Sentences with phrase «in wrong thread»

(Tried to post this comment earlier but wordpress is really annoying in not accepting my login so I'm trying another address — and ended up in the wrong thread.

I anserwed you in wrong thread below, sorry... Thats what happend if you use converged device to do something (I, m typing from my milestone)

In the wrong thread.

Not exact matches

Every new bit of information in this thread supports Julie's story, and where clarifications have indicated that someone has been tarred with the wrong brush, she has been very quick to apologize and move on.

sorry; i must have hit the wrong reply button — this SHOULD have been tagged as a reply to a thread further down the page where i pointed out that the «Pastor» Knapp had shaved and was wearing a shirt made of a blended fabric — both also prohibited in Leviticus.

Yet NT verses have been given in this thread which clearly show that to be wrong.

Mind you that wasn't the only thing you said in that particular thread that led me to the conclusion that attempting to have any real dialogue with you was pointless and I was already well on the way to that point from the countless encounters of you avoiding questions and offering nothing more to support your stance than «I'm right and you're wrong» or «read it again, it's clear».

there's a right and wrong way to have a convo and you've already been a prick several times in this thread.

Resume: Always threads the needle in hindsight and is never wrong because, unlike like the rest of «yhall», I'm too smart to provide any foresight.

The other interesting aspects of this article are the possible anecdotal evidence for one of the benefits of free birth over a birth with an unskilled midwife, possible resulting in a false sense of security - she realised something was wrong and went to hospital - and also the description of the birth - the first twin's head essentially becoming trapped by the second twin - which seems to match something Attitude Devant raised as a possible complication of first twin breech, in one of the Lisa Barrett threads.

These are brand - new diapers that have a small defect in the manufacturing — sometimes it's as simple as using the wrong color of thread or a slight offset on one of the snaps.

I am not a medical professional, so please correct me if I am wrong, but we do understand how much of an important role that stress hormones play in labour — the way medical professionals do talk about birth in terms of risk without paying attention to emotions (I am getting this from a somewhat flippant comment earlier on this thread where the author says the would like to see 100 % c - section rate) does exacerbate the problem.

In short, they could be dirty, have a crooked tag, seams sewn with the wrong color thread, extra seams, etc..

I have also heard that you can buy slightly damaged (as in used the wrong color thread) diapers for a steep discount.

As I said yesterday, David Cameron made it perfectly clear during the leadership election that economic stability would be prioritised over unfunded tax cuts, and was subsequently elected by a significant majority of the party membership, so anybody getting their knickers in a twist about him sticking by that policy (the title of this thread is clearly wrong) now is being unreasonable.

The protagonists sometimes meddle to right wrongs which then shape the future, or they may observe narrative threads unfurl in the past with consequences revealed in their own timeline.

Paul Thomas Anderson «s Phantom Thread clearly rubbed some people the wrong way — see the recent think - piece in the New Yorker that completely misses what the film is actually about, for instance.

The primary revenge plot is a bore, which is still better than can be said about D'Artagnan's soggy romance with a chambermaid (a very out - of - place Mena Suvari); that thread is memorable for all the wrong reasons, in particular some forced and downright embarrassing sexual innuendo.

According to one thread in social media, the authors involved were trying to convince the naysayers that all these resellers are selling returns and books that should have been pulped because there was something wrong with them.

I stopped posting in the thread because I got the feeling that I had said something wrong.

I don't know what you're doing wrong, but like everyone else in this thread, my Wifi Xoom had Flash working out of the box on every site I tried it on.

This renders the whole answer to be completely wrong (as all the rest in this thread).

Six years have come and passed since the sudden announcement of Aliens: Colonial Marines, a game enthusiastically advertised as set to fix all the wrongs of Alien 3 and answer many of the unresolved plot threads in the franchise.

It was a game riddled with twists, turns and «wrong ends» that culminated in haunting, brutal death scenes, and its conclusion left many questions unanswered and more than a few loose threads untied (while at least one other was tied perhaps a bit too tightly)...

