Now that we are swinging the hammer, there are yet further idols to be smashed
in our theological language.
In theological language it is usually said that God is infinite or perfect.
To put the point
in theological language, glorifying God is an activity essentially sustaining a basic contrast between lamentation and thanksgiving.
A party, which is ahead of its time and espouses the truth, including philosophical truths,
in theological language, as Marx would have said, can only end up by suffocating democracy.
In theological language, this means that his revelation or self - disclosure, which is made primarily through what are sometimes styled his «mighty acts» in nature and history, has been the clue to his nature.
In philosophical language, the problem was that of the relation between the one and the many, or the noumenon and the phenomena;
in theological language it was the problem of God and the universe.
In theological language we would be speaking of the power that exists when one is under the claim of the eschaton.
Not exact matches
The book moves back and forth between accounts of meetings and chronological detail to a kind of
theological interpretation grounded
in the Christian
language of death and new life.
I aim to get at some of the
theological underpinnings of that unease
in language that may seem unfamiliar or even unwelcome, but it is
language that is grounded
in important Christian affirmations that seek to understand the child as our equal» one who is a gift and not a product.
He wants to argue that mercy is not just important
in the Bible's story of our salvation, where God is sometimes described anthropomorphically or
in poetic
language, but that
in precise
theological terms mercy is the highest perfection of God.
But any genuine recovery of a «particular
language of faith» will entail developing and appropriating a
theological tradition and embodying that tradition
in faithful living — a project that necessarily requires motivations and insights deriving from a quite different kind of authority than the sociologists possess.
Women pastors who are concerned more for their people than for any ideology are less suspect and therefore probably better able to help us around the grave
theological and liturgical hazards
in God -
language changes.
Such
theological thinking will be grounded firmly
in a Christian context and
in the
language of commitment particular to the Christian tradition, interpreting the dimensions of our faith for the Christian community.
Francis has famously refused to live
in the sumptuous papal apartment, picked out a used Fiat to scoot around Rome and dropped the fancy papal vestments and high
theological language of his predecessors.
Or,
in more explicit
theological language, the death of God is the actualization of the movement of Spirit into flesh.
The critique of religion, as we enumerated it
in the preceding paragraphs, confronted Bonhoeffer immediately with a new problem: finding a non-religious
language to interpret the Biblical and
theological concepts.
We can be so full of our own wisdom, that we forget that sex is a profound mystery to put it
in theological terms, or to put it
in humanistic
language, it is an intricately complex mix of physiological, psychological and relational factors.
The revelation consists first and foremost
in the person of Jesus Christ himself, but this can become material for
theological use only as it is given
in human
language.
In regard to the nature of
theological language, it would mean avoiding a position which limited meaningful or nonmythological
theological statements to assertions about God's activity which apply universally.
In opposition, speaking as a student of Greek and Hebrew, a participant insisted that these languages are a foundational study for all theological education, and seminary is, for her, an opportunity to gain a solid grounding in God's Wor
In opposition, speaking as a student of Greek and Hebrew, a participant insisted that these
languages are a foundational study for all
theological education, and seminary is, for her, an opportunity to gain a solid grounding
in God's Wor
in God's Word.
And Paul is making claims about «all flesh» and «every person» and about the «power of the gospel to save» that go beyond the specific cultural conditions of Jews and gentiles
in the first century — his
language demands to be engaged with at the anthropological /
theological level.
What I find tragic is that we do not have adequate social or
theological options (visions,
in my
language) to provide a more viable articulation of these concerns.
Academic theologies (with their focus on such questions as method, the disciplinary status of theology
in the modern university, the relationships of theology and religious studies, and the development of public criteria for
theological language) are obviously related principally to the public of the academy.
The central place accorded to Muhammad and the use of
theological - traditional
language and structure
in Sufism is hardly surprising.
In more Hartshornean
language, the question is this: How does one reconcile the apparently restrictive
theological assertion that God favors the struggle of the oppressed with apparently unrestrictive neoclassical assertions — for example, that God is «the subject of all change?
Ibn «Arabi's style of intermixing radical elements with traditional
language, models and
theological structure could perhaps be explained
in this background as an echo of freethinking controlled by a rigorous interpenetration of the old and the new.
