Sentences with phrase «include even the things»

Not exact matches

Those will include things like investing in faster check - out for customers, flexible scheduling and competitive wages for store workers, turning over merchandise more quickly to keep things fresh and making its supply chain even more efficient.

That includes things that fly from other planets, which touches on one of Relativity's even more ambitious goals.

That's factoring in the snacks, breakfasts, coffee, and drinks I haven't had to pay for, but not including things like WiFi, comfort, or the fact that it's made it easier to finish up work from the airport when I'm catching early - evening flights on Fridays.

You can even include this personal trivia in short profiles for things like your Chamber of Commerce directory.

The good news is that a lot of things you might not expect actually count as small businesses, including freelancing, side gigs, and even selling things on eBay.

Even though adware is not considered harmful, it can collect personal information from the device that it is installed on including things like a user's birthday, location, serial number and contacts, according to the Verizon report.

You'll be able to add custom channel art, obtain a verified channel name, and even include things like a teaser trailer for your channel for first - time users.

Because the New York metro area — including all five boroughs, not just super-expensive Manhattan — has a huge population and a relatively high vacancy rate, an influx of even 50,000 new workers wouldn't mean much in the greater scheme of things.

But, even more so, mixing up the floor plan has an added bonus: It gets you to notice new things — including new products you may not have tried before.

Even things that once seemed risky like banking or buying a car online are activities people are doing daily — including your employees.

It includes such things as a boarder adjustment tax, increased tariffs aimed at specific industries or countries, non-tariff barriers, and even broader multilateral measures.

I'll tell you why: Because it suggested that things were so badly run at Uber with regard to treating women techies fairly that one manager could not even pretend to make an effort on even the most basic of gestures to allow his female employees to feel included.

Yet, even that sum could be highly conservative because Harvard's numbers — released last week on its website — fails to include such things as performance bonuses, reimbursements, profit sharing, 401K matching programs, restricted stock or stock options.

But there are more things to think about as well, including long - term care issues and even funeral & memorial planning.

And, who knows, it may even include things like improved labour laws, improvements to public health care and education that actually mean it about the public part, requiring the Workers Compensation Board to get serious about the compensation part of its mandate and, yeah, an effort to get off the energy price rollercoaster.

Hey Henry — you are right, and actually I found that even after publishing this many folks still reach out to me asking for the best way to get started, so I recently published a super simple guide to the very first thing you should do with respect to keyword research (and I included a free tool that helps speed up the consolidation process) You can check it out here: http://www.seonick.net/keyword-research-tool

Lots of things don't factor into the VantageScore model — or any other credit scoring model, for that matter — including race, color, religion, nationality, gender, marital status, age, salary, occupation, title, employer, employment history, where you live, or even your total assets.

Outright purchases of unsecured bank debt remain highly unlikely at this stage given the conflict of interest the ECB is facing, although other targeted options could be envisaged, including a reduction in collateral haircuts, eligibility of more risky ABS tranches, or even some targeted purchases of bank loans if things get worse.

The recent downturn in the global equity market has been attributed to a litany of different things, including slowing growth in the United States, China, Europe and Japan, geopolitical issues in Russia and Ukraine, ISIS in the Middle East and even Ebola cases in the United States.

Any other reality so long it does not include things we can not even imagine.

Unfortunately in my case, I've probably gone to excess the other way... after 43 years of being (in my view) threatened with hellfire for every cotton - picking thing (including the «sinfulness» of being born in the first place because it's a well - known scriptural fact that every human is born sinful and separated from G - d, with a heart that does nothing but desire evil and no way to please G - d even when righteous), threatened with being «left behind» in the rapture (should I fail on some doctrinal (belief) point at the crucial moment)... I refuse to consider ANY possibility of hell at all.

@fimilleur from time to time mankind experiences the presence of God, there have been and continue to be events that testify to the presence of Him.The multiple gods you continually point to have an unique difference from the God who first revealed His presence to ancient men i.e. the Hebrews.The particular gods you mention roman etc. are all man made and in many instances men themselves i.e. hercules, but even the ancient greeks realized the limitations of their understanding and included an «unknown» God in their worship structure.many cultures did likewise, having a glimpse of God but not the fullness of understanding that was given to the Jews.Whether or not «we» believe, does not alter the fact that God exists as an unique being, whether or not «we» acknowledge Him «we» will stand before Him.You do not choose to understand, but we are actually standing in His presence right now as He is much bigger than the doctrines and knowledge man ascribes to Him those things you find so questionable are the misconceptions and misrepresentations of God made by men throughout history.

... we can disagree without being divisive - yr entitled to yr understanding of correct theology that leads to faith - I'm more concerned with faith and the theology that will support it.It might appear that I just said the same thing in two ways, but I wd be quick to argue that theology shld be Faith's child.Most of us have our experience of God or Christ (including Paul) before we even know what theology is — correct or not.

I know that I see elements of divine around me in things and in ways that others don't, including other religious people... And as long as different religions and even sects constantly argue about what god truly is, and as long as they come up with different asnwers, then I have to say that the spiritual elements of our universe simply manifest differently for different folks, including not at all for some... as with those who label themselves as athiest...

and bart shouldn't even be included because of his disingenuous book about the variants of the BIble... (he never really gets down to the explicit details of what they are... thus misleading people into thinking the Bible is full of errors - for example... a verse may say «Jesus said to give all your possessions» whereas a VARIANT says «And HE says, give all your possesssions») an extremely low number of variants in the Bibel even change a thing...

