Sentences with phrase «in subatomic»

Yet, Bohr managed to assert the reality of objects in the subatomic world, even if they could never truly know them in the absence of measurement devices that distort that reality.

The film also alluded to the possibility that the character did not die, but was rather lost in a subatomic universe.

Using their super suits, the two will evade government agents and multiple enemies all while searching for Hope's mother Janet, the original Was who isp believed to be in the subatomic quantum realm of the Microverse.

In the everyday macroscopic world we inhabit, the exact position a thing occupies in space can be estimated with remarkable accuracy but, in the subatomic world, this reality begins to unravel, giving way to what's commonly called «quantum weirdness» by befuddled scientists.

RHIC drives two intersecting beams of gold ions head - on, in a subatomic collision.

Tollaksen, currently at Chapman University in Orange County, California, developed an early taste for quantum mechanics, the theory that governs the motion of particles in the subatomic world.

The journey of light through space is illuminated in the water and gold dust, moving slowly with convection currents from heated elements beneath the tank, alluding to the similar structure of macro and microworlds: stars in the cosmos and micro-particles in the subatomic scale.

Early on, two teams had spied a telltale anomaly in the subatomic wreckage: an excess of energy from proton collisions that hinted at new physics perhaps produced by WIMPs (or, to be fair, many additional exotic possibilities).

Scientific American's JR Minkel: «Two recent experiments show something interesting is going on in a subatomic particle called the Bs (B - sub-S) meson.

The grandfather of particle and nuclear physics facilities in Canada, TRIUMF, is located on the University of British Columbia campus and provides facilities for experiments in subatomic research with beams of pions, muons, protons, and neutrons.

We believe in subatomic particles we can't see.

Einstein also failed to deliver an all - encompassing theory of «quantum gravity» — one that reconciled the laws of gravity observed on the scale of stars and galaxies with the laws of quantum mechanics, the branch of physics that explains the behavior of particles in the subatomic realm.

Either the relation between successive events in the subatomic world is analogous to the relations we experience, or we have no way of thinking of them at all.

The succession of scientific discoveries and revolutions in physics over the last 500 years have led to fundamental paradigm shifts (Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 1962) in the way that science conceives of the reality of this universe both on the cosmological scale and in the subatomic realm, and perhaps even beyond this universe.

Some think that, indeed, the subjectivity resides only in the subatomic events of which molecules are ultimately constituted.

Not exact matches

Groestlcoin has the potential to enter in top 20 due to its speed and subatomic fees.

When women routinely win Nobel Prizes in physics, chemistry or medicine, when a woman becomes a world chess champion, when a woman conceives and develops a brand new computer chip that represents a significant advancement over quad cores, when a woman invents warp drive or phasers, when a woman solves an «insolvable» math problem, when a woman, while working with the Large Hadron Collider, discovers the now - hypothetical Higgs Boson to be an actual scalar subatomic particle, when a woman figures out how to pinpoint the exact location of an electron at any point in time, when a woman working for Merck or Pfizer develops a remedy for Alzheimer's disease, when a woman's baseball team can defeat the New York Yankees, when a woman can bench press six hundred pounds, run the 100 meter dash in under nine seconds or set a world record in the high jump, then the fairer sex will have made an advance or contribution unlike any it has made before.

When physicists investigated the subatomic realm, however, they discovered that the principle of least action is just a limiting case of the much more subtle and sophisticated path integral principle, which is the basis of quantum mechanics, as Richard Feynman showed in the 1940s.

In itself this would have had minor philosophical consequences if the subatomic entities could be understood as smaller exemplars of the sorts of entities that physicists had been studying.

There is absolutely no evidence anywhere in the known univers, from the tiniest subatomic particle to the structure of the universe as a whole, that even remotely implies the faintest possibility thata deity exists.

At most simple levels of material synthesis, individual nodes of organization like subatomic particles are only determinate as functions within a bigger framework, so it is perhaps not surprising that their behaviour can only be expressed in terms of statistical probability.

In fact, subatomic particles come in and out of existence out of nowhere all the time and this has been proven for some time noIn fact, subatomic particles come in and out of existence out of nowhere all the time and this has been proven for some time noin and out of existence out of nowhere all the time and this has been proven for some time now.

As such they would be instances of, rather than exceptions to, the very kind of experiential activity that occurs in all living things and, so process thinkers speculate, in all existents, even subatomic events.

One argument against the Null Hypothesis concerning God, but not limited to, can be that Elementary Subatomic Particles, aka Quarks, can never be observed nor can they be found in singularity / isolation, yet they can be detected by what they make up, that is Composite Subatomic Particles, aka Hadrons.

In natural science, the rational deduction that there ought to be another planet, or another subatomic particle, for example, has led to the discovery of these facts.

The intuition that reality for human beings, and indeed for all living things, is necessarily temporal, with an irreversible distinction between past, present, and future, is difficult to reconcile with the idea, long orthodox in the physics community, that time does not exist for subatomic particles or even for single atoms.

