Sentences with phrase «in radiative transfer calculations»

[Perhaps this is obvious, but since nothing seems to obvious to state explicitly here, when I say «you use the same equations», I mean the standard equations used in all radiative transfer calculations, i.e., those used by scientists and engineers in practical calculations every day (as David M Hoffer has pointed out).]

(That's why in radiative transfer calculations satellite data are used).

The mean - free - path is not typically utilized in radiative transfer calculations.

Not exact matches

The basic principle for the development of ARTS is to provide a code that can be applied for many different applications concerning radiative transfer calculations in the microwave region.

Line - by - line type radiative transfer calculations used to find a forcing for a certain fractional change in CO2 (e.g., the Myhre et al 1998 paper) can not be applied to conditions like Venus or ancient Earth.

As the paper says atop its 2nd page; «We evaluate the radiative transfer in the range 50 — 100,000 / cm (0.1 — 200 microns) as a combined solar and thermal calculation.»

It presented quite correct calculations of the radiative heat transfer including results that were very close of proving his conclusions wrong, but he stopped just short of doing the last step that would have resulted in that.

Here, using fully coupled global climate model integrations, in addition to radiative transfer model calculations, the authors confirm the existence of such a negative RFTOA: INST over parts of Antarctica in response to an in - stantaneous quadrupling of CO2.

Its main argument is that idealized blackbody calculations did not correctly predict the Moon's surface temperatures in the 1960s because other factors besides radiative heat transfer equations actually determine real surface temperatures.

Methane does produce some stratospheric water vapor in AOGCMs and therefore a forcing slightly different from simple radiative transfer calculations.

When you get to models, the radiative transfer calculations are highly parameterized and those parameterizations have been known to have been wrong in the past for some models.

Column radiative forcing calculations by fifteen radiative transfer codes of varying complexity (Boucher et al., 1998) show that, for well constrained input data, differences in the computed radiative forcing when clouds are excluded are relatively modest at approximately 20 % (see Figure 6.3).

And, there is plenty of empirical data at every level: There is empirical data on the basic absorption lines of the various atmospheric constituents, there is a wealth of empirical data backing up the basic equations of radiative transfer that are applied in calculating the greenhouse effect in just the same way that engineers and scientists use these equations everyday in other calculations, there is empirical spectra looking both up from the surface of the earth and down from satellites.

Van Diedenhoven, B., O.P. Hasekamp, and J. Landgraf, 2006: Efficient vector radiative transfer calculations in vertically inhomogeneous cloudy atmospheres.

The whole algorithm applied in my calculations is in Modest's book on radiative heat transfer.

1950s: Research on military applications of radar and infrared radiation promotes advances in radiative transfer theory and measurements = > Radiation math — Studies conducted largely for military applications give accurate values of infrared absorption by gases = > CO2 greenhouse — Nuclear physicists and chemists develop Carbon - 14 analysis, useful for dating ancient climate changes = > Carbon dates, for detecting carbon from fossil fuels in the atmosphere, and for measuring the rate of ocean turnover = > CO2 greenhouse — Development of digital computers affects many fields including the calculation of radiation transfer in the atmosphere = > Radiation math, and makes it possible to model weather processes = > Models (GCMs)-- Geological studies of polar wandering help provoke Ewing - Donn model of ice ages = > Simple models — Improvements in infrared instrumentation (mainly for industrial processes) allow very precise measurements of atmospheric CO2 = > CO2 greenhouse.

The question of whether the IPCC's values of 3.7 W / m2 and 1.2 C are correct in the sense they're useful for further calculations goes beyond whether HITRAN gets the values right in the very narrow view of radiative transfer, it describes today.