Sentences with phrase «in violation of a court order»

Emails anonymously provided to Chevron may show a «conspiracy against Chevron,» the oil giant claims, as well as leaks of confidential court materials to high - level Ecuadorian government officials in violation of court orders

In all three cases, the mothers» attitude went from «what excuses can I make to prevent the father from exercising visitation without being in violation of the court order?»

Husband was wrong in letting the policy lapse in violation of the court order but couldn't the family court have ordered Wife to file an insurance claim and give Husband any proceeds from that claim?

PARENTAL KIDNAPPING - the act of one parent illegally taking a child in violation of a court order.

Even if you have sole physical custody of your child, you can not deny the other parent his visitation rights in violation of the court order.

Not exact matches

The Supreme Court found Standard Oil in violation of antitrust laws and ordered it to dissolve in 1911.

In 1911 a Federal court ruled DuPont in violation of antitrust laws, and the following year ordered the complete dissolution of Eastern as part of a remedIn 1911 a Federal court ruled DuPont in violation of antitrust laws, and the following year ordered the complete dissolution of Eastern as part of a remedin violation of antitrust laws, and the following year ordered the complete dissolution of Eastern as part of a remedy.

«If it is a crime to oppose the Buhari administration and speak up against his gross violations of human rights that they are indulging in and the violation of court orders they should just say so.

The applicants were praying the court to declare a violation of their human rights with the non-implementation of the law, and a subsequent order for them to take part in general elections and national referenda while residing abroad.

The violation of the court order, Melanson said, could result in Matthews being sentenced to an additional year in state prison.

She also wants the court to order Skye Bank to pay her damages in the sum of N200m for what she termed a violation of her right to own personal property under Section 44 of the Constitution.

«We cite the case of Sambo Dasuki who has been in detention for over two years and running even when many courts in Nigeria and the Ecowas Court have ordered for his release, but the President has fragrantly disobeyed these court orders which again are a violation of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of NigCourt have ordered for his release, but the President has fragrantly disobeyed these court orders which again are a violation of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigcourt orders which again are a violation of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

The applicant who also pleaded with the court to order the respondents to pay him the sum of N200m as compensation for the violation of his fundamental rights, insisted that his arrest and detention in prison custody between August 24 and September 1, 2016, violated his fundamental rights.

The three - judge appeals court panel said in its order Thursday that the Supreme Court should rule on whether voiding the law is the proper remedy for an open meetings law violation and whether a court has the authority to stop the secretary of state from publishincourt panel said in its order Thursday that the Supreme Court should rule on whether voiding the law is the proper remedy for an open meetings law violation and whether a court has the authority to stop the secretary of state from publishinCourt should rule on whether voiding the law is the proper remedy for an open meetings law violation and whether a court has the authority to stop the secretary of state from publishincourt has the authority to stop the secretary of state from publishing it.

A three - judge panel on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit ordered the Pentagon on Wednesday to cease investigations and discharges of service members in violation of the ban on gays serving openly in the military.

The National Eczema Association reserves the right at all times to disclose any information as necessary to satisfy any law, regulation, government request, court order, subpoena or other legal process, or to edit or remove any information, in whole or in part, that in the National Eczema Association's sole discretion is objectionable, disruptive to the Site or in violation of these Terms and Conditions.

Acting on the premise that The New York Times was in violation of the Espionage Act, however, Attorney General John Mitchell obtains a court order preventing the paper from any further publication of the document, an event that provides an opening for The Washington Post to become a bigger player in the world of journalism.

Nor shall anything herein be construed to deprive courts of their power, by civil contempt proceedings, without a jury, to secure compliance with or to prevent obstruction of, as distinguished from punishment for violations of, any lawful writ, process, order, rule, decree, or command of the court in accordance with the prevailing usages of law and equity, including the power of detention.

No order of the court shall require the admission or reinstatement of an individual as a member of a union or the hiring, reinstatement, or promotion of an individual as an employee, or the payment to him of any back pay, if such individual was refused admission, suspended, or expelled or was refused employment or advancement or was suspended or discharged for any reason other than discrimination on account of race, color, religion, sex or national origin or in violation of section 704 (a).

Each complaint asks the court to enter a permanent injunction barring the defendants from engaging in debt settlement in Illinois and order the defendants to pay restitution for aggrieved consumers, civil penalties of $ 50,000 for violating the Consumer Fraud Act, an additional $ 50,000 penalty for each violation committed with the intent to defraud, as well as a $ 10,000 penalty per violation committed against a person 65 years or older.

In May 2012, the court had to freeze his assets and issue a restraining order, in response to what they viewed as continued violations of the injunctioIn May 2012, the court had to freeze his assets and issue a restraining order, in response to what they viewed as continued violations of the injunctioin response to what they viewed as continued violations of the injunction.

