Not exact matches
To put things
in context, Bell followed that quote up by expressing his disappointment when communities
of faith discourage people from asking questions about
religious texts or beliefs.
There are many, many schools which prohibit any and all music with a
religious text from their curricula and prohibit teachers from programming such music for concerts no matter how balanced the program may be (that is, it encompasses secular and sacred, accompanied and unaccompanied, difficult and easy, music
in a variety
of styles and from a variety
of musical eras.
I just don't like it when people cherry pick their
religious sources or,
in the case
of this article, outright go against what their
religious texts teach to try and appear more politically correct.
In the same breath, let us also just believe that the
religious fanaticism shown by some Muslims is also an act
of corruption
of their own sacred
text.
If he truly believes his
religious text as a Christian or Jew would their own then he is doing the right thing
in the eyes
of god.
«People who find themselves wanting to insert
religious texts and
religious authority into public life,» he said, «are
in fact recognizing something correct: namely, the nonneutrality
of secular reason.»
Should students never perform any music with a
religious text, even if done
in a secular setting and with the purpose
of providing a complete education, not for the purpose
of worship or
of promoting a particular belief?
I would say Evans, and many
of the commenters, are missing the point that several hundred years
of scholarship
in the fields
of literary and textual criticism enable us to arrive at at - least reasonable interpretations
of religious texts driven by context, the literary genre, etc..
The «religiously devout» is important, for Geck puts to death the notion, prominent from the early 1960s through the 1980s, that correct dating
of Bach's cantata production proves that his interest
in writing liturgical music was a professional obligation only and that Bach had no abiding commitment to the
religious texts he was paid to set.
«god» doesn't exist and is make believe, your
religious texts were written by human beings without any kind
of «divine inspiration» regardless
of what you read
in them... written by people who thought the Earth was flat... it isn't.
Most
religious laws are based off
of laws that are much older than the
religious texts they appear
in.
If there is such a passage
in any
of the
religious texts, please enlighten me.
The «Declaration on the Relation
of the Church to Non-Christian Religions» now known simply as Nostra Aetate (or, «
In our Time,» from the first words
of its Latin
text), denounced all forms
of religious hatred, and called for a new dialogue among the world's religions.
By contrast, traditional philosophy tends to emasculate
texts like the above, construing them as mere anthropomorphisms, since obviously Gad can not be described
in emotional and temporal terms — or so the doctrine goes, despite massive evidence
of religious experience to the contrary.
maxi, Yes atheists lack a reason to believe
in your sky - fairy and the creationist pseudo-science that attempts to muddy the water about the real science that disproves the foundation
of your
religious texts.
There is every danger
of a piously suppressed smile at artistic faults
in the performance
of the
text engendering doubts
of the true
religious feeling and faith
of the actors, danger also
of misinterpretation
of the... motives
of the community
in performing the Play.
He wanted to show us that God's role
in those violent
religious texts is not
in the inflicting
of pain and suffering
of others, but
in receiving and suffering that pain along with us.
In light of my series this past week about the Bible, in which I said that the Bible is the most violent religious text in the world, someone sent this picture to m
In light
of my series this past week about the Bible,
in which I said that the Bible is the most violent religious text in the world, someone sent this picture to m
in which I said that the Bible is the most violent
religious text in the world, someone sent this picture to m
in the world, someone sent this picture to me.
While I do not consider myself an expert on all the
religious writings
of all
of the main religions
in the world, I have read most
of the main
religious texts for most
of the main world religions, and while it is not uncommon to find violent events being described
in these other
religious books, no other set
of religious writings comes even close to describing the violence and bloodshed that one finds within the pages
of the Hebrew Scriptures.
The 31 - year - old Democrat said she will take her oath
of office on the Hindu
religious text Bhagavad Gita
in January.
God wants humanity to understand that nothing and nobody is beyond the scope
of His redemptive purposes, and so by sending Jesus as the fulfillment
of the most violent
of religious texts, God not only revealed Himself by way
of a stark contrast to that violence, but also showed how to reinterpret and understand those violent events
in light
of the self - sacrificial God dying on the cross for the sins
of the whole world.
You may not provide, post or otherwise distribute, User content that: i. Contains vulgar, profane, abusive, racist or hateful language or expressions, epithets or slurs,
text, photographs, videos or illustrations
in poor taste, inflammatory attacks
of a personal, racial or
religious nature; ii.
In light of my series on the violence of God in the Bible, in which I said that the Bible is the most violent religious text in the world, someone sent this picture to m
In light
of my series on the violence
of God
in the Bible, in which I said that the Bible is the most violent religious text in the world, someone sent this picture to m
in the Bible,
in which I said that the Bible is the most violent religious text in the world, someone sent this picture to m
in which I said that the Bible is the most violent
religious text in the world, someone sent this picture to m
in the world, someone sent this picture to me.
Raimundo Panikkar
in his great collection
of Vedic
texts for modern man or woman called The Vedic Experience, whilst recognising that the Vedas are «linked for ever to the particular
religious sources from which they historically sprang», also says that the Vedas are a monument
of universal religion and therefore
of deep significance for all people.
Religious virtuosos, on the other hand, engage
in ressourcement: they draw on the resources
of profound traditions and project them into the future, calling for action
in light
of what the ancient
texts themselves project.
Finally, aware
of the
religious dimensions
of the
texts, they are able to appreciate how claims to ultimate significance are inevitably forged
in terms that are anthropologically rooted, historically conditioned and literarily defined; on the other hand, for the first time, many
of them come to perceive Christianity as
in fact making a number
of extremely interesting
religious claims.
The Bible can't be used to verify claims any more than the Quran or the Book
of Mormon, as all
religious texts first require a basic belief on the part
of the reader that they (the
texts) are right
in order to be viewed as such.
It required them to move from literal interpretations
of the
texts to allegorical interpretations
in which the
religious insight
of the
texts was uncovered.
I have a theory that SBNRs are so because one or more or a combination
of the following: (1) they can't justify their spiritual
texts - and so they try to remove themselves from gory genocidal tales, misogyny and anecdotal professions
of a man / god, (2) can't defend and are turned off by organized
religious history (which encompasses the overwhelming majority
of spiritual experiences)- which is simply rife with cruelty, criminal behavior and even modern day cruel - ignorant ostracization, (3) are unable to separate ethics from their respective
religious moral code - they, like many theists on this board, wouldn't know how to think ethically because they think the genesis
of morality resides
in their respective spiritual guides / traditions and (4) are unable to separate from the communal (social) benefits
of their respective religion (many atheists aren't either).
Progressive
religious folks
of all stripes tend to share a post-triumphalism (a sense that it's time to move beyond the old triumphalist paradigm
in which one religion is The Right Path to God and all the other paths are wrong), as well as an inclination toward reading our sacred
texts through interpretive lenses which take into account changing social mores and changing understandings
of justice.
After Wieman's review
of Process and Reality, his first published
text relevant to our concerns was «God and Value,» a chapter
in Religious Realism, ed.
During the Abbasid era, for example, Muslim culture progressed rapidly, and the
religious texts were interpreted
in a way which suited the spirit
of the age.
The use
of numbers
in ancient
religious texts was usually numerological rather than numerical; that is, their symbolic value was more important than their secular value as counters.
Gradually that tie has largely gone, but the christians
in the USA at least want to impose their religion on the rest
of us despite the First Amendment: biblical
texts on public buildings, their god on the currency, their
religious beliefs to be law, christian prayer at public events, etc..
I desire to understand not only the
religious experience or the time - bound perspectives
of the writers but also the system
of truth deposited by the Spirit
in this
text.
Perhaps most important, while the great Western religions have held that God is revealed
in the events and shape
of history, none
of the
texts discuss
religious interpretations
of history.
The type
of atheists, like most on this post, that continue with the ridiculous assertion that there can be nothing greater than us that exists above or outside
of our little physical realm, are simply either intellectually stunted individuals, or more likely, bitter people who have gotten their panties
in a bunch because some
religious text contains some apparent condemnation
of their lifestyle.
Taken
in totality we have natural explanations for all that
religious texts offer as the work
of a god.
That doesn't mean they didn't have their various
religious beliefs, but they knew that they should not limit their ideas
of freedom and governance to what was
in a
religious text.
On the matter
of self and fulfillment, John Boswell, a Yale historian who has written some
of the major
texts employed by homosexual activists, asserts, «Not only is homosexual eroticism the oldest and most persistent strand
in the Christian theology
of romantic love, but Christian
religious life was the most prominent gay life - style
in Western Europe from the early Middle Ages to the Reformation, about two - thirds
of the period since Europe became Christian.»
It is,
in particular, the second
of evangelicalism's two tenets, i. e., Biblical authority, that sets evangelicals off from their fellow Christians.8 Over against those wanting to make tradition co-normative with Scripture; over against those wanting to update Christianity by conforming it to the current philosophical trends; over against those who view Biblical authority selectively and dissent from what they find unreasonable; over against those who would understand Biblical authority primarily
in terms
of its writers»
religious sensitivity or their proximity to the primal originating events
of the faith; over against those who would consider Biblical authority subjectively, stressing the effect on the reader, not the quality
of the source — over against all these, evangelicals believe the Biblical
text as written to be totally authoritative
in all that it affirms.
In America, marriage does not have to be a
religious event, and quoting from your
religious text has no persuasive effect on those who don't follow your particular brand
of religion.
«The importance
of studying parallels lies
in providing a check against isolating the Hebrew prophet from his specific historical context as if his
text represented a timeless
religious literature that floated above all historical particularity,» he writes.
Proud
of their secular society, most Japanese aren't
religious in the way Americans are: They tend not to identify with a single tradition nor study
religious texts.
A copy
of this long lost gospel was discovered as part
of a large collection
of ancient
religious texts unearthed near the Egyptian city
of Nag Hammadi
in 1945.
It will examine the relationship between religion and politics
in the period
of the American Revolution, founding, and early republic by exploring primary sources including charters, constitutions, and legal
texts, sermons, pamphlets, essays, speeches, debates, and
religious texts.
But the process
of ecumenical and interreligious dialogue that Pope Benedict XVI has repeatedly endorsed may cause participants to question whether any canonical story
of violence — such as the conquest narratives
in Joshua and Judges, or functionally equivalent
texts in the history
of Islam — may legitimately be claimed to offer a
religious warrant for continued violence
in today's world.
Credited to Rabbi Israel Salanter
in reference to the development
of religious self - improvement (the «Musar Movement») and quoted
in, among many
religious texts, «To Heal a Fractured World, The Ethics
of Responsibility,» by Rabbi Jonathon Sacks.
You can post quotes from and references to this book all year long and it will not change the fact that: Yes, there are some practical words
of wisdom for peaceful human behavior
in it (as there are
in most
religious texts), but just because this is true it does not make all
of the supernatural fantasies
in it true.
To many
of the jewish faith, the Christians hijacked part
of their
religious writings and applied their own interpretations, often own «translations» which
in parts are different from older
texts (that Christianity did not control).