As we honor National School Choice week beginning Sunday, one fact stands out: 2012 marks the year when there can be no turning back
in school choice reforms.
Not exact matches
Private
schools, charter
schools, voucher programs and other
school choice options have been championed by
reform - minded conservatives such as Jeb Bush for years now, partly because of their success for countless children of color living
in poor communities with even poorer - performing public
schools.
Indeed,
in every «Blaine» state
in which the legislature attempts
school choice reform through statute, lawyers will have to persuade their state supreme court to interpret these old provisions
in a manner that respects the legislative and popular will.
[EDUCATION: Promote innovation and
reform in education, including support for
choice and charter
schools, so our children are prepared for college and to become active participants
in the 21st century economy]
Major issues
in the 2015 legislative session included dealing with the $ 300 million budget shortfall, funding for roads and bridges, criminal justice
reform,
school choice, and healthcare.
Other announcements expected include
reform of the system for diagnosing and helping children with special educational needs to give parents more
choice in how they are
schooled;
reforms to the family justice system to speed up care proceedings so no cases take more than six months; and promised changes to the adoption system to make sure parents and children are matched more quickly.
Mr Grayling, the Shadow Home Secretary, reviews what the Tories already intend to do on family, welfare
reform and
schools choice in order to mend the broken society.
«We're going to do everything we can to support the governor
in advancing a bold education
reform agenda that improves the quality of traditional public
schools and expands
choice for families,» the group's executive director, Jenny Sedlis, said
in an interview.
School choice is not the only
reform they oppose - for union interests are deeply rooted
in the status quo, and most changes of any consequence create problems for them.
In the following debate, Jay Greene of the University of Arkansas's Department of Education
Reform and Mike Petrilli of the Thomas B. Fordham Institute explore areas of agreement and disagreement around this issue of
school choice and
school quality.
Observers said that House and Senate conference committee members were close to reaching an agreement on the volatile
school -
choice issue, which has been a major factor
in the legislature's inability to adopt a
reform bill.
«The tests will empower parents by providing them with information critical to the success of
reforms such as charter
schools and
school choice,» William J. Bennett and Chester E. Finn Jr. wrote
in an opinion piece published
in TheWashington Post on Sept. 15.
While district
reform collapsed, and claimed the court case on the never - implemented voucher program as collateral, charter parents will ensure that
school choice carries on
in this Colorado suburban county.
In three new articles published in Education Next, researchers with the Education Research Alliance for New Orleans (ERA - New Orleans) at Tulane University, directed by professor of economics, Douglas Harris, show the impact of the reforms on student performance; consider to what degree the city's system of school choice provides a variety of distinct options for families; and take a careful look at the city's unique centralized enrollment syste
In three new articles published
in Education Next, researchers with the Education Research Alliance for New Orleans (ERA - New Orleans) at Tulane University, directed by professor of economics, Douglas Harris, show the impact of the reforms on student performance; consider to what degree the city's system of school choice provides a variety of distinct options for families; and take a careful look at the city's unique centralized enrollment syste
in Education Next, researchers with the Education Research Alliance for New Orleans (ERA - New Orleans) at Tulane University, directed by professor of economics, Douglas Harris, show the impact of the
reforms on student performance; consider to what degree the city's system of
school choice provides a variety of distinct options for families; and take a careful look at the city's unique centralized enrollment system.
Today's advocates for better
schools are insurgent groups that challenge the establishment by encouraging parents to engage actively
in K - 12
reform efforts, demanding major changes
in school choice and teacher policies, as well as
school governance.
In fact, several urban union locals, in Cincinnati, Denver, and Rochester, to name a few, have already agreed to reforms such as merit pay, peer review, and public school choic
In fact, several urban union locals,
in Cincinnati, Denver, and Rochester, to name a few, have already agreed to reforms such as merit pay, peer review, and public school choic
in Cincinnati, Denver, and Rochester, to name a few, have already agreed to
reforms such as merit pay, peer review, and public
school choice.
11 - Year Trends
in Public Opinion Winter 2018 • Accompanies The 2017 EdNext Poll on
School Reform Public thinking on school choice, Common Core, higher ed, and more By Martin R. West, Michael B. Henderson, Paul E. Peterson and Samuel B
School Reform Public thinking on
school choice, Common Core, higher ed, and more By Martin R. West, Michael B. Henderson, Paul E. Peterson and Samuel B
school choice, Common Core, higher ed, and more By Martin R. West, Michael B. Henderson, Paul E. Peterson and Samuel Barrows
New York has proved that high
school reform is possible; that boosting graduation rates of the poor and unprepared, even if the effort is begun
in high
school, is possible; that small alone is not enough; that
choice alone is not enough.
