He said the national policy moment that resulted
in teacher evaluation laws and regulations stems from both the financial crisis and Race to the Top, a federal competition for grant money in exchange for the pursuit of specific education reforms.
Didn't he cave in a couple of years ago after taking thousands of dollars from NYSUT and vote with a «heavy heart» for a budget that included changes
in the teacher evaluation law that quite severely tied teacher ratings to test scores?
The Commission will examine factors contributing to teacher recruitment and performance including: incentives to hire and retain high - quality teachers; improvements in the teacher evaluation system to ensure New York is implementing one of the strongest evaluation systems in the country; the use of teacher evaluations for decisions regarding promotion, hiring and termination as required
in the teacher evaluation law; and teacher preparation, certification and education programs to ensure that teachers are properly trained to best educate our students.
Not exact matches
NYSUT was opposed to the tax credit, but the labor union had its hands full on other key issues, including Gov. Andrew Cuomo's effort to once again overhaul
teacher evaluations, weaken
teacher tenure
laws and strengthen charter schools
in addition to the perennial push for more school aid.
Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie on Wednesday didn't close the door to yet another revision of the state's
teacher evaluation law, though nothing is
in the works to do so at this point.
New York's current
law — pushed by Cuomo
in April — allows districts to base up to about half of
teachers» annual
evaluations on «growth scores» generated by a complex numerical formula.
Cuomo's proposed education measure focuses more on
teacher evaluation and has little to do with eliminating the so - called last
in, first out state
law.
Interestingly enough, the governor pivoted from opposing any changes to his
teacher evaluation law to suggesting there may be tweaks
in store during the post-budget session
in order to accommodate Common Core implementation concerns.
The New York State United
Teachers union,
in particular, was deeply opposed to the new
evaluation law and has started a counteroffensive with another Cuomo proposal: the education investment tax credit.
In the Times story, Malatras tellingly dismisses the strategy of asking the Legislature to change the language of the
law when it comes to setting the percentage and makeup of test scores counting for
teacher evaluations.
Disagreements that have roiled the state's education community
in the wake of new
teacher evaluation laws approved by Governor Andrew Cuomo and the legislature as part of the budget were highlighted at a day long summit called by education officials.
Regents Chancellor Merryl Tisch said
in late April that she could administratively delay the implementation of the latest version of
teacher evaluations until September of 2016, if schools can demonstrate that it would be a hardship to meet the short time frame imposed
in the new
law.
It came after a cascade of dissent from parents and
teachers, steadily growing since tests aligned with the Common Core academic standards were introduced into classrooms
in the 2012 - 13 school year and since the state toughened its
evaluation laws, with an increasing amount of educators» job ratings linked to student performance on exams.
Recent changes to the
teacher evaluation law are a first step
in the right direction, but will have little impact unless we implement new and better ways to recruit, retain and reward our most talented educators.
The statewide
teachers union, NYSUT, whose political influence is strongest
in the Democratic - led Assembly, has railed against the new
evaluation law and how it is tied to
teacher tenure.
Gov. Andrew Cuomo
in a news conference this morning did not mention the women's agenda as potential measures he'd like to push
in the spring, but did note the Dream Act, public financing of political campaigns and changes to the
teacher evaluation law were items he wished were
in the budget.
Democratic lawmakers
in that chamber already have a number of issues they have to get done: rent control, monitoring the regulations for the new
teacher evaluation law and an extension of mayoral control for New York City schools and criminal justice reform, just to name a few.
At the Red Room press conference where Gov. Andrew Cuomo and Democratic legislative leaders — minus Skelos — had announced the med - mar deal, Klein said a vote would be held Thursday evening on the bill, along with bills that would create a 25 mph
in New York City and adjust the state's
teacher evaluation law.
The legislation includes changes to the state's
teacher evaluation law, which will rely on a mix of state testing and
in - classroom observation.
An overhaul of federal education
law moving through Congress — the biggest legislative change
in 14 years — holds the prospect of a major shift
in New York's contentious debate over the linkage of student test scores to
teachers» job
evaluations.
In a joint letter, education reform groups thanked Governor Cuomo, Senate Leaders Skelos and Klein, and Assembly Speaker Silver for the substantial improvements you made to New York State's
teacher evaluation law as part of this year's budget.
Passed
in 2010, the state's first
teacher evaluation law mandated that test scores contribute at least 20 percent of some
teachers» ratings.
There's nothing
in the
law to prevent parents from posting their
teacher's
evaluation results on the Internet, then pooling the information to «
teacher shop» for their children
in the next school year.
In a statement Tuesday, they pledged to recommend changes next week that would address parents» and
teachers» concerns while moving forward with implementation and adhering to the state
evaluation law.
Betty Rosa, the Regents chancellor and a former New York City school administrator, noted the current
evaluation law has created a situation under which
teachers in fields not covered by state tests, such as physical education, often find themselves rated on the basis of student achievement
in areas that are tested, such as English and math.
Board of Regents Chancellor Merryl Tisch thinks the current
teacher -
evaluation law doesn't work well
in small, rural districts and doesn't cover enough
teachers, among other complaints.
