Sentences with phrase «in resurrection of the dead»

It is clear that he is refuting those within the church who didn't believe in the resurrection of the dead, perhaps they hoped to practice Christianity as a way of gaining earthly benefits and no more, as had been common in many early religious practices.

One of the goals of a typical theology of resurrection is to affirm the value and dignity of the body, even if we don't know very clearly what happens or will happen to it in the resurrection of the dead.

Historically, it was the sect of the Sadducees that didn't believe in resurrection of the dead.

His statement that those who participated in the resurrection of the dead would be like angels, not marrying or giving in marriage (Mk 12:25 and parallels), implies a kind of incorporeal existence.

for example... a) he slams them for not believing in the resurrection of the dead.

Further, every resource I have ever seen makes reference to the Pharasees believing in the resurrection of the dead.

Obviously, if there is no personal immortality, there is no great interest in the resurrection of the dead or the end of the world.

«To exalt the crucified Jesus to the right hand of God» was a statement which implied another, namely, «to raise from the dead», and the two seem to have been used almost synonymously at first.49 At this point we must take note of the widespread belief in the resurrection of the dead at the end - time, already described in the previous two chapters.

In the resurrection of the dead we will indeed have our bodies, but they will be transformed from the earthly to the heavenly.

In the Middle Ages, Maimonides counted belief in the resurrection of the dead as one of the thirteen cardinal principles of Jewish faith and wrote an entire treatise to defend it.

The kingdom itself is the content of the eschatological hope for the transformation of our mortal lives through participation in God's eternal glory by the power of his Spirit in the resurrection of the dead.

The third controversy in the series (Mk 12:18 - 27; Mt 22:23 - 33; Lk 20:27 - 40) revolves about a question raised by the Sadducees, who did not believe in the resurrection of the dead.

That's why we confess in the creeds that we believe in the resurrection of the dead.

They may have been believers in the resurrection of the dead; they may have been hopeful of something extraordinary.

Not exact matches

Both the Christian celebration of Jesus» resurrection from the dead and our sharing in it through baptism, and the Jewish Passover celebration of their deliverance from slavery and oppression are understood in the light of the Exodus.

The references to baptisms for the dead is by Paul — IN SUPPORT — of his argument that the resurrection is a reality.

This chapter shows how Paul was trying to convince the Corinthians that the resurrection of Jesus Christ actually occured... in his support, he said in verse 29, «Else what shall they do which are baptized for the dead, if the dead rise not at all?

My point was according to doctrine of the time, resurrections were fairly commonplace (in comparison to modern times, when we know the dead can not come back to life) and therefore not so special.

The apostle Paul speaks to the resurrection of the dead in Romans 15 and in doing so comments on the dead.

When you read the context and see that Paul was speaking on the subject of those who don't believe in the resurrection, but believed in baptism as Christians, you realize that he was saying that what is the point of baptism if you are only going to end up dead.

Please read I Corinthians 15 in its entirety and you'll find that the chapter has nothing to do with «baptizing for the dead» as the Mormons practice it but rather the fact that baptism is symbolic of the death, burial and resurrection.

No Visti of the Magi No star of the East No flight to Egypt to escape the massacre of innocents No meeting with Satan and flying around the mountains No Earthquake No Last Supper No Foot washing rite No Temple curtain tearing No resurrection of dead saints Nothing about his actions in the Temple over turning the money changers tables.

'» Or as the Catechism of the Catholic Church puts it: «The bodies of the dead must be treated with respect and charity, in faith and hope of the Resurrection.

# No Visit of the Magi # No star of the East # No flight to Egypt to escape the massacre of innocents # No meeting with Satan and flying around the mountains # No Earthquake # No Last Supper # No Foot washing rite # No Temple curtain tearing # No resurrection of dead saints # Nothing about his actions in the Temple over turning the money changers tables.

I choose to place my faith and hope in Jesus Christ and the resurrection of the dead.

This interpretation is grounded in biblical themes — the vision of the Hebrew prophets of a branch growing from the seemingly dead stump of the Davidic royal line, and, of course, the central Christian affirmation of the death and resurrection of Jesus.

The resurrection does and never will make sense, it is not a fact and there is no proof or can there be that it happened A fairytale like the dead being able to conduct war in the Lord of the Rings.

In the earliest period, for example, the appointment of Jesus as son of God came only after his resurrection from the dead (cf. Rom.

Therefore what you worship in ignorance, this I proclaim to you...... 32 Now when they heard of the resurrection of the dead, some began to sneer, but others said, «We shall hear you again concerning this.»

I find it ihighly ronic that you not chose a Hindi god of resurrection as a a comparison for a god who didn't raise from the dead, you chose one with some highly similar (and far earlier) story details in common with the Christ story.

The pagan Greeks and Romans cremated their dead, but the Jews who believed in the resurrection of the body laid their dead to rest in tombs.

The restoration of Israel, in fact, will have the character of a resurrection from the dead.

2.9 - 11); he is made «Lord and Christ» as the inauguration of eschatological existence at Pentecost (Acts 2.36); in this sense he is «appointed Son of God according to the Spirit of holiness by the resurrection of the dead» (Rom.

The Sadducees do not believe in an afterlife, let alone a resurrection, which is why Paul had to say that if there is no resurrection of the dead, then Christ is preached in vain.

