Sentences with phrase «in teaching your pet»

is a training aid helpful in teaching pets to keep away from off - limits household items and to break bad urination habits.

So, be patient enough in teaching your pet to love whatever it is you want it to wear.

She assists families in teaching their pets basic manners and clear expectations, as well as alleviating entrenched problem behaviours.

Breed Profile: Espree is the industry leader in teaching pet parents how to groom their pet through our breed profile located on our website.

Not exact matches

«Peter is one of the two people... who has taught me the most about how to invest in startups,» Altman wrote, when Thiel came on board in 2015.

Now she's teaching dozens of participants not only the basics of dog grooming and the fundamentals of being an good employee, but also helping them sort out the other logistical and life challenges that stand in the way of a career in the pet beautification business..

A number of people that have written to respond to this article have spoken of the interpretation of the Bible, which is the number one problem in this present world as the Bible itself teaches us that no prophecy of scripture is of any private interpretation (2 Peter 1:20).

Catholics believe that this teaching authority is invested in the Magisterium, namely, the Bishop of Rome, who is the successor of Peter, and the bishops in communion with him.

In communion with the body of faithful Christians through the ages, we also affirm together that the entire teaching, worship, ministry, life, and mission of Christ's Church is to be held accountable to the final authority of Holy Scripture, which, for Evangelicals and Catholics alike, constitutes the word of God in written form (2 Timothy 3:15 - 17; 2 Peter 1:21In communion with the body of faithful Christians through the ages, we also affirm together that the entire teaching, worship, ministry, life, and mission of Christ's Church is to be held accountable to the final authority of Holy Scripture, which, for Evangelicals and Catholics alike, constitutes the word of God in written form (2 Timothy 3:15 - 17; 2 Peter 1:21in written form (2 Timothy 3:15 - 17; 2 Peter 1:21).

In the Biblical Manuscript P72, dating from 175 - 200AD, and containing the entire text of 1 Peter, 2 Peter, and Jude, in this, we find 2 Peter 1:1 — ``... our God and Savior, Jesus Christ...» proving that the deity of Jesus was NOT a construct of Emperor Constantine (Roman Emperor from 306 - 337) as was proclaimed by Dan Brown in his book «The DaVinci Code,» but rather, this was a central teaching of the disciples from day In the Biblical Manuscript P72, dating from 175 - 200AD, and containing the entire text of 1 Peter, 2 Peter, and Jude, in this, we find 2 Peter 1:1 — ``... our God and Savior, Jesus Christ...» proving that the deity of Jesus was NOT a construct of Emperor Constantine (Roman Emperor from 306 - 337) as was proclaimed by Dan Brown in his book «The DaVinci Code,» but rather, this was a central teaching of the disciples from day in this, we find 2 Peter 1:1 — ``... our God and Savior, Jesus Christ...» proving that the deity of Jesus was NOT a construct of Emperor Constantine (Roman Emperor from 306 - 337) as was proclaimed by Dan Brown in his book «The DaVinci Code,» but rather, this was a central teaching of the disciples from day in his book «The DaVinci Code,» but rather, this was a central teaching of the disciples from day 1.

Just yesterday in church, I taught a Sunday school lesson to children about the Apostle Peter from the New Testament.

But at the same time, I see Paul and John and Peter in their letters telling the churches to not listen to certain people because they teach incorrect doctrine, and even sometimes having them remove people from the fellowship.

Jesus Christ didn't write the Bible his disciples did and therefore I conclude that most people in the world are illiterate and will be saved by the preaching and teaching of the only one real church of catholicism founded in Rome, Italy by Peter the first bishop of Rome.

Peter, in fact, teaches clearly that it is possible to know the Lord and then return to unrighteousness and that person is worse off than if they had never become a Christian.

Paul and John and Peter reiterate this teaching in various places.

Rabbi Neuberger asserted that «it's really important that one accepts that... new scientific research has taught us... that the human embryo is not as unique as we thought before... We do have to think differently about the «unique quality of human embryos» in the way that Peter Saunders is saying... The miracle of creation... may have to be explained somewhat differently... Our human brains are given to us by God... to better the life of other human beings... and if this technology can do it..., and I don't believe that anybody is going to research beyond fourteen days, then so be it, lets do it.»

We therefore accept unequivocally all the defined teachings and Councils of the Church from Jerusalem to Vatican II and we profess our loyalty to the Magisterium in communion with the See of Peter.

Back in November 1977 the co-founder of Faith Movement wrote, as editor of this magazine, «There will be no traditional priesthood left in Europe in ten years time, among the younger clergy, unless a start is urgently made to teach priests the full faith, the full spiritual heritage of the Church, and the full content of the life of Christ in the traditional image of the priest of the Western Patriarchate, the priesthood of the Latin rite, which is the priesthood of the fullness of Peter and Paul.»

For example, the Spirit guided what Paul wrote in such a way that the apostle recorded and taught exactly what God desired (2 Tim 3: 16 - 17, 2 Peter 1:20 - 21).

They went to Capernaum, where Jesus taught in the synagogue and drove out an evil spirit, and afterwards went to the home of Simon and Andrew and healed Peter's mother - in - law who was ill in bed (Mark 1:14 - 31).

Peter's sermon in Acts 2:14 - 39 is not an example of early church «teaching» method.

Sending them out into the world with a covering of grace is what happens to us as His Royal Priesthood in His son, so this is consistent with NT teaching, as Peter points out in 1 Peter 2:9.

