The words «science», «intelligence» and «reason» do not find any place
in sacred scripture which puts the source of human knowledge in the «heart».
It is evident that Smith's theology is «natural theology», a knowledge of God arrived at by the study of nature alone, without any reliance on «revelation» as recorded
in sacred scripture.
A growing number of people have by now found inspiration
in the sacred scriptures of the world and have been willing to join together in prayer with members of different religions.
Religion as the means of well - being for a community and thus for each individual, who has a role in that community, requires a common understanding between like - minded involving faith in a creed, obedience to a moral code set down
in sacred Scriptures or participation in a cult.
This faithfulness stems from the church hearing anew the old time gospel of Jesus Christ
in the sacred scriptures, tempered by the communal hearing of that Word, which is its collective memory.
This narrative dimension of revelation is embodied especially
in the sacred Scriptures.
Not exact matches
Unless your passion and hobby and degrees are
in Christian theology, I seriously doubt most agnostics have a clue about
sacred tradition and
scripture and the divine revelation.
Scriptures are
sacred treasures held
in trust by one community, but for the benefit of all people.
And thus do they pervert and distort the
Scriptures, making them the guide to slavish details of the daily life and an authority
in things nonspiritual instead of appealing to the
sacred writings as the repository of the moral wisdom, religious inspiration, and the spiritual teaching of the God - knowing men of other generations.»
The
Scriptures are
sacred because they present the thoughts and acts of men who were searching for God, and who
in these writings left on record their highest concepts of righteousness, truth, and holiness.
Others, like Protestantism, allow the individual freedom
in its interpretation; but
in some sense, among all it is the
sacred scripture to which appeal must be made if one desires to know the truth.
All alike, however, of the
sacred scriptures purport to be
in some degree divine
in origin.
Its author lives
in another world than the Palestine of Jesus» days — one can scarcely believe that he ever saw Palestine, or knew Judaism and its
sacred Scriptures intimately and sympathetically.
The Pope puts into practice the methodological principle found
in Dei Verbum, 12: he reads and interprets the
Scripture «
in the
sacred spirit
in which it was written».
(Exodus 3:13 - 14)
In consonance with this traditional attitude, the Jews, from reverential motives, substituted adonai, meaning «lord,» for the sacred name in their reading of the Scriptures; as a consequence, in the thirteenth century Christian Hebraists mistakenly used the consonants of the name jhwh with the Hebrew vowels of adonai, thus getting Jehovah; but behind this later mystification lay in primitive times the recognized unwillingness of any god to surrender possession of his secret name, lest the possessor thereby gain control over hi
In consonance with this traditional attitude, the Jews, from reverential motives, substituted adonai, meaning «lord,» for the
sacred name
in their reading of the Scriptures; as a consequence, in the thirteenth century Christian Hebraists mistakenly used the consonants of the name jhwh with the Hebrew vowels of adonai, thus getting Jehovah; but behind this later mystification lay in primitive times the recognized unwillingness of any god to surrender possession of his secret name, lest the possessor thereby gain control over hi
in their reading of the
Scriptures; as a consequence,
in the thirteenth century Christian Hebraists mistakenly used the consonants of the name jhwh with the Hebrew vowels of adonai, thus getting Jehovah; but behind this later mystification lay in primitive times the recognized unwillingness of any god to surrender possession of his secret name, lest the possessor thereby gain control over hi
in the thirteenth century Christian Hebraists mistakenly used the consonants of the name jhwh with the Hebrew vowels of adonai, thus getting Jehovah; but behind this later mystification lay
in primitive times the recognized unwillingness of any god to surrender possession of his secret name, lest the possessor thereby gain control over hi
in primitive times the recognized unwillingness of any god to surrender possession of his secret name, lest the possessor thereby gain control over him.
«To speak of God's Kingdom,» says Wright, «is thus to invoke God as the sovereign one who has the right, the duty, and the power to deal appropriately with evil
in the world,
in Israel, and
in human beings, and thereupon to remake the world, Israel, and human beings... When full allowance is made for the striking differences of genre and emphasis within
scripture, we may propose that Israel's
sacred writings were the place where, and the means by which, Israel discovered again and again who the true God was, and how his Kingdom - purposes were being taken forward... Through
scripture, God was equipping his people to serve his purposes.»
(CCC: 2500) People have always been drawn to Christian faith by the
sacred beauty that the Church offers us
in the revelation of God
in Jesus,
scripture, liturgy, sacraments, lives of the saints,
sacred art, miracles of conversion and healing, and
in her own very nature.
Yet our
sacred scripture informs us
in Ecclesiastes that there is not only a time for love, but also «a time for hate.»
Victor Paul Furnish
in The Moral Teaching of Paul (1979) contrasted those who treated
scripture as a
sacred cow and those who considered it a white elephant.
Even
in his classic account of the plenary inspiration of
scripture, the 19th - century Princeton theologian Charles Hodge acknowledged that «the
sacred writers impressed their peculiarities on their several productions.»
Such a feminist hermeneutics of liberation reconceptualizes the understanding of
Scripture as nourishing bread rather than as unchanging
sacred word engraved
in stone.
Gadamer, of how the inspired text, which we question
in order to find its meaning and relevance, questions, criticizes, challenges and changes us
in the process -» Some who today raise the proper question, whether there are not culturally relative elements
in Paul's teaching about role relationships (an the material has to be thought through from this standpoint), seem to proceed improperly
in doing so; for
in effect they take current secular views about the sexes as fixed points, and work to bring
Scripture into line with them - an agenda that at a stroke turns the study of
sacred theology into a venture
in secular ideology.