The heightened level of concern with events
in the capital comes amid shakeups
in state leadership, important legislation on the negotiating table with deadlines looming, and recently passed controversial state
teacher evaluation laws.
But the allies who helped him adopt the new curriculum, testing and
teacher evaluations law — members of the state Board of Regents and leaders
in the State Senate and Assembly — are now defecting as they confront a grassroots revolt.
The first case challenging New York's
law on
teacher evaluations has been heard
in the state Supreme Court.
StudentsFirstNY made a number of policy recommendations to address the findings of the report, including the implementation of a robust and comprehensive
teacher evaluation system
in accordance with State
law.
There was something for everyone on the menu: using Apple technology, developing research - based practices to teach students
in the early grades, engaging students through digital instruction, understanding the new
teacher evaluation system as set by state
law, preventing high - risk student behaviors and how Community Learning Schools meet the needs of students and their families.
The state Legislature set the January deadline for school districts to comply with a 2010 state
law requiring a new
evaluation system for all
teachers or forfeit their share of the state's 3 percent increase
in annual school aid.
«The
law is clear that the additional state funding is linked to a
teacher evaluation system, just like last year,» Alphonso David said
in a statement obtained by Capital New York.
The new
law expressly forbids the federal government from mandating the use of tests scores
in teacher evaluation and from mandating the use of Common Core standards.
The state's original
teacher -
evaluation law, adopted
in 2010, limited the weight of growth scores to 20 percent of
teachers» overall ratings.
Members, including chancellor Merryl Tisch, argued the new
evaluation system, which was largely prescribed
in law by Governor Andrew Cuomo and the state Legislature, would penalize
teachers who work
in the most challenging environments and with the neediest students and even prevent talented individuals from entering the field to begin with.
Whatever the parties negotiate or King decides, the
evaluation system will be based 20 percent on standardized test scores when applicable, 20 percent on other evidence of student learning and 60 percent on classroom observation and other measures of
teacher effectiveness,
in keeping with the 2010 state
law on
teacher evaluation.
President Obama on Dec. 10 signed into
law major legislation that dials back the federal role
in public education and bars the federal government from tying
teacher evaluations to test scores.
President Barack Obama on Dec. 10 signed into
law major education legislation that dials back the federal role
in public education and bars the federal government from tying
teacher evaluations to test scores.
The U.S. Senate on Dec. 9 voted 85 to 12 for an overhaul of federal education
law that dials back the federal role
in public education and bars the federal government from tying
teacher evaluations to test scores.
In addition to the marijuana bill, Mr. Cuomo and lawmakers had not been able to reach agreements on disclosure rules for
teacher evaluations and on a requirement that college and high school coaches report possible acts of sexual abuse to
law enforcement.
Scores from the Common Core tests play a larger role
in teacher evaluations under the new
law.
But perhaps most substantially, there is a growing awareness
in the world of education reform that the big battles over getting new teacher - evaluation laws passed or school accountability systems implemented are not the end of the story («The Teacher Evaluation Revamp, In Hindsight,» features, Spring 2017
in the world of education reform that the big battles over getting new
teacher - evaluation laws passed or school accountability systems implemented are not the end of the story («The Teacher Evaluation Revamp, In Hindsight,» features, Spring
teacher -
evaluation laws passed or school accountability systems implemented are not the end of the story («The Teacher Evaluation Revamp, In Hindsight,» features, Spr
evaluation laws passed or school accountability systems implemented are not the end of the story («The
Teacher Evaluation Revamp, In Hindsight,» features, Spring
Teacher Evaluation Revamp, In Hindsight,» features, Spr
Evaluation Revamp,
In Hindsight,» features, Spring 2017
In Hindsight,» features, Spring 2017).
While governed by state
laws,
teacher -
evaluation systems are generally designed and operated at the district level, and they vary widely
in their details and requirements.
That surprise reversal can be attributed to at least four factors: a wave of new research on
teacher quality, philanthropic interest
in boosting
teacher effectiveness, efforts by advocacy groups and policymakers to revamp state
laws on
evaluation, and political pressure to dismiss poorly performing
teachers.
Note: Some of these provisions aren't
in current
law — some were
in the stimulus bill (like Race to the Top), some are
in Secretary Duncan's conditional waivers (like
teacher evaluations), and some were
in one of the bills passed
in July (like Title I portability).
The
law allows veteran
teachers to meet the criteria
in part by using an alternative method created individually by each state, the High Objective Uniform State Standard of
Evaluation or HOUSSE provision.
Recent revisions to the most prominent federal
law dealing with school quality — the Elementary and Secondary Education Act — mark a sharp rollback of the federal role
in teacher evaluation and accountability.
Though the decision received wide coverage (per above) and throws New York school districts a curve (they are supposed to have an
evaluation policy
in place by September 1), it's not clear that the decision will have any major implications for other states that are considering linking
teacher evaluations to test scores (except as inducement to make sure their regulations correspond to their
laws).
«We do not see anything
in the
law about state mandates for
teacher evaluation,» he said.