According to the Executive Order, its recommendations were to
include measures of student achievement (representing at least 50 % of the evaluation); demonstrated practices of effective teachers and leaders; and weights for the various components.
According to a report from the National Council on Teacher Quality, 30 states require that teacher evaluations
include some measure of student achievement.
Together, the team decided to collect a variety of additional data,
including measures of student achievement (standardized test and report card grades), engagement (such as attendance and discipline), and teacher perceptions of parent involvement.
Not exact matches
The system is based on multiple
measures of performance
including student achievement and rigorous classroom observations.
By
measuring average point scores rather than a single cutoff point, the new
measure will also ensure that the
achievement of all
students is recognised equally,
including both low attainers and high fliers.
Charter school leader Deborah Kenny's op - ed in today's The New York Times argues against the move by many states toward teacher evaluations based on multiple
measures,
including both
student progress on
achievement tests and the reviews
of principals.
The new evaluation system will provide clear standards and significant guidance to local school districts for implementation
of teacher evaluations based on multiple
measures of performance
including student achievement and rigorous classroom observations.
These may
include portfolios
of student work, classroom observations,
achievement measures, and intelligence scores.
Student performance measures include average student achievement on reading and math exams, along with median proficiency and the percentage of students achieving profi
Student performance
measures include average
student achievement on reading and math exams, along with median proficiency and the percentage of students achieving profi
student achievement on reading and math exams, along with median proficiency and the percentage
of students achieving proficiency.
There was an organization called the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards, where a teacher could submit videos, but there was actually a hesitance to
include student achievement in any
of those
measures, for many reasons, many
of them ideological.
Evaluations
of any educational technology program often confront a number
of methodological problems,
including the need for
measures other than standardized
achievement tests, differences among
students in the opportunity to learn, and differences in starting points and program implementation.
The school characteristics
include whether it is in an urban area, grade level (e.g., high school), the number
of students enrolled,
student - teacher ratio, the percentage
of students who are eligible for the free or reduced - price lunch program, the percentage
of minority
students, and
measures of student achievement in reading and math.
In tackling this task, Feinberg says, they «backed into» the five essential tenets
of the KIPP model: High Expectations (for academic
achievement and conduct); Choice and Commitment (KIPP
students, parents, and teachers all sign a learning pledge, promising to devote the time and effort needed to succeed); More Time (extended school day, week, and year); Power to Lead (school leaders have significant autonomy,
including control over their budget, personnel, and culture); and Focus on Results (scores on standardized tests and other objective
measures are coupled with a focus on character development).
But for Core proponents, the timing couldn't be worse: Just as states began implementing the new standards, 40 states receiving No Child waivers are also launching new systems to evaluate teachers, which will incorporate some
measures of student achievement,
including, where available, scores from standardized tests.
Our basic value - added model
measures the effectiveness
of a principal by examining the extent to which math
achievement in a school is higher or lower than would be expected based on the characteristics
of students in that school,
including their
achievement in the prior year.
We
included administrative data from teacher, parent, and
student ratings
of local schools; we considered the potential relationship between vote share and test - score changes over the previous two or three years; we examined the deviation
of precinct test scores from district means; we looked at changes in the percentage
of students who received failing scores on the PACT; we evaluated the relationship between vote share and the percentage change in the percentile scores rather than the raw percentile point changes; and we turned to alternative
measures of student achievement, such as SAT scores, exit exams, and graduation rates.
According to the National Council on Teacher Quality (NCTQ), the number
of states requiring objective
measures of student achievement to be
included in teacher evaluations nearly tripled from 2009 to 2015, from 15 to 43 states nationwide (see Figure 1).
A handful
of school districts and states —
including Dallas, Houston, Denver, New York, and Washington, D.C. — have begun using
student achievement gains as indicated by annual test scores (adjusted for prior
achievement and other
student characteristics) as a direct
measure of individual teacher performance.
