As a born again Christian I wouldn't want to live
in the theocracy of Iran, so why would I want to live in a theocracy here in the United States?
Or feel free to rejoin the dark ages
in the theocracy of your choice.
Not exact matches
«There are Baha'is rotting
in jail on a 20 - year sentence on trumped up charges simply because they have a certain set
of faith beliefs that run against the
theocracy in Iran.»
This kind
of behavior does not exist
in the rest
of the world with the exception
of of islamist - based
theocracies
Dawkins, who is widely regarded as the most respected figure
in atheism, is lending his voice to this event because he says freedom for atheists is «constantly under threat from people who would like to turn this country into some sort
of a
theocracy.»
The tightie righties are always working on their extremist agenda
of theocracy, whether it's out
in the open like now or not.
The National Day
of Prayer is an embarrassment to America and makes us look as intellectually barbaric as fervent middle eastern
theocracies that
in many ways haven't progressed much past the last millennium.
And besides; if we were to become a Christian
Theocracy, we'd all be forced to have that same old picture
of that dead carpenter guy mounted
in our living rooms.
Because without their steadfast support
of freedom
of speech and religion, you run the risk
of ending up
in a
theocracy that only accepts a religion other than your own.
In fact, even the concept
of a religious foundation for Statehood guarantees
theocracy, and as such should revolt all truly free men, ESPECIALLY Americans.
It was the Christian
theocracy in Europe that called people / groups they didn't like satanic, evil and practitioners
of black magic.
American
Theocracy: The Peril and Politics
of Radical Religion, Oil, and Borrowed Money
in the 21st Century by Kevin Phillips Viking, 480 pages, $ 26.95 The Baptizing
of America: The Religious Right's Plans for the Rest
of Us by James Rudin Thunder's Mouth, 300 pages, $ 26 Kingdom Coming: The....
We have never been under threat
of theocracy in America.
... and as for atheists / agnostics commenting on religious matters, it is important since uncontrolled religion can lead to various levels
of theocracy (e.g. Iran
in the extreme case) which obviously would be detrimental to all
of us.
The State
of Israel was founded with at least some theocratic elements» at exactly a point
in history when the Catholic Church was renouncing
theocracy and withdrawing from secular governance.
It is tiresome but can you imagine what America would be like if a creationist
theocracy ever gained power
in all three branches
of government.
The real question is will we continue to at least strive for separation
of Church and State or go down the slippery slope that leads ever closer to a
Theocracy - which never had ended well
in the entire history
of mankind.
I would recommend to the author that if he does not like living
in a secular land that embraces equality and fairness, he is free to move to the
theocracy of his choice.
When the holiness
of the land (a divine proclamation) becomes the holiness
of the state (a human creation) we all too easily move
in the direction
of theocracy veiled as statism (
in which the state is the embodiment
of divine will).
Gilead's Commanders
of the Faithful have fulfilled their dream: they have constructed a
theocracy (centered
in Cambridge, Massachusetts) on the lines
of ancestral Puritanism and biblical patriarchy.
Every atrocity
of religious / totalitarian government, from fascism
in Europe to the
theocracies in the Middle East to the personality cults
in Soviet Russia and North Korea, is now identified and broadcast with unprecedented clarity.
If we lived
in a
theocracy, where every debate would be settled by edicts from the Bishop
of Washington, this wouldn't be a problem.
But hey, it is a free country unlike a lot
of theocracies in the world so to those who still believe, go for it.
«Religion is an important part
of our society, its voice should be heard, but I wouldn't want to live
in even a democratic
theocracy,» the former prime minister said at the office
of his Tony Blair Faith Foundation, which works to promote multifaith understanding.
Richard Posner, a judge
of the U.S. Seventh Circuit Court
of Appeals,
in a New York Times op - ed co-authored December 2 with Law Professor Eric Segall, takes Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia to task for threatening America with a «majoritarian
theocracy» because
of his repeated....
There is a basic incompatibility between Islam's belief
in all encompassing doctrines that embrace religion, private and public life and the American principles
of liberty
of belief and speech and the absolute separation
of state and church affairs For Americans belief is a private matter, not so for Islam, where
theocracy rules over all human affairs.
