Without the benefit of a wide shot, we can't tell where
in space the object is in relation to him.
any nuclear reactor wherever located; any nuclear fuel cycle facility; any radioactive waste management facility; the transport and storage of nuclear fuels or radioactive wastes; the manufacture, use, storage, disposal and transport of radioisotopes for agricultural, industrial, medical and related scientific and research purposes; and the use of radioisotopes for power generation
in space objects
Not exact matches
Space junk is dangerous because one collision could trigger a chain reaction of objects hitting each other, resulting in a thick cloud of debris that would make space travel extremely dange
Space junk is dangerous because one collision could trigger a chain reaction of
objects hitting each other, resulting
in a thick cloud of debris that would make
space travel extremely dange
space travel extremely dangerous.
Devices can superimpose 3D
objects in various
spaces, giving customers a chance to interact with digital renderings from the comfort of their own homes.
When a small
object orbits a big
object in space, the less massive one doesn't travel
in a perfect circle around the larger one.
Hololens is Microsoft's new augmented reality device that appears to make
objects appear
in front of you within the physical
space you're inhabiting.
A start - up called Desktop Metal has developed 3 - D printers that can produce metal
objects safely,
in smaller
spaces and for a lower cost than traditional manufacturing, which requires expensive machinery, lots of floor
space and risky physical labor.
This is an early example of how physical locations and
objects can be activated
in a digital or gaming
space.
Also, there is no substantial law on who can claim what
objects or resources
in space, beyond the 1967 Outer Space Treaty that declared space open for most kinds of exploitation, so long as «states» clean up their mess, leaving no contamination or dangerous objects that could harm ot
space, beyond the 1967 Outer
Space Treaty that declared space open for most kinds of exploitation, so long as «states» clean up their mess, leaving no contamination or dangerous objects that could harm ot
Space Treaty that declared
space open for most kinds of exploitation, so long as «states» clean up their mess, leaving no contamination or dangerous objects that could harm ot
space open for most kinds of exploitation, so long as «states» clean up their mess, leaving no contamination or dangerous
objects that could harm others.
I feel like meeting someone
in meatspace that I've developed a relationship with online would be a lot like having a dream where your mind has placed a really familiar
object in a place that it's not supposed to be... like your car on a boat, or your mom
in a
space suite.
Let's see, hmmm, even if I didn't have to pay for it or the cleaning of it with my tax dollars, I would
object to any monument to any religion being placed
in a public
space that I pay to keep clear for my and others use.
In considering passage Whitehead assumes that a structure of events «provides the framework of the externality of nature within which
objects are located» (PNK 80) and that «
space and time are abstractions expressive of certain qualities of the structure» (PNK 80).
In relation to the
space around it the Earth is weightless.But early man felt that the Earth (a very huge
object) must be held up by something.
The brain neutralizes change by transferring it from the time within
objects to the
space between them, displacing the change that is ingredient
in the
object to a surface interaction as another property of
space.
You have further made a host of assumptions regarding tensors if you wish to limit how physical
objects can violate assumed constants
in a given time and
space.
I do not have to locate my hand
in objective
space and direct it toward the desired
object, nor do I have to identify the hand as my own.
We think not only of
objects as self - contained
in particular regions of
space and related to one another only externally, but we think of human selves that way, too.
And as the Kneales have it, «when «
space» and words of similar origin occur
in pure mathematics, they refer to abstract patterns of ordering which may conceivably be exemplified by widely differing systems of
objects» (DL 386).
29 More perhaps than do «eternal
objects,» these «propositions» show how far Whitehead has come with his new solution to the problem of form: he has provided a free
space for the unfolding of creativity
in world - process.
What appear to us to be solid
objects are really made up of molecules and atoms extended
in space and time.
What appear to be solid
objects are made up of myriads of these energy events, throbbing, dynamic, interrelated and interacting, extended
in space and time, with varying degrees of complexity of organization.
Because of God's transcendence it would be mythological to refer to God's action
in terms appropriate only to
objects available,
in principle at least, to ordinary sense perception.13 This especially means that one can not speak of God
in terms of the categories of time and
space; 14 i.e., whatever is predicated of God can not apply only to some particular time and
space, but must apply equally to all times and
spaces.15 Thus the implication of Ogden's criterion for non-mythological language about God corresponds to his statement of several years ago, that «there is not the slightest evidence that God has acted
in Christ
in any way different from the way
in which he primordially acts
in every other event.
Until the nineteenth century, mathematicians traditionally held that the axioms of geometry, arithmetic, and other disciplines could be established as self - evidently true statements about
objects in space.
Temporality exists
in the relations among occasions; without temporality, no larger scale events or enduring
objects are possible, and
in a realistic and relational theory of time and
space, the concrescence of microphysical occasions is productive of
space - time by providing the relata for the relations which are the fabric of
space - time.