Equal opportunity
in choosing a
school A recent Wall Street Journal editorial had it right
in criticizing civil rights groups like the NAACP for not jumping on the educational
choice bandwagon since, as the Journal says, «
reform's main beneficiaries are poor and minority students
in places like Harlem and New Orleans.»
Second, these heated debates have led
school -
choice proponents to pay too little heed to crucial questions of market design and implementation — especially the extent to which
reforms have, or have not, created a real market dynamic
in education.
In polls, parents and community members generally support
reforms like
school choice, charter
schools, and improved teacher quality.
One of the most notable «laboratories of democracy» was Texas, where governors on both sides of the aisle pursued a
reform agenda, starting
in the early 1980s, centered on higher academic standards, standardized testing,
school accountability, competition, and
choice.
Regardless of the
reform strategy — whether new standards, or accountability, or small
schools, or parental
choice, or teacher effectiveness — there is an underlying weakness
in the U.S. education system which has hampered every effort up to now: most consequential decisions are made by district and state leaders, yet these leaders lack the infrastructure to learn quickly what's working and what's not.
These sorts of dichotomies are all the rage
in education
reform right now, but they are an older and long - standing dinner - table exchange among the private -
school -
choice set.
In «A Strong Start on Advancing Reform,» Burke argues that the administration has already made some positive strides in improving K — 12 and higher education through policy changes, rescissions of Obama - era regulations, and rhetorical support of school choic
In «A Strong Start on Advancing
Reform,» Burke argues that the administration has already made some positive strides
in improving K — 12 and higher education through policy changes, rescissions of Obama - era regulations, and rhetorical support of school choic
in improving K — 12 and higher education through policy changes, rescissions of Obama - era regulations, and rhetorical support of
school choice.
This is an exceptionally interesting and important contribution to scholarship on
school choice, and it is bound to play a key role
in shaping future dialogue about vouchers as a
reform strategy.
Reform efforts such as
school choice, charter
schools, reconstituting
schools, and reducing class size all rest on the belief that changes
in structure or governance will result
in higher student achievement.
In the 1990s, she served on the boards of Children First America and the Education
Reform Council, two early organizations devoted to promoting
school choice.
In short, if Trump wants a fifty - state
school -
choice victory and he wants it soon, the federal tax -
reform bill that can be acted upon as early as this spring is the best vehicle to get this done.
By making equal opportunity a central theme of the movement, organizations such as the BAEO, the Friedman Foundation (established by Milton and Rose Friedman and now known as EdChoice), Democrats for Education
Reform, and other groups
in favor of
school choice have put Republican support at risk by emphasizing the role that vouchers can play
in opening
school doors to the disadvantaged.
With the nomination of Betsy DeVos — the soon - to - be former chair of the American Federation for Children and a lifelong
school -
choice advocate — as the next secretary of education, many folks are now trying to understand for the very first time the role vouchers and private
school choice play
in the
reform universe.
When they insist that ideas like
school choice, performance pay, and teacher evaluations based on value - added measures will themselves boost student achievement, would - be reformers stifle creativity, encourage their allies to lock elbows and march forward rather than engage
in useful debate and reflection, turn every
reform proposal into an us - against - them steel - cage match, and push researchers into the awkward position of studying whether
reforms «work» rather than when, why, and how they make it easier to improve
schooling.
Expanding
school choice, like almost all of education
reform, occurs
in the states, so who is
in charge
in DC will not make too much of a difference other than turning a headwind into a tailwind.
Yet economic theory suggests that
school choice would change the teaching profession
in ways that would fulfill many of the
reform movement's goals.
«Every
reform has limitations,» wrote Winerip, perhaps tellingly,
in that 1998 story for the Times magazine, «and the problem with
school choice is what happens to
schools that have nothing to sell,
schools left behind after the most - motivated families have made their
choices and moved on.»
Some conservatives want more
school choice in the bill, yet most
choice advocates themselves want to keep Uncle Sam at bay, understanding that he has a tendency to hug favored
reforms to death.
