Sentences with phrase «in scriptures does»

My question is, where in the Scriptures does it ever treat sexual perversion as no big deal?

Please tell me why slavery (as just one example) in scripture does not receive the same treatment that you give to the patriarchal model presented in scripture.

And where in scripture does it say anything about who is «allowed» to read the Gospels?

Secondly, nowhere in Scripture do we ever find the term «The Unpardonable Sin.»

Which story of a woman in Scripture do you find most liberating and why?

No where in Scripture do we find to get a whole chain of people praying and then God will listen.

But encountering God in scripture doesn't necessarily translate into clear propositional forms with single, static meanings.

No where in scripture does it give an age of when to baptize and Jesus said to baptize «ponta ethnae» (all people).

Akira, I can promise you that no where in scripture does it mention locking someone up in a concentration camp for being gay.

Also, nowhere in Scripture do we read that this is eternal weeping and everlasting regret.

Where in scripture does it state Peter and Judas and their... «placement» (heaven or hell) after death?

Nowhere in Scripture does it say that suicide is not forgivable, so the burden of proof is on those who teach that people who commit suicide can not be forgiven.

Interestingly, not once in Scripture do we find the Father addressing the Son as «my God.»)

So whatever we see people in Scripture doing (or not doing), this does not give us license or liberty to treat others the same way today.

But nowhere in Scripture does it say that our ability to make decisions (good or bad) was taken away.

Not exact matches

«I don't know how many times I've seen the most cluttered resumes... written in seven - point font, no margins, and it's like, «This is scripture,»» says Chu.

Instead, being exclusive and prideful does hurt others... so I see closed - minded, exclusive theology as sinful, not gay marriage... and I think Scripture, especially the teachings of Christ, is in that same spirit.

tha tis a practice of some other religions, but the word does not even exist in Mormon scripture as a practice of the church.

In one response you have referred to me as silly, accused me of being unable to reconcile my beliefs to scripture, accused me of stalling, rambling on and on, (love the irony in this one... grin), likened me to a tween, insinuated I do not know or rightly divide scripture, referred to me as sensitive, and implied my post was immaturIn one response you have referred to me as silly, accused me of being unable to reconcile my beliefs to scripture, accused me of stalling, rambling on and on, (love the irony in this one... grin), likened me to a tween, insinuated I do not know or rightly divide scripture, referred to me as sensitive, and implied my post was immaturin this one... grin), likened me to a tween, insinuated I do not know or rightly divide scripture, referred to me as sensitive, and implied my post was immature.

Then, even though they may apply cultural references to other scripture, they refuse to acknowledge (or at least look at some unbiased research) that loving committed gay or lesbian relationships today do not resemble the types of homosexuality referenced by Paul in Romans or 1 Corinthians.

I sugest you reread scriptures and listen to those Christ left in authoriy, because you certainly don't know what you are talking about!

Would you care to explain how it is that «primitive sheep herders» as most of you love to derogatorily call them were able to in and of themselves write scripture such that the first two books Genesis & Exodus spell TORAH = LAW for every equidistant letter sequence of the 50th letter... and does the same backwards HAROT for Numbers & Deuteronomy, and the 3rd book that they're pointing towards Leviticus, every 7th letter (7 is God's number for perfection) spells YHWH = The name of God.

I don't memorize scripture very often, but one I've hidden in my heart is Philippains chapter two.

However, I do think that there are genuinely consistent messages that flow in streams throughout Scripture, that can not & should not be ignored.

It's not that I don't feel like I can, I can... but is that in the vocabulary of the one who I worship, if it's not then why would I as His Son want to take on what is not His, my Father's nature... The versions of the Bible I've read seem to think that words are powerful and speaking them is an action and can even change physics if used properly... Again, the scriptures speak for themselves and circumventing the topical study with christiany cliche come - backs doesn't answer or annul anything that the Word has to say on the matter.

I just think some Christians are lazy and don't want to read more about the totality of scripture and delve deeper into interpretation... we prefer a grade 3 reading and comprehension level in many aspects of Christianity.

I think Christians, in general, don't know jack squat about the gay lifestyle / community nor do they really take the time to understand... their scripture says this and that's all they need (blatant ignorance — but that's life)... even those scriptures are up for contention as noted earlier by Trey.

