Zoloth has a B.A., a BSN and two M.A. degrees, as well as a Ph.D.
in social ethics from the Graduate Theological Union in Berkeley, Calif..
Instead of discussing each point raised in detail, we shall deal with the authority of the Bible
in social ethics by emphasizing two points.
All we are saying now in liberation theology is this: in the United States we've finally got to take Reinhold Niebuhr's pioneering step serious in theology as well as
in social ethics.
Thus sin appears in a Reinhold Niebuhr boomlet as the note of Christian realism needed
in social ethics; ignorance receives attention through «the epistemological privilege of the poor» or an action hermeneutics; death is addressed in the issue of nuclear winter.
Evangelicals, all claiming a common Biblical norm, are reaching contradictory theological formulations on many of the major issues they address — the nature of Biblical inspiration, the place of women in the church and family, the church's role
in social ethics, and most recently the Christian's response to homosexuality.
The writings of Harold Lindsell, Francis Schaefer, Bernard Ramm, Carl Henry, Clark Pinnock, Dick France, James Packer and others present a range of contradictory theological formulations on such issues as the nature of Biblical inspiration, the place of women in the church and family, the church's role
in social ethics, and the Christian's response to homosexuality.
In this sense, one of the greatest present dangers to responsible moral discourse
in social ethics is, I think, «moralism» and unrestrained idealism, which frequently operate to overcome these harsh realities I have described by attacking them — or worse, by simply ignoring them.
A Church That Can and Can not Change: The Development of Catholic Moral Teaching by john t. noonan, jr. university of notre dame press, 280 pp., $ 30 Doctrinal development follows a different course
in social ethics than in the realm of revelation.
One of the biggest fallouts (to oversimplify) then was that conservatives cared about personal morality and not involvement
in social ethics / issues of evil, while liberals cared about social ethics / issues but were seen as lax about morality.
Not exact matches
Shareholders, for example, according to SHARE's Peter Chapman, are and ought to be concerned about the «ESG» (
ethics,
social and governance) obligations of the companies they invest
in.
It was the recession of the early 1990s that broke the back of the old
social contract, says Bruce Mast, an Exeter, N.H., business consultant who has degrees
in social psychology and
ethics.
The authors emphasise that success
in business is based on
ethics,
social and environmental responsibility, providing value to others, and people - centered marketing.
They willingly cheat and ignore privacy rules and data
ethics in order to win,» said
social media analyst Jonathan Albright, research director of the Tow Center for Digital Journalism at Columbia University.
I want to thank Brian for his tireless work
ethic and sharing his drive campaigning as well as the many mornings, evenings and nights that he spent working toward the growth of
social democracy
in Alberta.
It's more important than ever to talk about
ethics in research, especially as it pertains to
social media.
Although I frequently find myself at odds with First Things over issues pertaining to economics and the role of government
in public life, I usually find its critique of American
social mores and
ethics to be insightful and illuminating.
After a brief stint at Woman's College
in North Carolina and a few years teaching «
social ethics» at the Hartford Seminary, the relentless clacking of Berger's typewriter earned him a return ticket to the New School
in 1963.
He asserts that the
social pathologies noticeable
in the underclass are there because «there are no
ethics at the top of society.»
Though seminary faculties like to affirm,
in principle, a relationship between Christian theology and the life of the church, academic theology tends to view the ministering congregation as an addendum to the really interesting issues of
ethics, philosophical and political theology, or
social policy.
Christine Pohl is professor of
social ethics at Asbury Theological Seminary
in Wilmore, Kentucky, and author of Making Room: Recovering Hospitality as a Christian Tradition (Eerdmans).
J. Philip Wogaman is professor of Christian
social ethics at Wesley Theological Seminary
in Washington, D.C.
In the name of Christ, modern Christian
social ethics points to an eradication of the very poverty that Jesus blessed.
The sixties ushered
in that option for
social ethics at the expense ofdeeper theological symbolism.
Some recognize that Buddhism, at least
in the form
in which it has operated
in China, Korea, and Japan, has failed to develop the kind of
social ethic needed
in the modern world.
First, a move to negate the communal - denominational approach to educational enterprise and to make intellectual dialogue among concerned teachers and post-graduate students of different religious and secular ideological faiths for exploring a new relevant common anthropology and
social ethic in a pluralist India, central to the Christian college.
It was not
in our modern sense of sociological utopianism; but it was something vastly profounder, a religious
ethic which involved a
social as well as a personal application, but within the framework of the beloved society of the Kingdom of God.
Moreover, because of his personal history, Keen has largely ignored matters of
social ethics in his discussion of play, despite his desire to become Homo Tempestivus, that timely man who responds appropriately to life around him.
There have been more obviously religious eras, as
in the medieval «age of faith» or the periods of the great revivals under Jonathan Edwards or Dwight L. Moody; it is doubtful that there has ever been a period of such general high Christian intelligence or deep commitment to Christian
social ethics as
in our own time.