Whitehead's ontological principle implies that everything is an actual entity (in the strictest sense of the word) or combination of actual entities: both mental experiences and events on the subatomic level are actual entities.

The very notion of a «field», such as the Higgs field, is a mathematical and physical model describing the interrelationship of matter at the subatomic level, what Holloway would have called an «equational» relationship since in this vision (that espoused by Faith movement) the cosmos is a vast, ordered equation.

To talk about the leap from subatomic particles and probabilities to objects as we know them, and to talk about the leap from chemistry to consciousness, is in a very real sense to engage in metaphysics.

I am not suggesting that God turns subatomic particles into atoms and then into molecules and then into chairs, giving them color and hardness in the process.

They found that in some respects subatomic behavior could be understood in terms of particles, in other respects, waves.

Nevertheless, process thinkers in general propose that anything actual at all — subatomic events, amoebic experience, human experience — has some capacity for novelty, at no matter how rudimentary, even negligible a level.

In our May 2011 Cutting Edge column and our November 2005 editorial we applied this insight to low - level, or subatomic, physics, using De Broglie's interpretation of quantum mechanics.

This ultimately led to Heisenberg's formulation of the uncertainty principle, whereby the action of an electron or proton can be only approximately predicted; moreover, subatomic realities can not be known in themselves since any introduction of a gamma ray to study their position or speed affects their position and speed.

In Quantum Mechanics (QM), the physics of atomic and subatomic particles, predictions are formulated in terms of probabilities, yet Einstein felt that «God does not play dice with the universe», to which Neils Bohr apparently replied: «Stop telling God what to do with his dice!.&raquIn Quantum Mechanics (QM), the physics of atomic and subatomic particles, predictions are formulated in terms of probabilities, yet Einstein felt that «God does not play dice with the universe», to which Neils Bohr apparently replied: «Stop telling God what to do with his dice!.&raquin terms of probabilities, yet Einstein felt that «God does not play dice with the universe», to which Neils Bohr apparently replied: «Stop telling God what to do with his dice!.»

Birch and Cobb maintain that the ecological model is more adequate than the mechanical model for explaining DNA, the cell, other biological subject matter (as well as subatomic physics), because it holds that living things behave as they do only in interaction with other things which constitute their environment (LL 83) and because «the constituent elements of the structure at each level (of an organism) operate in patterns of interconnectedness which are not mechanical» (LL 83).

We have a pretty darn good mathematical model and theory that describes the behavior electrons in elemental atoms and other subatomic particles in nature.

In PR he identifies subatomic occasions with events which are only millionths of a second in duratioIn PR he identifies subatomic occasions with events which are only millionths of a second in duratioin duration.

If both human occasions of experience and subatomic events are best understood as syntheses of prehensions of other events, then their relation to one another is not as puzzling as has been supposed in the modern epoch.

The issue that was posed above was whether the exhaustive analysis of tables into subatomic entities yields tiny substances with attributes, or instead, events in relation.

It is common scientific knowledge now that not only life, but the stars, galaxies, planets on the macroscale and the subatomic layers at the micro level are all involved in transformations to which the word story seems more and more applicable.

Atomic and subatomic structures aren't in that category.

for a human occasion and 10 - 24 secs for subatomic occasions.1 Nor is any attempt made to allow for any possible «unevenness» in the genetic phases.

Given his panpsychism or «psychicalism,» Hartshorne holds that the ultimate units of reality are, in the broadest sense, feelings, or that feeling is a «cosmic variable» which can range from the most primitive, unconscious aesthetic reactions of subatomic particles to their environment to the most elaborate conscious experiences of God's.

Matter is no longer an ultimate concept; the hierarchy of macroscopic, molecular, atomic, subatomic levels trails away without hitting rock - bottom until matter dissolves into patterns of energy - concentration, and then perhaps into tensions in space.

However scientists did do an experiment where they put 2 metal plates so close together in a vacuum that larger subatomic particles could not get created.

Curiously, though the discoveries of subatomic physics signal to some a breakdown of modern dualism, the implications of such discoveries have been slow to penetrate most people's consciousness (including that of many scientists), and they may in fact merely lead to another sort of dualism.

The usual answer is that the structure which Whitehead imputes to his functional feeling is «micrological» in character, i.e., that feeling, as the function of actual entities, belongs to an impalpable subatomic realm lying at the basis of things.

In our world the football spectrum contains a lot of Navy and Orange, and the occasional Halas - like wavelength on a subatomic level, with the occasional Ditkaesque groove on an incandescent aura.

«The greatest city on earth, a great jiving funkapolitan melting - pot... And that's why we lead in all those creative and cultural sectors and that's why we have the best universities, because the best minds from across the world are meeting in some of the best pubs and bars and nightclubs like subatomic particles colliding in a cyclotron.»