From the limitation of offering assisted suicide to terminally - ill patients whose prognosis is only six months of life, to the so - called «safeguard» of having two doctors check the patient has a «clear, settled, and voluntary» wish to die (and, er, as we all know, a two doctor requirement was such a powerful safeguard
in the Abortion Act!)
Not exact matches
I don't believe either side of people involved
in these situations realize that even the woman goes through major trauma after doing this... So please don't
act like oh I'm pro-choice «hehe
abortion is some easy thing» when you haven't done it.
You don't think the «elephant
in the room» of OUR time is the fact that we awkwardly pretend affirmative action isn't racist;
abortion isn't murder; people compare the gay marriage debate to 300 + years of black slavery, oppression, and / or murder; and the major political parties
act like Ron Paul doesn't exist?
The lawyers may have as much of an aversion as I've had to Donald Trump, but they are the ones who are sent into court to resist the mandates of Obamacare and to defend the Little Sisters of the Poor, the owners of Hobby Lobby, or the doctors and nurses who are invoking their rights under Hyde - Weldon
Act not to be forced to participate
in abortions.
Consider the Partial - Birth
Abortion Ban
Act of 2003 and the Unborn Victims of Violence
Act of 2004 — the first two pieces of federal pro-life legislation to pass
in years.
We can think of
abortion acting as a type of insurance policy for teenage sexual activity
in the same way that a car insurance policy covers theft etc..
The
Abortion Act has a clear provision to respect the conscience of staff: «No person shall be under any duty, whether by contract or by any statutory or other legal requirement, to participate
in any treatment authorised by this
Act to which he has a conscientious objection.»
While President Bush endorsed the 2005 Partial Birth
Abortion Ban
Act, which I supported, he also championed a pre-emptive war
in Iraq that costs hundreds of thousands of lives.
In a report on the issue, it said: «While «prayer» is outlined within the prohibited activities, it is critical to note that only prayer in relation to protesting in an act of approval or disapproval in 34 respect of abortion services is included within this prohibitio
In a report on the issue, it said: «While «prayer» is outlined within the prohibited activities, it is critical to note that only prayer
in relation to protesting in an act of approval or disapproval in 34 respect of abortion services is included within this prohibitio
in relation to protesting
in an act of approval or disapproval in 34 respect of abortion services is included within this prohibitio
in an
act of approval or disapproval
in 34 respect of abortion services is included within this prohibitio
in 34 respect of
abortion services is included within this prohibition.
We think the reason no one
acted is because the women
in question were poor and of color, because the victims were infants without identities, and because the subject was the political football of
abortion.»
A federal judge denied Hobby Lobby's request for an injunction against the Affordable Care
Act's (ACA) contraceptive mandate on Monday, ruling that the arts - and - crafts giant must cover emergency contraceptives
in its insurance policies even though it believes the pills cause
abortions.
Leaving aside the issue of whether or not EBC may
act in an abortifacient way
in some cases, every single such study has found that schemes promoting EBC simply do not reduce observed rates of unwanted pregnancies or
abortions.
Yes, we need to, as Christians, LIVE God's way, but we also need to be light and salt and not just stick our head
in the sand and
act like... or give the impression that... homosexual marriage, genocide, and
abortion are ok, by our lack of speaking out because we're too busy living our own little holy lives.
There is only one way it could not be, and that is if you decide that it teaches that nihilism is the truth, revealed here by the pointless failure of Davis's career, so that his having to obtain
abortions for women he impregnated is just another absurd, annoying, and energy - sapping aspect of that, his irrational guilt instincts causing him to have to scrounge for money, and so that his learning that one of these
abortions didn't occur is just another sort of misfortune, saddling him with sentiments that he will have no way to really
act upon (it is unlikely the that the mother of the child wants to see him), and probably causing him to draw some kind of superstitious karmic connection between a random coincidence of having hit a cat that looks just like one he abandoned, and his driving by the town his child may be living
in.
Arkes remains a convinced incrementalist
in abortion politics: he recounts the battle over partial - birth
abortion (still ongoing) as a «modest first step» away from the jurisprudence of Roe;
in a similar vein he has hopes that the Born - Alive
Act (now signed into law) might help to revive reasoned public discourse about the true character of
abortion.
They will be on the spot, especially if the Bush Administration proves to be creative and determined
in pressing the legal implications of the
Act when it comes to hospitals that allow the killing by exposure (or more direct means) of children who survive
abortion procedures.
