In British Columbia, standard of review issues are regulated by the Administrative Tribunals Act: correctness review is provided for in respect of some questions (including procedural ones); deferential review in respect of others (
including exercises of discretion).
Not exact matches
On June 15, 2012, then - Secretary
of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano issued a memorandum entitled «
Exercising Prosecutorial
Discretion with Respect to Individuals Who Came to the United States as Children,» creating a non-congressionally authorized administrative program that permitted certain individuals who came to the United States as juveniles and meet several criteria —
including lacking any current lawful immigration status — to request consideration
of deferred action for a period
of two years, subject to renewal, and eligibility for work authorization.
You hereby grant to Non-GMO Project an irrevocable, perpetual, transferable, non-exclusive license to be
exercised by Non-GMO Project at its sole and absolute
discretion throughout the Universe on or through any media and using any technologies, whether now known or hereafter devised,
including the right (a) to grant sublicenses to any Content that You Post; (b) to edit, reproduce, copy, publicly display, publicly perform, publish, broadcast, retransmit, distribute, create derivative works
of and otherwise to
exercise and exploit, whether commercially or otherwise, any and all proprietary rights in and to any Content You Post; and (c) to reproduce, copy, publicly display, publish, broadcast, retransmit, and distribute your name in association with your Posted Content.
57 (3) Where the court orders that costs be assessed as special costs, the registrar shall allow those fees that the registrar considers were proper or reasonably necessary to conduct the proceeding to which the fees relate, and, in
exercising that
discretion, the registrar shall consider all
of the circumstances,
including,
When considering whether to
exercise this
discretion, the court must consider all the circumstances
of the case
including six factors:
In deciding whether to
exercise its s 33
discretion, the court is also likely consider several other factors
including: public policy; the value
of the claim; and the potential for further litigation.
[45] In explaining how I reach this conclusion, I first outline the approach to the review
of prosecutorial
discretion,
including the threshold evidentiary burden that must be met by an accused person alleging an abuse
of process based on the improper
exercise of prosecutorial
discretion.
These
include legislation, prosecutorial charging guidelines, court challenges, jury nullification, the
exercise of prosecutorial
discretion in the absence
of offence - specific charging guidelines, and the
exercise of judicial
discretion in sentencing.
In
exercising his
discretion to award costs against a losing party (s. 63
of the Act), he construed «other costs» in s. 59 (1)(c)
of the Act as
including the cost
of litigation funding.
While the authorities indicate that the Court has a
discretion as to whether to permit the accused to conduct a voir dire in relation to the alleged Charter violation and that in determining how to
exercise that
discretion the Court may require the accused to summarize the evidence he intends to rely upon, they do not suggest that a notice must
include all
of the facts which the applicant intends to prove to meet the onus which rests on him in the application.
For five years she was a member
of the BC provincial court, time and time again, when serious criminals —
including sex offenders — appeared before her court, she
exercised her
discretion to give them a lenient sentence.
In this case, double costs was not awarded but the court paid attention to several factors in
exercising its
discretion,
including the conduct
of the parties and the interests
of children involved.
Although the Deskbook appears silent on the factors to be weighed in
exercising the
discretion to direct a stay
of proceedings, the decision to prosecute test, contained in s. 2.3.2,
includes consideration
of whether there is a «reasonable prospect
of conviction».
[55] The prosecutor must however have regard to any applicable restraints on the
exercise of discretion,
including the Witness Charter and the Code
of Practice for Victims
of Crime.
«For five years she was a member
of the B.C. provincial court, time and time again, when serious criminals —
including sex offenders — appeared before her court, she
exercised her
discretion to give them a lenient sentence,» the web site states.
The BC Appeal court in Smithies Holdings Inc. v. RCV Holdings Ltd., 2017 BCCA extensively reviewed the law relating to an award
of special costs and held that reprehensible pre litigation conduct should not be
included when a judge
exercises his or her
discretion as to award... Read more
In N v F, Mostyn J reminds himself that these types
of case are «highly fact specific and very discretionary»; but then he goes on to spend 10 pages
of a 17 - page judgment explaining the cases and other external factors — ie not «fact specific» to the case at all — that he plans to take into account in
exercise of his
discretion (16 earlier cases —
including Ribiero PJ in LKW v DD (FACV 16/2008)-- are cited).
She also contributes to Westlaw Insight and has written a number
of relevant articles
including: «Health and Safety Executive v Wolverhampton City Council [2012] UKSC 24 — the final word on the relevance
of financial considerations in the
exercise of discretion under s. 97
of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990,» RTPI Cynllunio Magazine, Winter 2012.
Prof. Conduct 123 (2001)(subject to the operational structure and content described in the opinion, a lawyer may affiliate with an online legal services website); Nebraska Op. 07 - 05 (lawyer may participate in internet lawyer directory which identifies itself as a directory, disclaims being a referral service and only lists basic information about lawyers without recommending specific lawyers and charges a reasonable, flat annual advertising fee); New Jersey Committee on Attorney Advertising Op. 36 (2006)(lawyer may pay flat fee to internet marketing company for exclusive website listing for particular county in specific practice area if listing
includes prominent, unmistakable disclaimer stating the listings are paid advertisements and not endorsements or authorized referrals); North Carolina Op. 2004 - 1 (lawyer may participate in for - profit online service that is a hybrid referral service - legal directory, provided there is no fee - sharing with the service and communications are truthful); Oregon Op. 2007 - 180 (2007)(lawyer may pay nationwide internet referral service for listing if listing is not false or misleading and does not imply that the lawyer can represent clients outside jurisdictions
of the lawyer's license, fee is not based on number
of referrals, retained clients or revenue generated by listing and the service does not
exercise discretion in matching clients with lawyers); Rhode Island 2005 - 01 (permitting website that enables lawyers to post information about their services and respond to anonymous requests for legal services in exchange for flat annual membership fee if website
exercises no
discretion over which requests lawyers may access); South Carolina 01 - 03 (lawyer may pay internet advertising service fee determined by the number
of «hits» that the service produces for the lawyer provided that the service does not steer business to any particular lawyer and the payments are not based on whether user ultimately becomes a client); Texas Op. 573 (2006)(lawyer may participate in for - profit internet service that matches potential clients and lawyers if selection process is fully automated and performed by computers without the
exercise of human
discretion); Virginia Advertising Op.
In North Carolina either party may petition for alimony, but the court shall
exercise its
discretion in determining the amount, duration, and the manner
of payment, and shall consider all relevant factors,
including the marital misconduct
of either
of the spouses.
If items 13, 24 and 27 are enacted, they should be amended to set out relevant criteria for the
exercise of the broad ministerial
discretion pursuant to which they are to be made,
including: