Sentences with phrase «in the new testament letters»

And when the Southern Baptists issued a statement in 1998 affirming the father's headship of the family as defined in the New Testament letters of Paul of Tarsus, we heard journalists Cokie Roberts and Steve Roberts warning the nation that this sort of thing could «lead to abuse, both physical and emotional.»

Yet out of this conviction of the «apartness» of the Christian community came a parochialism which in the New Testament letters and the book of Revelation contrasts sharply with the universalism of the vista of Jesus, and which has pursued the Church to the present day.

I notice the «one another» and «each other» commands in the New Testament letters written to congregations, and I realize that a person can not obey them without being in a congregation of saints — whatever the form.

Not exact matches

We encounter it in the Gospels and in other places in the New Testament, especially in the words of Saint Paul in the First Letter to the Corinthians and in Romans.

The list of 27 books of the New Testament were not even proposed until 367 AD in Athanasius's Easter letter.

Since this is so, how is it that the idea of the church being a Body became so prominent if it is not found throughout the New Testament, but only rarely in Paul's letters?

For example, he still believed in the Virgin Birth, but when his New Testament professor pointed out that the genealogies in both Matthew and Luke seemed to assume that Jesus» descent was through Joseph and that the doctrine of Mary's virginity played no role in Paul's letters, he found it harder to suppose that this belief was essential to Christianity.

This is the vision that informs the whole of the New Testament, most clearly perhaps in the first chapter of the letter to the Ephesians.

In comparison to the New Testament where Paul's letters were written starting 15 years after Jesus» ascension, the first gospel, Mark written 25 years after (Peter was the source of Mark), Matthew who was an eye witness at 35 years, and Luke 35 years as a careful Roman / Greek trained historian who interviewed living eye witnesses such as Mary, mother of Jesus.

In the words of Henri de Lubac, the distinguished theologian and historian of early Christian exegesis: «The conversion of the Old Testament to the New or of the letter of scripture to its spirit can only be explained and justified, in its radicality, by the all - powerful and unprecedented intervention of Him who is himself at once the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last..In the words of Henri de Lubac, the distinguished theologian and historian of early Christian exegesis: «The conversion of the Old Testament to the New or of the letter of scripture to its spirit can only be explained and justified, in its radicality, by the all - powerful and unprecedented intervention of Him who is himself at once the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last..in its radicality, by the all - powerful and unprecedented intervention of Him who is himself at once the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last....

Lin memorized a few Bible verses, Chen says, including a passage from Paul's letter to the Romans in the New Testament that reads in part: «We also glory in our sufferings, because we know that suffering produces perseverance; perseverance, character; and character, hope.»

The earliest of the New Testament writings also refer to it; in his letters, Paul wrote with passion and complete confidence about the approaching time when

(13) This is not the only clue and center even in the letters of Paul, not to speak of the New Testament at large, but it is a crucial dimension of it and gives the theologian a marvelous framework for displaying and exhibiting the message of the Bible in relation to the needs of people today.

On the other hand, all six occurrences of the word «justification» in the New Testament are in letters unanimously ascribed to Paul.

Paulâ $ ™ s most common self - description throughout his letters is: â $ œI am a slave who is sent by Jesus to non-Jews to communicate the good news that the Kingdom of God has come in Jesus.â $ English readers of the Bible find it easy to overlook this important aspect of Paulâ $ ™ s self - understanding, since the 190 different Greek terms used for slavery in the New Testament are sanitized to â $ œservant.â $ This is not a very appropriate translation, since in Paulâ $ ™ s day 1 / 3rd of the population of the Roman empire were masters who owned slaves, 1 / 3rd of the people were slaves, and 1 / 3rd were former slaves.

However, against Fung's assertion that no examples of apologetic letters exist (quoting Meeks and Russel, p. 30), see Klaus Berger, «Hellenistische Gattungen im Neuen Testament», in Aufstieg und Niedergang der rdmischen Welt (Berlin / New York: de Gruyter, 1984), 2.25, pp. 1272 - 74.

Ronald Y.K. Fung, in his The Epistle to the Galatians (New International Commentary on the New Testament; Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1988), pp. 28 - 32, surveys the reviews that are critical of Betz's approach and concludes that «apologia is not the most appropriate category to apply to the letter as a whole».

In the early days of the church, there were more letters and documents than just the 27 in our New TestamenIn the early days of the church, there were more letters and documents than just the 27 in our New Testamenin our New Testament.

These letters, like all of the New Testament, were written in the Greek vernacular used throughout that part of the world.

Perhaps some notes of Paul's were incorporated, somewhat as the Gospel writers drew on earlier sources, but it is practically certain that these letters in their finished form stand at or near the end of the New Testament writings.

And yet... I find his letters to be some of the most boring in the New Testament.

No one in his right senses denies the authenticity of most of the letters, or epistles, included in the New Testament, and several of these are considerably earlier documents than the gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John.

In the New Testament interpretation of Jesus» suffering, this theme is perhaps most sharply expressed in the letter to the ColossianIn the New Testament interpretation of Jesus» suffering, this theme is perhaps most sharply expressed in the letter to the Colossianin the letter to the Colossians.

Paul, in his letter to the Corinthians in the Christian New Testament, says that we now see through a glass darkly.

No one could honestly read the letters of the New Testament without becoming aware that not only the writers themselves but scores of other people were looking at life and death in a way in which they had never been looked at before, and were experiencing a contact with the living God unprecedented in human history.

