Not exact matches
The
conclusion we should draw after so many pundits were
wrong about Donald Trump's candidacy isn't that there's no such thing as expertise
in political commentary.
So Hempton's
conclusion was that either the Times had the story
wrong, and Trump wasn't able to avoid taxes, or Trump used some other tax avoidance scheme that was still hiding
in his tax returns.
But if your concern about index investing starts and ends with the notion that some fund managers will lose their jobs, that you might have to pay slightly more for an airline seat, and that it's a small price to pay for lower fees
in your 401 (k), your
conclusion might be incredibly
wrong.
Because, clearly, ETF flows data
in the
wrong hands can produce misguided
conclusions like these.
------------------- Upon what standard do lean
in order to draw the
conclusion that anyone's morality may be judged as
wrong?
This article is pretty limited
in it's scope, creating tunnel vision that leads to a
wrong conclusion.
Bishop Richard Holloway took this to its natural
conclusion in 1995 when he wrote
in The Times «God has given us our promiscuous genes, so I think it would be
wrong for the Church to condemn people who have followed their instincts.»
You CAN conclude that, but since you haven't taken many factors
in, your
conclusion is
wrong.
Brown's
conclusion is based on this premise and it is here that Brown has gone
wrong in his argument.
Whitehead states the
wrong: «Mr. Russell, a scholar known
in every major university of the world, impelled by motives which religion dare not disown, has been driven out of academic life and deprived of academic encouragement...» Whitehead «leave [s] the question here,» without drawing the
conclusion explicitly: restore the lectureship to rectify the
wrong.
Rejecting an imaginary being
in the heavens as a moral compass does not rationally lead to the
conclusion that there is no right and
wrong.
The
conclusion Campolo came to was if «the reality»
in front of you conflicts with your faith, then it's your faith which is
wrong and must change
in some way.
However, I've sometimes drawn the
wrong conclusion from this, believing that I just need to never get that angry or stressed
in the first place.
I think Ayn formed the
wrong conclusion about business and government and hence I don't agree with her premise
in Atlas Shrugged, but I still can appreciate what a waste government and group thinkers can be.
When I ponder your struggling between God
in old testament and Jesus, It comes to my own
conclusion (which is still guessing... I can be 100 %
wrong but, it makes sense to me...:)
Sure you can claim to be «rational» and you are right, but at the same time that you are right
in conclusions you are
wrong, because you have not dealt with metaphysical claims with a proper method.
But wasn't there something
wrong with holding theological doctrines and then refusing to draw the consistent
conclusions in particular cases?
So
in conclusion, if I am
wrong what have I lost, comared to those that reject the claims of Christ and spend an eternity
in hell.
Mind you that wasn't the only thing you said
in that particular thread that led me to the
conclusion that attempting to have any real dialogue with you was pointless and I was already well on the way to that point from the countless encounters of you avoiding questions and offering nothing more to support your stance than «I'm right and you're
wrong» or «read it again, it's clear».
there are plenty of things
wrong in her life, not bringing a child into it would be a sound
conclusion, well go with that.»
Anyway
in my
conclusion on this I will say I AM A DIE HARD ARSENAL FAN, though my loyalty should not mean I should support all the
wrong doings and sit back and watch my beloved team going down the drain and I am there smiling, that's not love, that's just playing stup!d or been a blind follower.
Henry may not have the experience to take Arsenal to the place that us fans want the club to be
in, but to suggest he couldn't do a job at Arsenal would be the
wrong conclusion to make.
talk about skewing the stats to fit your own
conclusions... this is like a slap
in the face to every real Arsenal fan... have you no shame, have you no dignity, have you no sense of right from
wrong... if you think everything was so well orchestrated why is everyone and their brother laughing at the way
in which we conduct business both on and off the field... either you're a paid hack or a delusional buffoon... regardless you can't be a genuine Arsenal fan because the difficulties facing this club having been going on for years and this latest episode
in our pathetic recent history is but a glaring reminder of how far we have fallen... I'm not going to waste my time discrediting every single ridiculous statement you made
in your love letter to Wenger, but if you write another article I will gladly expose you for the fraud you truly are... this club is
in desperate need of a serious cleansing and for you to try and package this dog and pony show as a well - oiled machine is a direct insult to anyone who has supported this team during the supposed «lean» years... the deceptive and disrespectful manner
in which this organization has treated it's fans is an abomination to supporters everywhere and for you to even try to justify their actions is akin to saying just shut - up and keep filling our pockets... so please crawl back under whatever stone you crawled out from under and think carefully before you spew this type of propaganda ever again
So
in conclusion; Wenger is
wrong when he does not pay the going rate and
wrong when he does pay the going rate.
He famously made that point when we lost to Liverpool right at the beginning of the season: «To come out with the
conclusion that you have to kick the ball
in the stands to win football games, then that's
wrong.
But then, surely your
conclusion ought to be that Wenger bought the
wrong sort of player for the position
in which we have BADLY needed top quality for the last decade, since Gilberto left,
in CDM.
«To come out with the
conclusion that you have to kick the ball
in the stands to win football games, then that's
wrong.
