This situation leaves vaccine investigators stuck with
inadequate study designs.
Not exact matches
Update: Six French scientific academies issued a statement on 19 October, saying the Séralini
study could not reverse previous conclusions that this and other GM crops are safe, because of problems with the experimental
design, statistical analysis and animals used, and
inadequate data.
The researchers found that «the
inadequate research
designs or incomplete reporting of data in many research
studies made it difficult to draw conclusions.
Considering that the
study as reported in the Séralini et al. (2012) publication is of
inadequate design, analysis and reporting, EFSA finds that it is of insufficient scientific quality for safety assessment.