)- CoralHydro2k (Tropical ocean hydroclimate and temperature from coral archives)- Global T CFR (Global gridded temperature reconstruction method comparisons)- GMST reconstructions - Iso2k (A global synthesis of Common Era hydroclimate using water isotopes)- MULTICHRON (Constraining modeled multidecadal climate variability in the Atlantic using proxies derived from marine bivalve shells and coralline algae)- PALEOLINK (The missing link in the Past — Downscaling paleoclimatic Earth System Models)- PSR2k (Proxy Surrogate Reconstruction 2k)

To point out just a couple of things: — oceans warming slower (or cooling slower) than lands on long - time trends is absolutely normal, because water is more difficult both to warm or to cool (I mean, we require both a bigger heat flow and more time); at the contrary, I see as a non-sense theory (made by some serrist, but don't know who) that oceans are storing up heat, and that suddenly they will release such heat as a positive feedback: or the water warms than no heat can be considered ad «stored» (we have no phase change inside oceans, so no latent heat) or oceans begin to release heat but in the same time they have to cool (because they are losing heat); so, I don't feel strange that in last years land temperatures for some series (NCDC and GISS) can be heating up while oceans are slightly cooling, but I feel strange that they are heating up so much to reverse global trend from slightly negative / stable to slightly positive; but, in the end, all this is not an evidence that lands» warming is led by UHI (but, this effect, I would not exclude it from having a small part in temperature trends for some regional area, but just small); both because, as writtend, it is normal to have waters warming slower than lands, and because lands» temperatures are often measured in a not so precise way (despite they continue to give us a global uncertainity in TT values which is barely the instrumental's one)-- but, to point out, HadCRU and MSU of last years (I mean always 2002 - 2006) follow much better waters» temperatures trend; — metropolis and larger cities temperature trends actually show an increase in UHI effect, but I think the sites are few, and the covered area is very small worldwide, so the global effect is very poor (but it still can be sensible for regional effects); but I would not run out a small warming trend for airport measurements due mainly to three things: increasing jet planes traffic, enlarging airports (then more buildings and more asphalt — if you follow motor sports, or simply live in a town / city, you will know how easy they get very warmer than air during day, and how much it can slow night - time cooling) and overall having airports nearer to cities (if not becoming an area inside the city after some decade of hurban growth, e.g. Milan - Linate); — I found no point about UHI in towns and villages; you will tell me they are not large cities; but, in comparison with 20-40-60 years ago when they were «countryside», many small towns and villages have become part of larger hurban areas (at least in Europe and Asia) so examining just larger cities would not be enough in my opinion to get a full view of UHI effect (still remembering that it has a small global effect: we can say many matters are due to UHI instead of GW, maybe even that a small part of measured GW is due to UHI, and that GW measurements are not so precise to make us able to make good analisyses and predictions, but not that GW is due to UHI).

While any actual physicists reading our paper may say we should have been a little more precise in our usage of the word «heat» in a few places, they will consider this to be «going a few miles above the speed limit» in comparison to Gerlich and Tscheuschner's «serial killing», i.e., huge scientific blunders in regards to the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics and the greenhouse effect.

I would argue that in comparison, «Most of the observed increase in global average temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations» is sufficiently precise.

Opening apps on two phones side by side to determine which is faster takes precise timing and a bit of preparation, so major OEM OnePlus decided to take its latest comparison in another direction entirely by flinging chunks of cactus at two poor souls working to compare its latest and greatest, the OnePlus 5T, to -LSB-...]

Median family income remains lower than it was in 2007, the Census report said, though precise comparisons are difficult to determine because the Census changed its methodology last year so it could provide a more detailed look at the sources of Americans» income.