Sentences with phrase «in terms of the court order»

A scenario where the payment is made over an extensive period of time is usually unacceptable even if payment of the instalments are fully protected in terms of the court order.

Not exact matches

The Internet companies described their policies as straightforward: they ban certain types of content in accordance with their own terms of service, and require court orders to remove or block anything beyond that.

He obtained a restraining order at the end of February, shortly before Daniels filed her lawsuit in court, and has now filed papers in federal court accusing Daniels of violating the terms of the nondisclosure agreement.

We also disclose User Information if: we have your consent; we need to share it in order to provide you with the products and / or services you requested; we respond to a court order or you violate our Terms of Use.

The regional court in its ruling also ordered all parties in the matter to abide by the terms of the settlement.

Other examples would include Moos and McClure (where the Court of Appeal overturned the only successful kettling case to date) and the admittedly contentious decision in Abdul v DPP - the conviction under section five of the Public Order Act 1986 of those protesting in fairly vituperative terms («baby killers», «rapists», «murderers» etc) about the war in Iraq at a homecoming for British troops.

The Federal High Court had added that «but the court trying the charge may be entitled, in appropriate cases, to review the terms of the freezing order.&rCourt had added that «but the court trying the charge may be entitled, in appropriate cases, to review the terms of the freezing order.&rcourt trying the charge may be entitled, in appropriate cases, to review the terms of the freezing order.»

She also wants the court to order Skye Bank to pay her damages in the sum of N200m for what she termed a violation of her right to own personal property under Section 44 of the Constitution.

In order to replace retiring Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman and avoid a vacancy for the next court term, the governor would have to nominate a candidate, and the full Senate would have to return to Albany prior to the start of the 2016 session.

The National Eczema Association reserves the right at all times to disclose any information as necessary to satisfy any law, regulation, government request, court order, subpoena or other legal process, or to edit or remove any information, in whole or in part, that in the National Eczema Association's sole discretion is objectionable, disruptive to the Site or in violation of these Terms and Conditions.

In December 2010, CCSA obtained a court order against LAUSD, requiring LAUSD to offer facilities to every charter school in accordance with law and the terms of the April 2008 Settlement AgreemenIn December 2010, CCSA obtained a court order against LAUSD, requiring LAUSD to offer facilities to every charter school in accordance with law and the terms of the April 2008 Settlement Agreemenin accordance with law and the terms of the April 2008 Settlement Agreement.

In a long - awaited decision from Judge Denise Cote, the court approved the settlement terms from three of the five Big Six publishers who allegedly colluded with Apple to set the prices of ebooks artificially high in order to rein in some of Amazon's dominance over the markeIn a long - awaited decision from Judge Denise Cote, the court approved the settlement terms from three of the five Big Six publishers who allegedly colluded with Apple to set the prices of ebooks artificially high in order to rein in some of Amazon's dominance over the markein order to rein in some of Amazon's dominance over the markein some of Amazon's dominance over the market.

In this situation, we will need a copy of the court order or divorce decree, showing the child support amount and the terms of support.

Court Ordered - In this situation, we will need a copy of the court order or divorce decree, showing the child support amount and the terms of supCourt Ordered - In this situation, we will need a copy of the court order or divorce decree, showing the child support amount and the terms of supcourt order or divorce decree, showing the child support amount and the terms of support.

In layman's terms, just because the court orders one of the parties to pay a debt obligation, it doesn't release the other spouse from liability on the account if it was originally opened as a co-signed account or joint account.

First there should be exceptions to when the dog IS allowed to threaten or bite, which would be considered provocation... those would include: a.) Legitimate self defense; b.) Defense of territory; c.) Defense of pack — human family, other home pets, and such; d.) Establishment of a reasonable pack order within the home; e.) Mouthing (which is not the same as being aggressive); f.) While being trained during lessons, and in the midst of long term maintenance training, to teach a dog to contain it's drives and aggression; g.) For legitimate police work — if a police force obtains ownership and control of the dog, then the court order should be rescinded and the dog be given a fresh start; h.) Legitimate hunting purposes (such as duck hunting).

