Sentences with phrase «in true language»

Not exact matches

«A person's name is to him or her the sweetest and most important sound in any language,» writes Dale Carnegie in his classic book «How to Win Friends and Influence People ``, and those words couldn't be truer.

While it's true that people often use cryptic language to show off, just as often it's simply a case of forgetting that there are those in the world who don't live and breathe the markets.

Custom iPhone 5 Cases Custom iPhone 6 Cases Personalized T - Shirts (nulgrida1.dothome.co.kr) Custom iPhone Cases Custom Shirts — presscbu.cbnu.ac.kr, Custom iPhone 4 Cases (Alecia) Custom iPhone 4 Cases Custom iPhone 4 Cases Custom iPhone 5 Cases Custom iPhone Cases Custom iPhone 5 Cases Custom iPhone 4 Cases (saukrapidsreader.com) Personalized T - Shirts — Alecia, Personalized T - Shirts Slavonic language to clean up true the matter for your ordinal number activity.awe - inspiring Tips On advertizing veridical realty in that location has been close to for links.

The First Vatican Council included language like (the Pope) «is the true vicar of Christ and head of the whole Church and faith, and teacher of all Christians; and that to him was handed down in blessed Peter, by our Lord Jesus Christ, full power to...» This transfer of power depends on the Roman Church's understanding of the Office of the Keys which I do not agree with, but their statements make it clear that the Pope's authority as the Roman Church understands it is derived from Christ's.

1 +1 = 2 is true in any language.

What is certainly true is that in serious Christian reflection, questions about the shape and fate of community have come to displace the language of personal conversion, transformation, and development from the central place such language held in Protestant Christian discourse in the first two - thirds of the twentieth century.

Many, it is true, are written by people with no expertise in medieval history or even basic competency in the languages necessary for research on medieval topics.

Scholars have determined that Matthew was not written in Greek, but in Aramaic, and was soon translated into Greek, so we have to go to the original written language to find the true meaning of this verse.

Most of the imagery, the visual symbols and the language expressed the spooking, sparking and spinning which Mary Daly in her recent book Gyn / Ecology proposes to women as the way to true liberation.

We were debating whether or not it's helpful to use language like «act like a man,» or «true womanhood,» or «real men» in our religious dialogs, and I was arguing that the goal of the Christian life is to be conformed to the image of Christ, not idealized, culture - based gender stereotypes.

While it is true that because of its very high literary style it is difficult, if not impossible, to translate the Qur» an into any other language without losing the beauty and vigor of the original, translations in the languages of the people are necessary in order that they may understand the meaning of this book which is the source of Islam.

But the true test of its greatness is that, into whatever language it is translated, it has a message for the people which they can understand and which, in constantly increasing numbers, they accept.

I do not mean by this that the gospel is merely a «fairy - tale,» although it is, of course, true that such tales are often told in language of that kind.

In conclusion, the point should be reiterated that to say that the gospel of Christ is to be stated in language which is avowedly metaphorical does not in any sense whatever imply that the gospel is not truIn conclusion, the point should be reiterated that to say that the gospel of Christ is to be stated in language which is avowedly metaphorical does not in any sense whatever imply that the gospel is not truin language which is avowedly metaphorical does not in any sense whatever imply that the gospel is not truin any sense whatever imply that the gospel is not true.

It is a metaphorical statement, true in its own poetical fashion; it is a most valuable way of saying in symbolical language, that he who is supreme in the order of being was for our sakes willing to be united to and self - expressed in the life of the Brother - Man who is therefore our Lord and Saviour, Emmanuel, God - with - us.

The language of «cost» and «price» and sacrifice would describe something very real, but we would not think that Love was therefore something cold and punitive in demanding such a high price to be true to itself.

And the Church in the 20th century hadn't always got its language and style right: Casti Connubii in the 1930s says wise and true things about marriage and family life, but didn't somehow quite manage to tackle the emerging questions being raised by women as educational opportunities for them expanded and new responsibilities cametheir way in public, commercial, and professional life.

