In this episode we speak with Adam Fisher about his dissertation research regarding Mormon couples who change
in regards to their faith, and how successful couples cope with these transitions.
i have strong values
in regards to faith n morals.
This is why ChristianCafe.com offers the best at its game — what else would come better than by being able to search through countless profiles of purely your own preference
in regards to faith?
I do not take a lassez faire approach with my children
in regards to faith.
Half a century ago, there was a similar development
in regard to faith, which was then viewed as a value «in itself,» a psychic, psychological value.
Obviously, God intervenes radically only in response to a radical attitude on the part of the believer — radical not in regard to political means but
in regard to faith; and the believer who is radical in his faith has rejected all means other than those of faith.
While hymns covered just about every subject, those which found particular favor in nineteenth century America were based on a personal experience of Jesus and the gospel, particularly
in regard to faith («Blessed Assurance, Jesus is Mine»), the atonement of Jesus («When I Survey the Wondrous Cross»), confession («Just As I Am, Without One Plea»), dedication («Nearer, My God, to Thee»), following Jesus» example («Saviour, Like a Shepherd Lead Us»), and salvation («Amazing Grace!
8 Just as Jannes and Jambres opposed Moses, so these men also oppose the truth, men of depraved mind, rejected
in regard to the faith.
She has a way with words
in regard to faith.
Obeying the Authority of Scripture: Both individually and corporately Trinity Western wholeheartedly embraces all the Bible teaches
in regard to faith, ethical commitments, and way of life, believing it to be the ultimate standard of truth and hope.
Not exact matches
Both categories would have been unintelligible
in the ancient or medieval worlds
to which I had thought I was casting back a wistful eye — worlds
in which reason and
faith had not yet come
to be
regarded as utterly distinct, ultimately antithetical movements of the mind.
This comment is
in response
to a previous commenter who replied
to my comment
regarding «having
faith in non-evidential biblical matters».
Given the decline
in the WCC of funds, members, and resources, and the concomitant need
to cut staff and programs, the bureaucratic approach — which emphasizes organic (structural) cohesion while insisting on an open - ended dogmatic pluralism — can hardly compete with a catholic, Christocentric
faith that is yet flexible and diverse
regarding forms.
Second: The Creation tale is simply a way for early humans
to explain mans creation and «fall» from God's predetermined path... The old testament is full of stuff more related
to philosophy and health advice then «Gods word» However, this revelation has not made me less of a christian...
In Contrast to those stuck in «the old ways» regarding faith (not believing in neanderthals and championing the claim that earth is only 6000 years old), I believe God created the universe on the very principle of physics and evolution (and other sciencey stuff)... Thus the first clash of atoms was the first step in the billionyear long recipe in creating the universe, the galaxies, the stars, the planets, life itself and u
In Contrast
to those stuck
in «the old ways» regarding faith (not believing in neanderthals and championing the claim that earth is only 6000 years old), I believe God created the universe on the very principle of physics and evolution (and other sciencey stuff)... Thus the first clash of atoms was the first step in the billionyear long recipe in creating the universe, the galaxies, the stars, the planets, life itself and u
in «the old ways»
regarding faith (not believing
in neanderthals and championing the claim that earth is only 6000 years old), I believe God created the universe on the very principle of physics and evolution (and other sciencey stuff)... Thus the first clash of atoms was the first step in the billionyear long recipe in creating the universe, the galaxies, the stars, the planets, life itself and u
in neanderthals and championing the claim that earth is only 6000 years old), I believe God created the universe on the very principle of physics and evolution (and other sciencey stuff)... Thus the first clash of atoms was the first step
in the billionyear long recipe in creating the universe, the galaxies, the stars, the planets, life itself and u
in the billionyear long recipe
in creating the universe, the galaxies, the stars, the planets, life itself and u
in creating the universe, the galaxies, the stars, the planets, life itself and us.
So it would be hard for jewish gentiles
to be holier than thou
in regards to the jewish
faith.
What is comparatively new is the
faith and fervor with which it is pursued and the manner
in which all else tends
to be
regarded as subordinate
to the happiness that comes from the satisfaction of wants.
With
regard to another post
regarding faith... I have seen my preemie child struggling for life... I have held the hand of an old person as they slipped from life
to death... I have stood vigil
in the room of a man of
faith as over 40 friends and family crammed into a room sharing pain and suffering as he slipped away suffering from cancer at a young age.
Unlike Superman whose creation can actually be traced back
to a couple of young Jewish men
in 1938 for the purpose of providing a sellable fictional story line
to Detective Comics, there is no such evidence
in regards to religious belief; especially since
in this case being that this is about a God who does not want
to be made known but who would rather have us develop our
faith.
