So when suspecting that science faces
inapt ISk («denial» is only this, once the section 10 negativities are discounted), observing such behavior does not confirm which side is which.
Further, as the «fundamental relationship» from section 1 is essentially equivalence (the same mechanisms drive apt and
inapt ISk), we can't reliably distinguish them by this means.
The 3P tests4 for a dividing line between skepticism (aka apt ISk) and «denial» (really,
inapt ISk), which evaluate rhetoric and source authorities, amount to little more than justifications for the authors» own biases35a.
Not exact matches
If so this
ISk proved
inapt.