Sentences with phrase «in present knowledge»

Likewise, gaps and deficiencies in present knowledge and research were identified.

The importance of this will only increase in the present knowledge economy, where knowledge is no longer limited to following formal training and eLearning.

Other liquids can not be ruled out but «nothing in our present knowledge entitles us to make such an assumption».

Not exact matches

In this way, knowledge, experience and theory have limitations and can be deterrents to seizing and keeping up with unexpected changes arisng from the present arrangement.

In short, while skill, experience, knowledge and passion help you run your business — or someone else's — they are management endeavors; and of course they are to be appreciated for the challenges they present.

With this knowledge present in the back of your mind, you can identify your natural strengths — and learned ones — and nurture them to fit your end goal.

With present programming knowledge and novelty of the blockchain, writing solid and comprehensive smart contracts can sometimes be difficult in practice and at the moment are only really useful for simple contracts (however, it's progressing rapidly).

The previous post presented Hayek's knowledge problem in the context of the economic calculation debate under socialism.

Each chapter presents a thorough view of an element of Rollovers for Business Start - ups, and proceeds in a linear order to build your knowledge base before moving on to the next topic.

With a unique blend of people in 5 offices, local knowledge and heritage operating in the Asia Pacific, we are able to offer access to an extensive network of partners as well as past and present entrepreneurs to accelerate your expansion across Asian markets and internationally.

When the information you were searching for is presented in a Google Knowledge Card, you don't need to click through because the information is right there in front of you (try typing in «donald trump age» and you'll see what I mean).

Being present in such diverse industry, the blend of expertise from financial services and technology who could marry knowledge of both these worlds with high tech solution and a scalable business model was a must have.

The present paper assumes an historical perception that the Creation of God is being undone by the power of science and technology, which is being manifested in the form of powers of exclusive truth of scientific knowledge, unlimited technological know - how, and their economic and political organization, such as the transnational corporation and the state, including the military machinery.

The only answer which is plausible can be given by the biological theory of knowledge: in the same way as our perception carves Out of the whole physical reality only that zone which has practical importance for our organism, only those recollections which are relevant to our present situation are transmitted into our present moment.

Coyne has in effect acknowledged that the personal «use» of reason by our minds is intrinsically present in all our knowledge of matter, and all our knowledge of anything else.

The document also insists, however, «that God has been present in their seeking and finding, that where there is truth and wisdom in their teachings, and love and holiness in their living, this, like any wisdom, insight, knowledge, understanding, love and holiness that is found among us, is the gift of the Holy Spirit.»

According to our present knowledge of physics, as already pointed out, the Second Law of Thermodynamics presents us in the material realm with the picture of a running - down universe which will ultimately be impossible for human life.

First, its premisses concerning society and modern man are pseudoscientific: for example, the affirmation that man has become adult, that he no longer needs a Father, that the Father - God was invented when the human race was in its infancy, etc.; the affirmation that man has become rational and thinks scientifically, and that therefore he must get rid of the religious and mythological notions that were appropriate when his thought processes were primitive; the affirmation that the modern world has been secularized, laicized, and can no longer countenance religious people, but if they still want to preach the kerygma they must do it in laicized terms; the affirmation that the Bible is of value only as a cultural document, not as the channel of Revelation, etc. (I say «affirmation» because these are indeed simply affirmations, unrelated either to fact or to any scientific knowledge about modern man or present - day society.)

In the present moment of experience, there is no knowledge of the cogito, because awareness of the cogito is strictly prereflective and nonthetic.

It is the task of the present generation to provide training in the essentials of Islam, to know Islam deeply, for out of that knowledge of the straight path of Islam will come the unity of belief and practice which has been revealed to mankind in the Qur» an and the Sunnah.

Rejecting my Asian religious and cultural background as worthless, I thought that the theological knowledge discussed, formulated and presented in the West was the authentic Christian theology.

Now whatever is capable of knowing certain things can not have any of them in its own nature, for that which is present in it naturally would impede the knowledge of other things.

First we comprehend the universal (potentially present in sense - data); then we are able to know the particular in a way that goes beyond mere sense - knowledge.

Thomas Kuhn's work on paradigm shifts in the history of science presents the idea that changes or increases in our understanding not only fill out gaps in previous knowledge, but at times bring about a reorganisation of the structure of the theories or paradigms by which previous ideas were organised and understood.

If man today is asking can God's existence be affirmed as transcendent without making God a functional element in an abstract scheme, it may be fruitful to realize that knowledge and experience of God involve a cyclic growth process from experience to schematization, from formulation to God present in the dynamism of man's life and activity.

I prefer to hope that our moral anguish will prompt us to coordinate our scientific knowledge with moral wisdom, so that the present crisis can be truly a crisis in a biblical sense — a transformation which brings new faithfulness to God and a derivative humanism.

In other words... I think the understanding you present (they had absolute knowledge) is hogwash as well.

What was yet future and known as such, moves into the present and from there into the past; but the divine knowledge accompanies it in its course, it assumes a changing shape in the divine knowledge itself, and that presupposes a movement, a change even in the knowing activity of God himself.»

If you're going to deliberately hobble your child's intellectual development, you might as well cover the full spectrum of knowledge as well as eliminate the risk that some educator (read: tool of Satan) might come along later in their life and present them with the knowledge hidden from them earlier.