In papers filed yesterday, the consumers argue that the Andersons have continued to violate a court order and the terms of a settlement agreement the parties entered into more than three years ago, by selling puppies from substandard breeding facilities and violating disclosure requirements as to where the puppies they sell come from.

We may disclose your personal information with or without your knowledge or consent when we are permitted or required to do so by applicable law, government request or court order, or based on our good faith belief that it is necessary to do so in order to comply with such law, request or court order; to enforce or apply applicable terms and conditions and other agreements; or to protect the rights, property or safety of our organization, our supporters, other users, pets in the care of organizations that we work with, the public or others.

Notwithstanding the general terms of this policy, the collection, use, and disclosure of personal information may be made outside of the terms herein to the extent provided for in any applicable privacy or other legislation in effect from time to time, or pursuant to court orders.

Notwithstanding the general terms of this policy, the collection, use, storage, disclosure, and deletion of personal information may be made outside of the terms herein to the extent provided for in any applicable privacy or other legislation in effect from time to time, or pursuant to court orders.

Disclosure of Personal Information The Pace Gallery may disclose your personal information to unaffiliated third parties if we believe in good faith that such disclosure is necessary (a) to comply with the law or in response to a subpoena, court order, government request, or other legal process; (b) to protect the interests, rights, safety, or property of The Pace Gallery or others; (c) to enforce any terms of service on the Web Site; (d) to provide you with the service requested by you (including allowing a purchaser of a Pace Gallery division, or Pace Gallery as a whole, to continue to serve you), and to perform other activities related to such services; or (e) to operate The Pace Gallery's systems properly.

The exercise that the court conducts is not one of enforcing the agreement but of determining whether an order should be made in the same terms of the agreement.

In these circumstances the Court decided to refer the following questions for a preliminary ruling to the CJEU: 1) whether for the purposes of Art. 2 (2)(c), Member States can require the direct descendant who is older than 21 years to have tried, without success, to obtain employment in the country of origin in order to be regarded as «dependant» and fall within the scope of the provision; and 2) whether in interpreting the term «dependant» any significance should be attached to the fact that the family member is, due to the personal circumstances such as age, education and health, deemed to obtain employment in the host Member State, which would mean that the conditions of dependence will no longer be meIn these circumstances the Court decided to refer the following questions for a preliminary ruling to the CJEU: 1) whether for the purposes of Art. 2 (2)(c), Member States can require the direct descendant who is older than 21 years to have tried, without success, to obtain employment in the country of origin in order to be regarded as «dependant» and fall within the scope of the provision; and 2) whether in interpreting the term «dependant» any significance should be attached to the fact that the family member is, due to the personal circumstances such as age, education and health, deemed to obtain employment in the host Member State, which would mean that the conditions of dependence will no longer be mein the country of origin in order to be regarded as «dependant» and fall within the scope of the provision; and 2) whether in interpreting the term «dependant» any significance should be attached to the fact that the family member is, due to the personal circumstances such as age, education and health, deemed to obtain employment in the host Member State, which would mean that the conditions of dependence will no longer be mein order to be regarded as «dependant» and fall within the scope of the provision; and 2) whether in interpreting the term «dependant» any significance should be attached to the fact that the family member is, due to the personal circumstances such as age, education and health, deemed to obtain employment in the host Member State, which would mean that the conditions of dependence will no longer be mein interpreting the term «dependant» any significance should be attached to the fact that the family member is, due to the personal circumstances such as age, education and health, deemed to obtain employment in the host Member State, which would mean that the conditions of dependence will no longer be mein the host Member State, which would mean that the conditions of dependence will no longer be met.

At least the court revised the insurer's proposed terms to circumscribe the obligation in these terms: «The defence insurer shall be entitled to require the claimant to undergo medical examination at its request upon reasonable notice being given to the claimant at any time during the claimant's lifetime, such medical examinations to be limited to obtaining a medical opinion as to the claimant's general health in order to obtain a quotation for the purchase cost of an annuity to fund the periodical payments and / or (not more frequently than once every seven years) for the express purposes of reviewing its reserve.

