Sentences with phrase «in scientific principles»

Canine and Feline Behavior Modification Karen Fazio, CDBC offers behavior modification and training programs that are grounded in the scientific principles of learning theory as well as neuroscience.

Lynn uses only positive dog training methods grounded in the scientific principles of animal behavioral learning.

VOC - driven matching is rooted in scientific principles to effectively bring people together with similar interests, passions, and goals.

A BASI Pilates education is anchored in scientific principles while celebrating the art of every movement.

There is no problem large or small that can't be addressed through partnership in a therapeutic encounter grounded in scientific principle, artistry and magic.»

Not exact matches

As with politics, those that are entrenched in the belief in a God will not be persuaded by any scientific findings; they can always say that God was behind the creation of those physical laws or principles, chemical reactions, etc..

More than a century ago, Frederick Winslow Taylor brought his stopwatch and principles of scientific management to the office, instilling efficiency as the highest calling in what was then a factory for processing paperwork.

A theory, in the scientific sense, is «a coherent group of general propositions used as principles of explanation for a class of phenomena» [Random House American College Dictionary].

Evolution is the central guiding principle of all biology, a scientific discipline that is responsible for our successes in medicine and agriculture.

A theory used in the scientific sense is «a coherent group of general propositions used as principles of explanation for a class of phenomena.»

Big Art One can be both if one is a moderate of both, but a strict adherence to scientific principles isn't compatible with a literal belief in gods and other things «unseen» and unprovable.

«And to focus more precisely on the issue of «scientific evidence,» the sciences, ordered by their nature and method to an analysis of empirically verifiable objects and states of affairs within the universe, can not even in principle address questions regarding God, who is not a being in the world, but rather the reason why the finite realm exists at all.......

In the seemingly straightforward «scientific principle» of testing to verify information before it can be believed, lie a formula that leads to the way of death.

To many scientific thinkers, however, any talk about «extraneous» organizational principles operative in nature sounds somewhat mystical.

In any case, even if what you said it's true and evolution and all scientific principles tomorrow were found to be strong, out still would not be evidence of a god's hand in anythinIn any case, even if what you said it's true and evolution and all scientific principles tomorrow were found to be strong, out still would not be evidence of a god's hand in anythinin anything.

Many of the great scientific principles of the world are Arab in origin.

From that perspective, one knows that not everything that is real is observable, that even scientific knowledge is partial and fallible, and that religious and scientific truth claims can in principle be perfectly compatible, even complementary.

For example, the canons of valid scientific knowledge are as much a matter of democratic concern as are the principles of representation in government.

In every field of endeavor — in scientific inquiry, manners, family life, politics, and all the rest — man is not his own judge and master; he is «under orders,» he is answerable to principles of «propriety,» he is responsible for the preservation, improvement, and perpetuation of the «traditions of civility.&raquIn every field of endeavor — in scientific inquiry, manners, family life, politics, and all the rest — man is not his own judge and master; he is «under orders,» he is answerable to principles of «propriety,» he is responsible for the preservation, improvement, and perpetuation of the «traditions of civility.&raquin scientific inquiry, manners, family life, politics, and all the rest — man is not his own judge and master; he is «under orders,» he is answerable to principles of «propriety,» he is responsible for the preservation, improvement, and perpetuation of the «traditions of civility.»

Their first concern is to find gaps in the explanatory competence of the sciences, inadequacies of theory that can not, in principle, be bridged without invoking God's «special» action to supplement the natural causes to which scientific inquiry is necessarily limited.

We continue to learn more and more about these principles and it is difficult not to develop a sort of faith, even reverence in these scientific workings of the universe.

The emphasis on the right of the individual to pursue and obey one's «reason and conscience» even against the dictate of church, community and / or the State whether in the realm of scientific or religious truth was a basic principle affirmed by them in common.

According to Whitehead, scientific laws state principles which are immanent in nature but which evolve concurrently with novel changes in the entities actually constituting the universe.1...

The present Humanism, whether we call it scientific or existentialist, is only the natural and nal culmination of those principles of autonomy and nominalism in philosophy, which oversowed the New Learning.

The Cultural Dimension As culture develops, so too will religion in order that it may answer more adequately the basic problems of human life and to further deepen the synthesis of scientific knowledge with religious knowledge - the principle of evolution is written into the nature of religion, as in all life.

The church - growth school has elevated to a «scientific principle» the distinction between inviting people to accept Christ and nurturing their life in Christ; the first part of the process is called «discipling»; the second, «perfecting.»

Picking his way expertly through three centuries of scientific history, from Newton on gravity (the force that causes apples to fall and planets to stay in orbit is the same), through electricity and magnetism (aspects of a single reality), to the present search for a Grand Unified Theory, he argued that the coherence of the physical universe progressively uncovered by science points to a «unity principle» at its heart.

