Without a doubt, there is merit to noticing that, particularly in a film so steeped
in religious culture.
Plus, I was living
in a religious culture that endorsed and promoted these beliefs.
Changes in the nature of religious television in the 1960s and 1970s can therefore be seen to have been a function of a historical coincidence of a number of related factors: social conditions, government regulation, audience response, and general trends
in religious culture.
I am speaking generally, of course, but I think Christian women wrestle with these questions most of all, perhaps because
in a religious culture that often puts forth narrow and contested definitions of womanhood, young women whose interests and personalities might lead them away from the list of acceptable rules and roles are subtly punished for not exhibiting a more «gentle and quiet spirit,» for not reigning in some of that ambition and drive.
Now this may seem very startling, even shocking, to many
in our religious culture, where there is a long tradition of doubting, or possibly even of being unable to tell, whether or not one is a Christian.
In the consumerism culture, these ugly aspects can be seen easily,
in religious cultures, they are disguised by «god - talk» and holiness professionals — and in this way, much more dangerous.
Not exact matches
Taoism itself is a
religious and philosophical tradition that was born
in China about 2,000 years ago, and dragons are a popular symbol
in Chinese
culture — although there's no sign West's dragon energy is connected to Taoism or to Chinese tradition.
Though the company had to alter parts of its branding, like changing its colour scheme from red to pink (the latter being less provocative), nixing forbidden photos of skin - baring women and axing Cupid imagery due to its
religious connotations, it was still adapting to a
culture that celebrates sexuality, albeit
in a different way.
For instance, while Star Wars has very evident
religious Buddhist and Taoist overtones, Star Trek shows religion from a cold perspective (e.g., science is supreme and only
cultures and worlds without an
in - depth knowledge of science need religion).
The
religious conservatives, beset by this sea change
in the secular
culture, might have been expected to retrench into their conventional media stereotypes: authoritarian, emotionally uninvolved husbands and fathers, a rigidly patriarchal family style, deeply gendered domestic roles that kept women at home» plus, as Wilcox puts it, «high levels of corporal punishment and domestic violence.»
Should those trends persist,
in the long term America's
religious culture may become more like Denmark's than like that of the Bible Belt of Billy Graham's youth.
Then he starts
in about the Resurrection, which strikes their ears as fantastic
religious fiction of the sort their
culture had long been steeped
in and was now weary of.
Such accounts of the previous generation's struggle to defend and advance authentic
religious faith against the scientism, atheism, materialism, hedonism, and despair of the surrounding
culture can do much to prepare and strengthen us for our struggles against similar forces
in our time.
That's compounded often
in the
religious evangelical
culture: «Send me.
There have been concerted efforts
in fundamentalist circles to become the dominant
religious voice
in our military as a means of ensuring their «victory»
in a «
culture war.»
CNN:
In culture war skirmishes, Georgetown becomes political football
In the latest round of
culture wars over contraception and
religious liberty, most Americans would probably identify places like the White House and Congress as key battlefields.
Social and
religious conservatism struggle
in today's
culture, which continues to favor anti-traditional expression (however routine and easy anti-traditionalism has become).
Milosz believed that the
religious question ought to be explored
in the mainstream of literature and
culture.
Bottum opines that we should prepare ourselves for the next chapter
in the
culture wars,
in which the left here will get into step with its European compatriots, espousing a militant skepticism toward science while maintaining their polemic against the
religious right, but this time for its uncritical embrace of scientific progress.
As Todd Brenneman argues
in his recent book, Homespun Gospel: The Triumph of Sentimentality
in Contemporary American Evangelicalism, sentimentality may be a defining characteristic of
religious life for many Americans, and so most readers
in the dominant Evangelical
culture, outside a few hip and urban churches, are more likely to encounter the treacly poetry of Ruth Bell Graham than the spiritually searing work of R. S. Thomas or T. S. Eliot.
When previous
cultures provided
religious and ethical guidance
in the process of technology, it was not to show that «ought» is built into the process and that «Godly cooking» is possible.
Religious historian Thomas S Kidd writes, «In American pop culture parlance, «evangelical» now basically means whites who consider themselves religious and who vote Republica
Religious historian Thomas S Kidd writes, «
In American pop
culture parlance, «evangelical» now basically means whites who consider themselves
religious and who vote Republica
religious and who vote Republican.»
If not for the facts that we live
in a common
culture and histories I would see
religious knowledge as a complete waste of time.
Rather, we refer to recent attempts
in sociobiology to account for the rise of human
culture and
religious values such as altruism.
The Secular City helped accelerate the secularization of American elite
culture, which created not only new openings
in the public square for more - traditional
religious bodies but also new fault lines
in our politics» fault lines that are as visible as this morning's headlines and op - ed pages.
Religious liberty means one thing
in an entirely Catholic
culture, and quite another
in a pluralistic democracy (as many have pointed out at length).