This Court should declare that they violate the APA and constitute a violation of due process, and it should order the Department to strictly comply with the Act and remedy the harm to graduates in public service, their employers, and the communities they serve.

The Second Chance program works by matching up at - risk students, who are in need of community service hours to complete court - ordered requirements for truancy violations, with shelter dogs who could use some basic obedience skills in order to better their chances for adoption.

A few days after the records disappeared from the USDA's website, The HSUS sent a notice to the Department of Justice that the agency was in violation of a 2009 court - ordered settlement requiring it to post online certain annual reports from animal research labs, which describe how many of each species of animal was used and what kinds of pain and distress they endured.

Last week, a Maryland Circuit Court ruled that Prince George's County was in violation of state law and ordered the immediate return of Storm.

«Miami - Dade county has wrongfully taken alleged pit bull dogs away from their owners to kill them without seeking court order or advising the owner that killing of their pet can not be completed without court order. As a result, Miami - Dade County has committed countless acts in violation of this ordinance and has deprived countless residents of their property without due process of law.»

In August 2007 a federal court ruled the Bush administration was in violation of the Global Change Research Act and ordered it to produce a years - overdue national climate assessmenIn August 2007 a federal court ruled the Bush administration was in violation of the Global Change Research Act and ordered it to produce a years - overdue national climate assessmenin violation of the Global Change Research Act and ordered it to produce a years - overdue national climate assessment.

San Francisco, Calif. — Following an earlier March 6th ruling finding the U.S. Department of Energy («DOE») in violation of its obligations under the Energy Policy Act of 1992, District Court Judge William Alsup yesterday rejected further government delay and ordered the DOE to come into compliance with the Act within 2 years.

Here are some of the other crimes for which Oakland says it will no longer be sending officers to the location unless it is «in - progress or there is a suspect on - scene:» • Lost Property • Theft • Vandalism • Vehicle Burglary • Vehicle Tampering • Residential Burglary • Identity Theft • Annoying and Harassing Phone Calls • Barking Dog • Violation of a Restraining Order • Reporting a Runaway • Violation of a Court Order • Violation of a child custody order where one parent failed to return the child at a specified Order • Reporting a Runaway • Violation of a Court Order • Violation of a child custody order where one parent failed to return the child at a specified Order • Violation of a child custody order where one parent failed to return the child at a specified order where one parent failed to return the child at a specified time.

Herb Weinberg and Randy Hsieh sought an emergency ex parte stay of the impending license suspension before the Los Angeles Superior Court in order to prevent the closure of the pharmacy on the basis that the alleged violations were not Category III as the Board found.

Take for example in Broadcom v Qualcomm, a patent litigation case where the court ordered $ 8.5 M in sanctions and investigation of ethics violations for a large quantity of withheld documents when a simple search revealed missing documents.

The court also found a violation of Art 8 given the disproportionate interference with the applicant's right to respect for his private life caused by the fact that the Russian order had rendered him legally incapable in all respects.

Representation of minority shareholders in home healthcare franchising companies in various state court litigation involving breach of fiduciary duty, breach of a shareholders» agreement, fraud and other tort claims, including successfully prosecuting charges for violation of court orders freezing millions of corporate funds, resulting in a civil contempt judgment that included a jail sentence.

In the U.S., for example, absent a court order, handing over customer information to a civil litigant is a criminal violation of the Stored Communications Protection Act, 18 U.S.C. 2072 (a)(1), which holds that anyone «providing an electronic communication service to the public shall not knowingly divulge to any person or entity the contents of a communication while in electronic storage by that service.&raquIn the U.S., for example, absent a court order, handing over customer information to a civil litigant is a criminal violation of the Stored Communications Protection Act, 18 U.S.C. 2072 (a)(1), which holds that anyone «providing an electronic communication service to the public shall not knowingly divulge to any person or entity the contents of a communication while in electronic storage by that service.&raquin electronic storage by that service.»

Yet in several cases recently, this court has seen troubling failures to produce exculpatory evidence in violation of the law and this court's orders.

In its decision against Google, the majority of the Court noted that «This is not an order to remove speech that, on its face, engages freedom of expression values, it is an order to de-index websites that were in violation of several court orderIn its decision against Google, the majority of the Court noted that «This is not an order to remove speech that, on its face, engages freedom of expression values, it is an order to de-index websites that were in violation of several court orCourt noted that «This is not an order to remove speech that, on its face, engages freedom of expression values, it is an order to de-index websites that were in violation of several court orderin violation of several court orcourt orders.

306, 665 A. 2d 112 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1995)-- This appeal arose out of the trial of an arson case in which the insurer was allowed to introduce otherwise hearsay evidence in order to defend itself against allegations of bad faith and violations of Connecticut's Unfair Trade Practices Act.

