Knowing all the individuals involved
in your court case ensures we have accurate documentation of the extent of your injuries.
Not exact matches
«Giving customers back their right to take Wells Fargo to
court gives them the power to
ensure they are made whole and helps prevent
cases like this
in the future,» he said.
In most
cases, the non-custodial parent can still see his child and even have overnights with her, but the
court may implement precautions to
ensure that she remains safe during these times, such as supervised visitation.
«
In the future, depending on the number of
cases that will come up for trial, the Judiciary may increase the
courts and number of Judges to
ensure that the
courts are not overwhelmed by the volume of work and that the
cases are dealt with expeditiously,» the statement added.
In January 2012, in a speech in Strasburg, Prime Minister David Cameron set out an agenda for reforming the ECtHR which would reduce the number of admissible cases, and thus the backlog, by ensuring that the Court did not act as a small claims court or Court of Fourth Instance and did not go over national decisions where it did not need t
In January 2012,
in a speech in Strasburg, Prime Minister David Cameron set out an agenda for reforming the ECtHR which would reduce the number of admissible cases, and thus the backlog, by ensuring that the Court did not act as a small claims court or Court of Fourth Instance and did not go over national decisions where it did not need t
in a speech
in Strasburg, Prime Minister David Cameron set out an agenda for reforming the ECtHR which would reduce the number of admissible cases, and thus the backlog, by ensuring that the Court did not act as a small claims court or Court of Fourth Instance and did not go over national decisions where it did not need t
in Strasburg, Prime Minister David Cameron set out an agenda for reforming the ECtHR which would reduce the number of admissible
cases, and thus the backlog, by
ensuring that the
Court did not act as a small claims court or Court of Fourth Instance and did not go over national decisions where it did not nee
Court did not act as a small claims
court or Court of Fourth Instance and did not go over national decisions where it did not nee
court or
Court of Fourth Instance and did not go over national decisions where it did not nee
Court of Fourth Instance and did not go over national decisions where it did not need to.
ALBANY — Providing legal services for low - income New Yorkers
in civil
cases boosts the economy by speeding
court dockets, keeping people
in their homes and
ensuring they get the federal...
«Though the
case is now before an appellate
court, the body language of our President is equally important
in ensuring the preservation of our democratic tenets.
ALBANY — Providing legal services for low - income New Yorkers
in civil
cases boosts the economy by speeding
court dockets, keeping people
in their homes and
ensuring they get the federal benefits they're due, state Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli said Tuesday.
The Lagos State Government on Wednesday assured that no effort would be spared
in ensuring the logical conclusion of the
cases filed
in court...
«We urge the
court to pursue this matter to a satisfactory conclusion by taking the
case forward as required by the provisions of the Rome Statute, and
ensuring a thorough investigation and prosecution of suspected perpetrators of grand corruption
in the electricity sector
in Nigeria,» he added.
Saying the
case was still
in court, Adeyeye said the police must ensure that Sheriff and others «are not allowed to use the secretariat,» adding that the status quo ante must be maintained until the determination of the appeal before the Supreme C
court, Adeyeye said the police must
ensure that Sheriff and others «are not allowed to use the secretariat,» adding that the status quo ante must be maintained until the determination of the appeal before the Supreme
CourtCourt.
Nana Oye, however, said statistics from DOVVSU showed that out of 1,547 sexual and gender - based violence
cases sent to
court in 2014, convictions were secured for 160
cases, representing 10.3 per cent and asserted that the way forward was to
ensure that the laws were enforced and implementation tracked through an effective monitoring system,
in addition to building the capacities of law enforcement institutions, social services and healthcare providers.
«As a party, we shall fully cooperate with the IGP and the Nigeria Police
in ensuring maximum compliance with the
Court order dated May 12, 2016 to the effect that no election should be conducted into the above offices, namely National Chairman, National Secretary, and National Auditor pending the resolution of the
cases in Court.
The
case was referred to the European
Court of Justice, which ruled
in 2014 that national
courts can and should
ensure that governments act to get air pollution below legal limits «as soon as possible».
While district reform collapsed, and claimed the
court case on the never - implemented voucher program as collateral, charter parents will
ensure that school choice carries on
in this Colorado suburban county.