(3) Finally your suggestion that II Peter 2:13,18 & 19 teach that such false teachers may be allowed to eat meals with the believers and even teach in the church is a horrible twisting of scripture!

In Mark's gospel, immediately after Peter had confessed that Jesus was the Christ, Jesus «began to teach them [the disciples] that the Son of Man must suffer many things and be rejected by the elders, chief priests and teachers of the law and that he must be killed and after three days rise again» (Mark 8:31).

Since ascending the throne of Saint Peter, Pope Francis has shown more than any pope in my life time (I am 68 years old and a Roman Catholic) that he follows the teachings of Jesus Christ and he is the biggest breath of fresh air the Catholic Church has seen in centuries.

Still, twelve years later I found myself standing before the altar of St. Peter's Cathedral in Scranton, Pa., saying: «I believe everything that the Catholic Church believes, teaches, and proclaims to be revealed by God.»

It is no secret that our Savior, Paul, Peter, and scores of others in scripture taught about sin, and righteousness.

His own pet proof of «why there almost certainly is no God» (a proof in which he takes much evident pride) is one that a usually mild - spoken friend of mine (a friend who has devoted too much of his life to teaching undergraduates the basic rules of logic and the elementary language of philosophy) has described as «possibly the single most incompetent logical argument ever made for or against anything in the whole history of the human race.»

It is true that both the gospels and the speeches of Peter and Paul in Acts give important testimony as to what the apostles taught about the Christian life and proclaimed about the meaning of Jesus» own life, death, and resurrection; yet both the gospels and Acts were written, not by apostles, but by later disciples, and their evidence on particular points stands in need of confirmation, if possible, from the apostles themselves.

For he [Mark] had neither heard the Lord nor been his personal follower, but at a later stage, as I said, he had followed Peter, who used to adapt the teachings to the needs of the moment, but not as though he were drawing up a connected account of the oracles of the Lord: so that Mark committed no error in writing certain matters just as he remembered them.

The same lesson, with a different background, is taught in the last chapter of John, where Jesus is working with his chosen right - hand man, Simon Peter.

-- but later on followed Peter and became his interpreter; and Peter «used to adapt the teachings to the needs of the moment, but not as though he were drawing up a connected account of the oracles of the Lord,» so that Mark was perfectly justified in setting them down «just as he remembered them.»

We have no record of Peter's wife preaching, teaching, organizing a potluck, or running the first nursery in Jerusalem.

Those who heard Peter's preaching were baptised, and — again in the words of Scripture — «they continued steadfastly in the teaching of the apostles and in the communion of the breaking of bread and in prayers... praising God and being in favour with all the people» (Acts 2:41 - 47).

Like his Vicar on earth at Tor Vergata to more than two million people, in this gospel Jesus teaches the crowd from the barque of Peter.

Peter thought he had grasped the ethical core in Jesus» teachings, and probably expected Jesus to nod and give his approval to Peter's comment.

Speaking about the teaching and practice surrounding sexuality, Archbishop Peter said: «The Communique seems deliberately to step around the real problem and then offer blame to the people who are really in a sense the victims.

Now certainly, the concept of false teaching and unsound doctrine is found elsewhere in Scripture, and the term «false prophets» which is also found in 2 Peter 2:1 is also found in other passages, but the disparaging label of «false teacher» which is so frequently tossed about these days, is not a common term in Scripture.

So the thing about Peter does not in any way conflict with Catholic teaching or practice.

Where Peter is, the Church shall be As Christ once taught in Galilee Your saints join us to sing your praise From now until the end of days.

If a teaching or practice threatened the integrity of the gospel, it was strongly condemned, as in the case of Peter and the circumcision party described in Galatians 2.

im sorry but your misinformed the catholic church does not teach there the only ones going to heaven and i disagree the rock was peter Jesus was the builder thats why he changed peters name from simon to peter which im sure you know peter means rock, The one church is a; ready here its the catholic church any one baptizied in the trinatarium form becomes part of that church which is the body of christ.

Peter addresses this very dilemma in 2nd Peter 3:8, but many who call them selves «christian» ignore much of what Christ taught and don't understand HIs message.

Returning to teach at Minnesota, he divided his time between Gustavus Adolphus College in St. Peter and the University of Minnesota.

Peter taught others, and in other ways, as well.

And while Jesus did teach that following Him in discipleship would bring division to families (Matt 10:34), when one of His disciples actually brought a sword to defend Jesus, Jesus told Him to put it away, and then went on to heal the man whose ear Peter had cut (John 18:10 - 11).

That pre-eminence can be sensed in the words used by Pius XII on the occasion of the definition of the Assumption of Our Lady «By the authority of Our Lord Jesus Christ, by the authority of the blessed apostles Peter and Paul and by our own authority do pronounce, declare and define as a divinely revealed dogma...» It is an awesome power, linking the current successor of St. Peter to the Lord who taught as one having authority, and not as their scribes and Pharisees (Matt.

In other words, the true model for our Christian religion and teachings was not created by Peter and Paul, it was created by Constantine (and his scribes) who also declared himself the supreme Christian church leader.

For an example, some take Peter's instruction in Acts 2:38 as a prescription for the practice of water baptism ignoring other clear teaching that nothing we can do can save us and that baptism is simply an outward reflection of Christ's saving work in our lives.

The voice of Peter is now, as it ever has been, a real authority, infallible when it teaches, prosperous when it commands, ever taking the lead wisely and distinctly in its own province, adding certainty to what is probable, and persuasion to what is certain.