«
In those times, we knew about things that have become common today: the reality of
abortion, of people who manifest homosexual tendencies, whose personal dignity we always respected, but we were formed to see these
acts as absolutely unacceptable, against the nature that God had created for us.»
Whereas BAIPA protects the right to life of the child who survives an
abortion, the Pennsylvania
act protects the child who could survive an
abortion, making it criminal
in most cases to abort the child and, where an
abortion is permissible within narrow limits, requiring doctors to treat the child as a second patient who should be brought into the world alive and unharmed if possible.
The Pennsylvania
Abortion Control Act provides that unless a physician can establish that he «reasonably believes» an unborn child is younger than 24 weeks, or, if the child is older, he can establish that continuing the pregnancy will result in either the death of the mother or «the substantial and irreversible impairment of a major bodily function,» the physician can not perform a late - term a
Abortion Control
Act provides that unless a physician can establish that he «reasonably believes» an unborn child is younger than 24 weeks, or, if the child is older, he can establish that continuing the pregnancy will result
in either the death of the mother or «the substantial and irreversible impairment of a major bodily function,» the physician can not perform a late - term
abortionabortion.
Campaign Life 2017 is designed to gather together and mobilise people
in the cause of life, so that, by the time the 50th anniversary of the passing of the
Abortion Act comes along on 27 October 2017, the pro-life movement
in Scotland will have a more powerful voice than ever.
During the three - day hearing, the NIHRC will argue that
abortion laws in Northern Ireland - which hasn't adopted the 1967 Abortion Act - infringe on women's right enshrined in the European Convention of Human Righ
abortion laws
in Northern Ireland - which hasn't adopted the 1967
Abortion Act - infringe on women's right enshrined in the European Convention of Human Righ
Abortion Act - infringe on women's right enshrined
in the European Convention of Human Right (ECHR)
The intention
in abortion and contraception is always either to kill or to prevent a child from coming into being by frustrating the natural sexual
act.
Sister Andrea: Campaign Life 2017 is designed to gather together and mobilise people
in the cause of life, so that, by the time the 50th anniversary of the passing of the
Abortion Act comes along on 27 October 2017, the pro-life movement
in Scotland will have a more powerful voice than ever.
And yet these sporadic chinks of light are couched
in the context of heavy and unhelpful language
in which
abortion is variously referred to as an «abomination» (p87), «this moral leprosy», «this savage beast» (p175) or «a violent and soul - destroying
act» (p218), to name but a few.
Third, I will treat
in detail the Hartshornian stance regarding
abortion, a stance with which I agree, both to illustrate the aforementioned connection between moderation
in metaphysics and moderation
in ethics as well as to combat the charge that virtue ethics, because it focuses more on the character of agents than on their
acts, is incapable of treating the really difficult issues
in applied ethics.
Miss Hubert launched a private prosecution against two doctors who had verbally agreed to perform «gender -
abortions»
in breach of the
Abortion Act 1967.
Twenty - five years ago, on January 22, 1973, the Supreme Court of the United States,
in what numerous constitutional scholars have called an
act of raw judicial power, abolished the
abortion laws of all fifty states.
Two leading pro-life groups say the recent US Supreme Court ruling
in favor of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care
Act (PPACA) means that taxpayer dollars will continue to pay for
abortions.
«This decision again demonstrates the need for enactment of the No Taxpayer Funding for
Abortion Act, which would permanently prevent taxpayer subsidies for abortion - covering health plans, both in ObamaCare and in other federal health benefits programs
Abortion Act, which would permanently prevent taxpayer subsidies for
abortion - covering health plans, both in ObamaCare and in other federal health benefits programs
abortion - covering health plans, both
in ObamaCare and
in other federal health benefits programs.»
The ad targeted Dreihaus's vote
in favor of the Affordable Care
Act (ACA); SBAL equates support for the act with support for taxpayer - funded abortio
Act (ACA); SBAL equates support for the
act with support for taxpayer - funded abortio
act with support for taxpayer - funded
abortions.
For every terrorist who claims to
act in the name of Islam, there are hundreds of Muslim people living average, peaceful lives, just as for every extremist who claims to
act in the name of Christianity while bombing
abortion clinics, beating gay men or otherwise engaging
in criminal activity, there are hundreds of Christian people living average, peaceful lives.
Hence the spilling of semen for any nonprocreative purpose —
in coitus interruptus (Gen. 38:1 - 11), male homosexual
acts or male masturbation — was considered tantamount to
abortion or murder.
