Interlocutory injunctions are rarely granted
in trademark infringement cases in Canada (counterfeit cases aside).
February saw two notable decisions from Canadian courts on motions for interlocutory injunctions
in trademark infringement cases.
The company says it doesn't have close enough ties with Free People to be implicated
in the trademark infringement case.
In it, they describe five factors that are always considered
in a trademark infringement case, the first two being the most important.
Not exact matches
In a federal
trademark infringement case, for instance, a plaintiff seeking a quick injunction would encounter at the threshold the high hurdle of showing «irreparable harm» — a standard that won't be met if money damages will provide the plaintiff with adequate recompense for any damages incurred — and it might also have to post an expensive bond (a major hurdle for a nonprofit).
We spoke to Jeffrey Kobulnick, a partner at law firm Brutzkus Gubner who specialises
in copyright and
trademark infringement, about the «Stairway to Heaven»
case ahead of the trial.
It seems that lawyers at the law firm Harding, Earley, Follmer & Frailey of Valley Forge, Penn.,
in the course of investigating a client's trade secrets and
trademark infringement case, viewed and printed pages from the Web site of Healthcare Advocates Inc. — both pages from its then - current site and archived pages found via the Wayback Machine.
Our lawyers have significant experience
in assisting our clients protect and develop the full value of their intellectual property by prosecuting and defending copyright and
trademark infringement cases, unfair competition actions, Internet and technology disputes, franchise disputes, false advertising claims, litigation concerning trade secrets and restrictive covenants, and other claims relating to intellectual property.
She also has experience litigating patent
infringement,
trademark infringement, copyright
infringement, unfair competition, and false advertising
cases in federal courts across the country.
Online
trademark infringement, including
cases involving domain names, cybersquatting and unfair use of
trademarks in pay - per - click advertising
After beginning a jury trial
in the Western District of Oklahoma, obtained favorable settlement for international distributor of food products
in unfair competition and
trademark infringement case.
Thus, after rejecting the alleged
infringement of art. 67 LRJCA by the judgment under appeal, the High Court to understand that it gave a succinct but substantial enough to arguments made
in response instance, if it considers, however, an
infringement of Art. 6.1 b) of Law 17/2001, of
Trademarks, and the applicable
case law.
After successfully defending a preliminary injunction hearing
in Western District of Oklahoma, obtained favorable settlement for franchisee
in case alleging breach of franchise agreement, theft of trade secrets and confidential information, and trade dress,
trademark, and copyright
infringement.
Obtained favorable settlement for manufacturer of screens used
in the oil and gas industry
in a patent and
trademark infringement and false advertising
case in the Northern District of Oklahoma.
Represented a chapter 7 trustee
in the bankruptcy
case of a consumer electronics distributor subject to multiple patent and
trademark infringement lawsuits.
FTD, Inc. v. Fleurop Interflora,
Case No. 01 - 70954 (E.D. MI 2006): Successfully represented Swiss floral association, Fleurop Interflora,
in trademark infringement action
in the Eastern District of Michigan resulting
in favorable settlement.
The task then was to see how to rely on the
trademark registration of «Snoopy» and filing a
trademark infringement and to use the outcome of the
trademark infringement to support the copyright dispute.At the first instance, the court delivered a decision
in favour of our client and subsequently the decision was taken up to the Court of Appeal, where the court initially declined to hear the
case on the grounds that the issue was double jeopardy.
Bob is a trial attorney with extensive experience
in cases involving trade secrets, covenants not to compete,
trademark infringement, software licenses, copyright
infringement and patent
infringement, as well as other commercial litigation matters.
Courtney Culver Baker has experience throughout the State of Texas
in both state and federal courts, as well as the Fifth Circuit, representing corporate, not - for - profit and individual clients both
in pursuing and defending
cases in areas including business and contract disputes, real estate, catastrophic personal injury, ad valorem taxation, securities disputes, insurance coverage, professional liability and
trademark infringement.
She has been involved
in numerous landmark German and European
trademark cases, including obtaining the first higher court decision world - wide on the liability of e-commerce platform providers for
trademark infringement.
Hugh Gottschalk has handled a myriad of
cases in his 30 - year litigation career, including contract disputes, franchise matters, environmental torts, professional and product liability
cases, and trade secret, patent, copyright, and
trademark infringement cases.
Bergman has extensive trial experience
in state and federal courts, litigating unfair competition, false advertising,
trademark, trade dress and copyright
infringement cases along with class actions and other complex business disputes.
She has represented clients
in a variety of
cases in federal court involving issues of patent and
trademark infringement, copyright
infringement, false advertising, unfair competition, and trade secrets.
In case of violation / infringement of any IPR such as trademark infringement by any employee / representative or any third party infringing upon the IPR of the Company, the Compliance Team of the Company would first investigate the matter in association with its Advocates and make recommendations to the Director / CFO for resolution of such violation / infringement including need for any legal course of actio
In case of violation /
infringement of any IPR such as
trademark infringement by any employee / representative or any third party infringing upon the IPR of the Company, the Compliance Team of the Company would first investigate the matter
in association with its Advocates and make recommendations to the Director / CFO for resolution of such violation / infringement including need for any legal course of actio
in association with its Advocates and make recommendations to the Director / CFO for resolution of such violation /
infringement including need for any legal course of action.
Tokyo - based developer Emonster kk sued Apple on Wednesday, Oct. 18,
in a San Francisco federal court, claiming it holds the U.S.
trademark for the term «animoji» and that Apple using the same name for its Animoji feature is a «textbook
case» of
trademark infringement, as Reuters reports.
In a 1979 case filed in Federal District Court in Illinois, the American Society of Real Estate Counselors, a NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS ® (NAR) affiliate, brought a trademark infringement action against the American College of Real.
In a 1979
case filed
in Federal District Court in Illinois, the American Society of Real Estate Counselors, a NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS ® (NAR) affiliate, brought a trademark infringement action against the American College of Real.
in Federal District Court
in Illinois, the American Society of Real Estate Counselors, a NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS ® (NAR) affiliate, brought a trademark infringement action against the American College of Real.
in Illinois, the American Society of Real Estate Counselors, a NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS ® (NAR) affiliate, brought a
trademark infringement action against the American College of Real...
Trademark infringement cases typically rest on whether the item or advertisement
in question is likely to confuse consumers about where a company's goods come from.