By way
of comparison, we can estimate the total effect a given teacher has on her
students»
achievement growth; that total effect
includes the practices
measured by the TES process along with everything else a teacher does.
And each
of the 43 states to which the Obama administration has granted a waiver from No Child Left Behind is now in the process
of implementing evaluation systems that employ multiple
measures of classroom performance,
including student achievement data.
A good teacher is now recognized as someone whose
students learn and grow, with 38 states revising their policies on educator effectiveness to
include measures of student growth or
achievement as one
of multiple factors in teacher evaluations.
Teachers» unions are strongly against these plans for a variety
of reasons,
including that they say it's nearly impossible to accurately
measure an individual teacher's contribution to a
student's success, since a child's
achievement is cumulative over a period
of years and the result
of the efforts
of many people.
The framework provides a holistic assessment
of school performance based on
student growth and
achievement in grades 3 — 8; school climate
measures,
including attendance and re-enrollment; and preschool classroom quality.
These characteristics
include, in addition to a variety
of measures of student achievement as
of 1996, the percentages
of students in the school that are eligible for free school meals, those who are nonwhite, and those with special educational needs; the pupil - teacher ratio and the number
of students enrolled; whether the school is all girls, all boys, a religious school, or in London; and several
measures of the qualifications
of the teaching staff.
In addition to assessing
student achievement, the NAP - CC sample test cycle
includes a survey, conducted for ACARA by staff from the Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER),
measuring students» perceptions
of citizenship, attitudes towards civic - related issues, and their civic engagement.
High school reform should
include making sure that we are
measuring the relevant skills; allowing states the flexibility to design systems that produce results; using multiple
measures to assess
achievement; allowing the use
of growth models;
including commonsense flexibility for
students with special needs; involving educators in planning; and effectively addressing dropout rates.
Annually
measures, for all
students and separately for each subgroup
of students, the following indicators: Academic
achievement (which, for high schools, may
include a
measure of student growth, at the State's discretion); for elementary and middle schools, a
measure of student growth, if determined appropriate by the State, or another valid and reliable statewide academic indicator; for high schools, the four - year adjusted cohort graduation rate and, at the State's discretion, the extended - year adjusted cohort graduation rate; progress in achieving English language proficiency for English learners; and at least one valid, reliable, comparable, statewide indicator
of school quality or
student success; and
To determine whether these trends have continued in more recent cohorts, we examine trends in several dimensions
of school readiness,
including academic
achievement, self - control, externalizing behavior, and a
measure of students» «approaches to learning,» for cohorts born from the early 1990s to the mid-2000s.
Moreover,
achievement tests are sometimes used to
measure or evaluate aspects
of education for which they are not designed,
including how well a school is educating its
students.
A high - powered commission appointed by Gov. Terry E. Branstad issued wide - ranging recommendations last week for change in Iowa's schools,
including a call for
measures of academic
achievement that all districts would be required to report for their
students.
The Education Trust, for example, is urging states to use caution in choosing «comparative» growth models,
including growth percentiles and value - added
measures, because they don't tell us whether
students are making enough progress to hit the college - ready target by the end
of high school, or whether low - performing subgroups are making fast enough gains to close
achievement gaps.
In Maine, Democratic Gov. John Baldacci is proposing a new set
of measures,
including allowing
student -
achievement data to be used in evaluating educators, and letting districts create «innovative» schools that would have substantial autonomy.
Implement a comprehensive evaluation system for teachers and principals based on multiple
measures of effectiveness,
including student achievement
Established in the 2009 - 10 school year, D.C.'s IMPACT evaluation system relies on a complex mix
of factors to score each teacher,
including both multiple observations and
measures of student achievement.
Washington's high - risk designation specified that the State must submit, by May 1, 2014, final guidelines for teacher and principal evaluation and support systems that meet the requirements
of ESEA flexibility,
including requiring local educational agencies (LEAs) to use
student achievement on CCR State assessments to
measure student learning growth in those systems for teachers
of tested grades and subjects.