3) Knowledge of the actual history of the traditional religions 4) Failure of the
faith to which they were born and
in which they were raised
to answer the fundamental questions
regarding morality and ethics
to the satisfaction of the seeker.
As a result, much energy was expanded on delineating the implications of Christian
faith in life generally, without
regard to the historic locus of
faith in the life of the Christian community.
So how does your school of thought apply
regarding the fewest of explanations and fewest assumptions apply when it comes
to God who does not want
to be made readily known
in the first place, but wants us
to develop
faith in that God instead.Your school of thought could apply well if the notion of God was a God who either wants
to be made known or doesn't care whether or not
to be made known, but your school of thought doesn't apply at all if said God does not want
to be made known but would rather have humanity develop
faith, which is not a perfect knowledge.
In the book's final pages Martin delineates what he regards as the only three possible solutions: «Only Faith,» in which the believer is dismissive of the expert opinions of the historians; «Only Reason,» in which the believer is «totally submissive to the historians»; and «Faith Seeking Understanding,» in which some sort of compromise is worked out between the historian and fait
In the book's final pages Martin delineates what he
regards as the only three possible solutions: «Only
Faith,» in which the believer is dismissive of the expert opinions of the historians; «Only Reason,» in which the believer is «totally submissive to the historians»; and «Faith Seeking Understanding,» in which some sort of compromise is worked out between the historian and f
Faith,»
in which the believer is dismissive of the expert opinions of the historians; «Only Reason,» in which the believer is «totally submissive to the historians»; and «Faith Seeking Understanding,» in which some sort of compromise is worked out between the historian and fait
in which the believer is dismissive of the expert opinions of the historians; «Only Reason,»
in which the believer is «totally submissive to the historians»; and «Faith Seeking Understanding,» in which some sort of compromise is worked out between the historian and fait
in which the believer is «totally submissive
to the historians»; and «
Faith Seeking Understanding,» in which some sort of compromise is worked out between the historian and f
Faith Seeking Understanding,»
in which some sort of compromise is worked out between the historian and fait
in which some sort of compromise is worked out between the historian and
faithfaith.
Evangelicalism
in general hides it sore spots very well with nice rhetoric — but they can't explain the dismal failure of the
faith with
regards to controlling «ego».
satans aim was
to stop the fulfillment of the seed that would crush satan underfoot.This hybrid between the angels and man created giants abominations
in Gods eyes.They also were a threat
to Gods people as can be seen by the giants
in the land of caanan after the flood.If we agree on that then there is no way that Eve would have had intercourse with satan [false doctrine of the seed of satan -RCB- because the blood lines were still untainted by angelic beings or satan at the time of Noah maybe that is also why the genealogy of Christ is well presented with no surprises apart from Hagar and Ruth these two were gentiles that shows Gods mercy grace was always there
to all nations he accepts people by
faith not by race.Prior
to the flood the mixing of the angels and man must have been widespread after the flood these beings were present but
in limited numbers and God told his people
to destroy them as they were abominations but they were a threat
to Gods people.It would be interesting
to hear what the rabbis had
to say on this matter as i would think the stories would have been past down from generation
to the next.Especially
regarding the flood.God promised he would never flood the earth again but a time is coming when the earth will be judged not by flood but by fire Jesus is our ark and we are safe
in him.brentnz
In this relationship between Church and state, the government fosters a marketplace of ideas where religious exploration and expression are open — where men and women of all
faiths are able
to reason together
regarding how
to flourish alongside one another.
People of
faith and even of non-
faith are all living as rented forms within collective formations ever rising and even falling with the tidal flurries
regarding the many societal accolades of a changing tides bantered momentums riding ever continuing laments
to rise and then fall upon socialisms shorelines
to be so aligned with subjectivities of placed regionalized variant findings dispersed yet rationed movements
in the ever
to so be done fluidic moments by people of
faith and also of non-
faith.
The Christian
faith must come
to terms with culture
in both the senses
in which I have defined it, and with full
regard for all these considerations as
to the nature of culture.
With this step from unconsciousness
to consciousness, from apathetic hopelessness
regarding ones fate
to faith in the liberating God of the poor, the quality of poverty also changes because one's relationship
to it changes.21
According
to catholic teaching, the existence of hell, of a state of eternal damnation, is an article of
faith (as indeed, given free will and evil, it is a logical necessity); but that some human beings are or will be
in fact damned is not an article of
faith (though again logically it must be
regarded as a possibility): hence Pere Teilhard's prayer further on
in this passage.
and never once was
faith ever used for Gods existance... but
in regards to His Promises... I am nmot mean
to the modern christians..
Religion Can Make You Poor
In her review of Lisa A. Keister's
Faith and Money: How Religion Contributes
to Wealth and Poverty (February), Naomi Schaefer Riley takes the author
to task for the superficiality of her analysis of her study's findings
regarding religion's effect on socioeconomic status.