Not all religions have a body of
sacred scriptures such as that described
in the preceding chapter, not even all of those which had reached the stage of writing.
The additional point can be made that to the extent these people do
in fact treat the whole Bible as equally
sacred, they are using the whole of
Scripture as their compass instead of Jesus of Nazareth.
In recent decades, this pneumatological and ecclesial way of reading the
Scriptures is being widely recovered, thus protecting the
sacred text from individualistic exegesis and those critical methodologies that are indifferent, or even hostile, to God's saving and sanctifying truth.
The whole of the Bible is «canon»
in the traditional sense that it constitutes our
sacred Scriptures.
Within Hindu
sacred literature may be found, as
in most
scripture, almost every type of writing.
- wine must be equated with blood,
in this case the blood of Christ, since all through the
Scriptures this «is foretold by
sacred type and testimony.»
By contrast, the traditional Catholic (and Orthodox) conception of the relationship does have the Church standing
in judgment over
Scripture in some sense, for as the Catechism forthrightly states, «the Church discerned which writings are to be included
in the list of
sacred books» (emphasis added).
Prof. Levenson notes that, among other differences between traditional Judaism and Christianity ignored by Dabru Emet, Jewish adherents of Judaism do not consider the New Testament to be their
sacred scripture, do not believe that Jesus was either Messiah or God, do not believe
in a Trinitarian God, and do not believe that Christianity either supersedes or fulfills Judaism.
The
Scriptures, against their own will, intention, and warning, became the «paper pope» with the result that the present was sacrificed, immediacy
in preaching was lost, and congregations became accustomed to being sacrificed weekly on the altar of «
sacred history»
Finally, it must be said that the concrete hermeneutical difficulties arising
in the interpretation of
sacred scripture and ecclesial tradition do not
in themselves form a problem specific to any tradition or one that should separate Churches.
Panikkar's theology is highly marked by his biography which laid the encounter of different religions and contexts
in his cradle, as it were.40 He has faced this challenge and engaged
in an intense study of languages, philosophies, theologies and
sacred scriptures as well as living everyday life
in many contexts.
Preachers who choose to absent themselves from this discourse risk being genuinely sectarian: so out of touch as to miss an entire language
in which their parishioners are far more conversant than with their own
sacred scripture.
In this regard, it may be noted that the hermeneutical difficulties are no fewer in the interpretation of the sacred scripture
In this regard, it may be noted that the hermeneutical difficulties are no fewer
in the interpretation of the sacred scripture
in the interpretation of the
sacred scriptures.
For example,
in the fourth book of Father Paul Sarpi's History of the Council of Trent, you will find that
in the year 1551 the Papal legates who presided over the Council ordered: «That the Divines ought to confirm their opinions with the holy
Scripture, Traditions of the Apostles,
sacred and approved Councils, and by the Constitutions and Authorities of the holy Fathers; that they ought to use brevity, and avoid superfluous and unprofitable questions, and perverse contentions....
They do not say this unless they think they know what God wants human beings to do — unless they can cite
sacred scriptures, or the words of a guru, or the teachings of an ecclesiastical tradition, or something of the sort,
in support of their own position (id.
In all the discoveries made through extended archaeological research, there has never appeared what might be called a
sacred scripture of the Babylonians or Assyrians.
The Name was regarded as so
sacred that wherever the reader came upon it
in his reading of the
Scriptures, he substituted for it the Hebrew word for «Lord».
To interpret
Scripture is at the same time to amplify its meaning as
sacred meaning and to incorporate the remains of secular culture
in this understanding.
Certainly she had materials of the sort that compose
sacred scriptures in other faiths, and certainly she had a priesthood who might have been thought of as interested
in crystallizing Egypt's religion by means of a preferred set of
sacred books.
What he actually does
in the preface is lament the ways
in which pagan superstition has twisted and distorted the true religion spelled out
in what he repeatedly refers to as the
sacred books of
Scripture and the divine law revealed through the prophets and the apostles.
Among the Jews there was a prejudice against committing the
Scriptures to writing
in any other than the
sacred tongue.
Tradition is subordinate to
Scripture, and should be shaped by
Scripture, but
Scripture, on the other hand, must be read
in the context of «a vibrant and ongoing interpretative tradition that serves to provide authoritative parameters for expositing [the]
sacred Scriptures.»
And the fact that we consider Habakkuk's complaints to be
Scripture suggests that wrestling with God
in this way is
sacred.
I believe that by looking at what the authors of
Scripture say about
Scripture, we can arrive a much better position — one where we maintain the accuracy and authority of
Scripture, but
in such a way that
Scripture is not set up as a
sacred idol.
Paul Schubert,
in a symposium devoted to the The Idea of History
in the Ancient Near East writes: «When it comes to the idea of history, it must be said that Israel, through its
sacred scripture... has proved to be the strongest and most influential single force observable by the historian
in shaping the idea of history throughout two millennia of Western history.»
As with
sacred Scripture, so with the exercise of the Petrine ministry: the truth or otherwise of a teaching is based on the authority invested
in it —
in both cases, by God himself, guaranteed by his Holy Spirit — rather than on the identity, oftentimes unknown, of this or that composer (or composers) of a particular text.
Our new Pope discloses that faith arises from a personal encounter with God's Word that infuses a person's existence with new meaning — but that this encounter is possible only within the faith community,
in which are rendered accessible the
sacred Scriptures, sacramental grace, fraternity and service to the Lord
in others.
In the worship of the Sufi these
sacred scriptures lie upon the altar on which stand seven candlesticks.