Sentences with phrase «in young earth»

While reading The Language of God, I experienced a strange phenomenon: I simultaneously grew more convinced that my faith in God was in fact reasonable while also growing more convinced that my belief in young earth creationism was not.

According to this chart, the Christian worldview includes belief in young earth creationism, support for the death penalty, a commitment to mind / body dualism, rejection of non-traditional family structure, and devotion to fee enterprise and capitalism.

Doris, I know and love several people who wholeheartedly believe in young earth creation.

Oh and Jerry... your «earned Ph.D. from an accredited institution» is clearly not in the sciences... LOL All those thousands of scientists who you claim believe in your young earth quackery?

I would like the name of one scientist that believes in a young earth and does so for non-religious reasons.

And to claim no «legitimate scientists» believe in a young earth is a fallacy.

Not exact matches

The potentially devastating impacts of showing such material to young children were illustrated back in 2009, when conspiracy theorists began circulating the idea that an invisible planet called «Nibiru» would collide with the Earth in 2012, and destroy it.

Once the U.S. had beaten the Soviet Union's cosmonauts to the moon and funding dried up, Young pushed NASA to return to the moon or venture to Mars, to provide the human race with a backup home in the event of Earth's destruction.

In 1981, Young commanded the shuttle program's inaugural mission, orbiting Earth 37 times in the ColumbiIn 1981, Young commanded the shuttle program's inaugural mission, orbiting Earth 37 times in the Columbiin the Columbia.

To prepare for our future in low - Earth orbit, cislunar space, on the Moon, and on Mars, we need to foster a diverse pool of qualified, enthusiastic young people who are inspired to further the off - Earth dream.

No, just over 40 % are young earth creationists, based on their infantile beliefs in the Easter Bunny, or some other fictional character.

I don't think Christians do themselves any favors by throwing their lot in with «Young Earth» creationists like Kenneth Ham.

Young earth creationism is ludicrous and young earth creationists, most of whom live in the United States and are fundamentalist Christians, are the laughing stock of the thinking wYoung earth creationism is ludicrous and young earth creationists, most of whom live in the United States and are fundamentalist Christians, are the laughing stock of the thinking wyoung earth creationists, most of whom live in the United States and are fundamentalist Christians, are the laughing stock of the thinking world.

An Australian geologist who got his credentials dating rocks billions of years old, still selling his services as a qualified geologist, but also employed as as a «Creationist Assistant Professor of Geology» by the Institute for Creation Research in the USA, where he supports a young earth.

Perhaps you can disprove certain beliefs, such as the «young earth» idea, but at the core level science and religion are not in conflict.

Ham utterly failed to establish his contention, that Creationism, in particular Young Earth Creationism, is a viable model.

As I sat alone in a room wondering f I was living my last day on earth — the things that went through my head were exactly what this author touched upon in her article and that I had felt during my illness in my younger days.

Dave Well maybe if you ask our Topher if he would want to see young earth creation or ID taught in schools over evolution then would you understand my concerns.

And yet you are a self - professed «Young Earth Creationist» nutjob without an ounce of understanding in science.

I don't «poke fun» of people but I do challenge Young Earth Creationists in matters of science.

A selection of statements on this blog by young earth creationists in just the last few days: Nope..

Yeah, they probably don't even believe in other stuff like talking snakes, a young earth, walking on water, virgin birth, and all that other everyday stuff that wacked - out Christians believe...

@topher, it's only people in your cult that say that current dating methods are flawed or that they point to a young earth.

Genesis 19:31 And the firstborn said unto the younger, Our father is old, and there is not a man in the earth to come in unto us after the manner of all the earth: 19:32 Come, let us make our father drink wine, and we will lie with him, that we may preserve seed of our father.

[6] Although many young Earth creationists (YECs) are active in the development of creation science, an endeavor that holds that the events as - sociated with supernatural creation can be evidenced and modeled through an interpretation of the scientific method, the consensus among scientists is that creation science is unscientific in both conception and methodology.

Reading breathless media reports about CO2 «pollution» and about minimizing our carbon footprints, one might think that the earth can not have too little CO2, as Simpson thought one couldn't be too thin — a view which was also overstated, as we have seen from the sad effects of anorexia in so many young women.

In fact, it's been demonstrated that population numbers are well within the limits for the Biblical view of a young earth.

Those earlier Christians who believed Scripture teaches a young Earth and human origins only 6000 years ago could not explain Indians in America without unsupported speculation.

During the «Younger Dryas» some 12,000 years ago, the earth very dramatically cooled and warmed by as much as 10 degrees Celsius in fifty years.

Not only are there reasons not to trust in an old earth, there's plenty of evidence in support of a young earth.