Usually, even a non-Christian knows something about the earth, the heavens, and other elements of the world... Now it is a disgraceful and dangerous thing for an unbeliever to hear a Christian, presumably giving the meaning of Holy Scripture, talking nonsense on these topics... How are they going to believe these books in matters concerning the resurrection of the dead, the hope of eternal life, and the kingdom of heaven?

In fact, the «WORK» of God «in the all - exceeding greatness of his Power» is made manifest not only in the Resurrection of Christ from the dead, but also in the BURIAL of Jesus in the WORK of his faithful followers ON «THAT DAY BECAUSE IT WAS GREAT DAY SABBATH» OF THE PASSOVER OF YAHWEIn fact, the «WORK» of God «in the all - exceeding greatness of his Power» is made manifest not only in the Resurrection of Christ from the dead, but also in the BURIAL of Jesus in the WORK of his faithful followers ON «THAT DAY BECAUSE IT WAS GREAT DAY SABBATH» OF THE PASSOVER OF YAHWEof God «in the all - exceeding greatness of his Power» is made manifest not only in the Resurrection of Christ from the dead, but also in the BURIAL of Jesus in the WORK of his faithful followers ON «THAT DAY BECAUSE IT WAS GREAT DAY SABBATH» OF THE PASSOVER OF YAHWEin the all - exceeding greatness of his Power» is made manifest not only in the Resurrection of Christ from the dead, but also in the BURIAL of Jesus in the WORK of his faithful followers ON «THAT DAY BECAUSE IT WAS GREAT DAY SABBATH» OF THE PASSOVER OF YAHWEof his Power» is made manifest not only in the Resurrection of Christ from the dead, but also in the BURIAL of Jesus in the WORK of his faithful followers ON «THAT DAY BECAUSE IT WAS GREAT DAY SABBATH» OF THE PASSOVER OF YAHWEin the Resurrection of Christ from the dead, but also in the BURIAL of Jesus in the WORK of his faithful followers ON «THAT DAY BECAUSE IT WAS GREAT DAY SABBATH» OF THE PASSOVER OF YAHWEof Christ from the dead, but also in the BURIAL of Jesus in the WORK of his faithful followers ON «THAT DAY BECAUSE IT WAS GREAT DAY SABBATH» OF THE PASSOVER OF YAHWEin the BURIAL of Jesus in the WORK of his faithful followers ON «THAT DAY BECAUSE IT WAS GREAT DAY SABBATH» OF THE PASSOVER OF YAHWEof Jesus in the WORK of his faithful followers ON «THAT DAY BECAUSE IT WAS GREAT DAY SABBATH» OF THE PASSOVER OF YAHWEin the WORK of his faithful followers ON «THAT DAY BECAUSE IT WAS GREAT DAY SABBATH» OF THE PASSOVER OF YAHWEof his faithful followers ON «THAT DAY BECAUSE IT WAS GREAT DAY SABBATH» OF THE PASSOVER OF YAHWEOF THE PASSOVER OF YAHWEOF YAHWEH.

As time went on and the concept developed, all kinds of pictures and ideas were associated with it, especially in the apocalyptic literature: the transformation of the earth, the end of history, the resurrection of the dead, and many others.

Thus, like Luke, Matthew embodies in a Resurrection story the conviction of the Church that the raising of Jesus from the dead, as the Lord of all men, meant that its task must be to witness to him and to preach him as Lord to all the nations, although, as Acts shows, the realization that the gospel was meant for all nations, and not only for the Jews, came gradually as a result of further revelation, and could not have been an instruction given at Easter.

When the last things refer to the life of the world or history as a whole, they customarily include the second coming of Jesus, the resurrection of the dead, general judgment (eliminating an interim state and resulting in heaven or hell), and the consummation of the world.

For the situation in which Paul wrote I Corinthians 15 was that some of the Corinthians were denying that there is a resurrection of the dead (I Cor: 15: 12).

This is not gruesome: as Addis and Arnold wrote in relation to relics in their Catholic Dictionary, because of the doctrine of the resurrection of the body «Christians have lost that horror of dead bodies which was characteristic of the heathen».

Was the Resurrection an event in the life of Jesus, so that we can say that God actually raised him from the dead?

In this case, baptism for the dead would be our own baptism, representing our passage from being dead in sin to alive in Christ through our full identification with the death and resurrection of JesuIn this case, baptism for the dead would be our own baptism, representing our passage from being dead in sin to alive in Christ through our full identification with the death and resurrection of Jesuin sin to alive in Christ through our full identification with the death and resurrection of Jesuin Christ through our full identification with the death and resurrection of Jesus.

Is it possible that the reason that the Corinthians were so concerned about baptism is that they had been taught by the Apostle Paul and other Christian evangelists that salvation and the promise of the resurrection of the dead and eternal life are received in Baptism, just as orthodox Christians, including Lutherans, have been teaching for almost 2,000 years??

It would be neither immortal nor resurrected in the full sense of the general resurrection of the dead.

Only God can do so, and God does so only in relation to everyone else, i.e., the resurrection of the dead.

A typical theology keeps the discussion of the resurrection of the body in its proper biblical context — the resurrection of the dead.

Our sins are daily and richly forgiven in it, and also we expect the resurrection of the dead.

I want to know Christ and the power of his resurrection and the fellowship of sharing in his sufferings, becoming like him in his death, and so, somehow, to attain to the resurrection from the dead.»

In this view, however, the resurrection of the dead is an ongoing, ever - increasing event.