The principal advantage of accepting initially the assumptions of the historical consciousness
in religious or
theological discourse is that one is not committed from the outset to possibly meaningless
language regarding some realm of the supernatural.
Probably the most important scholarly and
theological generalization to be drawn from the hundreds of articles
in the Kittel Dictionary has been that the teaching and
language of the New Testament, including the teaching and
language of Jesus himself, can not be understood apart from their setting
in the context of Judaism.
The one thing which the New Testament
language on these matters gives us no ground for is the notion that the
theological task could be exercised
in isolation from the bearers of other gifts or from the surveillance of the total community.
The speaker's drama
in preaching is both a search for a
language of lived experience and for a way of speaking sermonic texts that are «believable» at a time when coherent,
theological frameworks have collapsed.
Theological language is never the «queen of the sciences» nor is it the only
language useful
in describing the acts of God.
The
language of liberation, with its salvation history themes, seems hollow and hypocritical
in our mouths, bespeaking a new form of American
theological triumphalism.
The current
language debate is just one more indicator of how much the church lost when it got caught up
in the philosophical /
theological Christology debates, and replaced the name of Jesus with the titles Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.
For that we need
language that is religious but not,
in this sense,
theological —
language more like the poetic.
Since psychological
language aims at revealing the depths of human transformation, and since this is the goal of
theological language as well, there is no reason the two can not walk together
in the search for truth.
Dr. Throckmorton is Hayes professor of New Testament
language and literature at Bangor
Theological Seminary
in Bangor, Maine.
The Board of
Theological Education, senate of Serampore college, has undertaken the task of publishing a bibliography of original Christian writings
in regional
language.
Here we find the endeavor to speak of the Kingdom of God
in a Christian
language even while refusing the
language of the Christian
theological tradition, and to do so
in the spirit of Blake's marriage of «Heaven» and «Hell» and under the influence of the identification of nirvana and samsara
in Mahayana Buddhism.
But of course the creedal statement, hallowed as it is by centuries of use during the celebration of the Eucharist, can be understood only when it is seen as a combination of supposedly historical data,
theological affirmation put
in a quasi-philosophical idiom, and a good deal of symbolic
language (with the use of such phrases as «came down from heaven», «ascended into heaven», and the like).
We don't usually need to use formal
theological language and concepts
in the everyday life of the church
in prayer, preaching and service.
This belief led him to a wholehearted recognition of the world come of age, to a criticism of religion, and to an attempt to interpret Biblical and
theological concepts
in a non-religious
language.
In the same essay, Davison puts forward the case for continuing to use
theological language, even when it might be strange, because «it is the task of apologetics to make things clear and on other occasions it is the task of apologetics to cut through the vapid familiarity of our time and present something unfamiliar, glorious and true».
In «Theology and Objectivity» Ogden holds that
theological language, though different from that of science, is objectifying because it is both cognitive and subject to rational assessment and justification.114 Of course, this view assumes the possibility of metaphysics, a possibility now generally denied.
Besides the paradox of foreign missionaries establishing the indigenous process by which foreign domination was questioned, there is a
theological paradox to this story: missionaries entered the missionary field to convert others, yet
in the translation process it was they who first made the move to «convert» to a new
language, with all its presuppositions and ramifications.
Hauerwas agrees with Linbeck that what needs to be emphasized
in a postliberal, postmodern theology and
theological ethics is the distinctiveness, the particularity, of Christian convictions, its «
language games» and «rules,» not for their own sake, but because they are true (AN 5).
The theology of the cross, that is to say, provides the
theological courage and the conceptual framework to hold the
language in place.
This stakes out the claim that
language and its proper use
in matters
theological is a fundamental concern of the theologian of the cross.
This has been described,
in traditional
theological language, as the «bondage of the will.»
(ENTIRE BOOK) A survey of process thought for the layperson: The author writes for those not necessarily versed
in complex
theological language.
The
theological work which will be most useful
in the years ahead will be that which works out its motifs
in correlation with the whole range of the biological, behavioral, and social sciences, and does so
in language which has the widest possible touch with ordinary modes of speech common to all educated persons.