Most of the 350 - plus books written by «creation scientists» consist in large part of discussions of the supposed errors of evolutionary teaching, reviewing vast amounts of technical scientific data and theory, challenging this or that piece of evidence, method of dating or use of data, while producing evidences and counterarguments of their own in favor of a young earth, recent humanity, worldwide flood, etc..

Are there non believers in your stack of proof for a young earth?

While mainline publishers of religious books and church - school curricula have been virtually silent on the subject, there are currently in print more than 350 books challenging evolutionary science and advocating a «creation science» based on six 24 - hour days of creation, a «young - earth» dating, and a worldwide «flood geology.»

Matthew 11:25 At that time Jesus said in response: «I publicly praise you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because you have hidden these things from the wise and intellectual ones and have revealed them to young children

Sad when people want lies like a «young earth» and that «evolution is a myth» or that «some god caused» the big bang taught to their children in their schools, paid for by their tax dollars.

In addition to his advice to the young ruler, there was his clear injunction to store up treasure not on earth but only in heaven, his rather pointed remarks on the impossibility of dual service to both God and Mammon, his parable about the rich man and Lazarus (which was not, I think we can grant, merely a warning against dissipation), and so oIn addition to his advice to the young ruler, there was his clear injunction to store up treasure not on earth but only in heaven, his rather pointed remarks on the impossibility of dual service to both God and Mammon, his parable about the rich man and Lazarus (which was not, I think we can grant, merely a warning against dissipation), and so oin heaven, his rather pointed remarks on the impossibility of dual service to both God and Mammon, his parable about the rich man and Lazarus (which was not, I think we can grant, merely a warning against dissipation), and so on.

But if you don't champion the place of the arts within the Body of Christ, if you don't encourage young Christians to pursue the calling God has put on their hearts, if you don't train up your creative troops to stand and fight, then why on earth would you — would we — expect to see the Church being anything other than routed in the world of entertainment?

As I've said many times before, I'm not particularly interested in converting young earth creationists into evolutionary creationists.I believe that Christians should be able to fellowship together in love and unity regardless of their various positions on the interpretation of Genesis Being neither an Old Testament scholar nor a scientist, I'll leave that debate up to the experts.

Since I've been asked: I'm with Nye in that I don't believe young earth creationism is a viable model of origins in today's modern scientific era.

Answers in genisis is a young earth creationist website full of bs.

Or if you were witness to that lovable young man's beautiful enthusiasm when he read and heard of the great men who fought with a heavy destiny and suffered badly in the world, the glorious ones whom earth renounced because it was not worthy of them, would you dare, when no clamor caused your speech to wander but when the stillness of intimacy, of the lovable one's confidence, the in experience of the young man, all obliged you to tell the truth; at such a time would you dare lay your hand on your heart and say, «Such things no longer happen.

This is the same as someone a couple of hundred years ago saying that because all Christian religions had thus far been «young earth» in nature that Christianity and young - earthism are the same thing.

One only need search for «young earth geology» on youtube to get a plethora of videos from a Dr Snelling who was referenced a few times by Ham in the recent Ham - Nye debate.

I.e., Andrew Snelling who obtained credentials for his expertise as a geologist in dating things, but who simultaneously worked for one of the big «young - earth» groups.

I'm not suggesting that God made a young earth and threw in bones to confuse people.

In «The Genesis Flood,» the 1961 book that in many ways help launch the Young Earth creationism movement in the United States, the authors write: «Our conclusions must unavoidably be colored by our Biblical presuppositions, and this we plainly acknowledge.&raquIn «The Genesis Flood,» the 1961 book that in many ways help launch the Young Earth creationism movement in the United States, the authors write: «Our conclusions must unavoidably be colored by our Biblical presuppositions, and this we plainly acknowledge.&raquin many ways help launch the Young Earth creationism movement in the United States, the authors write: «Our conclusions must unavoidably be colored by our Biblical presuppositions, and this we plainly acknowledge.&raquin the United States, the authors write: «Our conclusions must unavoidably be colored by our Biblical presuppositions, and this we plainly acknowledge.»

In this way, young earth creationism is demonstrably incorrect as a theory.

Creationism means believing in a literal 6 day creation, believing that the words in the Bible were written in English and the term day was used (it wasn't but that's another argument), and a young 6000 — 10000 year old Earth.

Ken Ham challenged Bill Nye to a debate, even while Ken Ham continues to run from me and my proposal that he «come out» and «come clean» regarding his positions relating to my argument that so many of his followers rail against but which quite properly is able to demonstrate why it is, in part, that young - earth creation - science promoters have failed in their scientific pretensions and legal challenges.

The stories you hear and the things you hear in this documentary will break your heart for these poor young girls who are caught into the darkest and most evil web on earth.