To attempt to justify this by transforming the epistemological problem of «uncertainty» into an ontological fact is simply a way of mobilizing the present limits of scientific knowledge in order to assert an arbitrary philosophical thesis.

A god that is described in the bible is suppose to include infinite knowledge, unlimited power, present everywhere, perfect goodness.

To my knowledge, there's only one reliable source of information about the true Nativity Story at present, namely the respective part of the essay «How Could Jesus Spend Three Days and Three Nights in the Tomb?»

Theology backs up that claim by presenting a comprehensive, systematic account of reality in which all other knowledge can find a home.

It is curious that the early days of clinical pastoral education, which has done more than any other movement to foster the present knowledge and skill in pastoral care, actually relied only in part upon interviewing methods and yet made the interview image dominant as the ideal.

It calls for us to present ourselves at each moment to God as we are, with as much knowledge of ourselves as we can muster, with all our desires and intentions exposed, and in so doing ask for guidance, help, and the transfiguration of our lives.

The world is reaching a situation in which the present type and level of resource depletion and environmental pollution can not be continued indefinitely or for long without disastrous environmental hazards and resource shortage, according to present scientific knowledge.

Living in the south, everyone has biblical knowledge, and can talk a good game... but the discipleship, the love, the need to serve Christ are not present.

In knowledge the thing which is seen is exclusively present and exists in itselIn knowledge the thing which is seen is exclusively present and exists in itselin itself.

The relationship of the finite creature with the supremely worshipful and unsurpassable deity is being affirmed; and along with it there is also affirmed the possibility of its becoming on occasion a matter of conscious knowledge on the part of the human, as it is always a present reality in the very nature of God himself.

In quality the future is of a piece with the present: «now» embraces tomorrow and tomorrow3 — in all of which, appropriate response to the confessional knowledge of meaning in history is faithful participation in the Yahweh cultuIn quality the future is of a piece with the present: «now» embraces tomorrow and tomorrow3 — in all of which, appropriate response to the confessional knowledge of meaning in history is faithful participation in the Yahweh cultuin all of which, appropriate response to the confessional knowledge of meaning in history is faithful participation in the Yahweh cultuin history is faithful participation in the Yahweh cultuin the Yahweh cultus.

In the biblical tradition, God was thought to possess full knowledge of human history, past and present; and from time to time he chose to reveal the future to certain select people, such as Joseph, Daniel and John of Patmos.

And no a belief does not mean actual knowledge, so when one proclaims a belief, it something that by definition can not be proven, so no I don't have to present evidence in order to declare a belief, but if one is saying outright that angels do not exist as being the absolute truth, then one should present evidence.

No, that's exactly what we'd expect to see if local tribal folklore was being presented as divine knowledge and, if that's the case, how many other things in the Bible fall under that category?

As being can never be studied as an independent object, the history of metaphysical thought can not be without implications for the history of being:» [E] very science goes through a process of historical development in which, although the fundamental or general problem remains unaltered, the particular form in which this problem presents itself changes from time to time; and the general problem never arises in its pure or abstract form, but always in the particular or concrete form, determined by the present state of knowledge or, in other words, by the development of thought hitherto.

equally important is the fact that in addition to family physicians, the clergymen of the community,... and the other guardians of mental health can consult with the center's professional staff to aid in serving individual patients about whom they share concern, as well as to add to their own knowledge of mental health and mental illness through formal and informal classes and meetings presented by the center's staff.

«For the inmost growth of the self is not accomplished, as people like to suppose today, in man's relation to himself, but... in the making present of another self and in the knowledge that one is made present in his own self by the other.»

However, as Schindler has suggested, self - consciousness could be understood as immanent in the present moment of experience as a nonthetic consciousness which would not amount to knowledge in the sense of objectification.

That knowledge which had been inherited from time immemorial was readily reverenced as being of divine origin, and was incomparable with anything that could be discovered in the present.

well just thinking about these wars in the muslim / mid-east world over religious differences (which may reflect mental states in many ways) in a world where most realize that living in the present moment is best way to happiness and being in the moment in non-strife and awareness through the teachings of masters such as found in the buddhist, taoist, zen, etc., etc., etc. spriritually based practices of religious like thought and teachings, etc. that to ask these scientifically educated populace whom have access to vast amounts of knowledges and understandings on the internet, etc. to believe in past beliefs that perhaps gave basis and inspiration to that which followed — but is not the end all of all times or knowledges — and is thus — non self - sustaining in a belief that does not encompass growth of knowledge and understanding of all truths and being as it is or could be — is to not respect the intelligence and minds and personage of even themselves — not to be disrespected nor disrespectful in any way — only to point out that perhaps too much is asked to put others into the cloak of blind faith and adherance to the past that disregards the realities of the present and the potential of the future... so you try to live in the past — and destroy your present and your future — where is the intelligence in that — and why do people continually fear monger or allow to be fear — mongered into this destructive vision of the future based upon the past?

This has been encouraged by our knowledge of the different sources of the Bible, by the development of form criticism and its insights and speculations into the early stages of the formation of the Gospels, by questions about the «original» intent of passages before they were set in their present literary context, by questions of «what really happened», and by the attempt to unravel diverse strands of tradition in both Old and New Testaments.