Sprint interval training is a well - defined form of HIIT, involving only 3 minutes of activity per session, not
including periods of warm - up and cool - down.
Not exact matches
DeConto and Pollard's study was motivated by reconstructions
of sea level rise during past
warm periods including the previous inter-glacial (around 125,000 years ago) and earlier
warm intervals like the Pliocene (around 3 million years ago).
Investigators recruited 31 sedentary but otherwise healthy women and tested the effect
of two different protocols, each
of which required a 10 - minute time commitment,
including warm - up, cool down and recovery
periods.
The researchers suggested this could be accomplished through making
warm - up
periods more vigorous, having more frequent and longer practices
of dance moves and
including a segment
of vigorous exercise in each class to improve fitness.
I'd love to know what they did take into account in attempting to model that
period — must
include astronomical location, sun's behavior, best estimates about a lot
of different conditions — where the continents were, what the ocean circulation was doing, whether there had been a recent geological
period that laid down a lot
of methane hydrates available to be tipped by Pliocene
warming into bubbling out rapidly.
Two examples
of climate extremes
include periods of intense
warm or cool temperatures and significant wet or dry spells across seasons.
Large - scale surface temperature reconstructions yield a generally consistent picture
of temperature trends during the preceding millennium,
including relatively
warm conditions centered around A.D. 1000 (identified by some as the «Medieval Warm Period») and a relatively cold period (or «Little Ice Age») centered around 1
warm conditions centered around A.D. 1000 (identified by some as the «Medieval
Warm Period») and a relatively cold period (or «Little Ice Age») centered around 1
Warm Period») and a relatively cold period (or «Little Ice Age») centered around
Period») and a relatively cold
period (or «Little Ice Age») centered around
period (or «Little Ice Age») centered around 1700.
Simulations
including an increased solar activity over the last century give a CO2 initiated
warming of 0.2 ˚C and a solar influence
of 0.54 ˚C over this
period, corresponding to a CO2 climate sensitivity
of 0.6 ˚C (doubling
of CO2) and a solar sensitivity
of 0.5 ˚C (0.1 % increase
of the solar constant).
Evidence for regional warmth during medieval times can be found in a diverse but more limited set
of records
including ice cores, tree rings, marine sediments, and historical sources from Europe and Asia, but the exact timing and duration
of warm periods may have varied from region to region, and the magnitude and geographic extent
of the warmth are uncertain.
We then examine climate impacts during the past few decades
of global
warming and in paleoclimate records
including the Eemian
period, concluding that there are already clear indications
of undesirable impacts at the current level
of warming and that 2 °C
warming would have major deleterious consequences.
Vazquez recommends always
including a proper
warm - up (
including dynamic stretching), and cool - down
period as part
of your routine.
In a
warm - up, dynamic stretches are usually performed following an initial
period of CV exercise (jogging / cycling etc) and usually
include a minimum
of 5
of this type
of drill, each performed 6 - 8 times at slow, medium and fast speeds.
Additional features
include innovative thermal encapsulation
of the drivetrain, which shortens the fuel - sapping
warm - up
period after a cold start.
Simulations
including an increased solar activity over the last century give a CO2 initiated
warming of 0.2 ˚C and a solar influence
of 0.54 ˚C over this
period, corresponding to a CO2 climate sensitivity
of 0.6 ˚C (doubling
of CO2) and a solar sensitivity
of 0.5 ˚C (0.1 % increase
of the solar constant).
I would like to see discussion about the most recent
period of rapid global
warming... leading to the Paleocene Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM) about 55 million years ago...
including differences and similarities to the climate projections for this century... and beyond.
Appraising the new work in this context, Thomas Crowley, a climate specialist at the University
of Edinburgh, said there are ample signs that Earth's climate,
including the great cycles
of warm periods and big chills driven by orbital mechanics, is within our sway.
In the posts, Stephen McIntyre questions sets
of tree - ring data used in, or excluded from, prominent studies concluding that recent
warming is unusual even when compared with past
warm periods in the last several millenniums (
including the recent Kaufman et al. paper discussed here).
But the time
period for your graph
includes the 1940 to 1970
period of slight cooling between
warming episodes before and after it.
