I feel that the main issues are policy and training related, which was why I enjoyed Mike's article earlier
in the thread as it had an example of a solution that I felt would be right for this.
Albers famously dubbed her tapestries that resulted from these experiences as «pictorial weaving»: intricate woven abstractions that evidenced her belief
in thread as a «carrier of meaning,» as Gardner Troy points out in her essay.
But I haven't seen
any in this thread as yet.
2) I mentioned above that Kevin Trenberth would have discussions
in this thread as a source of information that he might use in refining his own article before the deadline (even though he has already submitted a draft).
I have been studying meteorology for 40 some - odd years now & I shake my head in seeing some of the most common properties of the atmosphere being missed
in these threads as it applies to these «thought experiments».
First I apologise if I am rehashing something that has already been discussed, I have been out in the field and haven't had a chance to catch up on all the posts
in this thread as yet, however this one did.
I didn't want to copy and paste
it in this thread as it has some of it's own dialog.
Not exact matches
In an August 2010
thread on a forum discussing ways to improve the privacy of Bitcoin, one commenter under the alias «Insti» proposed zero knowledge proofs
as one potential approach, though the author worried that they might be «theoretically impossible.»
As well as making a strong case for the perfect side - parting, the young royal has single - handedly sparked a revival in traditional childrenswear looks thanks to The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge — who regularly dress their little ones in vintage - inspired thread
As well
as making a strong case for the perfect side - parting, the young royal has single - handedly sparked a revival in traditional childrenswear looks thanks to The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge — who regularly dress their little ones in vintage - inspired thread
as making a strong case for the perfect side - parting, the young royal has single - handedly sparked a revival
in traditional childrenswear looks thanks to The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge — who regularly dress their little ones
in vintage - inspired
threads.
Far from offering the sort of insightful, well - informed take that has brought the site
as many
as 35 million monthly uniques and won kudos from everyone from Nas to Junot D?az, they were more akin to the sort of juvenile remark one might find buried
in the comments
thread on a low - budget news aggregator: cruel, idiotic, shockingly insensitive, and misogynistic.
«Imagine there was a base metal
as scarce
as gold,» the inventor wrote
in a
thread on an online Bitcoin forum.
But the developments on Monday make it clear that,
as this and the other
threads surrounding the multiple investigations into Trump and his associates continues, the boundaries of legal precedent are being tested
in ways unlike any other point
in modern history.
This thinking is then given time to incubate
in the subconscious mind
as we connect
threads before the ideas pop out
as new eureka - like innovations.
And
in even more dire news, the season is likely to be shorter
as the Thrones producers begin to wrap up the multiple story
threads as well
as while fans of the original book series wait for Martin publish the sixth book
in the series, The Winds of Winter.
The probe, broadly, has two main
threads related to Trump: whether members of his campaign colluded with Moscow to tilt the race
in his favor, and whether he sought to obstruct justice when he fired James Comey
as the FBI director last May.
By fixing I mean, for example, addressing admins
in the forums that talk badly of your desired brand name and ask them to remove that keyword from the
thread's title
as it's hurting your business.
«Written
in 1960s San Francisco and New York, Didion's collection of essays is not so much a bundle of nonfiction
as it is a long,
threaded musing on her own life, set to the daunting counterculture tempo of the times,» Wang and Wolfson note.
Two separate answers on the
thread took the same quote
as their jumping off point: «We tend to overestimate what we can do
in a year, and underestimate what we can do
in ten.»
Four tragic deaths,
in four separate instances, using two different flavors of self - driving tech (driver assist & fully automated), but one common
thread which we must,
as a society and industry, address candidly: user error and — most confoundingly — the abuse or misuse of this technology.
The community was not pleased at all,
as was apparent
in thousands of social media
threads, one of which you can read here.
As many describe
in this Quora
thread on the topic, D&B works well for business that are dealing with larger companies, but often isn't even considered when loans are being lent to small private businesses.
The
thread originated with a user who wanted to know why the company used net income rather than the correct non-operating profit after tax (NOPAT)
as the numerator
in the ROIC calculation.
Comments
in the
thread state that WeWork's Berkley location,
as well
as Fort Point
in Boston also have had some noise issues.
Here's CJ's addition to it
in the
thread:
As someone else who argues for Founderism
in academic circles, I agree with what you say here.
But
as I read the
thread, I did not see anything
in Bernardo's comments that hinted of what you said.