In Whitehead's paradoxical language, «It is as true to say that God creates the world as that the world creates God.

Most linguistic analysts take these terms for granted when any true scientific procedure would require their clarification as a necessary step to their proper use in language.

I suppose in theory, this is somewhat true, but if God was waiting until there was a common language and good lines of communication before sending Jesus, He could have picked no better time than right before humans decided to build the Tower of Babel.

Ethics provides a fruitful territory in which to explore these issues because the sense in which the language of Christians is true is similar to the sense in which lives are true.

Second, is a belief in God as the proper referent of that religious experience and language meaningful and true?

There are a thousand ways in which we try in today's language to affirm this faith, but perhaps none is more forceful or rings truer than the words of Maltbie D. Babcock's familiar hymn:

But I am too, and those of us who do not pray in tongues or with spiritual prayer languages often get concerned about what we hear from those who do, that we are not truly using all of our emotions and feelings to communicate with God, and that we are missing out on a true spiritual connection with Him, and so on.

Keillor has a keen ear for parody, and makes use of it in unlikely ways, as in the marvelous «Your Wedding and You» with its explanation of the «alternative wedding» (only Garry Trudeau's «Doonesbury» has caught this «60s and «70s language as accurately), and in his more recent homage to punk rock in «Don: The True Story of a Young Person.»

Second: to say that this particular book is true is to say that we can trust it, trust it as a guide to faith and life which provides not only specific claims about God's faithfulness and how we ought to live our lives in response to it, but also a way of understanding the whole world and a language in which to speak about that world.

We find them in the treatise On Divine Names by Dionysius the Areopagite, where God is true Being and Goodness and Beauty, but also in the triadic analogies explored by Augustine in his treatise On the Trinity, where God is compared to Memory and Intellect and Will, as well as in the triads of nouns fashioned by theologians inventing terms for God in new languages.

Metaphor, which serves as a medium that provides insight into Jesus» parabolic language, is a comparison based on everyday objects or experiences.108 In the words of Wilder,»... a true metaphor or symbol is more than a sign, it is a bearer of the reality to which it refers.

In the generation before Scotus, Thomas Aquinas argued that, although we have to use the same language to talk about both creation and its Creator, the things we say can only be true analogously in the two caseIn the generation before Scotus, Thomas Aquinas argued that, although we have to use the same language to talk about both creation and its Creator, the things we say can only be true analogously in the two casein the two cases.

Alison Milbank says that we need «to find a language that can show people that they are already engaged in religious practice, and assuming implicitly that it is true».

In the same essay, Davison puts forward the case for continuing to use theological language, even when it might be strange, because «it is the task of apologetics to make things clear and on other occasions it is the task of apologetics to cut through the vapid familiarity of our time and present something unfamiliar, glorious and true».

He's a wordsmith in the truest sense bending language to bring new perspective to his listeners.

Nonetheless, it is true that activists» attitudes are often more polarized than the general public's, and activists often express those attitudes in more uncompromising language than many people feel comfortable with.

Hauerwas agrees with Linbeck that what needs to be emphasized in a postliberal, postmodern theology and theological ethics is the distinctiveness, the particularity, of Christian convictions, its «language games» and «rules,» not for their own sake, but because they are true (AN 5).

The carefully chosen language of Nostra Aetate is that «the Catholic Church rejects nothing that is true and holy in these religions.»

Thus, the language of true Christianity is called the «pure language», whereby individuals learn to «call upon the name of Jehovah, in order to serve him shoulder to shoulder.»

It is affirmed in the charming, naive language of the folktale that Job's and Israel's true fulfillment (indeed, every man's fulfillment) is in abandonment of pride, in acceptance of the status of servant, and in cheerful acquiescence in the given condition and existent role.