So, by your reasoning, if «People put so much importance on words» (implying that they don't matter and we shouldn't take thought of how we use them) then I ought to be able to sing along with the lyrics from pac's «hit»em up» with my black friends, curse in a kindergarten class as well as a corporate meeting for my boss... what impression would a client have of my boss if I were cussing in a professional meeting or at a charity event... it doesn't add up, it's a cop - out rebuttal... trying to find loopholes or applying «human reasoning» like» ll take a swearing guy who's helpful» doesn't change Jesus or scripture it's just setting up a what - if scenario and trying to allow that to in some way justify your stance when again, that doesn't change The Holy Spirit or His heart in those who have been born again... the verses (inspired by His own Spirit) speak for themselves.

People don't behave the way we do, good or bad, because of ancient scripture or the voice of burning bush in the desert or the face of the messiah on French toast.

But I believe that we are to not give in to our every urge, and to do our best to live by the laws governing society and those laid out for us in Holy Scripture.

Don't take it from me; consider that working hard shows up in Scriptures several times, like in Ephesians 6 and throughout the book of Proverbs.

Regardless of what I believe Scripture says or does not say about this or that act being or not being a sin, I do not want a theology that leads Jesus to be the one portrayed in the cartoon.

TORAH TORAH TORAH > YHWH YHWH YHWH < HAROT HAROT HAROT you get the picture This CAN NOT be done by any man and still retain the meaning of scripture / or the text in which it is written.

But don't be so harsh on your friends who are sure if they've read what's revealed to us in Scripture...

People who murder their own children in order to enable their promiscuous lifestyle are not being led to do that by the Holy Spirit, regardless if what they are doing is not explicitly forbidden in the Scriptures.

You don't want to try to understand the scriptures, and if you did, then you would know how wrong you are But, its more fun to twist things in your mind, so you can co = meback with your old and worn out «fouls» on everything.

When Judas went back and try to give back the 30 silver coins he did so because he felt remorse, now there is a huge difference between remorse and repentance, which I don't have time to explain here, my point is let's not be ignorant of the Scriptures, we have to dig in real deep so that we can understand what it is trying to tell us.

Evangelicals maintain that the one Church becomes visible on earth in all local congregations that meet to do together the things that, according to Scripture, the Church does.

Then, as a doctor in a general free university, I began, at the command of pope and emperor, to do what such a doctor is sworn to do, expounding the Scriptures for all the world and teaching everybody.

Besides, Jesus discussed hell far more than he discussed heaven, and most Christian do believe it because the bible discusses it as a real place for real people on real pages in real scripture verses.

Perhaps some judge her in an inappropriate way: But also remember the Scripture: «If I say to the wicked man, you shall surely die; and you do not warn him or speak out to dissuade him from his wicked conduct so that he may live: that wicked man shall die for his sin, but I will hold you responsible for his death.»

I don't know why folks don't want to understand that discoveries by scientists do prove the scriptures in the Bible to be true.

If one does «literally believe» upon these above four verses of KJVB scripture you will then slowly begin to understand the Truth in God's Word!

If one does «literally believe» the above four verses of KJVB scripture you will then understand the Truth in God's Word!

How is it that an inspired woman could write scripture (e.g., Mary's song), and an inspired woman could determine for both a king and a high priest whether something is scripture (e.g., the prophet Huldah in 2 Kings 22 and 2 Chronicles 34)-- or at least could do these things in the time of the Old Testament — but an inspired woman can not now teach about God?

It's in Scripture, and sorrowfully, many do not believe it.

Scripture does do something to us in worship, which is why it is a scandal that Catholic, Orthodox, Anglican and other traditions have more public reading of Scripture in their services than we Bible - oriented evangelical Protestants.

I do not believe that God wanted the Israelites to have slaves, but I also must admit that there are select instructions attributed to God in scripture that would strongly suggest otherwise.

I also don't believe that God wanted only men to be in positions of authority within the church, but I also must admit that there are select instructions attributed to God (or at least believed to be inspired by God) in scripture that strongly suggest otherwise.

2 Peter3: 15 - 16 and regard the patience of our Lord as salvation; just as also our beloved brother Paul, according to the wisdom given him, wrote to you, 16 as also in all his letters, speaking in them of these things, in which are some things hard to understand, which the untaught and unstable distort, as they also do the rest of the Scriptures, to their own destruction.