TRIBECA & SOHO & NOHO & EAST VILLAGE & MURRAY HILL 100 Painters of Tomorrow / 23 Warren / thru 12/6 Material Way curated by Kathleen Kucka / BMCC — CUNY / 81 Barclay / thru 12/1 Carey Denniston / Kansas / 59 Franklin / thru 12/20 Anton Perich / Postmasters / 54 Franklin (new location) / thru 11/22 Terry Winters / The National Exemplar / 381 Broadway @ White — suite 206 / thru 12/31 Bianculli's Personal Theory of TV Evolution organized by David Bianculli / Apexart / 291 Church / thru 12/20 Seokmin Ko; Elena Berriolo / API / 434 Greenwich / thru 12/20 Basim Magdy; Daphne Fitzpatrick; Will Yackulic / Art in General / 79 Walker / thru 1/10 Mohammed Kazem / Grahne / 157 Hudson / thru 12/20 MFA Thesis Exhibition (Part I) / Hunter / 205 Hudson (on Canal) / thru 11/22 Ariel Orozco / Brownstone / 3 Wooster / thru 11/22 Design Series / Swiss Institute / 18 Wooster / thru 11/23 Classical Nudes / Leslie - Lohman Museum / 26 Wooster / thru 1/4 Roy Lichtenstein / Feldman / 31 Mercer / thru 12/20 Opening 11/22 Pedro Cabrita Reis / Freeman / 140 Grand / thru 12/20 Sam Samore / Team / 83 Grand / thru 12/21 Opening 11/23 Tim Noble & Sue Webster / Geiss / 76 Grand / thru 12/20 Chris Domenick / Recess Activities / 41 Grand / thru 12/20 Smoothie Social: 11/22 (3 - 6 PM) Performance: 12/18 (6 - 8 PM) Prime Matter / Senaspace / 229 Centre / thru 12/6 Thread Lines; Xanti Schawinsky / Drawing Center / 35 Wooster / thru 12/14 Open Sessions 2 / Drawing Center: The Lab / 35 Wooster / thru 12/14 Opening 11/21 Andreas Schulze / Team / 47 Wooster / thru 12/21 Opening 11/23 Phillip Chen, etc. / Museum of Chinese in America / 215 Centre / thru 3/1 Nadja Frank; Jessica Segall / Denny / 261 Broome / thru 12/7 Paul Cowan / Clifton Benevento / 515 Broadway / thru 12/20 Mitsuko Miwa / Longhouse / 285 Spring / thru 12/6 Reuven Israel / Fridman / 287 Spring / thru 12/20 Plasmatik: K.K.Thoen, G.Kroenert, S.A.March, T.Francke, S.Tufnell; curated by N.Kates / Melissa / 102 Greene / Opening 11/20 (7 - 9 PM) Social Photography IV / Carriage Trade @ Harvey Foundation / 537 Broadway / Closing Reception 11/22 (6 - 9 PM) The Right Amount of Wrong curated by Lovina Purple / ISE Foundation / 555 Broadway / thru 12/19 Ernesto Burgos / Werble / 83 Van Dam / thru 12/20 Suzatte Bross / Geary / 185 Varick / thru 12/6 Amy O'Neill / Karma / 39 Great Jones / thru 12/6 Alex Kwartler; LeRoy Stevens / Karg / 41 Great Jones / thru 11/26 Learn to Read Art: A Surviving History of Printed Matter / 80WSE / NYU / 80 Washington Square East / thru 2/14 Opening 12/2 Reception 12/12 Ernest Cole / NYU Grey Art Gallery / 100 Wash..

I have gone through the first 6 videos and used the boxing for a loaf of bread and cutting board sketch (in the sketch thread on pg 116)... helped but after taking a photo of it realized all the things wrong with it, but it's much better than it would have been if I had not been following this course.

It emerges, rather than returns to the vagina, as in Terribly wrong, which has its faux - naif print - reversed lettering reproduced here again here in thread, tied up on the back of the blanket, reinforcing its deliberateness.

They seem to presume that Gavin's primary point in this thread is to rationalize why climate models are so wrong compared to reality, especially now they know for sure:

Wrong topic, it's not meant for discussion; plenty of that in prior threads.

I will offer up my apologies in advance because this is probably the wrong thread to ask this, however...