Some
in this
thread have asked why we,
as non-believers, would need to gather
in DC.
However,
as we've seen
in this
thread, all too many of his followers do.
Reconstructionists accept that the deconstructionists have succeeded
in severing the
thread of French tradition, but see deconstruction
as nihilism with no future.
Christians who are posting on this
thread should choose their words just
as wisely
as if you were talking to someone
in person.
I'm glad you admit that the whole point of your coming here is to start a
thread where you feel justified
in being
as big of a dick
as you can by mere virtue of having starting the
thread.
I want you to know none of this was sarcastic, I'm very curious
as to your toughts on this particular matter, because maybe, being
as against the original post of this
thread as you were, YOU could be the one making a slight shift
in your perspective when all's said and done.
I'm a materialist
as well
as an atheist and therefore don't believe
in free will so I don't agree with some of what you said anyways but that's an argument for another
thread.
Cheese,
as I said earlier, I have been through all of this with Tom
in threads below.
d. I think
as shown by the numerous persons identifying themselves
as recovering atheistic alcoholics
in this
thread, the steps and the program work.
However, seeing
as there are clearly people
in this discussion
thread who are disinclined to lend equal weight and credibility to the words of a woman when there's a perfectly good white man about I will endeavor to break down one particularly telling statement (to me, at least)
in McLaren's non-apology apology so that, perhaps, something might pierce the fog McLaren is attempting to deploy
as a defensive shroud.
Full marks to David for at least addressing the women
in this comment
thread as peers, even
as he disagrees.
And, at least
as I see it, Julie has sought to do both
in this
thread — work toward forgiveness and hold leaders accountable.
I felt like I was getting a disproportionately low number of «likes», and a disproportionately high number of «dislikes»,
as were other women,
in the
thread.
As it stands, you've done no better (and
in some ways far worse) than your colleagues who have appeared on this
thread previously.
Sometimes, David, it's just so much easier to come up with a creative stream of swears to emote,
as some situations (like what I read
in this
thread) are beyond words.
As far as evidence of that, you obviously haven't paid very good attention to your friend's reactions in this threa
As far
as evidence of that, you obviously haven't paid very good attention to your friend's reactions in this threa
as evidence of that, you obviously haven't paid very good attention to your friend's reactions
in this
thread.
The definitions and descriptions
in the article are salient; especially, the «Psychopaths» and «Almost Psychopaths» definitions and «
as percentage of population» (~ 1 % and an estimated 10 - 15 %, respectively) were important to help discuss some issues generally, and specifically to this post and the
thread (though I haven't read anything
in the last month or so).
I know it sucks to have dirty laundry aired, but this looks like more that airing of dirty laundry — if Julie is correct (and I realize I'm hearing her side
in this
thread), denigrating your partner to give you an out, and maintain your state of paragon exemplar
in ministry strikes me
as a sinister act.
As someone who has been educated as an advocate for many women in Julie's position I find the back and forth of this thread to be infuriatin
As someone who has been educated
as an advocate for many women in Julie's position I find the back and forth of this thread to be infuriatin
as an advocate for many women
in Julie's position I find the back and forth of this
thread to be infuriating.
I know this is not the
thread for it, but let me go on record
as saying that sometimes an «I do not consider him to be a brother / sister
in Christ» does more good for those who have been abused than a «judge not.»
As Julie herself has suggested
in a few comments on this
thread, it's the sob storyline of «the suffering spouse» whose wife has become mentally ill, and the marriage has long since declined, but she is still grasping to keep it alive or alternatively to take revenge, and et cetera, et cetera.
Tony, being seen
as the powerful one
in this equation, has been brought low
in this
thread; Julie, recognized
as the marginalized voice, has been raised up.
[I'm sure I've seen some of those names
in this
thread — no wonder they want to control their image
as pastors.]
Final thought:
As I mentioned early on
in this
thread (September 15, 2014 at 11:39 pm), I was one who watched this story unfold five years ago.
• There is much misinformation on this
thread: o The emergent movement is not a cult o emergent started
as a conversation among people of various theological / philosophical understandings and remains that way o The emergent conversation hasn't faded away at all —
in fact — it's now integrated
in practically every Christian expression o Mars Hill and emergent have very little
in common o Mark Driscoll and Tony Jones have very little
in common o I don't know of the personal behavior of everyone involved
in the conversation, but because people have been involved — I'm sure there has to be bad behavior from some.