It nonetheless took me months to stop thinking of myself like a thought experiment
in utilitarian ethics — to see that strenuous acts of service weren't the only good things I was capable of doing.
My proposal was an attempt to add
in a utilitarian ethic (mandatory use of seat belts and car seats is based on a utilitarian ethic imposed on autonomy) to assure the best outcome for those who prefer home birth.
Not exact matches
Utilitarian views matter
in these technological days, when religious
ethics often seem insufficient.
It must be admitted that there are certain potential vices to virtue
ethics even
in its minimalist mode, i.e., even when it does not try to crowd out the legitimate insights of deontologists and
utilitarians (e.g., from the deontological side, that there are limits — deontoi — regarding what any virtuous person can be permitted to do, and, from the
utilitarian side, that there are calculations which are relevant regarding many moral decisions the virtuous person must make).
In fact, on several occasions Hartshorne himself is explicit in stating that his form of ethics is not utilitaria
In fact, on several occasions Hartshorne himself is explicit
in stating that his form of ethics is not utilitaria
in stating that his form of
ethics is not
utilitarian.
Economists tend to be skeptical of that kind of reasoning, because they're generally
utilitarians in their
ethics, not Kantians.
In his analysis, Rolston avoids both
utilitarian and bio-centric views of nature — allowing him to present a view that bridges these two ends of the environmental
ethic spectrum.
That is deontological,
utilitarian, justice, ecocentric, biocentric, and relationship based
ethics would not condone using scientific uncertainty as justification for not reducing high levels of greenhouse gas emissions given what is not
in dispute among mainstream climate scientists (See Brown, 2002: 141 - 148).