It also is time to substantially limit the use of forensic experts and GALs in family court altogether because for the most part, MHPs,
including child custody evaluators and their related forensic offshoots, in fact are unneeded, unhelpful, and undesirable in the vast majority of child custody cases.
Not exact matches
For
child custody evaluators, accepted standards
include interviewing both parents and the
child as well as observing the interactions between each parent and the
child.
One would think that Bauserman must have realized that he
included skewed amicable self - selected joint -
custody groups in his meta - analysis because he observed that «mothers appear just as likely as other
evaluators to perceive joint
custody as beneficial to their
children's adjustment.»