Limitations
include high attrition rate, generalizability to other populations based upon ethnicity of participants, and lack of follow - up.
Limitations
include high attrition rate, lack of alternative treatment control and length of follow - up for this study.
Limitations
include high attrition rate, modest sample size, overlap of therapeutic techniques across the two approaches, and lack of adequate follow - up.
Limitations
include high attrition rates, differences in the number of BEPP exposure sessions, and use of other concurrent treatments.
Limitations
include high attrition rate, reliance on self - reported measures, and lack of generalizability due to ethnicity.
Limitations
include high attrition rates and small sample size.
Limitations
include high attrition rate and limited generalizability to others not in primary care settings.
Limitations
include high attrition rate, generalizability due to gender and ethnicity and lack of follow - up.
Not exact matches
Loss to follow - up was a particular problem in studies where women were recruited in the antenatal period and, as we have described above, we have not
included any outcome data from studies that were otherwise eligible for inclusion in the review because of
high levels of
attrition for all outcomes.
We were not able to
include data from this study in the review due to very
high levels of
attrition.
We've covered quite a few topics since last year
including teacher attention and
attrition, and the effects of
high noise levels on student learning outcomes.
According to the
Higher Education Act (HEA) of 1965, all institutions receiving Title IV funds must submit specific data about their educational programs, student population, enrollment,
attrition, and completion rates, staff and faculty, financial information, tuition and fees, and allocation of all student financial aid (NCES, n.d.) IPEDS HistoryIn 1995, NCES established the National Postsecondary Education Cooperative (NPEC) as a «voluntary organization that encompasses all sectors of the postsecondary education community
including federal agencies, postsecondary institutions, associations, and other organizations interested in postsecondary education data collection» (NPEC, n.d., p. 4).
«Since 2014, the three Commissioners have ensured providers are held to the
highest quality standards while also assisting in the transition to the updated
Higher Education Standards Framework, providing outstanding support for Australia's international education sector and tackling important issues
including first year student
attrition rates.
Charter schools are often marked by very
high attrition —
including the schools that are hailed for supposedly
high graduation and college matriculation rates.
Student
attrition and other factors,
including the refusal of several schools to carry out the randomization despite agreeing to do so, led to relatively
high rates of noncompliance.
Report
Includes State - by - State Teacher
Attrition Costs, Says Comprehensive Induction Programs Can Improve Teaching Effectiveness and Retain
High - Quality Teachers
On the Path to Equity
includes a state - by - state breakdown detailing the number of teachers leaving the profession, as well as a low and
high estimate of teacher
attrition costs.
Welner (2013) points out a number of ways that charter schools can influence school enrollment to get the already -
high - achieving students they want,
including attrition bias, selection bias, and lack of necessary services for
high - need students.
This new WEAC Research Brief concludes that there is little evidence to substantiate the expansion of private voucher schools on the grounds that they are intended to help student achievement: «Research in Wisconsin and other states consistently shows little to no voucher school advantage, and in fact often documents significant ill - effects on students
including: school closings,
high rates of student
attrition for lower - performing students, and decreased assessment scores in math and reading.»
The legal media (
including legal blogs) are full of stories of
high levels of
attrition, lawyer burn - out, and general malaise in the profession, but I do not think it is entirely pervasive.
Some of the costs and disruptions that occur as a result of these
high levels of
attrition include project delays, loss of institutional knowledge, dilution of team culture and morale and the related domino effects that can also kick in when
attrition rates spike.
Limitations
include follow - up on only a small sample of initial population, lack of control group, selection bias, and
high attrition rate.
Limitations
include lack of control group,
high attrition rate, small sample size, and lack of follow - up.
Limitations
include the study only assessed parents at baseline and at 12 months postrandomization, only allowing a pre-post examination,
high attrition rate, and TAU consisted of an array of services,
including nonmanualized family therapy.
Limitations
include small sample size,
high attrition, reliability on self - reported measures and findings may only be generalizable to children with sexual abuse trauma.
Limitations
include generalizability due to gender and ethnicity and
high attrition rate.
Limitations
include lack of matching or random assignment to study groups,
high attrition in the MAPP / GPS group and small sample sizes.
Limitations
include generalizability due to gender and race and
high attrition rate.
Limitations
include higher study
attrition among nurse - visited women and reliability on self - reported measures.
Limitations
include small sample size, reliance on self - reported measures and
high attrition rate.
Limitations
include results may have limited generalizability due to ethnicity,
high attrition rate, and reliability on self - reported measures.
Limitations
include generalizability to other ethnic populations,
high attrition rate, and reliability on self - reported measures.
Limitations
include the differences between the two groups at baseline, differences between the intervention delivered in the two groups (the open - group format did not
include the child component of the program, while the closed - group format did), and the
high attrition rates in the open - group sample.
Limitations
include attrition bias due to the
high dropout rate and bias due to the fact that the assessors who administered the measures were not blinded to treatment conditions.
Limitations
include small sample size,
high attrition rate and lack of follow - up.
Limitations
include the same sample size,
high attrition rate (only 40 of the original 65 participants completed the postintervention assessments), and lack of information regarding what the control group received.
Limitations
include generalizability due to gender and
high attrition rates.