But the courts struck out his mention of her recantation in his defence, on the basis the complainant's statement was
inadmissible in the court action, due to section 36 (3) of Regulated Health Professions Act stipulating that no document prepared for a proceeding under the Act was admissible in a civil proceeding.
Giving the final judgment
in the matter, the
Court declared Front Polisario's
action to be
inadmissible, since the Agreements could not be interpreted as applying to Western Sahara, leaving them with a lack of standing under Article 263 TFEU (Judgment para 133).