And what the Chinese government is doing is no worse than what several
theocracies around the world are doing and what assholes like Rick Santorum would do
in the USA if given the chance — none
of which is supported by atheists.
Theocracy is based on studies
of an old book or two written by philosophers and politicians
in addition to stories handed down over generations with no real physical evidence to analyze.
There is also a practical benefit to Reno's ecumenism,
in that anyone speaking
of «Christian society»
in this day and age invites being tarred with words like «
theocracy» and «inquisition,» as if Christian society necessitated those forms.
Absolutely, I would never want to be a part
of a
theocracy in this world.
This constitutional disestablishment
of all churches embodied the wisdom
of Roger Williams and Thomas Jefferson — the one from his experience with the Massachusetts
theocracy and the other from his experience with the less dangerous Anglican establishment
in Virginia — which knew that a combination
of religious sanctity and political power represents a heady mixture for status quo conservatism.
Also, just FYI, this country (meaning the US, which I assume is where you live) is not a
theocracy, which means that the laws
of this country (including the laws regarding abortion) should not be based on any one religion (or holy book)
in particular.
They remembered also what had happened
in this country to religious dissenters
in the Puritan
theocracy of the Massachusetts Bay Colony and under the Anglican establishment
in Virginia.
In the 21st Century, there is mislead segment
of the American population that are trying to turn this country into a
theocracy.
If the Bible, as its theme, concerns the deliverance
of humanity, and if the deliverer is God, personified by Jesus, consider the following: Contentious subjects
in Jesus» time, as items
of debate or discussion, typically had to do with adultery (a «capital offense» by Moses), paying taxes (which might be tough
in a
theocracy), and divorce.
There is a big difference between government having people
in it and policies affected by beliefs (religious or otherwise) but that is a far cry from a
theocracy or an establishment
of one religion over another which is what the Founders were leery
of.
Intimidated by loose (and often ludicrous) charges
of «
theocracy,» many committed religious believers have hesitated to cite the Bible
in support
of anything political, even though our Founding Fathers did.
American Evangelicals want to force a
Theocracy on the rest
of Americans shrouded
in the false cloak
of the premise that the Founders wanted a Christian nation.
These deluded folks are usually thwarted
in their efforts to turn this country into some kind
of evangelical
theocracy.
In the absence
of any means for succession other than the recognition
of someone possessing charisma, there comes to the front what Buber calls the «paradox
of all original and direct
theocracy.»
France,
in the throws
of the revolution had huge issues with the church and clergy which owned most
of the land and were trying to co-opt the revolution and create a
theocracy by installing the church into the vacancy left by the aristocracy.
Now that the USA is one step closer to becoming a
theocracy, I'm going to have to decide whether to become more intolerant
of religion (
in legal and non-violent ways), or just give up on the USA.
He's fighting against the injustice
of having to live
in a
theocracy.
It would take ignorance
of that level to see a person living
in a totalitarian
theocracy following a not - state - sanctioned religion as a fanatic and not a victim.
Got to love that
theocracy in Iran and their religion
of peace.
better yet — he's the type
of guy to extort money from a congregation that doesn't understand global economics, fiat currency, OPEC, oil production, the supply chain, the exploration
of oil reserves or how foreign / state run companies keep supply low to drive up demand which they then use the proceeds to seed their Islamic
theocracies which
in turn oppress woman and preach anti-American propaganda.
Should I respect the group
of Muslims who attacked the U.S. because they wanted to impose Taliban - style
theocracies in Saudi Arabia and other middle eastern countries?
afraid
of my country becoming a
theocracy much like the countries we fight against
in the Middle East because they are
theocracies.
Some evangelicals and conservative Catholics lean
in this direction, but gingerly and equivocatingly, if not disingenuously, because
of the sheer
in - feasibility
of theocracy in a pluralistic America.
Your brand
of theocracy, while thriving
in countries like Iran, has not yet infected the United States, and one can only hope that it never will.