The results are at best inconclusive, since three
of the updated series,
including Michael Mann's celebrated and controversial tree - ring reconstructions, do not refute the hypothesis, while the others quite significantly point to different dates
of maximum temperature achievements into the past centuries, in particular those associated to the Medieval
Warm Period.
Evidence for regional warmth during medieval times can be found in a diverse but more limited set
of records
including ice cores, tree rings, marine sediments, and historical sources from Europe and Asia, but the exact timing and duration
of warm periods may have varied from region to region, and the magnitude and geographic extent
of the warmth are uncertain.
• Greenhouse gases contributed a global mean surface
warming likely to be in the range
of 0.5 °C to 1.3 °C over the
period 1951 to 2010, with the contributions from other anthropogenic forcings,
including the cooling effect
of aerosols, likely to be in the range
of − 0.6 °C to 0.1 °C.
It is reasonable to assume that natural variability is in total charge
of earth temperature and that it causes all the
warming and cooling,
including the Cold
period after the Roman Warm Period, The Little Ice Age and the next cold period that will follow this Warm P
period after the Roman
Warm Period, The Little Ice Age and the next cold period that will follow this Warm P
Period, The Little Ice Age and the next cold
period that will follow this Warm P
period that will follow this
Warm PeriodPeriod.
My understanding
of the viewpoint
of the majority
of experts in related fields is that analysis shows that relative to 50 years ago, and the LIA, and the MWP, average global temperatures are
warmer, and increasing in warmth at an anomalous rate than indicated by the data on previous time
periods,
including the MWP.
They have survived previous Arctic
warming periods,
including the last
warm stretch between ice ages some 130,000 years ago, but some climate experts project that nothing in the species» history is likely to match the pace and extent
of warming and ice retreats projected in this century and beyond, should emissions
of heat - trapping gases continue unabated.
In particular, as even a brief perusal
of Luning and Varenholt's sources shows, the
warm periods shown in their sources are not aligned over a set
period and
include colder spells within their
warm periods which may also not align.
If there was any truth to the claim that CO2 is heating the Earth, one would have to ignore all
of its previous ice ages that were followed by natural
warming periods,
including the most recent mini-ice age from about 1300 to 1850.
DK12 used ocean heat content (OHC) data for the upper 700 meters
of oceans to draw three main conclusions: 1) that the rate
of OHC increase has slowed in recent years (the very short timeframe
of 2002 to 2008), 2) that this is evidence for
periods of «climate shifts», and 3) that the recent OHC data indicate that the net climate feedback is negative, which would mean that climate sensitivity (the total amount
of global
warming in response to a doubling
of atmospheric CO2 levels,
including feedbacks) is low.
Greenhouse gases contributed a global mean surface
warming likely to be in the range
of 0.5 °C to 1.3 °C over the
period 1951 − 2010, with the contributions from other anthropogenic forcings,
including the cooling effect
of aerosols, likely to be in the range
of − 0.6 °C to 0.1 °C.
The lack
of a statistically significant
warming trend in GMST does not mean that the planet isn't
warming, firstly because GMST doesn't
include the
warming of the oceans (see many posts on ocean heat content) and secondly because a lack
of a statistically significant
warming trend doesn't mean that it isn't
warming, just that it isn't
warming at a sufficiently high rate to rule out the possibility
of there being no
warming over that
period.
Extreme measures taken to keep the monster alive
included adjusting the record to eliminate previous
warm periods and lowering the historic instrumental record to increase the slope
of the curve to create or accentuate
warming.
The dramatic decline in Arctic sea ice and snow is one
of the most profound signs
of global
warming and has coincided with «a
period of ostensibly more frequent events
of extreme weather across the mid-latitudes,
including extreme heat and rainfall events and recent severe winters,» according to the conference organizers, who are posting updates under the #arctic17 hashtag on Twitter.
So my point remains, he has made a blanket statement which is at odds with the many studies which have built up our knowledge
of this during the last century, by which the Holocene Maximum was first arrived at and which
included growing data
of following
warming periods greater than present though not as hot as the Max.
I recently gave a talk about the powerful relationships among various co - factors
including seasonal sunlight, seasonal temperature change, sea level, and even tectonic activity that extends back to the bipolar Quaternary ice - ages and interglacial
warm periods of last 2.6 million years.