In these he proposes a highly convincing readjustment of the old ideas of «matter» and «form», overcoming some of the difficulties inherent in the scholastic theory of a real distinction between the principles of «act» and «potency» as dual constituents of reality, especially in the light of modern scientific knowledgIn these he proposes a highly convincing readjustment of the old ideas of «matter» and «form», overcoming some of the difficulties inherent in the scholastic theory of a real distinction between the principles of «act» and «potency» as dual constituents of reality, especially in the light of modern scientific knowledgin the scholastic theory of a real distinction between the principles of «act» and «potency» as dual constituents of reality, especially in the light of modern scientific knowledgin the light of modern scientific knowledge.

Of course, this «more» to human and cosmic reality need not be transcendent in any sense other than «beyond»: beyond our present ordinary awareness and knowledge, perhaps in principle beyond purely scientific avenues of knowledge.

Although a clear scientific understanding on these matters will be long in coming, it is ignorance to say that religion is founded only on lies and its principles of faith have no adaptive or psychological value.

They include the «chilling effects» of libel suits, the perennial conflicts between property and access, the three out of four publishers who intervene in news decisions affecting their local markets, the advertisers» freedom to move their money to where their interests are, industry self - regulation in broadcasting and advertising, the backlash against conveying under duress (as in a hostage crisis) points of view that are never aired as directly without duress, the flareups of book banning and censorship of textbooks, the rout of the civil rights movement, the retreat from principles of fairness and equality (even where never implemented), the attack on scientific and humane teaching, the threat of self - appointed media watchdogs to also spy on teachers in the classroom, and the general vigor of ancient orthodoxies masquarading as neo-this and neo-that.

In other words, revealed doctrine is not a source of the content of scientific statements nor a positive principle of scientific method and research.

God's Revelation can in fact and in principle concern realities which themselves are accessible to secular experience of a scientific or historical kind, so that on the one hand what Revelation states about them is open to possible threat of an eventual at least apparently opposed discovery of secular science and on the other hand natural science must in principle always reckon on a possible veto on the part of theology (Cf. Denzinger 1947 ff., 2187).

In principle, the Catholic scientist enjoys no absolute autonomy in his genuine or supposed scientific results in relation to revealed doctrine concerning maIn principle, the Catholic scientist enjoys no absolute autonomy in his genuine or supposed scientific results in relation to revealed doctrine concerning main his genuine or supposed scientific results in relation to revealed doctrine concerning main relation to revealed doctrine concerning man.

J.B.S. Haldane pointed out in The Philosophy of Humanism (1922) that Einstein's theory of relativity is a scientific and exact illustration of a much wider principle: all our knowledge is relative to the human mind that produced it.

Its conclusion should touch the nerve of every Christian's conscience: «A large proportion of mental patients at present, as in the past, are not treated in accordance with democratic, humanitarian, scientific, and therapeutic principles.

Atheism is conforming to logic and scientific principles and believing only in that which has evidence to support its existence.

It is a scientific principle con - finned for most causal relations in this cosmic epoch (PR 468f).

This inability to listen is equally surprising on the part of intelligent people committed to the principles of sound, scientific exegesis and on the part of believers who profess to rely on the revelation in Holy Scripture.

Thus, what Whitehead speculatively sketched out as a metaphysician, always in the hope that his principles and categories could be transposed to the individual forms of scientific research, has at least in part proved a success in its naturalistic variants.

Such evidence is admissible only under the presupposition that the principle of scientific method, namely that every effect which occurs can be explained in terms of purely immanent relationships within the operation itself, is not only valid methodologically but is true in and of itself.

The scientific mode of perception has been realized, in principle, in the external technology that constitutes our material environment....

Church growth people attempt to apply to the American scene the scientific principles of church growth as developed by Donald McGavran, based on his 30 years of missionary work in India.

The faith that gives one the ability to walk out of their door in the morning, the faith that allows one to trust one's senses, the faith in provable scientific principles, and the faith that allows us to continue to trust that intelligence exists and can bring about good in civilization — all are considered reasonable.

Even scientific principles are rooted in faith.

But no amount of scientific information could, in principle, ever tell us whether there might be a God outside nature who could intervene in nature if he or she chose.

A number of modern physicists hold that events at the sub-atomic level are not only indeterminable or unpredictable by scientific observation, but that they are also unpredictable even in principle.

In scientific circles one often hears reference to the principle of Ockham's razor.

The notions of physical reality and emergence that we have advanced in the previous chapters, unlike those of scientific materialism and mechanism, do not preclude in principle our attributing a teleological aspect to the universe.

In principle, anybody with the right equipment could follow the same procedure and arrive at the same results (allowing for normal variation), but for better or worse, modern scientific experiments require expertise and equipment that is not accessible to the layman.