Any attempt at applying «logic» to explain the bible by people who are believers and still think of themselves as rather intelligent (self - delusion is a symptom / cause of religious belief) always ends up
in ridiculous arguments...
I'm not going to engage
in this ridiculous argument anymore.They are regarded by UK obstetricians as professional equals.
Not exact matches
I (mis) spent my youth dancing on podiums
in a bikini at nightclubs, and I vividly remember having a long
argument with a radical Islamist outside my university about why it was
ridiculous that women wear the hijab.
I'm not even going to address how
ridiculous that
argument is
in light of the issues of overpopulation or the fact that gay people can indeed have children (my wife and I are planning to have five), or how many orphans there are
in the world that could use a loving home.
In addition, most Greeks and Italians to this day identify as White, most modern Jews identify as White, and even Egyptians, Libyans and Algerians identify as White... this whole «
argument» is
ridiculous.
I'm just taking this
argument to what seems like a
ridiculous end but could,
in fact, happen without laws defining «man and wife».
the creation described
in the bible was not intended be scientific; that's a
ridiculous notion and
argument, to think that was its intentions.
I would like to see Live4Him actually admit to the math mistake
in their
argument, and promise not to use this
ridiculous argument ever again.
For the record, this
in no way is an
argument against gay marriage and as an atheist I find it
ridiculous that this is actually a big debate we're having
in our country, let alone that there is just an incredible amount of opposition.
Moreover the
argument is
ridiculous that banning live cattle exports to Indonesia will somehow destroy the beef industry, because the direct and indirect value of the red meat industry
in Australia is something
in the order of $ 17 billion dollars and employs some 55,000 workers.
Besides several teams who have questions surrounding one or possibly two players, there is no squad that has so many issues heading into the final week of the transfer window... even Monaco, who have lost numerous players from their starting 11 have less controversy swirling
in and around their club and they have champion's league play to contend with this season... just think of how
ridiculous this situation is especially considering that we have had the same manager for over 20 years... no team should be better organized than ours... if nothing else, that should be the one advantage this team holds over all others, yet the exact opposite has occurred... this fact is even more disturbing considering the main
argument against removing Wenger from his managerial position was that there was no suitable replacement and that people feared some sort of perceived drop - off if a new manager was brought into the mix... based on what we've witnessed since the time of his contract renewal a monkey with a magic eight ball could have done an adequate job... I hate to make jokes,
in light of our current dilemma, but this team is so screwed up if I don't laugh about it, the only plausible response is to either cry or do something incredibly destructive... just look around this squad and try to see what our delusional manager sees that allow him to make such positive statements about our current team
Yeah of course - LEICESTER CITY are hundreds of millions
in debt.If they won the league with an inferior set of players ans a fraction of our finances why is wrong to expect us to at least be able to compete.Trust me those Dustbin Lids up the road have a ground to pay for so wait and see how long those English Luvvies you seem to adore either hang around or are sold.You are putting forward a
ridiculous argument.
No matter the
arguments, it is
ridiculous to place Celtic and even Liverpool
in the same league with Barcelona and Real and Inter and AC Milan not to mention putting Liverpool ahead of Barca.
There may be a few more bad outcomes
in the homebirth groups depending on how you look at the data, but when you consider the number of births we are looking at, the absolute number is so very few that the
argument is a little
ridiculous.»
I've posted for a reason, discovered that it was
in fact unnecessary, gotten some good info
in the process, and pretty much have no reason to continue a
ridiculous argument about what seems to you to be the case.
That has been a claim, and continues to be a claim
in slightly modified fashion (see the
ridiculous «we've been cooling since 1998»
argument that still gets circulation).
«I don't think it's going to encourage misbehavior, I think it's a
ridiculous argument,» the speaker told reporters when asked if the measures would lead to a decrease
in quality of life.
His allies defend his poll numbers with the following
argument: Margaret Thatcher and David Cameron were also unpopular at the same stage
in their leaderships, yet the following general elections propelled them to Downing Street; suggestions that he is Labour's William Hague or Iain Duncan Smith, and destined for failure, are, they say,
ridiculous.
People argue against it by saying, «Hey, you know the carbon footprint of flying food thousands of miles is
ridiculous so we should grow [things] locally» but the counter
argument is, but if you can grow so much wheat sufficiently
in Kansas even including the transportation for thousands of miles it's still more efficient
in terms of resources.
Said no powerlifter, ever,) not to mention that fundamentally strength and endurance athletes tend to not have much
in common, other than
arguments over whether or not a squat suit and Chuck Taylors look any more or less
ridiculous than men's neon booty shorts and black and yellow Kayanos.But there are plenty of reasons that some of you strength focused folks may be interested
in distance running (which will be the example for cardio I'm using
in this article).
The story gets too
ridiculous at this point to even be satirical or reasonably credible, it is just bad film - making; but, it does try
in its unclear and scrambled way to blame the media and the rich people who control it, for not being risk takers and offering fresh
arguments into the political fray.
Taking up the same baseless, tired, and nostalgic
arguments used by Charles Murray (and citing that tired polemicist's overly long claptrap, Real Education) Gardner declares that the focus on college is
ridiculous because some kids
in his mind aren't «college material» and that many jobs don't require higher education.
Well, I think Newark needs good schools, period... This idea of «we have to build charters at the expense of public school» is a
ridiculous notion... That's an
argument that people are having about real estate, about space, about money and finances, when on the ground, the thing that improves education is what happens
in the classroom — is teacher development, staff development, and extended days and, you know, curriculum...
That is a
ridiculous argument, both the mynah and cats are invasive
in some areas, depending on the area.
This issue has direct parallels with Marriott's
ridiculous introduction of «tip envelopes»
in rooms back
in 2014 and a lot of the same
arguments from then apply here and now.
In one
argument, that is a bit
ridiculous since Nintendo announced before hand that they will show off the new system.
Trying,
in my spare time, to be the bane of
ridiculous arguments that sound scientific but aren't.
This is almost identical to the «temp changes by 15 - 20C over the course of year
in some places; therefore, getting worked up over 0.7 C
in fifty years is
ridiculous»
argument.
However, the
argument that a point ought to be ignored since its not
in peer reviewed journal will likely be considered
ridiculous in the medium term.
Your claims and
arguments attempting to proscribe from the well - established and conventional language usage of CENTURIES
in this case are
ridiculous.
Michael Tobis to Richard Tol:» I can't believe that you are dragging my name through the mud
in the name of this
ridiculous hair - splitting
argument.
You can argue and nit pick all you like about what heat is, but for those living
in the real world feeling the real heat from the Sun and having been educated before AGWScience mangled everything or are
in the real world science now using this real knowledge about Thermal IR, your
arguments appear
ridiculous.
In written reasons, the judge accused the lawyer of «bombastic rhetoric and hyperbole, called the lawyer's request for a stay «totally
ridiculous» and one of his
arguments «idle quibbling».
Based on the good verdict, the jurors
in that case clearly rejected the
ridiculous insurance company
arguments.
I would have hoped, however, that someone who has devoted sufficient time to set up his own blog to argue the anti-TWU case would have better
arguments in favour of their case than the facially
ridiculous ones you've cited.
I recognized aspects of my husband and me
in it, especially the
ridiculous arguments the couples had.