Parker J held her to an order in the terms of the original agreement: «[58]... The duty of the court [is] to make its own independent assessment, and to consider the s 25 criteria and fairness, and a just result.

Such provisions must be formulated in terms that are clear, precise and stringent, both in order to enable people to understand the consequences of their actions under criminal law and also in order to prevent arbitrariness when applied by the courts.»

Finally, as the Court is not actually interpreting terms in a different manner for Member States, than it is doing for the internal EU legal order, but rather (dis) applying them due to the nature of the EU, I do not see how the «inequal treatment» plays into it.

Accused went to cottage of JC with whom she previously cohabited — Accused found JC with victim, another lady, in sauna — Angry words were exchanged between accused and JC — Victim testified that accused pushed her following verbal exchange, as a result victim lost balance and ended up against stove, thereby sustaining serious burns to body — Trial judge accepted victim's evidence that there was some kind of pushing — Accused convicted on one count of assault causing bodily harm, and sentenced to two - year term of probation and $ 1,000.00 fine, and accused was also ordered to provide DNA sample pursuant to s. 487.04 of Criminal Code — Accused appealed — Appeal against conviction dismissed — Although trial judge did not address analytical steps in order, he properly analyzed evidence and concluded that injuries sustained by victim were not accidental and could not have occurred in any other fashion than as stated by victim — Having provided reasons for accepting victim's evidence, trial judge was entitled to reject accused's evidence — Trial judge's reasoning, though skeletal, permitted accused and appellate court to determine how and why finding resulted.

The following factors are considered in determining recognition and enforceability of a Alaska injunction: (a) are the terms of the order clear and specific enough to ensure that the defendant will know what is expected; (b) is the order limited in its scope and did the originating court retain the power to issue further orders; (c) is the enforcement the least burdensome remedy for the Canadian justice system; (d) is the Canadian litigant exposed to unforeseen obligations; (e) are any third parties affected by the order; and (f) will the use of judicial resources be consistent with what would be allowed for domestic litigants.

The matter then came before the Supreme Court of Canada, which was asked to address an important legal question: in cases where the support terms of an agreement have been incorporated into a court order, what is the proper approach by a court to an application to Court of Canada, which was asked to address an important legal question: in cases where the support terms of an agreement have been incorporated into a court order, what is the proper approach by a court to an application to court order, what is the proper approach by a court to an application to court to an application to vary?

In such a situation many parents may not consider the repercussion of not addressing this issue in their separation agreement or court order and as a result may face problems obtaining a passport for their children if they are not on good terms with their spousIn such a situation many parents may not consider the repercussion of not addressing this issue in their separation agreement or court order and as a result may face problems obtaining a passport for their children if they are not on good terms with their spousin their separation agreement or court order and as a result may face problems obtaining a passport for their children if they are not on good terms with their spouse.

In 2003, the terms of this agreement were incorporated into a formal court order by a judge.

There were 11 allegations which included that he circumvented the terms of a British Columbia Supreme Court order and attempted to mislead the court; he breached his ethical obligations by receiving funds from an individual and disbursing them for the benefit of a client without advising the individual that his interests were not being protected; and he represented parties in a B.C. Supreme Court action despite a conflict of inteCourt order and attempted to mislead the court; he breached his ethical obligations by receiving funds from an individual and disbursing them for the benefit of a client without advising the individual that his interests were not being protected; and he represented parties in a B.C. Supreme Court action despite a conflict of intecourt; he breached his ethical obligations by receiving funds from an individual and disbursing them for the benefit of a client without advising the individual that his interests were not being protected; and he represented parties in a B.C. Supreme Court action despite a conflict of inteCourt action despite a conflict of interest.

In addition to a fine or even as a stand - alone order, the court can order a publicity order requiring the defendant company to advertise its conviction for corporate manslaughter, to include details of the offence, the level of fine and the terms of any remedial order made.

