This doesn't address longer causal connections, but if the net impact of temperature on CO2 can be shown to be neutral or
in the negative direction over then long term, than cointegration probably means that CO2 is causing global warming.
Not exact matches
Once the ice reaches the equator, the equilibrium climate is significantly colder than what would initiate melting at the equator, but if CO2 from geologic emissions build up (they would, but very slowly — geochemical processes provide a
negative feedback by changing atmospheric CO2
in response to climate changes, but this is generally very slow, and thus can not prevent faster changes from faster external forcings) enough, it can initiate melting — what happens then is a runaway
in the opposite
direction (until the ice is completely gone — the extreme warmth and CO2 amount at that point, combined with left -
over glacial debris available for chemical weathering, will draw CO2 out of the atmosphere, possibly allowing some ice to return).
SM, One of the things which puzzles me here is that if Mennian slicing is introducing a bias
in step removal associated with
direction of trend, then we would expect to see a bias towards removal of positive steps
over a period when trends were predominantly
negative.
While the trend lines may be quite persuasive, and a useful shorthand for the characteristic
direction of the temperature, we see that
over and
over (up to almost 1 / 3rd of all running decades)
in the clearly rising trended climate post 1930 a
negative or non -(unambiguously *)- rising trend (* within error bars).
Exposure to these initial traumatic experiences, the resulting emotional dysregulation, and the loss of safety,
direction, and the ability to detect or respond to danger cues may impact a child's development
over time and can lead to subsequent or repeated trauma exposure
in adolescence and adulthood without supports that might buffer the
negative effects.
It's this ability to change which is the focus of new behaviors and helping families move into positive
directions rather than
negative, all - or - nothing «attack and defend» cycles of behavior, which inherently spill
over to their children and inherently develop into child alienation
in many cases.