It then ordered that the case be reargued in order to answer the question: «Whether and under what circumstances the Alien Tort Statute... allows courts to recognize a cause of violations of the law of nations occurring within the territory of a sovereign other than the United States.»

But the court censured Webber, as well, because Rule 30 (b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure only allows lawyers to instruct deponents not to answer in order to preserve a priviledge or avoid violation of a protective order.

This leaves the door open to forcing a step - parent into a child custody case to hold that step - parent in contempt of court for his or her contribution to any violation of child custody or parenting time orders applicable to his or her spouse's children.

In order to bring a lawsuit in federal court, there has to be a violation of a federal statute related to employmenIn order to bring a lawsuit in federal court, there has to be a violation of a federal statute related to employmenin federal court, there has to be a violation of a federal statute related to employment.

The best way for a parent to get maximum power, protections, and right is to get: 1) sole legal custody (so that the parent can make all major decisions without his input and without court approval); 2) the most days and overnights of parenting time as the court will allow; and 3) very specific language throughout the final custody / divorce order that spells out exactly which activities and behaviors that the parents must either perform or are prohibited from doing (so that if the other parent violates, then it will be easier to prove the violation to the court and therefore get some sort of remedy, such as finding the other parent in contempt of court).

An interesting decision was issued by the Arizona Court of Appeals in Munari v. Hotham regarding whether a stepparent could be held in contempt for violation of a court order for visitation of his or her spouse's cCourt of Appeals in Munari v. Hotham regarding whether a stepparent could be held in contempt for violation of a court order for visitation of his or her spouse's ccourt order for visitation of his or her spouse's child.

Ryan Newell discusses the first case in which a court has ordered an employer to pay damages for a Human Rights Code violation in the context of a wrongful dismissal action.

(3) If a court, prior to April 11, 1991, issued an order granting parenting time rights to a parent who is not the residential parent and did not require the residential parent in that order to give the parent who is granted the parenting time rights notice of any change of address and if the residential parent files a notice of relocation pursuant to division (G)(1) of this section, the court shall determine if the parent who is granted the parenting time rights has been convicted of or pleaded guilty to a violation of section 2919.25 of the Revised Code involving a victim who at the time of the commission of the offense was a member of the family or household that is the subject of the proceeding, has been convicted of or pleaded guilty to any other offense involving a victim who at the time of the commission of the offense was a member of the family or household that is the subject of the proceeding and caused physical harm to the victim in the commission of the offense, or has been determined to be the perpetrator of the abusive act that is the basis of an adjudication that a child is an abused child.

Thus the Supreme Court held that the policy of «deport first; appeal later» is a violation of human rights as an appeal against a deportation order by reference to a claim in respect of private and family life under ECHR, art 8 should be effective, and this means there must be an opportunity for appellants to give live evidence to assist the tribunal.

(4) If a parent who is granted parenting time rights pursuant to this section or any other section of the Revised Code is authorized by an order issued pursuant to this section or any other court order to receive a copy of any notice of relocation that is filed pursuant to division (G)(1) of this section or pursuant to court order, if the residential parent intends to move to a residence other than the residence address specified in the parenting time order, and if the residential parent does not want the parent who is granted the parenting time rights to receive a copy of the relocation notice because the parent with parenting time rights has been convicted of or pleaded guilty to a violation of section 2919.25 of the Revised Code involving a victim who at the time of the commission of the offense was a member of the family or household that is the subject of the proceeding, has been convicted of or pleaded guilty to any other offense involving a victim who at the time of the commission of the offense was a member of the family or household that is the subject of the proceeding and caused physical harm to the victim in the commission of the offense, or has been determined to be the perpetrator of the abusive act that is the basis of an adjudication that a child is an abused child, the residential parent may file a motion with the court requesting that the parent who is granted the parenting time rights not receive a copy of any notice of relocation.

The Ohio Supreme Court also concluded that the State had to establish scienter in order to prove a violation of § 2907.323 (A)(3) based on the Ohio default statute specifying that recklessness applies when another statutory provision lacks an intent specification.

I acknowledge and agree that violation of this Employee Confidential Information and Invention Assignment Agreement by me may cause the Company irreparable harm, and therefore I agree that the Company will be entitled to seek extraordinary relief in court, including, but not limited to, temporary restraining orders, preliminary injunctions and permanent injunctions without the necessity of posting a bond or other security (or, where such a bond or security is required, I agree that a $ [NUMBER] bond will be adequate), in addition to and without prejudice to any other rights or remedies that the Company may have for a breach of this Employee Confidential Information and Invention Assignment Agreement.

If one party is found in violation of the order they can be held in contempt of court, face fines and even damage their credibility and jeopardize their future wants or needs.