So how,
in a society like the United States where the right of an individual to worship or not worship the God they choose is a fundamental and constitutional right, does a
religious person reconcile the sense of preeminence with a pluralistic
culture?
As mainline Protestantism ceased to be a
culture - forming force
in American public life, the void was filled by a new Catholic presence
in the public square and, perhaps most influentially
in electoral terms, by the emergent activism of evangelical, fundamentalist, and Pentecostal Protestantism
in what would become known as the
Religious Right» a movement that has formed a crucial part of the Republican governing coalition for more than a quarter - century.
It was designed to a meet a situation that,
in virtually everybody's opinion, needed remedying: the rapid and distressing decline of a strong
religious presence at Catholic universities, and the simultaneous desire to foster a renewal of the Catholic intellectual presence
in secular
culture.
It is evident that this period influenced Morrison's permanent interest
in exploring the relationships between religion and its surrounding
culture, with the result that a unique feature of the Century came to be its openness to articles on topics — political and literary, for instance — that did not commonly appear
in religious publications.
The AFA statement read,
in part, «Here at the Academy, we world to build a
culture of dignity and respect, and that respect includes the ability of our cadets, Airmen and civilian Airmen to freely practice and exercise their
religious preference --- or not.»
First, very many people
in the world are not
religious, and some entire
cultures appear to be quite secular, without apparent damage to their happiness and functionality.
Likewise, if 100
cultures develop
religious systems based on a real god I expect them to have a good bit
in common, or at least agree on the basics such as the number of gods.
The Conference examined the way sacred music has evolved
in Jewish, Christian and Muslim traditions, its different modes of expression, its contribution to deepening
religious experience, and its place
in wider musical and general
culture of the three faith traditions.
Dan and I were both raised
in loving, grace - filled homes, but
in a fundamentalist
religious culture that required total acquiescence to a strict set of theological beliefs and left little room for mystery.
We were debating whether or not it's helpful to use language like «act like a man,» or «true womanhood,» or «real men»
in our
religious dialogs, and I was arguing that the goal of the Christian life is to be conformed to the image of Christ, not idealized,
culture - based gender stereotypes.
This model invites students to see the New Testament as the product of a profoundly human process of experience and interpretation, by which people of another age and place, galvanized by a radical
religious experience, sought to understand both that experience and themselves
in the light of the symbols made available to them by their
culture.
But that this should be interpreted as freedom from religion, and used as a means of sealing our
culture against the imparting of
religious knowledge, has no justification
in fact.
The message behind the «
culture creep» promoted by the Times is a «gospel,» says veteran reporter Proctor, because it is adhered to with
religious - like devotion both
in the editorial and news sections of that influential medium.
Distinguished men of letters, essayists, novelists, and poets, have recently asserted their conviction that the only thing which can save our sagging
culture is a revival of
religious faith, but many of these men make no contact whatever with the particular organizations
in their own communities which are dedicated to the nourishment of the very faith they declare necessary for our salvation.
This is increasingly evident
in contemporary
culture, where the search for
religious truth is often supplanted by the idolization of supposed tolerance.
How can our
religious communities renew the
culture of marriage
in a society burnt over by the sexual revolution?
The
religious rules
in first - century Jewish
culture didn't make life better — they made it more difficult.
Thus the Commission called for a Christian concern for Higher Education which helps critical rational and humanist evaluation of both the western and Indian
cultures to build a new cultural concept which subordinated
religious traditions, technology and politics to personal values according to the principle «Sabbath is made for man and not man for the Sabbath», enunciated by Jesus and illustrated
in the idea of Incarnation of God
in Christ.
The past two years have seen the appearance of an informative Encyclopedia of the American Constitution (4 vols., edited by Leonard W. Levy [Macmillan]-RRB-, several outstanding studies on its intellectual background (including Forrest McDonald's Novus Ordo Seculorum: The Intellectual Origins of the Constitution [University Press of Kansas] and Morton White's Philosophy, The Federalist, and the Constitution [Oxford University Press], at least one pathbreaking effort to trace the document's role through the years (Michael Kammen's A Machine That Would Go of Itself The Constitution
in American
Culture [Knopf]-RRB- and a gaggle of good books on its
religious themes (see Martin Marty's review
in The Century [«James Madison Revisited,» April 9.
Russian national identity is tied to Russia's
religious history
in a way not unlike how Western
culture is deeply connected to its Catholic and Protestant histories.
A historian with a hand on the pulse of contemporary
religious culture, I admire her like crazy, so when she expressed some disagreement with my post at CNN, «Why Millennials Are Leaving the Church,» my first instinct was to curl up
in a ball and cry.
«All we ask is that it be fair and the church not be singled out for a horror that has cursed every
culture,
religious organization, institution and family
in the world,» he said.
Her Catholic
culture is evident
in the
religious and moral management of her Hollywood years.
Coupled with Russia's failure to establish a religiously and ideologically «neutral» public space
in 1990s, this indicates that Christian
religious ideals still hold strong influence over Russian
culture.