The
reform amounts to a substantial increase
in public financing for private K - 12
schooling, while doing little to meaningfully increase
school choice.
The Republican leaders
in the executive and legislative branches, which once championed accountability, have turned to
school choice as the primary strategy to produce
reform (even as public opinion on
choice, especially more extreme forms such as vouchers, has begun to sour).
by Brett Wigdortz, founder and CEO, Teach First; Fair access: Making
school choice and admissions work for all by Rebecca Allen, reader in the economics of education at the Institute of Education, University of London; School accountability, performance and pupil attainment by Simon Burgess, professor of economics at the University of Bristol, and director of the Centre for Market and Public Organisation; The importance of teaching by Dylan Wiliam, emeritus professor at the Institute of Education, University of London; Reducing within - school variation and the role of middle leadership by James Toop, ceo of Teaching Leaders; The importance of collaboration: Creating «families of schools» by Tim Brighouse, a former teacher and chief education officer of Oxfordshire and Birmingham; Testing times: Reforming classroom teaching through assessment by Christine Harrison, senior lecturer in science education at King's College London; Tackling pupil disengagement: Making the curriculum more engaging by David Price, author and educational consultant; Beyond the school gates: Developing children's zones for England by Alan Dyson, professor of education at the University of Manchester and co-director of the Centre for Equity in Education, Kirstin Kerr, lecturer in education at the University of Manchester and Chris Wellings, head of programme policy in Save the Children's UK Programme; After school: Promoting opportunities for all young people in a locality by Ann Hodgson, professor of education and director of the Learning for London @IOE Research Centre, Institute of Education, University of London and Ken Spours, professor or education and co-director of the Centre for Post-14 Research and Innovation at the Institute of Education, University of L
school choice and admissions work for all by Rebecca Allen, reader
in the economics of education at the Institute of Education, University of London;
School accountability, performance and pupil attainment by Simon Burgess, professor of economics at the University of Bristol, and director of the Centre for Market and Public Organisation; The importance of teaching by Dylan Wiliam, emeritus professor at the Institute of Education, University of London; Reducing within - school variation and the role of middle leadership by James Toop, ceo of Teaching Leaders; The importance of collaboration: Creating «families of schools» by Tim Brighouse, a former teacher and chief education officer of Oxfordshire and Birmingham; Testing times: Reforming classroom teaching through assessment by Christine Harrison, senior lecturer in science education at King's College London; Tackling pupil disengagement: Making the curriculum more engaging by David Price, author and educational consultant; Beyond the school gates: Developing children's zones for England by Alan Dyson, professor of education at the University of Manchester and co-director of the Centre for Equity in Education, Kirstin Kerr, lecturer in education at the University of Manchester and Chris Wellings, head of programme policy in Save the Children's UK Programme; After school: Promoting opportunities for all young people in a locality by Ann Hodgson, professor of education and director of the Learning for London @IOE Research Centre, Institute of Education, University of London and Ken Spours, professor or education and co-director of the Centre for Post-14 Research and Innovation at the Institute of Education, University of L
School accountability, performance and pupil attainment by Simon Burgess, professor of economics at the University of Bristol, and director of the Centre for Market and Public Organisation; The importance of teaching by Dylan Wiliam, emeritus professor at the Institute of Education, University of London; Reducing within -
school variation and the role of middle leadership by James Toop, ceo of Teaching Leaders; The importance of collaboration: Creating «families of schools» by Tim Brighouse, a former teacher and chief education officer of Oxfordshire and Birmingham; Testing times: Reforming classroom teaching through assessment by Christine Harrison, senior lecturer in science education at King's College London; Tackling pupil disengagement: Making the curriculum more engaging by David Price, author and educational consultant; Beyond the school gates: Developing children's zones for England by Alan Dyson, professor of education at the University of Manchester and co-director of the Centre for Equity in Education, Kirstin Kerr, lecturer in education at the University of Manchester and Chris Wellings, head of programme policy in Save the Children's UK Programme; After school: Promoting opportunities for all young people in a locality by Ann Hodgson, professor of education and director of the Learning for London @IOE Research Centre, Institute of Education, University of London and Ken Spours, professor or education and co-director of the Centre for Post-14 Research and Innovation at the Institute of Education, University of L
school variation and the role of middle leadership by James Toop, ceo of Teaching Leaders; The importance of collaboration: Creating «families of
