Not exact matches
Remaining issues
include mechanisms for transparency that would ensure nations live up to their commitments, how much money will be available to help struggling nations adapt to
climate change or deal with loss and
damage from extreme weather, and whether commitments will be revisited and made more ambitious in the future.
Mitigation — reducing emissions fast enough to achieve the temperature goal A transparency system and global stock - take — accounting for
climate action Adaptation — strengthening ability of countries to deal with
climate impacts Loss and
damage — strengthening ability to recover
from climate impacts Support —
including finance, for nations to build clean, resilient futures As well as setting a long - term direction, countries will peak their emissions as soon as possible and continue to submit national
climate action plans that detail their future objectives to address
climate change.
Alarmed at the pace of
change to our Earth caused by human - induced
climate change,
including accelerating melting and loss of ice
from Greenland, the Himalayas and Antarctica, acidification of the world's oceans due to rising CO2 concentrations, increasingly intense tropical cyclones, more
damaging and intense drought and floods,
including glacial lakes outburst loods, in many regions and higher levels of sea - level rise than estimated just a few years ago, risks
changing the face of the planet and threatening coastal cities, low lying areas, mountainous regions and vulnerable countries the world over,
The scientists will outline how only a combined strategy employing all the major sustainable clean energy options —
including renewables and nuclear — can prevent the worst effects of
climate change by 2100, such as the loss of coral reefs, severe
damages from extreme weather events, and the destruction of biodiversity and ecosystems worldwide.
The local governments want the industries to pay for
damage and adaptation costs resulting
from climate change,
including sea - level rise and more extreme storms.
The decisions also
includes a mechanism for helping developing countries deal with loss and
damage from climate change.
They
include, among many others, principles on what is each nation's fair share of safe global emissions, who is responsible for reasonable adaptation needs of those people at greatest risk
from climate damages in poor nations that have done little to cause
climate change, should high - emitting nations help poor nations obtain
climate friendly energy technologies, and what responsibilities should high - emitting nations have for refugees who must flee their country because
climate change has made their nations uninhabitable?
The vulnerable nations declared that they are, «Alarmed at the pace of
change to our Earth caused by human - induced
climate change,
including accelerating melting and loss of ice
from Greenland, the Himalayas and Antarctica, acidification of the world's oceans due to rising CO2 concentrations, increasingly intense tropical cyclones, more
damaging and intense drought and floods,
including Glacial Lakes Outburst Floods, in many regions and higher levels of sea - level rise than estimated just a few years ago, risks
changing the face of the planet and threatening coastal cities, low lying areas, mountainous regions and vulnerable countries the world over...»
Included here are the
climate -
change - related costs of extreme weather events such as Hurricanes Irene (which resulted in
damages totaling $ 20 billion) and Sandy ($ 65 billion), along with the costs we incur
from increasingly dangerous floods, wildfires, and heat waves that are fueled by global warming.
The
damage to the world
from an almost 30 year US delay in taking serious steps to reduce the threat of
climate change including the enormity of global ghg emissions reductions that are now necessary compared to the reductions that would have been necessary if the United States and the world acted more forcefully a decade ago or so earlier.
Barring policies to curb GHG emissions, scientists expect this problem to grow and eventually lead to
climate change and its accompanying costs,
including damage to economic activity
from the destruction of capital (for example, along coastal areas) and lower agricultural productivity.
They have been flown out to La Jolla by the
Climate Accountability Institute (whose board of advisers
includes one Michael Mann) to attend a workshop titled: «Establishing Accountability for
Climate Change Damages: Lessons
from Tobacco Control.»
The lawsuit, filed Tuesday in federal court, seeks
damages from the five largest publicly - traded oil companies — BP, Chevron, ConocoPhillips, ExxonMobil and Royal Dutch Shell — to help pay for the city's work adapting to
climate change,
including coastal protections and upgrading its sewer system.
On the other side of the equation, it has long been recognized that the price of fossil fuels does not reflect their many external costs,
including air pollution, political and security risks, and
damage from climate change.
The full paper published in Nature
Climate Change, «A typology of loss and
damage perspectives,» contains more detail and analysis of each of the four perspectives,
including their implications for science, practice, and policy, and supported by key quotes
from interviewees.
The reasons are several and
include: (a) Their emissions levels are very high compared to others; (b) Huge reductions in emissions
from existing emissions levels are necessary to achieve safe atmospheric stabilization levels; and (c)
Climate change damages to some people, not to mention plants, animals, and ecological systems, are already occurring.
Yet norms about responsibility for
damages from human - induced
climate change are well established not only by most ethical theories but also in a variety of international agreements, including the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development (UN, 1992b), United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UN
climate change are well established not only by most ethical theories but also in a variety of international agreements, including the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development (UN, 1992b), United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UN 1
change are well established not only by most ethical theories but also in a variety of international agreements,
including the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development (UN, 1992b), United Nations Framework Convention on
Climate Change (UN
Climate Change (UN 1
Change (UN 1992a).
Costs are defined in a variety of ways and under a variety of assumptions that affect their value ► Cost types
include: ► administrative costs of planning, management, monitoring, audits, accounting, reporting, clerical activities, etc. associated with a project or program; ►
damage costs to ecosystems, economies and people due to negative effects
from climate change; ► implementation costs of
changing existing rules and regulation, capacity building efforts, information, training and education, etc. to put a policy into place; ► private costs are carried by individuals, companies or other private entities that undertake the action, where ► social costs
include additionally the external costs on the environment and on society as a whole.
Although we focus on a hypothesized CR - cloud connection, we note that it is difficult to separate
changes in the CR flux
from accompanying variations in solar irradiance and the solar wind, for which numerous causal links to
climate have also been proposed,
including: the influence of UV spectral irradiance on stratospheric heating and dynamic stratosphere - troposphere links (Haigh 1996); UV irradiance and radiative
damage to phytoplankton influencing the release of volatile precursor compounds which form sulphate aerosols over ocean environments (Kniveton et al. 2003); an amplification of total solar irradiance (TSI) variations by the addition of energy in cloud - free regions enhancing tropospheric circulation features (Meehl et al. 2008; Roy & Haigh 2010); numerous solar - related influences (
including solar wind inputs) to the properties of the global electric circuit (GEC) and associated microphysical cloud
changes (Tinsley 2008).
A hard - hitting report has revealed the threat to businesses
from damage done to the world's freshwater supplies by problems
including climate change.
It is intended to
include (but is not limited to)
changes in net agricultural productivity, human health, property
damages from increased flood risk, and the value of ecosystem services due to
climate change.
The social cost of carbon
includes, for example,
changes in net agricultural productivity and human health, property
damage from increased flood risk, energy system costs, and the value of ecosystem services lost because of
climate change.