Thanks to global
warming we have just loss much
of a world heritage area,
including species that were around during our cretaceous
period.
And it
includes the last
warm period between 130,000 and 117,000 years ago, when there was a climate somewhat
warmer than today's for much
of the 13,000 year
period.
The U.S. state experiences one
of its
warmest winter
periods on record during the second half
of January,
including some temperatures that ran 40 degrees Fahrenheit (22 degrees Celsius) above average.
This
period, known as the «last deglaciation,»
included episodes
of abrupt climate change, such as the Bølling
warming [~ 14.7 — 14.5 ka], when Northern Hemisphere temperatures increased by 4 — 5 °C in just a few decades [Lea et al., 2003; Buizert et al., 2014], coinciding with a 12 — 22 m sea level rise in less than 340 years [5.3 meters per century](Meltwater Pulse 1a (MWP1a)-RRB-[Deschamps et al., 2012].»
Large - scale surface temperature reconstructions yield a generally consistent picture
of temperature trends during the preceding millennium,
including relatively
warm conditions centered around A.D. 1000 (identified by some as the «Medieval Warm Period») and a relatively cold period (or «Little Ice Age») centered around 1
warm conditions centered around A.D. 1000 (identified by some as the «Medieval
Warm Period») and a relatively cold period (or «Little Ice Age») centered around 1
Warm Period») and a relatively cold period (or «Little Ice Age») centered around
Period») and a relatively cold
period (or «Little Ice Age») centered around
period (or «Little Ice Age») centered around 1700.
She said that it is quite clear from the fashion's point
of view that Europe was experiencing a
warm period in the middle
of the middle ages (e.g., monk's dress code
including sandals).
Alteration
of the historic record
includes the infamous hockey stick, in which a member
of the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) group is reported to have told Professor David Deming, «We have to get rid
of the Medieval
Warm Period?
The 2001 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Report
included evidence in the form
of a «hockey stick» graph, showing that the Medieval
Warm Period (MWP) did not exist.
Respondents were picked because they had authored articles with the key words «global
warming» and / or «global climate change», covering the 1991 — 2011
period, via the Web
of Science, or were
included the climate scientist database assembled by Jim Prall, or just by a survey
of peer reviewed climate science articles.
If polar bears have been around for, say, half a million years this means that they've survived several ice ages,
including all the sudden
warming periods at the beginning
of each interglacial, many
of which will have been
warmer than now.
Why did you not
include the
warming period (
of roughly equal dimensions)
of 1910 to 1943?
Dr. Easterbrook comment: NOT TRUE — Except for the Little Ice Age, all
of the past 10,000 years has been 2.5 to 5.5 F
warmer than today
including much more intense
periods of warming.
IPCC has stated (AR4 WG1 Ch.9) that the «global mean
warming observed since 1970 can only be reproduced when models are forced with combinations
of external forcings that
include anthropogenic forcings... Therefore modeling studies suggest that late 20th - century
warming is much more likely to be anthropogenic than natural in origin...» whereas for the statistically indistinguishable early 20thC
warming period «detection and attribution as well as modeling studies indicate more uncertainty regarding the causes
of early 20th - century
warming.»
Matthew Marler, the whole
of the Holocene
including the
warm periods and LIA has been within one degree C
of global temperature.
This time
period is too short to signify a change in the
warming trend, as climate trends are measured over
periods of decades, not years.12, 29,30,31,32 Such decade - long slowdowns or even reversals in trend have occurred before in the global instrumental record (for example, 1900 - 1910 and 1940 - 1950; see Figure 2.2),
including three decade - long
periods since 1970, each followed by a sharp temperature rise.33 Nonetheless, satellite and ocean observations indicate that the Earth - atmosphere climate system has continued to gain heat energy.34
We then examine climate impacts during the past few decades
of global
warming and in paleoclimate records
including the Eemian
period, concluding that there are already clear indications
of undesirable impacts at the current level
of warming and that 2 °C
warming would have major deleterious consequences.
Just that plus 0.8 C over that
period - with several clearly distinct ups and down in the graph -
including crucially the ongoing 16 year flat lining is not a reason to jump out the window screaming nor change the socio economic make up
of the world to stop «catastrophic man - made global
warming».