I see this as an identifying denydiot characteristic: regardless of the current thread, they jump in and repeat their obsession with whatever they think is wrong with Science.

I note that the censorship continues in this thread, with Dave Dardinger's comment being deleted because he suggested that John A should admit to being wrong.

The hurricane students therefore can not judge climateaudit on its proxy research, this is simply the wrong group of GT students, were merely passing judgement on the hurricane threads and the blogospheric process in general (as opposed to the more traditional venues of university seminars, the peer reviewed literature, conferences, etc).

Reading on new ideas we must remember what was discussed in another recent thread: Very many scientific papers are wrong, publishing also such papers is necessary for the progress of science, but we must remember that only well enough confirmed results are really part of best scientific understanding.

In response to my plea that everybody should ignore the several attempts to distract this thread by use of the «red herring» of atheists promoting their religion, your post at January 6, 2013 at 2:36 pm says I am «wrong» and addresses me with

It is Roy who either needs to make even just one comment on his own thread to either admit he's wrong, or prove all of us at PSI are wrong in some way, perhaps because the Second Law of Thermodynamics would not somehow lead to isentropic conditions, rather than isothermal in a vertical plane.

It should be clear from the recent comments on Roy Spencer's latest thread that Jeff Conlon (owner of «The Air Vent» website) was wrong in assuming that microbolometers (infra red thermometers) disproved what Prof Claes Johnson said about how one - way spontaneous radiation can not transfer heat from a cooler source to a warmer target.

[P] erhaps more important than demonstrating that the global cooling myth is wrong, this review shows the remarkable way in which the individual threads of climate science of the time — each group of researchers pursuing their own set of questions — was quickly woven into the integrated tapestry that created the basis for climate science as we know it today.

I see no poster in this thread has proven anything wrong with those algebraic proof steps especially original poster Robert Brown.

I'd have used italics, but why use italics when yelling works just as well and can not mess up the next post in the thread if you end it wrong?

(reposted, first attempt was at the wrong parent in the thread) @Steven Mosher at 11:57 am Rasey: «Undocumented breakpoints derived from differences to a krigged fuzzy surface (one with error bar thickness) defined by uncertain control points in an iterative process is a source for huge amounts of error.»

I also participated in a discussion on this on the Open Thread, and especially Bob Tisdale's WUWT response to it, which got wrong what many skeptics here are getting wrong.

• This has been a great Thread, although it begins by giving too much prominence to Taleb's version of Popper's original Black Swan finding, where although citing Popper in general quite often, he somehow manages to omit Popper's actual Black Swan statement, which is really the same as Einstein's No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right; a single experiment can prove me wrong.

In the thread above I have tried (in vain) to get Trenberth's critics to put their scientific reasons on the table why they think he is wrong, so that we could have a good science discussioIn the thread above I have tried (in vain) to get Trenberth's critics to put their scientific reasons on the table why they think he is wrong, so that we could have a good science discussioin vain) to get Trenberth's critics to put their scientific reasons on the table why they think he is wrong, so that we could have a good science discussion.

In what would saying that «you are wrong because you are a leftist, and leftists are immoral, self - serving, idiots» (such as our much beloved Wags, GaryM, Chief, or Peter Lang might write in any given thread) be at all likely to have a positive outcomIn what would saying that «you are wrong because you are a leftist, and leftists are immoral, self - serving, idiots» (such as our much beloved Wags, GaryM, Chief, or Peter Lang might write in any given thread) be at all likely to have a positive outcomin any given thread) be at all likely to have a positive outcome?

I don't know about Alexi but I see that Annan is further threatening poor Steve in the Lindzen thread, who had already apologized to Tobis even though he hadn't done anything wrong.

Teddy — He is wrong in almost all of the many comments he has made in recent threads.

More info and beautiful pictures in the extended.Working for the fashion industry as a photographer, Besanson realized how much fabrics and threads that were in perfect condition were usually thrown away for nothing (wrong color, leftovers).

The support to the Guardian in this thread go along the line of «there are some minor things wrong, but they're not scientists and it is a difficult task».

As was demonstrated in the thread I linked to, this is simply wrong.