What things do you have
faith in regards to unknown things?
Now, here's where I suspect Challies and I may agree: Because we believe Scripture
to be authoritative
in matters of
faith and practice and a trustworthy testimony
regarding Jesus Christ, we would be right
to be highly suspicious of anyone whose claims about their experiences with God run contrary
to the teachings of Scripture.
Collins is very keen
in his book
to explain how a number of other viewpoints with
regard to the
faith - science debate are untenable.
This may mean helping a patient deal with the implications of his
faith for his problems, raising the issue with the staff
regarding the effect of the religious dimension of a patient's life on his present behavior, or
in helping the staff
to deal with their own religious feelings or understanding.
Other members of the
faith, however, said they recognized the Holy Father had, as of late, grown slower and more feeble
in his ability
to block measures
regarding scientific discovery and same - s.
When our conclusions
regarding regarding troubling passages
in the NT contradict the clear, positive statements out of the mouth of Jesus
in John 3:16, 18, 5:24, and elsewhere,
regarding eternal life being a simple matter of
faith we need
to keep seeking until our understanding of those passages agrees with that He said.
There is immutable divine law
in the Church and the Church
in its clear unclouded awareness of the
faith has always been conscious of the fact
in regard to such fundamental laws as a whole.
The sheering deniability of commoner low life atheists dare
to make rude and crude nostalgias of blatant misgivings against those who have little education
regarding the relative whereabouts of God's kingdom domains but nevertheless they have
faith in God's physically born son who lived among us and was crucified due our passing generations wanting
to free Barabbas from the cross thereby crucifying God's son, Christ our Lord Jesus!
I'm sure I'm self - serving here or muddled
to the point of oblivion, but your quote from Stage 6
in Stages of
Faith, and your agonized Christ - on - the - Cross questioning the inadequacy of the «love everybody» notion seems pertinent
to both my critique of you, David, and your critique of me
in the last blog thread that went on and on
regarding victimization.
Therefore, although implications for the soteriological issue will be briefly mentioned, the task of this essay is
to determine whether Ogden's employment of process philosophy has enabled him adequately
to explicate the objective intention of Christian
faith in regard to Jesus, i.e.,
to explain how one can speak of Jesus as God's decisive act.
The thing is the only facts ever established
regarding the certified validity of a deity let alone what that deity does is that there is nothing proven that there is a deity AND there is also nothing proving that there is no deity who does not want
to be made known but would rather have us development our own
faith in said deity.
Consequently what will have
to be said
in a moment
regarding the mutability and immutability of the Church's doctrine of
faith applies
to them.
I find that when you speak about your
faith and your experiences,
in regards to yourself, I am far more comfortable
in hearing what you have
to say... when you bring your beliefs and experiences
to a level that it is ultimate truth and applies
to everyone,
in regards to us, the fellow blogger / responders... it rankles.
Ralph C. Wood
regards John Updike as a writer
to be «reckoned with theologically» though he finds
in the novelist's recent memoirs — and
in his work as a whole — more «justification by sin» then justification by
faith.
Hartshorne attributes this consistent violation of the principle of dual transcendence
to the fact that classical theism has placed too much
faith in Greek philosophy, and
to a Western prejudice according
to which absolute independence along with the power
to the cause of events is
regarded as a superior attribute while relativity and the capacity
to be an effect is mistakenly
regarded as an inferior attribute.»
It is difficult
to convey how touching, for instance, the character of Orlando is
in some respects: especially his utter naïveté
regarding» and childlike
faith in» women (the very characteristic that will lead,
in Ariosto's epic,
to the madness that gives the poem its title).
In 2000 the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith issued a document called Dominus Iesus and then, in 2007, reiterated its main points in «Responses to Some Questions Regarding Certain Aspects of the Doctrine on the Church.&raqu
In 2000 the Congregation for the Doctrine of the
Faith issued a document called Dominus Iesus and then,
in 2007, reiterated its main points in «Responses to Some Questions Regarding Certain Aspects of the Doctrine on the Church.&raqu
in 2007, reiterated its main points
in «Responses to Some Questions Regarding Certain Aspects of the Doctrine on the Church.&raqu
in «Responses
to Some Questions
Regarding Certain Aspects of the Doctrine on the Church.»
In regards to words and language being fluid, that is my point when I state that while trust and faith may have common roots and share similarities, they do not mean the same thing right now in all circumstance
In regards to words and language being fluid, that is my point when I state that while trust and
faith may have common roots and share similarities, they do not mean the same thing right now
in all circumstance
in all circumstances.
All of this blue - chip evangelical clout is brought
to bear
in support of the doctrine of biblical «inerrancy» against a growing party of theological compatriots inclined
to speak more of the «authority» of Scripture with
regard to «
faith and practice.»