In a minority of U.S. states it isn't automatically unlawful to evict someone for non-payment of rent or the termination of a lease term without a court order, if it can be accomplished without a breach of the peace.

In some circumstances the term «protective order» refers to agreements on issues as between the parties while «confidentiality order» refer to orders relating to the filing and handling of materials by the court.

It was also a term of the agreement that the periodical payment order would be funded in accordance with the Damages Act 1996 (DA 1996), ss 2 (4) or 2 (5) and that the method by which the payments were to be funded — so that they were «reasonably secure» — was to be determined and the court's approval obtained.

You hereby grant Box and its contractors the right to transmit, use and disclose Content posted on the Service solely to the extent necessary to provide the Service, as otherwise permitted by these Terms, or to comply with any request of a governmental or regulatory body (including subpoenas or court orders), as otherwise required by law, or to respond to an emergency which Box believes in good faith requires Box to disclose information to assist in preventing the death or serious bodily injury of any person.

Further if the carrying out of this order has been in breach of the terms of this order or otherwise in a manner inconsistent with the Applicant's solicitors» duties as officers of the court, the Applicant will comply with any order for damages the Court may make.&rcourt, the Applicant will comply with any order for damages the Court may make.&rCourt may make.»

The following factors are considered in determining recognition and enforceability of a Georgia injunction: (a) are the terms of the order clear and specific enough to ensure that the defendant will know what is expected; (b) is the order limited in its scope and did the originating court retain the power to issue further orders; (c) is the enforcement the least burdensome remedy for the Canadian justice system; (d) is the Canadian litigant exposed to unforeseen obligations; (e) are any third parties affected by the order; and (f) will the use of judicial resources be consistent with what would be allowed for domestic litigants.

In fact, the introduction of computers to all members of the Court did have a profound impact on the administration of the Court — particularly in terms of expanding the Court's ability to collect and maintain its own statistics in order to establish its workload and administer it accordinglIn fact, the introduction of computers to all members of the Court did have a profound impact on the administration of the Court — particularly in terms of expanding the Court's ability to collect and maintain its own statistics in order to establish its workload and administer it accordinglin terms of expanding the Court's ability to collect and maintain its own statistics in order to establish its workload and administer it accordinglin order to establish its workload and administer it accordingly.

Counsel for the husband argued that the court should not ««shirk» or abdicate» from its duty to review the lump sum obligation «in favour of the family courts», the consent order having been «highly unusual in its terms» (the lump sum order was said, in effect, to be a maintenance order).

It may be possible to change a temporary Court Order if there has been what is referred to as a material change in circumstances such that the terms of the temporary Court Order may no longer be appropriate.

Courts will not casually order an annulment, as they are reserved for cases where there is a clear capacity issue at the time of marriage in terms of age, voluntariness, or knowledge and understanding.

They know what to reasonably expect in terms of compensation, what evidence a court will expect in order to prove your case and can prevent you from making medical, personal or legal mistakes that could drastically affect the outcome of your case.

We'll provide a brief refresher on the meaning of the term (information you will also find in the Child Custody and Access section of our Help Centre), followed by some more detailed information on when a court may, or may not, order joint custody.

Though Keehan J does not use the term «sanctions» he could have meant this, in the sense that FPR 2010 r 4.6 and CPR 1998, r 3.9 mean it: that is to say, where parties fail successively and without reference back to the court (by FPR 2010, Pt 18 application for extension of time) to comply with court orders.

«The rules could have provided that on appeal the normal rules as to costs should prevail, but part 27.14 (2) applies in terms to costs relating to an appeal; an appellate court should therefore be wary of ordering costs on appeal to be paid if they were not ordered below, unless circumstances on appeal are truly different.»

That end - of - term order gave Nacchio reason to hope that the court would hear his case when it reconvened in the fall.

Some states require that you file your Marriage Separation Agreement with the court seeking legal approval of its terms in order for the Agreement to be enforceable.