Sentences with phrase «in skeptical»

It is because of this that a lot of people in these skeptical times have allowed their manners and their good treatment of others to fall away.

Almost all the questions I'd wanted to ask about this topic in a skeptical and widely varied discussion setting, collected together in one handy place.

I have attempted to answer the first question previously in a Skeptical Science post that discussed the 2012 Nature Climate Change article by Neil Swart and Andrew Weaver.

In an email to me from the late Bob Carter a few years ago, he commented that engineers like me were highly represented in the skeptical community.

This recent article in Skeptical Climate: The Denial Personality fits Victor to a tee, except he is completely clueless as to any aspect of the science.

In particular, the volunteers in the Skeptical Science team have been an inspiration.

I hope that the author will correct this problem in both his original post and in the Skeptical Science re-post.

Many of these articles were not published in peer - reviewed journals, but were rather published by organizations skeptical of climate change such as the Fraser Institute (here and here), The George C. Marshall Institute (here and here), and in the skeptical science journal Energy & Environment (here).

We put the call out for PayPal donations in a Skeptical Science blog post (Cook 2013a).

That was - in a matter of a few tens of seconds, climate myths 1, 170 (possibly - see below), 39, 46, 27, 1 again, 4, 45, 9 and 37, as listed in the Skeptical Science Most Used Climate Myths database that appears on the left - hand side of all Skeptical Science pages.

When members of the public respond in a skeptical manner to a promoted narrative, be this religious or political or scientific in origin, their response is not typically shaped by knowledge of philosophical skeptics such as Socrates or Pyrrho or Descartes or Hume.

This is a basic assumption in papers by the A-list skeptics I have listed, and puts you in a skeptical B list that doesn't even rise to their level.

They are the only moves in the skeptical game.

Jeesh, it is getting a little creepy of late in the skeptical communities.

I assure you that I am a great believer in this skeptical attitude but I also think we need to look carefully at the data.

Investigations such as the one pursued by Cuccinelli have been condemned by many in the skeptical community for very good reason.

It's probably obvious from the weird eyes and barely coherent ramblings that Sarah Palin's brainwashing in Skeptical Science's secret prison has done some permanent damage.

The big guns in the skeptical community are Steve McIntyre and Anthony Watts, and no one has demonstrated one smidgeon of evidence that they are on the take, from anyone at all, much less the oil industry or powerful industrial concerns.

I never see this trolling foul mouthed troll in skeptical forums that are MODERATED.That is because he would be banned very fast.For his frequent bad mouthing.I would have banned this jerk within 24 hours at my forum.

Try reading what Lomborg said about it in The Skeptical Environmentalist.

Tom Curtis (who is, as far as I can tell, a partner in the Skeptical Science blog enterprise) obliges, with archetypal green invective.

Whether or not you have a dog in the fight, Jelbring definitely did and still does, and his paper is used by many people in the skeptical camp to defend the absurd statement that gravity alone will create a stable temperature gradient in a gas, even if the gas is e.g. prepared in an isothermal state originally.

His work, determination, and ethics were all directed at answering questions in the skeptical method that is true science: the antithesis of the efforts of all those who challenged and tried to block or denigrate him.

Indeed, the first point made in this Skeptical Science article is «A variety of different measurements find steadily rising sea levels over the past century.».

I wrote about the latest research in a Skeptical Science article in April, 2015Permafrost feedback update 2015: is it good or bad news?

«Could turn the climate change world upside down» The rise in skeptical scientists are responding not only to an increase in dire «predictions» of climate change, but also a steady stream of peer - reviewed studies, analyses, real world data, and inconvenient developments have further cast doubts on the claims of man - made global warming fear activists.

Paul Robinson's posting of March 24 on the subject of ozone depletion and CFCs is correct in its skeptical answer, but very wrong in how he arrives at that answer.

In Skeptical Science Ari translates articles to Finnish, hosts New Research From Last Week series, and writes other articles every now and then.

In a recent article in Skeptical Inquirer, geologist and writer James Lawrence Powell, claims that there is a 99.99 % scientific consensus on Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW).

Pekka is technically correct if he means the word CAGW only exists in skeptical discourse, as opposed to the thing the word refers to, which is dangerous human caused global warming.

Climate Etc is essentially a parade of failures in skeptical reasoning.

So, if dogma exists in the skeptical / denialist arena then it is a personal individualistic phenomena where there is no widely shared common dogma.

If you do not like the fact that thispremise has become known (in skeptical circles, at least) as «CAGW», I can not help that.

Since it consists almost entirely of long - debunked myths, most of our response will consist of linking to existing rebuttals in the Skeptical Science database.

This figure is also available in the Skeptical Science Hi Rez Climate Graphics.

The point made in the skeptical science article is that there is good quantitative agreement between ocean heating and satellite measurements of the radiation imbalance which is what one would expect to see.

In fact, its results are relevant to three seperate myths in the Skeptical Science database.

The existence of this positive feedback to warming has been disputed by many in the skeptical community.

So Mr. Lambert puts in this skeptical view based on this research, BUT fails to ALSO comment whether CO2 has an equally significant ELECTRICAL significance, and, hence, has a dependant relationship with the cosmic ray flux.

Particularly germane is «Communicating Climate Change Risks in a Skeptical World,» a paper by John Sterman of the Sloan School of Management at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, whose work has been discussed here before.

After all, there's REALLYRealClimate... Have you noticed the tremendous increase in skeptical internet traffic at the grass roots level?

A detailed account of these events are provided by Chris Mooney in the Skeptical Inquirer and The American Prospect, by David Appell in Scientific American, and in a news brief in Nature.

«contributing factor» is far too vague to ask a question that can be answered and therefore should not be use in a skeptical argument, since a skeptic WANTS answers.

«There is a lot of false advertisement out there that has resulted in a skeptical consumer,» says Gonzalez.

Norty Cohen, author of The Participation Game: How the Top 100 Brands Build Loyalty In A Skeptical World

At the time, lawmakers and educators throughout the state raised a collective eyebrow in skeptical bemusement.

Then, in a skeptical tone — one that might have been reserved for dealing with a used car salesman — she added, Explain to me whats going on here.

Went in skeptical; an excellent surprise.

There's a reason this movie sets off joke titles in the skeptical part of our brains.

Fortunately, a couple of gadflies in the ointment emerge in a skeptical science teacher (Hal Holbrook) and an outside agitator (John Krasinski) who urge everybody not to be blinded by dollar signs, but to do a little research into the potential fallout from fracking.