With 17,300
students, the district receives an abundance
of information,
including data from PARCC tests, districtwide pre - and post-common assessments in all content areas,
Measures of Academic Progress in elementary and middle schools, Eureka Math and Achieve 3000
achievement scores, and professional - development surveys given to all teachers.
complies with nonpublic school accreditation requirements as set forth in Section 22.1 - 19
of the Code
of Virginia, and administered by the Virginia Council for Private Education (VCPE) or is a nonpublic school that maintains an assessment system that annually
measures scholarship
students» progress in reading and math using a national norm - referenced
achievement test including, but not limited to, the Stanford Achievement Test, California Achievement Test, and Iowa Test of Ba
achievement test
including, but not limited to, the Stanford
Achievement Test, California Achievement Test, and Iowa Test of Ba
Achievement Test, California
Achievement Test, and Iowa Test of Ba
Achievement Test, and Iowa Test
of Basic Skills.
Gov. Phil Bredesen
of Tennessee earlier this month called on his legislature to hold a special session in January to consider a package
of education
measures,
including a requirement that
student -
achievement data be used in teacher evaluations, and a proposal he said would strengthen provisions allowing the state to intervene in chronically low - performing schools.
In addition, some research,
including an ongoing study
of measures of effective teaching supported by the Gates Foundation, gives credence to the use
of student achievement measures when combined with other
measures, such as teacher observations and
student feedback, as part
of an effective teacher evaluation system.
These assessments
include SOL tests and other
measures of student achievement,
including alternative assessments taken by certain
students with disabilities and children with limited English proficiency.
Since joining the Association in June 2007, Eileen led the Association in notable efforts
including: developing a model that
measures «value - added» growth in
achievement, which is used for A-F rankings
of all Arizona schools; creating trainings that enable teachers and school leaders to collaboratively use data; launching joint purchasing programs; filing lawsuits for equitable funding for all K - 12
students; increasing positive public perceptions
of charters; and, building a comprehensive program to support prospective charter school operators.
The most controversial
of them
include what is known as value - added models1 that use data from standardized tests
of students as part
of the overall
measure of the effect that a teacher has on
student achievement.
Evaluations should be based on at least a few years» scores.The district also must find a fair way
of evaluating teachers whose
students don't take the annual tests and should look at multiple ways
of measuring achievement,
including student portfolios and graduation rates.
While the short and long term
measures of this leadership work must
include various
measures of student achievement, we need to identify other metrics that
measure the extent to which teaching practice is improving every week — not every couple
of months or every year.
«Multimetric accountability promotes comprehensive
student achievement and well - being by using multiple
measures of performance, incorporating a range
of subjects,
including nonacademic factors, and promoting continuous improvement and support.
Over the border in Georgia, Gwinnett County has developed a «Results - Based Evaluation System,» in which fully 70 percent
of the score for schools and their principals is tied to
student achievement, as assessed by indicators
including standardized test scores and
measures of where schools are in closing the
achievement gap.
The Framework affirms the important role that school environment factors play in increasing
student achievement by
including concrete, quantifiable
measures that provide important indicators
of how schools are engaging and supporting
students.
While the Department will likely add more academic performance
measures in the future, for 2014 officials also
included the level
of participation in state assessments,
achievement gaps between
students with disabilities and the general population as well as scores on the National Assessment
of Educational Progress, a standardized test used to gauge academic growth across the country.
«Mississippi has built a strong foundation for its public education system that
includes rigorous academic standards for all
students, aligned assessments to evaluate
student achievement and an accountability model that clearly
measures the performance
of our schools and districts.
CEPA researchers examines a wide range
of issues,
including how to best
measure student success, what factors predict and promote
student success, and how different types
of teacher instruction, school programs, and education policies can improve
student achievement.