In response to Mormonism where is the factual evidence from what this Faith is based on: 1) Prove that reformed Eygptian is a true language 2) Provide a map showing the journey in American the Nephites and the Moronites took to establish themselves will validating their establisments 3) The Book of Abraham has been proven false so why is still accepted as scripture 4) Joseph Smith was not a Jew or part of the tribe Levi, but believed that the rights of the priesthood was given to hiIn response to Mormonism where is the factual evidence from what this Faith is based on: 1) Prove that reformed Eygptian is a true language 2) Provide a map showing the journey in American the Nephites and the Moronites took to establish themselves will validating their establisments 3) The Book of Abraham has been proven false so why is still accepted as scripture 4) Joseph Smith was not a Jew or part of the tribe Levi, but believed that the rights of the priesthood was given to hiin American the Nephites and the Moronites took to establish themselves will validating their establisments 3) The Book of Abraham has been proven false so why is still accepted as scripture 4) Joseph Smith was not a Jew or part of the tribe Levi, but believed that the rights of the priesthood was given to him.

So true is this of Paul's statement that interpreters have often said that the Roman church must have been «adoptionist» in its Christology and that Paul is expressing himself in language more congenial to its views than to his own.

True Detective, by contrast, is discussed in the language of trope, of deconstruction and / or remix.

In the nature of sound he finds the true individuality of a language, each people showing, in its system of sounds, its unique preferenceIn the nature of sound he finds the true individuality of a language, each people showing, in its system of sounds, its unique preferencein its system of sounds, its unique preferences.

Humboldt states in his monograph on the dual that, though the study of language should be pursued for its own sake, it «resembles other branches of learning in not having its ultimate purpose in itself but that it conforms to the general purpose of interest in the human mind to help humanity to realize its true nature and its relation to everything visible and invisible around and above itself.»

Or do we reach the true meaning of Biblical language by passing through a process of secularization that stills all human language about God, thereby allowing man to respond passively in faith to the full and final language of God?

We go home at night and escape to foreign lands on Netflix, while the grandest, realest, thickest (like the grass in C.S. Lewis» heaven in The Great Divorce), truest story that has been or ever will be told is a story in which we find ourselves, or — to use theologian Vanhoozer's language — a theatre in which we are not a passive, but participating audience.

The bad language and evil usage we received on this account is hard to be expressed, besides the danger we were sometimes in of losing our lives for this matter, and that by the great professors of Christianity, who thereby discovered they were not true believers.

Christian acquiescence in this fate can be measured in any number of ways: by the extent to which the Church renounces her inherent «platonism,» thinking and speaking in the language of psychology, sociology, economics, and politics rather than philosophy (metaphysics) and theology; by the tendency to view the Church not first as sacrament transcending political order, but as a mere mediating institution within that order; by the «political» or «clerical» temptation to equate true ecclesial reform with institutional or curial reform.

The true context of history, wrapped in value - laden local languages, is replaced by the pseudo-context of media images, drafted to meet the immediate needs of the powers that control, or merely the convenience of technicians that operate, the electronic media system.

Wherever and whenever an authoritative, true, and faithful word comes to speech — within the church or beyond its domain, in the form of preaching and the language of piety or in the parlance of the world — there the one who was the word of faith is present and active [op.

Indeed, their paranoid fascination with the fossil record (which includes, almost, surreally, a «creation museum» in Cleveland, Ohio where one can see biblical children playing with dinosaurs) Hell, American Indians, Australian Aboriginals, «true» Indians, Chinese, Mongols, Ja.panese, Sub-Saharan Africans and the Celts and other tribes of ancient Europe were speaking thousands of different languages thousands of years before the date creationist say the Tower of Babel occurred — and even well before the date they claim for the Garden of Eden!!!

Hebrew language and literature, Jewish history, modern Jewish theology and philosophy, even undue absorption in the study of the biblical text — all are proscribed as evidence of defection from Torah - true Judaism.