As I mentioned
in the first paragraph though it is only # 5 (less in this launch period for PS + members) which I think is a fair price for a fun if over too soon experience.
Not exact matches
And you really favored this explanation over you making a mistake the
first time around even
though you've proven
in this
paragraph alone that you are highly prone to error as is after having left our a crucial part of an experiment?
Even
though it's
in the title and the
first paragraph, this post really isn't about hell.
I have a following now as a freelance writer,
though it doesn't have nearly the numbers listed
in the
first paragraph of your article.
For
paragraph formats, the plug -
in supports most of what we need: Bold, Italic, Bold Italic, Left indent,
First line indent, Right indent, Space before (above), Space after (below), the four alignments [left, right, center, and justify left], the page break character, and white space characters (
though they only mention non-breaking spaces).
Funny thing
though, he would actually take what you said
in your
first two
paragraphs as an attack on him... might even claim you're obsessed simply because you acknowledged his existence (he feels threatened by people smarter than him), and follow it up with goofy assertions about your character... be ready for it!
Your disclaimer
in the
first paragraph is very clear, so the context of calling this 100x increase «worst case» should be clear,
though perhaps it would be better if you changed the wording given that it's causing some confusion.
(See above
paragraph, combine with economic alarmism, a great sense of solidarity, an easy issue — complex and futuristic — to do it on, and a huge tea party and right wing conservative movement predicated on the idea that markets «solve» everything even
though by definition they can't solve externalities — hence along with justice and national defense why we even need just limited government
in the
first place, and an implicit inherent belief
in the right to pollute (here it's really better characterized as just radical alteration against our interests, not pollution), since common area is «fair game,» and there we go.)
Journalists are taught to tell the story
in the
first paragraph; here,
though, you have to scroll down to the last
paragraph to learn what was going on:
Auris announced its newest round of funding
in an easy - to - miss
paragraph on its website, and it's been similarly low key about its work to date,
though it says that lung cancer is the «
first disease»
in its sights.
I also made a point of linking to the patent itself right
in the
first paragraph of the story, so people could see — and decide — for themselves (
though not everyone appears to agree...)