At least, there is no such list in Scripture, and even if we could compile such a list, it would have to include many of the things that the religious leaders of Jesus» day were involved in.

Liberation includes both redemption and emancipation.5 Ogden identifies God's redemption as the boundless acceptance of all things, even sinners, into the divine life.

I'm not arguing that Enoch should be in the cannon (as even Enoch understood his work would not be included in Scripture) but I am suggesting that Jesus himself repeatedly echoed things found only in Enoch.

Biblicism falls apart, Smith says, because of the «the problem of pervasive interpretive pluralism,» for «even among presumably well - intentioned readers — including many evangelical biblicists — the Bible, after their very best efforts to understand it, says and teaches very different things about most significant topics... It becomes beside the point to assert a text to be solely authoritative or inerrant, for instance, when, lo and behold, it gives rise to a host of many divergent teachings on important matters.»

God so badly misjudged how things would turn out that he basically had to wipe out all the people including children, babies and fetuses and start all over even though it meant saving a moral loser like Noah.

Since there's obviously a lot of semantic confusion on this blog, we'll define everything as, well, everything — all the things you can possibly imagine, and even those you can't, including all the matter and energy in the universe, all that is constructed thereof, and all that can affect such.

Why indeed should anyone be aggressive in a land where fruit was to be had for the picking, game for the trapping, and all good things were abundantly at hand, even including gold?

Many of the things she said to a packed auditorium that evening were off the theological charts for most of us, including me.

sorry got a little off track we as believers are screwwing up big time we are using His word, Big and HUGE uncool thing, we are still normal, we all fall short of the glory of God, So because of this deception or lack of the proper teaching of the way of the cross we have a huge on set of actual so called Christians that cant even get along, and tell me this dosent exist in the muslim home or what ever cult mindset you are following and that includes the Christian church if they are more consirned with getting you in and keeping you there then setting you FREE!

Such things might be included here as natural theology (the making of inferences about God from a study of the natural world); the teachings of other great religions — again, to the extent they are compatible; or even the Old Testament prophets, depending on how you view their relationship to Jesus.

«God's salvific will also includes those who (without having received the Gospel) acknowledge the Creator... God is not far even from those who seek the unknown God in shadows and figures, for he gives to all life, breath and all things (cf. Acts 17:25 - 28), and the Redeemer wills all men to be saved (cf. 1Tim 2: 4).

Even Louisa May Alcott — unquestionably a writer of substantial gifts — included puzzling things in her books.

Young white male who thinks that bigotry of all sorts (including racism) are intentional ignorance, detrimental to our future as a species, adn relaly about the only thing a person can engage in that makes even less sense than religion.

When we think of the word great, my hope is that we (and yes, I'm including myself in this) don't think of things like fame, fortune, being liked or even of doing something the world remembers.

I thought maybe your teaching even if not taking things literally might include such concepts of proper speech.

The problem is that most of these things have been included in marriage for so long that we have lost sight of it's original makeup and even justified the deviations.

Now, regarding the guidance that is in that horrid book, it is a darn good thing that even Christians don't follow the evil guidance in their bible more closely, when it includes such violent demands as in these quotes, from both foul testaments:

There are those who would be clear (and even neat and witty) at almost any cost, including that of vastly over-simplifying things.

But for our present purpose, it is enough to say that when we are thinking about the last things, our thought must include much more than human existence and human personality in its body - mind totality, even in its social relationships.

Much as most English Catholics love Her Majesty the Queen, many of us felt just a little uneasywhen it became known that she referred to the late Cardinal Hume as «my Cardinal», and not entirely enthused by television images of Her Majesty attending Vespers at Westminster Cathedral, for all the world as if it was Choral Evensong at Westminster Abbey: not because such ecumenical gestures are in themselves a bad thing, but because this one seemed all too likely to be have been a reward to the English Church for no longer making so much of a nuisance of itself, as it could have done, for instance, by criticising the supposedly Catholic - minded Tony Blair for his wholehearted support for abortion (including abortion up to term)- a stance which, north of the border, had led the late Cardinal Winning to utter a series of blistering denunciations of the Prime Minister even during NewLabour's honeymoon years.

It is a healthy thing to recall that the alcoholic's conflicts are structured by the culture in which he lives, and that they are shared to a degree by even the so - called normal individuals Within that culture, including those who write books about alcoholics and those who try to help them.

And my reason for thinking this includes, among other things, the fact that my scientific friends in a great college of a great university (among them many agnostics and self - identified «atheists») are the very people who often seem to me most aware of mystery in the world, even in the scientific research that they carry on with such devotion and yet with such humility.

Making things explicit incurred huge costs, to be sure, including much sectarian strife and even religious wars, but believers assumed it was important to know specifically what was right and what was wrong.

Each of these groups, and they often overlap even to include Christians, BELIEVE in these things to at least a similar degree that you believe in God.

Their site even posted a list of «10 Things You Can Do Today» to promote dignity and protest destructive sexual paradigms, including simple tasks such as, «Challenge those who make sexist jokes.»