In a paper of this brevity, I have to assume that the reader is largely familiar with actual entities and eternal objects, in order to have adequate space for a discussion of nexu
In a paper of this brevity, I have to assume that the reader is largely familiar with actual entities and eternal
objects,
in order to have adequate space for a discussion of nexu
in order to have adequate
space for a discussion of nexus.
The
objects of sense - experience, and
in particular those of visual experience, are often passive and bounded
in particular regions of
space to the exclusion of other regions.
As
objects in one's visual field move through
space, for example, one's feeling of them changes.
Triangles, mathematical relations, logical systems, groups, rings,
spaces, etc. are all eternal
objects or can be viewed as eternal
objects through their ordinary expression
in mathematical or logical symbolism.
The Protestant bishop of Karachi, for example, has been stopped twice
in the past year by Christians who
object to his plan to develop commercial
space around the outer wall of St. Andrews, the second - largest Protestant church property
in Karachi.
Each actual occasion prehends the
space - time continuum
in its infinite entirety; that, says Whitehead, is nothing but an example of the general principle (also illustrated by prehension of qualitative eternal
objects) that «actual fact includes
in its own constitution real potentiality which is referent beyond itself.»
Every occasion, as it completes its concrescence, is (1) located
in a specific region of the
space - time continuum, and (2) is perfectly definite
in regard to the inclusion of every eternal
object.
The arrows run from the past3 to the present — for the «there» is antecedent, however slightly,
in time as well as external
in space to the «here» — and from
objects to a subject.
Whitehead's cosmology is based on a double foundation: time -
space, on the one hand, and what he (
in Process and Reality) calls «eternal
objects,» on the other.
There are differences, thirdly, as to the nature of the
object — whether it is material reality, thought
in the mind of God or man, pantheistic spiritual substance, absolute and eternal mystical Being, or simply something which we can not know
in itself but upon which we project our ordered thought categories of
space, time, and causation.
Our planet home is a giant spaceship, and it is vulnerable to all the
objects wandering aimlessly about
in space.
suppose atheists want to put an empty
space there witha plaque dedicated to nothing
in honor of the people who didn't believe
in anything... I wouldn't
object.
Since «to perceive means to immobilize» (MM 275),
space is needed
in order to reconstruct and localize
objects.
To each observer there corresponds a 3 - or 4 - dimensional perspective or «private
space,»
in which the sense data literally serve as mathematical points
in mapping out the existence and extent of
objects that a particular observer seems to perceive.
Thus we experience precisely
in freedom what is meant by God, even if we do not name or consider this ineffable, incomprehensible, infinite goal of freedom, which makes possible the distance to the
object of our choice, the actual
space of freedom.
Similarly, Newton believed that
objects can move
in space because of the existence of another absolute — time.
Furthermore, he conceived of all
space as occupied and considered what we regard as empty
space simply as
space in which the occasions are not organized into enduring
objects.
In taking various profiles, the percipient reaches across space to distinguish events, objects, and relations, while letting them stand as they are in them selve
In taking various profiles, the percipient reaches across
space to distinguish events,
objects, and relations, while letting them stand as they are
in them selve
in them selves.
This gives him cognizance of the event by adjective (R 18), for he identifies it and its
space - time boundaries by sense -
objects situated
in it (PNK 67, 84; CN 78, 147).
The units of which the world is made up were thought to be material particles which remained unchanged
in themselves as they moved about
in space and formed the diverse configurations which made up the physical
objects in our world.
The difficulty, which Newton recognizes, is that there may be no physical motion whereby absolute time is accurately measured (PNP 8); and there may be no material
object at rest
in absolute
space in reference to which absolute positions are determined (PNP 8).
Whiteheadian cosmology embraces the notion of a uniform metric structure for the
space - time continuum that is independent of the material
objects commonly said to be «
in»
space - time and also that is independent of the material
objects appropriated as standards of spatio - temporal measurement.
Now, given any system of material
objects that might be considered as a frame of reference
in a theory of dynamics, that system is either at rest, or
in motion with uniform velocity, or
in accelerated motion relative to absolute
space.
Any system of material
objects in accelerated motion relative to absolute
space manifests forces — the «inertial forces» — that vary
in accordance with the degree of acceleration; the centrifugal force discussed above is an example.
Neither Newton nor Whitehead ascribes to a purely relative theory of
space and time structure, that is, a theory which would maintain that any selected system of material
objects may serve as a suitable framework
in terms of which to analyze physical reality.
More to the point, Newton's «Scholium» which introduces the notions of «absolute, true, mathematical»
space and time, and «relative, apparent, common»
space and time (PNP 6 - 12), makes clear that absolute
space and absolute time continua are thought to be necessary for a satisfactory theory of dynamics, that is, a theory of the forces which determine • the motion of material
objects.7 The main idea
in Newton's position is that not all physical frames of reference are suitable for satisfactory analysis of the motion of material
objects;
in fact, no physical frame of reference is completely suitable for this purpose.