Then there is the fact that
in the first
case to go to the Supreme
Court under the special education law, Hendrick Hudson District Board of Education v. Rowley (1982), the
Court ruled that the way to
ensure students» receiving an «appropriate» education was to follow proper procedures.
A defining moment came
in the 1970s, when the California Supreme
Court in Serrano v. Priest decided that in order to ensure equal educational opportunity for all children, all school districts in California must spend equal amounts per pupil, instigating a wave of school - finance court cases across the cou
Court in Serrano v. Priest decided that
in order to
ensure equal educational opportunity for all children, all school districts
in California must spend equal amounts per pupil, instigating a wave of school - finance
court cases across the cou
court cases across the country.
We hope the state's highest
court will take up the
case and rule
in favor of the students, but regardless of what happens
in court, the state legislature has the ultimate responsibility to fix a broken system and
ensure that every child has an effective teacher
in the classroom.
-LSB-...] Our goal
in filing a motion for further relief -LSB-...] was straightforward: The United States is seeking the
court's assistance
in ensuring that the information Louisiana collects
in connection with its school voucher program is provided to the United States
in a timely fashion and that Louisiana implements its program
in full compliance with federal law, including the desegregation order
in this
case.
Also, given Samsung's recent spate of
court battles with Apple over
cases of infringement of the iPad's design patents, the Samsung design team will work doubly hard to
ensure their next tablet is discussed more
in tech circles and markets than various
courts the world over.
Following the previous
case law of the
Court, particularly the DRI
case, the level of protection
ensured in the EU is quite demanding and the respect of same level of protection has to be
ensured before transferring personal data to third countries (see
in particular para. 96
in Schrems).
So while this law student initiative might,
in the long run help cure the problem of diversity at the Supreme
Court (by
ensuring a larger minority representation at large firms that handle Supreme
Court cases), the growing consolidation of the Supreme
Court bar still troubles me - as much or more than the lack of diversity.
This month, the government began negotiations with the European Union to make sure that as Britain leaves the EU, a clear set of rules remain
in place to
ensure that whenever an issue of family law crosses borders, it's clear which
courts will hear the
case, and which country's law will be applied.
An MoJ spokesperson commented: «Any action to disrupt the
courts is unacceptable and we are taking all necessary steps to
ensure legal representation is available for defendants
in criminal
cases.
The
Court's contention that EU law provides for a complete system of remedies, or at least remedies «sufficient to
ensure effective judicial protection for individual parties
in the fields covered by EU law» (
Case C - 64 / 16, para. 34) has to be understood as a formalistic conception
in the sense that BITs clearly provide more complete and effective remedies to investors than EU law or domestic law — and this understanding has been at the heart of the reasoning of arbitral tribunals
in cases where they have rejected the argument that intra-EU BITs are incompatible with EU law.
Both sides will adopt legislation to
ensure this, and on the EU side the
Court of Justice will be the final authority, as it will be EU law, while UK
courts will be required to interpret the UK law
in the light of
Court case law, and will even have the possibility to refer questions for up to eight years.
During this address, there are 15 things that the
court must
ensure that the defendant understands (if they apply
in the
case); one of these is the nature of every charge the defendant is pleading guilty to.
However, the
Court of Justice found at paragraph 24 of Opinion 1/91 that the «interpretation mechanism» whereby the EEA court would have to interpret the rules of the agreement in conformity with the case - law of the Court of Justice would not be sufficient to ensure the legal homogeneity between the EEA states and the EU Member St
Court of Justice found at paragraph 24 of Opinion 1/91 that the «interpretation mechanism» whereby the EEA
court would have to interpret the rules of the agreement in conformity with the case - law of the Court of Justice would not be sufficient to ensure the legal homogeneity between the EEA states and the EU Member St
court would have to interpret the rules of the agreement
in conformity with the
case - law of the
Court of Justice would not be sufficient to ensure the legal homogeneity between the EEA states and the EU Member St
Court of Justice would not be sufficient to
ensure the legal homogeneity between the EEA states and the EU Member States.