Picture this, we don't come out of the gate firing on all cylinders, Wenger speaks of how there wasn't enough time for the first - teamers to build chemistry, several key players aren't even playing because of Wenger's utterly ridiculous policy regarding players who played
in the Confed Cup or the under21s and the boo - birds have returned
in full flight... if these things were to happen, which is quite possible considering the Groundhog Day mentality of this club, how long do you think it will take for Wenger to recant his earlier statements regarding Europa... I would suggest that it's these sorts of comments from Wenger which are often his undoing... why would any manager worth his weight
in salt make such a definitive statement before the season has even started... why would any manager who fashions himself an educated man make such pronouncements before even knowing what his starting 11 will be come Friday, let alone on September 1st... why would any manager who has a tenuous relationship with a great many supporters offer up such a potentially contentious talking point considering how many times his own words have come back to bite him
in the ass... I think he does this because he doesn't care what you or I think,
in fact he's more than slightly infuriated by the very idea of having to answer to the likes of you and me... that might have been acceptable during his formative years
in charge, when the fans were rewarded with an scintillating brand of football and success felt like a forgone
conclusion, but this new Wenger led team barely resembles that team of ore... whereas
in times past we relished a few words from our seemingly cerebral manager,
in recent times those words have been replaced by a myriad of excuses, a plethora of infuriating stories about who he could have signed but didn't and what can only be construed as outright fabrications... it's kind of funny that when we want some answers, like during the whole contract debacle of last season, we can't get an intelligent word out of him, but when we just what him to show his managerial acumen through his actions, we can't seem to get him to shut - up... I beg you to prove me
wrong Arsene
For various reasons, it might be
wrong to draw too many
conclusions from the two most recent encounters — the FA Cup final, which went Arsenal's way, and the recent friendly
in Beijing, which the Blues won with great ease.
The best thing that can be done, at least from my perspective
in terms of the best thing that could have been done for me, is to gently try to hold mom into the feelings of being terrified, the feelings of wondering what went
wrong, because there is a tendency to go straight from «big bad thing happened»... to «
in conclusion» with no description of the lived experience.
But after reading a few books about how best to care for your new baby we were left with one of two
conclusions: either everything we had learned
in anthropology, my specialty, was
wrong, or all these western recommendations about how best to care for babies had nothing to do with babies at all.
Run through them
in your mind before you jump to
conclusions and think that there is something is
wrong.
So,
in response, I decided to start a blog to try and correct all of the inaccuracies one by one that are leading people to the
wrong conclusions about this initiative.
Although you may think of justifications as what your child gives you as an excuse when he's done something
wrong,
in math a justification is a statement that proves that a mathematical
conclusion is correct.
If we lose sight of the central role of debt
in this crisis we will come to the
wrong conclusions about how to respond.
«The tribunal wrongly neglected, failed and refused to abide by and follow the binding decision of the court of appeal
in APC vs Olujimi Agbaje: appeal no: CA / L / EP / GOV. / 751A / 2015 (unreported) delivered on 26th August, which was duly cited to it and thereby came to a
wrong conclusion.»
Boris Johnson's father Stanley, who worked
in the European Commission
in the 1970s, tells Sky News he believes his son has come to the
wrong conclusion on the European Union.
They've persisted
in drawing these
wrong conclusions and putting them
in their manifesto».
Not because it would lead to a re-run of the immigration - dominated 2005 campaign (as argued
in the Sunday Telegraph by my old friend Peter Oborne, who, not for the first time, has come to the right
conclusion but for the
wrong reason), but because I do not think he is needed and would become a distracting influence.
They'll talk about why the polls were
wrong in New Hampshire and how pollsters make
conclusions about how voters plan to cast their ballots.
But rather than writing off cancer immunotherapy, some researchers argue that the agents have been examined
in the
wrong way, resulting
in erroneous
conclusions.
Rao says, «Although we agree with Miller and Su that Youyou should be recognized as a representative, we find they went too far
in reaching
conclusions that are not supported by available sources and
in attributing credits based on claims that are at least controversial if not
wrong.»
That can lead to challenges
in understanding how a child is developing
in a second language and
conclusions that the child is pronouncing the word
wrong due to a language processing deficit, which
in turn can be a precursor to a disability diagnosis.
Sugihara, a mathematician and theoretical ecologist at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography
in La Jolla, Calif., analyzed that data and came to a surprising
conclusion: both potential explanations of the sardine collapse were
wrong.
Armando D'Agostino of the University of Milan
in Italy thinks that the strangeness of dreams resembles psychosis, because individuals are disconnected from reality and have disrupted thought processes that lead to
wrong conclusions.
Scientific freedom is essential for those who are working
in fields that have an impact on public policy, and it is also essential that scientists be able to follow the data without fear that their
conclusions will upset the
wrong people.
So,
in conclusion, if you're planning on visiting Kepler - 13Ab, bring your own UV protection — the naturally - occurring sunscreen snow is useless because it falls on the
wrong side of the planet.
However, Prof Michael Mann, distinguished professor of atmospheric science at Penn State University, who wasn't involved
in the study, says the researchers may have got their
conclusion the
wrong way around.
that
in effect leads the public to the
wrong conclusion.
However, the disparaging, constant stream of criticism often leads to depression, low self - esteem and negative identity
conclusions in many people — a strong critical voice has the power to convince the person it talks to that he or she is
wrong.