The 1967
Abortion Act was only supposed to allow for a termination of pregnancy under such exceptional circumstances as those that would result
in «grave permanent injury to the physical or mental health of the pregnant woman.»
Code § 13A -6-1 (2006) defines «person,» for the purpose of criminal homicide or assaults, to include an unborn child
in utero at any stage of development, regardless of viability and specifies that nothing
in the
act shall make it a crime to perform or obtain an
abortion that is otherwise legal.
And even more fundamentally, if we are bearers of inviolable dignity and a basic right to life
in virtue of our humanity, and not
in virtue of accidental qualities such as age, or size, or stage of development or condition of dependency --- if,
in other words, we believe
in the fundamental equality of human beings --- how can a right to
abortion (where «
abortion» means performing an
act whose purpose is to cause fetal death) be defended at all?
In its lead editorial, «A Threat to Abortion Rights,» the New York Times fulminated that Clinton «must act swiftly to reel in those officials who would lure him into a disastrous political betrayal.&raqu
In its lead editorial, «A Threat to
Abortion Rights,» the New York Times fulminated that Clinton «must
act swiftly to reel
in those officials who would lure him into a disastrous political betrayal.&raqu
in those officials who would lure him into a disastrous political betrayal.»
As I flew back from Dublin to Edinburgh I read the Sunday edition of the Irish Independent the headline of which was «POLL:
Act Now on
Abortion say voters» with the story continuing: «The most seismic shift [in the Irish public's attitude to abortion] is that a clear majority (56 %) now favour a new referendum to repeal the current position, which gives equal right to life to the mother and foetus
Abortion say voters» with the story continuing: «The most seismic shift [
in the Irish public's attitude to
abortion] is that a clear majority (56 %) now favour a new referendum to repeal the current position, which gives equal right to life to the mother and foetus
abortion] is that a clear majority (56 %) now favour a new referendum to repeal the current position, which gives equal right to life to the mother and foetus.»
Sirico describes as the «notable exception of
abortion» should give him some sense that the bishops are engaged as bishops
in genuinely offering pastoral advice based upon the Church's magisterium, rather than
acting as Democratic pundits with miters.
Although I'm not quite sure what Mr. Gardner means by actions being «motivated
in part by the immediate circumstances,» I can assure him that so long as he holds that there are
acts, such as direct
abortion and terror bombing, that are wrong
in any circumstances, he stands with us against proportionalism.
Others, including Philadelphia's Archbishop Charles Chaput, have already noted that
in the 1980s,
abortion advocates attempted to silence various pro-life groups using RICO, the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations
Act.
Louise: a woman
in her late 40s who thought her childbearing years were over but got pregnant, and
in light of extreme medical complications had an
abortion, an
act for which she later gave thanks to God.
The preacher's absolute sureness might push her to question her doubts and to
act in a way that later causes anguish if her doubts return, especially following an
abortion.
«Catholic politicians should build new coalitions
in support of protecting innocent human life: Coalitions, first and foremost, with American women» the majority of whom are pro-life» who understand that Roe's
abortion license has encouraged irresponsible male sexual behavior more than any other legal
act in our history.
In answer to the question of why the Reproductive Parity
Act was needed, proponents said they were concerned that implementation of the Affordable Care
Act might cause insurance carriers to stop covering
abortions and new carriers might enter the market with more restrictive coverage.
The House voted 237 - 189
in favor of the Pain - Capable Unborn Child Protection
Act, which targets late - term
abortions at the point where pro-life advocates argue that babies can feel pain
in utero.
He voted against partial - birth
abortion, and
in support of the Child Custody Protection
Act.
«Research has shown that life - affirming laws do have an impact on lowering the number of
abortions, and with all the life - affirming laws passed since 2010, we have a reason to celebrate the number of lives saved and women protected as legislators worked to defend them from a predatory and rarely accountable
abortion industry,» AUL
Acting President Clark Forsythe said
in a written statement.
Acting the day after the 44th anniversary of the US Supreme Court's legalization of
abortion, Trump signed an order restoring what is known as the Mexico City Policy, which President Barack Obama had rescinded three days after he was inaugurated
in 2009.
She commends cultures
in which «
abortion is viewed as one way of completing the sacred cycle that begins with sexuality,» condemning the squeamish «white Western culture»
in which we «don't want to accept responsibility for our destructive
acts or our negative side, so we deny their existence.»
In his article, Instone - Brewer ridiculously caricatures the Catholic theological answer to this question, erroneously describing it as having to do with the
act of sex itself, and even as making a moral equivalence between
abortion and artificial contraception.