Currently, the EU provides a mechanism which proscribes which country's jurisdiction takes precedence when there are two hearings taking place simultaneously
in different countries; it enables
court orders for maintenance, child contact or injunctions to be enforced
in all member states; it enables information to be shared between nations so a partner can be located across borders; and it
ensures cooperation between member states
in cases of child abduction overseas.
Since tort damages are recoverable, the
courts have attempted to carefully define the range of potential defendants
in interference
cases to
ensure that the liability of the contracting parties is limited to damages available for breach of contract.
I constantly and diligently work on
cases to
ensure that my clients obtain the results they need, and I utilize every ounce of my top - tier legal education, my experience
in both state and federal
courts, and my unswerving level of commitment to achieve this objective.
It is rare that the
court in BC will require a claimant to hire a lawyer, especially for a personal injury
case, and it is the claimant's responsibility to
ensure they are properly represented at trial.
If your claim does go to
court, your attorney will argue your
case in the courtroom and
ensure that justice is done.
Most
courts forbid sequestered jurors from making or receiving phone calls, or will only allow them if a bailiff, U.S. marshal, or other
court official listens
in to
ensure that the
case is not discussed
in any way.
Many of these
cases are resolved without having to go to
court; however, having a legal representative on your side is a must
in order to
ensure you are receiving adequate compensation, whether you go to
court or not.
With years of experience representing individuals and corporations charged with crimes
in state and federal
court throughout Georgia, he fights to
ensure that your rights are protected and that your
case results
in a successful disposition.
[Jonathan Adler, more (the Justice deserves commendation for
ensuring that the
Court will consist of only 7 non-recused Justices, the better to speak with a clear majority voice,
in case Donald Trump figures
in a disputed election)-RSB- Yet more: Bob Fredericks, New York Post (thanks for quote).
CONSIDERING that, as any national
court, the Unified Patent Court must respect and apply Union law and, in collaboration with the Court of Justice of the European Union as guardian of Union law, ensure its correct application and uniform interpretation; the Unified Patent Court must in particular cooperate with the Court of Justice of the European Union in properly interpreting Union law by relying on the latter's case law and by requesting preliminary rulings in accordance with Article 267 TFEU;&r
court, the Unified Patent
Court must respect and apply Union law and, in collaboration with the Court of Justice of the European Union as guardian of Union law, ensure its correct application and uniform interpretation; the Unified Patent Court must in particular cooperate with the Court of Justice of the European Union in properly interpreting Union law by relying on the latter's case law and by requesting preliminary rulings in accordance with Article 267 TFEU;&r
Court must respect and apply Union law and,
in collaboration with the
Court of Justice of the European Union as guardian of Union law, ensure its correct application and uniform interpretation; the Unified Patent Court must in particular cooperate with the Court of Justice of the European Union in properly interpreting Union law by relying on the latter's case law and by requesting preliminary rulings in accordance with Article 267 TFEU;&r
Court of Justice of the European Union as guardian of Union law,
ensure its correct application and uniform interpretation; the Unified Patent
Court must in particular cooperate with the Court of Justice of the European Union in properly interpreting Union law by relying on the latter's case law and by requesting preliminary rulings in accordance with Article 267 TFEU;&r
Court must
in particular cooperate with the
Court of Justice of the European Union in properly interpreting Union law by relying on the latter's case law and by requesting preliminary rulings in accordance with Article 267 TFEU;&r
Court of Justice of the European Union
in properly interpreting Union law by relying on the latter's
case law and by requesting preliminary rulings
in accordance with Article 267 TFEU;»
Hiring Horton, Dowd, Bartschi & Levesque as your trial litigation counsel
ensures that you will be prepared for any legal challenge that may arise
in your
case from pre-trial discovery through a petition for certification to the Connecticut Supreme
Court.
First,
in both
cases the General
Court referred to the role of diplomatic cables (read «Wikileaks») and the suggestion that some Member States,
in particular the UK, were subject to American pressure to
ensure the adoption of restrictive measures against Iran.
We can also expect the
court to be more active
in ensuring that arbitrators are accountable for delays
in hearing and deciding
cases.
