Sentences with phrase «in pure thought»

At no point is this challenge more overwhelming than in that radically new understanding of matter and the body itself which is incorporated here, just as nothing is more ultimately new than an enactment of the body itself in pure thinking.

Leahy is a deeply contemporary and a deeply Catholic thinker, and his first book, Novitas Mundi (1980), intends to be a revolutionary breakthrough to an absolutely new thinking, and while conceptually enacting the history of Being from Aristotle through Heidegger, at bottom this book is an apocalyptic calling forth and celebration of the absolute beginning now occurring of transcendent existence in pure thinking itself.

And only here is apocalypse realized in pure thinking itself, for even if this seemingly occurs in ancient Eastern Christian thinking, the apocalypse which Orthodox Christianity knows is an apocalypse of eternal return, or an apocalypse of an original or primordial eternity, whereas a uniquely modern apocalypse is an absolutely immanent apocalypse, and precisely thereby an absolutely new apocalypse.

Not exact matches

«I think we're substantially inoculated from the other issues that are happening in the industry... Just objectively, we're much more of a media company in that way than pure tech.

Think of food companies» plight this way: The finest scientists in industry have spent decades trying to find or invent a no - calorie sweetener that tastes and feels as good as the stuff extracted from pure cane.

None of us have pure thoughts; we all live in glass houses.»

Krupa: I think at the end of the day, relationships — let us say pure, nonfactual relationships — play a role everywhere in the world.

«Aside from pure in - game token situations, companies really need to think of these as securities,» says Jeffrey Neuburger, who advises clients about ICOs at the law firm Proskauer in New York.

Pure Barre teacher and author, Emily Liebert, recently released a new book, «Some Women,» in which the main characters find inspiration for life from the Pure Barre mantra, «You're stronger than you think.»

Pure Barre: The Pure Barre mantra «You're stronger than you think» is used a couple of times in the book.

I said I like it but haven't found a pure - play company that I think has solid numbers to invest in.

If you have a friend, co-worker, neighbor, parent, sibling or cousin who is thinking about Pure Barre, and is not sure if they can join in — share this blog with them!

HASTINGS: Well, the mistakes in Pure was that every time we had a significant error — sales call didn't go well, bug in the code — we tried to think about it in terms of, what process could we put in place to ensure that this doesn't happen again, and thereby improving the company?

That thought quickly evolved into, «I could open a Pure Barre in Kennesaw!»

We were one of the first - ever pure - play social media agencies and remain rooted in social - first thinking to this day.

In Pure Barre, we tell our clients, «You're stronger than you think» and in my life as a studio owner, that has proven to be truIn Pure Barre, we tell our clients, «You're stronger than you think» and in my life as a studio owner, that has proven to be truin my life as a studio owner, that has proven to be true.

I looked at what my sister and mom had created in Idaho (they own two studios there) and saw that Pure Barre offers the opportunity to empower women, help them reach goals they didn't think were possible before, and build a community of all different beliefs, cultures, and ages!

After teaching in Willowbrook, she can not think of a more supportive place to to continue her Pure Barre journey as manager.

To just dismiss that out of hand because you think religion is complete nonesense is spitting in the face of of logic in favor of pure bias.

Each had the purest form of free will in the perfect environment and one chose to think otherwise and fell along with 1/3 of the angels he was leading.

It is as if they don't realize that pure logic, because their thinking is so clouded by the idea that a person must be a genetically pure White, blonde hair, blue eyed, with not much color in you skin tone, in order to be any good.

Now, you can look at what these two people did, and think of them in absolutist terms, as the embodiment of pure evil.

To pick out just three: that which Deleuze theorizes as «the virtual» bears a certain similarity to Whiteheadian pure potentiality; likewise, the elements of the virtual, namely, what Deleuze calls «Ideas,» play a role comparable to that attributed to eternal objects; finally, the factor in the Deleuzean system which corresponds most closely to Whitehead's notion of creativity — that ultimate principle by which the production of novelty is to be thought — goes, for Deleuze, under the name of «productive difference,» or «Difference in itself?»

As humans, pure goodness in thought, deed or both will always remain unattainable because of our sins.

He never thought, after the Greek fashion, of soul as pure being, capable of disembodiment, but spoke, as his Jewish contemporaries did, of future life in terms of bodily resurrection, and on that basis he discussed life after death with the skeptical Sadducees, protesting only against the popular, contemporary ways of conceiving the raised body and its uses in the next world.

Two and a half centuries later the German philosopher Immanuel Kant, in the «Preface to the Second Edition» of his Critique of Pure Reason (1787), appropriated this «Copernican Revolution» in thought for his own shift from the presumed objectivity of what we know to the act of conscious knowing itself.2 It remains a contestable assessment because the movement is precisely in the opposite direction: After Copernicus, we humans are no longer understood to be in the center of the universe, whereas Kant concentrated precisely on the subjectivity of individual knowing.

In Science and the Modern World, Whitehead argues strongly against the value of pure abstraction because it leads to thinking that is detached from concrete reality and it leads to narrow specialization.

There is reason to think that such a conceptuality can make more adequate sense of the possibility of new beginnings and new creations in history than a pure humanism can.

As it says in Phillipians, «whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable — if anything is excellent or praiseworthy — think about such things.»