But then you make an extended argument for the opposite position, ending with this clincher: «If you are going to be Red - Letter Christians, it is important for you to recognize that there is no record in the New Testament of Jesus saying anything about homosexuality.»

It is an introduction to some of the contextual issues and interpretive principles that are necessary for reading, understanding, and teaching the letters of Paul in the New Testament.

There is nothing new about the letter form, and in the days of the New Testament letters were sometimes unsigned or written in another's nanew about the letter form, and in the days of the New Testament letters were sometimes unsigned or written in another's naNew Testament letters were sometimes unsigned or written in another's name.

The combination of law and fulfillment, as well as the combination of law and love, is mentioned repeatedly in the New Testament, particularly in the letters to the Romans and the Galatians.

In the New Testament, churches were sending out missionaries, bringing in new speakers, trading letters with each otheIn the New Testament, churches were sending out missionaries, bringing in new speakers, trading letters with each othNew Testament, churches were sending out missionaries, bringing in new speakers, trading letters with each othein new speakers, trading letters with each othnew speakers, trading letters with each other.

Anyway, despite all the confusion about pre-millenialism, a-millenialism, post-millenialism, the recent invention of the rapture, Paul's confusing statement about «we who remain», the entire book of Revelation not appearing to be written by John because of the Greek used, and the odd way in which eschatological views seem to change in the New Testament Pauline letters, and the bizarrely easy way people like Thessalonians became convinced Christ had already returned in their time, and all the other confusing things about New Testament prophecy — the truth is that it is all trustworthy and you should not question this.

The earliest New Testament books are the letters of Paul, and he gives no indication that he had ever met Jesus in the flesh, and he shows little interest in the earthly life of Jesus.

Hebrew lettering is used throughout, both to name Old Testament books and to reflect the smattering of Aramaic in the New Testament.

What was the course of events which gave rise to the Christian faith in the period of approximately twenty years between the death of Jesus and the writing of the earliest New Testament documents, the letters of Paul?

In Paul's letters and the other New Testament letters, Jesus Christ (Jesus Messiah) and Christ Jesus (Messiah Jesus) became the ordinary way of speaking, so much so that many modern readers have thought of these expressions as Jesus» common name.

Abbot Chapman was a patristics and New Testament expert as well as student of mystical theology, and his Spiritual Letters is a collection of correspondence that Abbot Chapman wrote in response to inquiries he received from both lay people and religious concerning largely, though not exclusively, difficulties in prayer (we only get his responses, not the letters he is responding to).

There is no doubt that Titus has a somewhat different concept of Christianity from that found elsewhere in the New Testament, and even from certain of the unquestioned letters of Paul.

There are few examples of Paul actually praying in the New Testament, but there are several places in Paul's letters where he writes about his prayer requests and how he prays (See Rom 15:5 - 6, 13; Eph 1:16 - 19; 3:16 - 19; Php 1:9 - 11; Col 1:9 - 12; 2 Thess 1:11 - 12).

Some scholars are convinced that Priscilla wrote the mysterious, anonymous letter to the Hebrews found in the New Testament.

Although we know Paul primarily from his letters in the New Testament, he was not called to be a letter writer but rather a preacher of the Gospel, especially to the Gentiles.

Before the New Testament was put together, from the oral traditions about Jesus and the letters and other material known in the primitive Christian community, appeal was made to the Old Testament, that is the Jewish Scriptures, for predictions of and a way for interpreting the significance of Jesus.

Some years before Revelation was written, Paul was sending letters to churches in Asia Minor and Greece to build up the Christ - rooted societies with an egalitarian credo, recognizing believers whether they were Greek or Jew, male or female, slave or free, These assemblies stood «in contrast to the hierarchical social relations» in the empire, Horsley wrote in Paul and Empire, a book deemed significant by Wright, a New Testament scholar and the Anglican bishop of Durham.

This view of the letters of Paul, combined with the use in Second Peter of other New Testament books, proves it to be the latest book in the New Testament.

Further, in one of those New Testament red - letter passages, referring to «the commandment of God,» Jesus rebukes the Pharisees for failing to apply the death penalty.

Happily, this debate has appreciably subsided, although in certain quarters there are still those ready to tilt to the death on behalf of what is, alas, an idol — a deified book representing the reduction of Israel's Yahweh (and in the New Testament Christ's God and Father) to a particular combination of ink letters preserved on lifeless sheets of paper bound together between a pair of cardboard or leather covers and known as the Bible.

By the way, the only other book in the New Testament that talks about the sealing of the Holy Spirit is Paul's second letter to the Corinthians.

The major New Testament references are found in two Pauline letters and in 1 Timothy.

Kasemann pointed out that time and again the Gospels narrate the healing of possessed persons, which then continues in the Acts of the Apostles; the New Testament letters, especially the «Revelation of John», celebrate the triumph of the Risen Christ as redemption from captivity to the powers and authorities, meaning by this, all who torment and seduce the world and individual human beings, and alienate them from their humanity, are thrown out of their power.

In the New Testament you can find quite a few warnings against such lack of integrity, so itâ $ ™ s not as if the writers of the letters that ended up in the Bible had no ideIn the New Testament you can find quite a few warnings against such lack of integrity, so itâ $ ™ s not as if the writers of the letters that ended up in the Bible had no idein the Bible had no idea.

The Koran, by way of contrast, is the product of one single mind; not so the New Testament, which has all the variety of the Old, and is a «social» product, a «traditional» book — that is, a book enshrining traditions, letters, anecdotes, revelations, sayings, stories — and its unity is found only in its central affirmations, convictions, loyalties, and the general way of life which it reflects.