This
Court of Appeal decision serves as a useful reminder that while in some cases the overriding objective and the obligation for a case to be dealt with proportionately will necessitate a speedy and efficient conclusion, in other cases, such as where a party's liberty is at stake, it is imperative that time is taken by the court to ensure that the procedural requirements are complied with, even if that means two separate hear
Court of Appeal decision serves as a useful reminder that while
in some
cases the overriding objective and the obligation for a
case to be dealt with proportionately will necessitate a speedy and efficient conclusion,
in other
cases, such as where a party's liberty is at stake, it is imperative that time is taken by the
court to ensure that the procedural requirements are complied with, even if that means two separate hear
court to
ensure that the procedural requirements are complied with, even if that means two separate hearings.
One of the key features of its mission and unifying nomophylactic essentially aimed at
ensuring certainty
in the interpretation of the law is the fact that,
in principle, the current rules do not allow the Supreme
Court to know the facts of a
case unless they prove by deeds already obtained
in proceedings
in the pre-trial stages, and only to the extent that it is necessary to know
in order to assess the remedies that the law allows you to use to motivate an application at the
Court.
The ECJ could not remain indifferent to the global trend to widen the category of crimes that «should not go unpunished», according to recent International Criminal
Court (ICC) guidelines (see Policy Paper on
Case Selection and Prioritisation of the Office of the Prosecutor, 15 September 2016), and therefore consider «serious» financial crimes as crimes against human rights, with the primary objective of
ensuring «jointly with the relevant national jurisdictions, that the most serious crimes committed
in each situation do not go unpunished» (ICC, Policy Paper, para. 1 (8)-RRB-, through the implementation of «effective» measures.
The fault - based divorce system that has produced such a situation sits very uncomfortably alongside the
court's overriding objective to deal with
cases justly,
ensuring that they are dealt with expeditiously and fairly,
in a way which is proportionate to the nature, importance and complexity of the issues.
«While not commenting on this
case directly, it must be said that lawyers should not be at risk when they are simply trying to
ensure that their clients appear
in appropriate attire before
court,» said Neuberger.
In the case of the CFSP the national courts replace the CJEU and have to ensure effective judicial protection of individuals also in the absence of the Court's competence to make preliminary rulings and monopoly to annul EU law (AG view, para 102
In the
case of the CFSP the national
courts replace the CJEU and have to
ensure effective judicial protection of individuals also
in the absence of the Court's competence to make preliminary rulings and monopoly to annul EU law (AG view, para 102
in the absence of the
Court's competence to make preliminary rulings and monopoly to annul EU law (AG view, para 102).
On the other hand, if national legislation falls within the scope of EU law, the
Court, when requested to give a preliminary ruling, must provide all the guidance as to interpretation needed in order for the national court to determine whether that legislation is compatible with the fundamental rights the observance of which the Court ensures (see, inter alia, Case C ‑ 617 / 10 Åkerberg Fransson [2013] ECR I ‑ 0000, paragraph 19 and the case - law ci
Court, when requested to give a preliminary ruling, must provide all the guidance as to interpretation needed
in order for the national
court to determine whether that legislation is compatible with the fundamental rights the observance of which the Court ensures (see, inter alia, Case C ‑ 617 / 10 Åkerberg Fransson [2013] ECR I ‑ 0000, paragraph 19 and the case - law ci
court to determine whether that legislation is compatible with the fundamental rights the observance of which the
Court ensures (see, inter alia, Case C ‑ 617 / 10 Åkerberg Fransson [2013] ECR I ‑ 0000, paragraph 19 and the case - law ci
Court ensures (see, inter alia,
Case C ‑ 617 / 10 Åkerberg Fransson [2013] ECR I ‑ 0000, paragraph 19 and the case - law cit
Case C ‑ 617 / 10 Åkerberg Fransson [2013] ECR I ‑ 0000, paragraph 19 and the
case - law cit
case - law cited).
Although the general procedure (dealt
in the District
Court) of compulsory execution is available for the enforcement of performance of obligations decided upon or agreed upon
in the disposition of family affairs
cases, the Family
Court has power to take, upon application of a party (obligee), certain measures for
ensuring the performance of such obligations.
However, the
courts are keen to find other ways
in which to change the outcome of a
case to reflect the change
in circumstances and
ensure a fair outcome.