Instead, «Sixty Minutes» eventually developed a large audience right in the middle of Sunday prime - time, a time, most of the industry thought, when people would opt for pure entertainment.

The Qur» anic language of the form - spirit is used with reference to the cosmic becoming of al - khalq in Ibn» Arabi.38 The point is that al - khalq as pure thought of the worlds to be [SP] receives its being as the actualized worlds in the same way as Jesus came into being.

Professional theologians today hesitate to share their experience, fearing lest the pure objectivity and the transcendent reference point of their God thoughts be thereby obscured; but this is a great pity, for when they define their role merely in ecclesiastical or academic terms, thus in effect hiding behind their official identity, it renders their theology at best enigmatic and at worst downright boring.

Christian theologians might learn to theologize creatively about thc Holy Spirit by consulting a tradition like pure - land Buddhism, in which this sort of thinking seems to have been going on for more than two millennia.

More positively, as fundamentalists have seen the nation become more secular they have felt a responsibility to be «an exemplary, called - out people,» pure in word, deed, thought and appearance.

Mark Driscoll, the well - known US pastor and avowed supporter of MMA, states: «I don't think that there is anything purer than putting two men in a cage... and just seeing which man is better.

This definition, however, is immediately followed by a proviso: «after all those metaphysicians were right who said — you simply can't think about pure abstract being; they were right in this sense, that when you do think about it (which in effect they admit you can do, or the words pure abstract being, which they themselves use, would be words without any meaning whatever) you find that it won't stay pure» (TNMS 10).

In pointing to the prior reality of I - Thou knowing, Buber is not setting forth a dualism such as is implied by Nicholas Berdyaev's rejection of the world of social objectification in favour of existential subjectivity or Ferdinand Ebner's relegation of mathematical thinking to the province of the pure isolated I («Icheinsamkeit»In pointing to the prior reality of I - Thou knowing, Buber is not setting forth a dualism such as is implied by Nicholas Berdyaev's rejection of the world of social objectification in favour of existential subjectivity or Ferdinand Ebner's relegation of mathematical thinking to the province of the pure isolated I («Icheinsamkeit»in favour of existential subjectivity or Ferdinand Ebner's relegation of mathematical thinking to the province of the pure isolated I («Icheinsamkeit»).

I would much rather see us continue to focus on the major issues of Reformed thought in an admittedly pluralistic denomination than get into the debates that seem inevitably to arise when evangelicals have established their own «pure» denominations.

I believe that this way of thinking fits with what I read in Pure Land Buddhist writings.

I find passages in all three of these papers that encourage me to think that Pure Land Buddhism is open to this kind of development.

As being can never be studied as an independent object, the history of metaphysical thought can not be without implications for the history of being:» [E] very science goes through a process of historical development in which, although the fundamental or general problem remains unaltered, the particular form in which this problem presents itself changes from time to time; and the general problem never arises in its pure or abstract form, but always in the particular or concrete form, determined by the present state of knowledge or, in other words, by the development of thought hitherto.

The assumption hidden in this procedure is that pure and true thought about reality can occur only when it is removed from act and practice follow theory: doing is an extension of knowing.

Christians certainly include compassion as a form of love, and process theologians especially emphasize compassion in just that way that Yokota has described and appropriated for purposes of expounding and expanding Pure Land thought.

In thinking about pure being, therefore, we are not thinking about existing objects or things, we are thinking about what, in Platonic language, are called forms, or ideas, or in modern terminology concepts» (TNMS 13In thinking about pure being, therefore, we are not thinking about existing objects or things, we are thinking about what, in Platonic language, are called forms, or ideas, or in modern terminology concepts» (TNMS 13in Platonic language, are called forms, or ideas, or in modern terminology concepts» (TNMS 13in modern terminology concepts» (TNMS 13).

In this regard Hausman found himself in good company: Mead, Whitehead, Russell (if that is good company), Santayana and Henry Nelson Wieman to name only a few, also saw Bergson as having sold out, to some degree, the conceptual, structural and / or rational element of thought for a more immediate and fluid grasp of pure becomingIn this regard Hausman found himself in good company: Mead, Whitehead, Russell (if that is good company), Santayana and Henry Nelson Wieman to name only a few, also saw Bergson as having sold out, to some degree, the conceptual, structural and / or rational element of thought for a more immediate and fluid grasp of pure becomingin good company: Mead, Whitehead, Russell (if that is good company), Santayana and Henry Nelson Wieman to name only a few, also saw Bergson as having sold out, to some degree, the conceptual, structural and / or rational element of thought for a more immediate and fluid grasp of pure becoming.4

Once accept the disclosure of God in Christ (and in all that is Christ - like in human experience, for we ought not to be exclusively christo - centric in the narrower sense); once take that disclosure with utmost seriousness — and then God as «pure unbounded love» becomes central in our thinking.

Far from being lifeless, listless, existing in some pristine void of pure thought, propositions are primordially affective.

But so it is too with the so - called «position» of sin when the medium in which it is posited is pure thinking; that medium is far too unstable to insure that this assertion that sin is a position can be taken seriously.

But in the thought of St Thomas, form is not - as you claim it is - «pure actuality».

In his view faith understands itself as the pure gift of God, a God who is imaged as acting from above and may be thought of by analogy with human persons.