schools» by Tim Brighouse, a former teacher and chief education officer of Oxfordshire and Birmingham; Testing times:
Reforming classroom teaching through assessment by Christine Harrison, senior lecturer
in science education at King's College London; Tackling pupil disengagement: Making the curriculum more engaging by David Price, author and educational consultant; Beyond the
school gates: Developing children's zones for England by Alan Dyson, professor of education at the University of Manchester and co-director of the Centre for Equity in Education, Kirstin Kerr, lecturer in education at the University of Manchester and Chris Wellings, head of programme policy in Save the Children's UK Programme; After school: Promoting opportunities for all young people in a locality by Ann Hodgson, professor of education and director of the Learning for London @IOE Research Centre, Institute of Education, University of London and Ken Spours, professor or education and co-director of the Centre for Post-14 Research and Innovation at the Institute of Education, University of L
school gates: Developing children's zones for England by Alan Dyson, professor of education at the University of Manchester and co-director of the Centre for Equity
in Education, Kirstin Kerr, lecturer
in education at the University of Manchester and Chris Wellings, head of programme policy
in Save the Children's UK Programme; After
school: Promoting opportunities for all young people in a locality by Ann Hodgson, professor of education and director of the Learning for London @IOE Research Centre, Institute of Education, University of London and Ken Spours, professor or education and co-director of the Centre for Post-14 Research and Innovation at the Institute of Education, University of L
school: Promoting opportunities for all young people
in a locality by Ann Hodgson, professor of education and director of the Learning for London @IOE Research Centre, Institute of Education, University of London and Ken Spours, professor or education and co-director of the Centre for Post-14 Research and Innovation at the Institute of Education, University of London.
To achieve scale with quality
in Albany has required spending of about $ 500,000 per
school for start - up grants, with an annual central office expense (for the Foundation for Education
Reform & Accountability and the Brighter
Choice Foundation) of around $ 1 million.
The 529 expansion has been called a major advance for
school choice, or
in the words of the
reform's sponsor Senator Ted Cruz, «The most significant
school -
choice legislation
in history.»
Upon taking office
in 1999, the governor pursued a multipronged strategy of education
reform: an emphasis on reading, standards and accountability for public
schools, and new
choice options for students.
That's why the Romney plan is apt to do some good
in states (and districts) that want to extend more
school choices to their students — the federal dime can join the 90 cents
in state and local funds
in the kids» backpacks — but won't make much difference
in places that aren't willing to put their own resources into this kind of
reform.
Private -
school lobbyists are also worried that partisan enmity stirred up by their advocacy of
school choice could deny them participation
in new education -
reform programs, some sources say, and even make it difficult for them to influence next year's reauthorization of most major precollegiate - education programs.
Reform started soon after;
in the early 2000s, City
Schools introduced choice to high school students, closed dropout factories, and founded small, specialized high s
Schools introduced
choice to high
school students, closed dropout factories, and founded small, specialized high
schoolsschools.
Particularly problematic is how this way of thinking has caused
school -
choice proponents to ignore crucial questions of market design and implementation — especially the extent to which
reforms have, or have not, created a real market dynamic
in education.
Engaging parents
in education
reform through
school choice may take longer, but no one involved
in education
reform should fool themselves into thinking that real and enduring
reform can be done quickly.
The authors use case studies of
schools involved
in such structural
reforms as site - based management and
choice to buttress their policy recommendations for achieving greater efficiency with limited
school funding.
In opting out of public
schools,
Choice parents are helping to
reform a Milwaukee Public
School (MPS) system that has resisted or subverted other
reform efforts.
Various fundamental
reform proposals put forward since the publication
in 1989 of Politics, Markets, and America's
Schools by John Chubb and Terry Moe would replace regulatory compliance with student - performance standards, make schools» existence and staff members» jobs contingent on performance, give families choices among public schools, and transfer control of public funds from centralized bureaucracies to individual s
Schools by John Chubb and Terry Moe would replace regulatory compliance with student - performance standards, make
schools» existence and staff members» jobs contingent on performance, give families choices among public schools, and transfer control of public funds from centralized bureaucracies to individual s
schools» existence and staff members» jobs contingent on performance, give families
choices among public
schools, and transfer control of public funds from centralized bureaucracies to individual s
schools, and transfer control of public funds from centralized bureaucracies to individual
schoolsschools.