Most fundamentally: how exactly do your eschatological views, particularly
in teasing out these details, provide a well - supported basis for a Christian
social ethic?
I have a theory that SBNRs are so because one or more or a combination of the following: (1) they can't justify their spiritual texts - and so they try to remove themselves from gory genocidal tales, misogyny and anecdotal professions of a man / god, (2) can't defend and are turned off by organized religious history (which encompasses the overwhelming majority of spiritual experiences)- which is simply rife with cruelty, criminal behavior and even modern day cruel - ignorant ostracization, (3) are unable to separate
ethics from their respective religious moral code - they, like many theists on this board, wouldn't know how to think ethically because they think the genesis of morality resides
in their respective spiritual guides / traditions and (4) are unable to separate from the communal (
social) benefits of their respective religion (many atheists aren't either).
indicates clearly enough that our «
social ethic» (what a lot of muddles are contained
in the background to that truncated phrase!)
The pervasiveness of this emphasis can now be seen even
in Christian
social ethics, the field born out of the Social Gospel movement and one which in the name of prophetic spirit and social analysis has been critical of Protestantism's tendency to focus on personal
social ethics, the field born out of the
Social Gospel movement and one which in the name of prophetic spirit and social analysis has been critical of Protestantism's tendency to focus on personal
Social Gospel movement and one which
in the name of prophetic spirit and
social analysis has been critical of Protestantism's tendency to focus on personal
social analysis has been critical of Protestantism's tendency to focus on personal piety.
Thus, what appears on the surface to be a secular and
social problem is ultimately rooted
in a deeply religious
ethic.
My interest
in democratic theory has been an attempt to find some way of getting a handle on the nature of Christian
social ethics.
Birch and Cobb propose that to live out such an
ethic one must act personally and politically to promote two complementary ideals: ecological sustainability
in our relations to the rest of nature, and
social justice among humans.
What interests me about the family is not the obvious
social problems associated with it
in contemporary life; nor am I particularly interested
in the
ethics of sexuality.
The doing of
ethics involves the use of certain presuppositions and procedures for reflecting on moral and
social questions
in some sort of orderly fashion.
Thus the particular historical exigencies and
social possibilities
in our own age will necessarily affect the ways
in which these values are translated into norms on such issues as women's rights, sexual
ethics,
social justice, property rights, energy policy or ecological concerns.
Broadly conceived, black theology asks not only about the metaphysical status of process theology, but also, and more importantly, can process theology illuminate
social - political
ethics in a way that contributes favorably to the liberation struggle?
Chastened by the Niebuhrs, those trained
in ethics no longer sought to «Christianize» the
social order.
The more America became the democratic society that the
social gospelers so desired, the more difficult it became to do
ethics in a theologically candid manner.
The way toward this integration has been indicated by Buber himself
in his treatment of philosophical anthropology, psychology, education,
ethics,
social philosophy, myth, and history.
Marty has also influenced the ways
in which I think about
social ethics.
In fact, it can be argued (and I will, in what follows below) that the present divergences in social thought throughout contemporary evangelicalism stem largely from this source from differing theological traditions that provide conflicting models for social ethics toda
In fact, it can be argued (and I will,
in what follows below) that the present divergences in social thought throughout contemporary evangelicalism stem largely from this source from differing theological traditions that provide conflicting models for social ethics toda
in what follows below) that the present divergences
in social thought throughout contemporary evangelicalism stem largely from this source from differing theological traditions that provide conflicting models for social ethics toda
in social thought throughout contemporary evangelicalism stem largely from this source from differing theological traditions that provide conflicting models for
social ethics today.
Sojourners (formerly called the Post American) gives voice to another opinion
in evangelicalism concerning
social ethics, one increasingly being felt by the wider community.
Too often,
in that section of the evangelical community which stems from American revivalism and fundamentalism, discussion of
social ethics passes over this foundational matter altogether, discussing instead only specific procedures.
While debate over the understanding of Biblical interpretation lies at the heart of current evangelical discussions concerning women, differences
in theological tradition lie at the center of discussions over
social ethics, and disagreement over one's approach toward the wider secular culture is surfacing as the focus of controversy regarding homosexuality.
To stress love as one's motive for involvement encourages an overvaluation of voluntaristic structures as the key to Christian
social ethics, and ultimately aborts rigorous structural involvement
in society.
That contemporary evangelical ideas of
social ethics are rooted
in outside theological / ideological frameworks can perhaps be illustrated by comparing the four positions outlined above with that of California politics over the last twenty years.
David Hubbard, for example,
in his taped remarks on the future of evangelicalism to a colloquium at Conservative Baptist Theological Seminary
in Denver
in 1977 noted the following areas of tension among evangelicals: women's ordination, the charismatic movement, ecumenical relations,
social ethics, strategies of evangelism, Biblical criticism, Biblical infallibility, contextual theology
in non-Western cultures, and the churchly applications of the behavioral sciences.2 If such a list is more exhaustive than those topics which this book has pursued, it nevertheless makes it clear that the foci of the preceding chapters have at least been representative.