Stephen also has substantial experience representing owners involved in intra-corporate disputes,
including shareholder litigation and close - corporation control matters.
He has represented companies in a variety of governmental investigations and has substantial experience representing owners involved in intra-corporate disputes,
including shareholder litigation and close - corporation control matters.
Not exact matches
The Briscoe Law Firm, PLLC is a full service business
litigation and
shareholder rights advocacy firm with more than 20 years of experience in complex
litigation matters,
including claims of investor and stockholder fraud,
shareholder derivative suits, and securities class actions.
Such risks and uncertainties
include, but are not limited to: our ability to achieve our financial, strategic and operational plans or initiatives; our ability to predict and manage medical costs and price effectively and develop and maintain good relationships with physicians, hospitals and other health care providers; the impact of modifications to our operations and processes; our ability to identify potential strategic acquisitions or transactions and realize the expected benefits of such transactions,
including with respect to the Merger; the substantial level of government regulation over our business and the potential effects of new laws or regulations or changes in existing laws or regulations; the outcome of
litigation, regulatory audits, investigations, actions and / or guaranty fund assessments; uncertainties surrounding participation in government - sponsored programs such as Medicare; the effectiveness and security of our information technology and other business systems; unfavorable industry, economic or political conditions,
including foreign currency movements; acts of war, terrorism, natural disasters or pandemics; our ability to obtain
shareholder or regulatory approvals required for the Merger or the requirement to accept conditions that could reduce the anticipated benefits of the Merger as a condition to obtaining regulatory approvals; a longer time than anticipated to consummate the proposed Merger; problems regarding the successful integration of the businesses of Express Scripts and Cigna; unexpected costs regarding the proposed Merger; diversion of management's attention from ongoing business operations and opportunities during the pendency of the Merger; potential
litigation associated with the proposed Merger; the ability to retain key personnel; the availability of financing,
including relating to the proposed Merger; effects on the businesses as a result of uncertainty surrounding the proposed Merger; as well as more specific risks and uncertainties discussed in our most recent report on Form 10 - K and subsequent reports on Forms 10 - Q and 8 - K available on the Investor Relations section of www.cigna.com as well as on Express Scripts» most recent report on Form 10 - K and subsequent reports on Forms 10 - Q and 8 - K available on the Investor Relations section of www.express-scripts.com.
These costs
include bankers» and lawyers» fees, the risk of class - action
litigation, the need to reveal commercially sensitive information that could benefit rivals, and the prospect of fights with corporate raiders who want juicier returns for
shareholders and social activists who want executives to pay heed to their values.
BlackBerry's ability to manage inventory and asset risk; BlackBerry's reliance on suppliers of functional components for its products and risks relating to its supply chain; BlackBerry's ability to obtain rights to use software or components supplied by third parties; BlackBerry's ability to successfully maintain and enhance its brand; risks related to government regulations,
including regulations relating to encryption technology; BlackBerry's ability to continue to adapt to recent board and management changes and headcount reductions; reliance on strategic alliances with third - party network infrastructure developers, software platform vendors and service platform vendors; BlackBerry's reliance on third - party manufacturers; potential defects and vulnerabilities in BlackBerry's products; risks related to
litigation,
including litigation claims arising from BlackBerry's practice of providing forward - looking guidance; potential charges relating to the impairment of intangible assets recorded on BlackBerry's balance sheet; risks as a result of actions of activist
shareholders; government regulation of wireless spectrum and radio frequencies; risks related to economic and geopolitical conditions; risks associated with acquisitions; foreign exchange risks; and difficulties in forecasting BlackBerry's financial results given the rapid technological changes, evolving industry standards, intense competition and short product life cycles that characterize the wireless communications industry, and the company's previously disclosed review of strategic alternatives.
Many factors could cause BlackBerry's actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward - looking statements,
including, without limitation: BlackBerry's ability to enhance its current products and services, or develop new products and services in a timely manner or at competitive prices,
including risks related to new product introductions; risks related to BlackBerry's ability to mitigate the impact of the anticipated decline in BlackBerry's infrastructure access fees on its consolidated revenue by developing an integrated services and software offering; intense competition, rapid change and significant strategic alliances within BlackBerry's industry; BlackBerry's reliance on carrier partners and distributors; risks associated with BlackBerry's foreign operations,
including risks related to recent political and economic developments in Venezuela and the impact of foreign currency restrictions; risks relating to network disruptions and other business interruptions,
including costs, potential liabilities, lost revenues and reputational damage associated with service interruptions; risks related to BlackBerry's ability to implement and to realize the anticipated benefits of its CORE program; BlackBerry's ability to maintain or increase its cash balance; security risks; BlackBerry's ability to attract and retain key personnel; risks related to intellectual property rights; BlackBerry's ability to expand and manage BlackBerry ® World ™; risks related to the collection, storage, transmission, use and disclosure of confidential and personal information; BlackBerry's ability to manage inventory and asset risk; BlackBerry's reliance on suppliers of functional components for its products and risks relating to its supply chain; BlackBerry's ability to obtain rights to use software or components supplied by third parties; BlackBerry's ability to successfully maintain and enhance its brand; risks related to government regulations,
including regulations relating to encryption technology; BlackBerry's ability to continue to adapt to recent board and management changes and headcount reductions; reliance on strategic alliances with third - party network infrastructure developers, software platform vendors and service platform vendors; BlackBerry's reliance on third - party manufacturers; potential defects and vulnerabilities in BlackBerry's products; risks related to
litigation,
including litigation claims arising from BlackBerry's practice of providing forward - looking guidance; potential charges relating to the impairment of intangible assets recorded on BlackBerry's balance sheet; risks as a result of actions of activist
shareholders; government regulation of wireless spectrum and radio frequencies; risks related to economic and geopolitical conditions; risks associated with acquisitions; foreign exchange risks; and difficulties in forecasting BlackBerry's financial results given the rapid technological changes, evolving industry standards, intense competition and short product life cycles that characterize the wireless communications industry.
Actual results may vary materially from those expressed or implied by forward - looking statements based on a number of factors,
including, without limitation: (1) risks related to the consummation of the Merger,
including the risks that (a) the Merger may not be consummated within the anticipated time period, or at all, (b) the parties may fail to obtain
shareholder approval of the Merger Agreement, (c) the parties may fail to secure the termination or expiration of any waiting period applicable under the HSR Act, (d) other conditions to the consummation of the Merger under the Merger Agreement may not be satisfied, (e) all or part of Arby's financing may not become available, and (f) the significant limitations on remedies contained in the Merger Agreement may limit or entirely prevent BWW from specifically enforcing Arby's obligations under the Merger Agreement or recovering damages for any breach by Arby's; (2) the effects that any termination of the Merger Agreement may have on BWW or its business,
including the risks that (a) BWW's stock price may decline significantly if the Merger is not completed, (b) the Merger Agreement may be terminated in circumstances requiring BWW to pay Arby's a termination fee of $ 74 million, or (c) the circumstances of the termination,
including the possible imposition of a 12 - month tail period during which the termination fee could be payable upon certain subsequent transactions, may have a chilling effect on alternatives to the Merger; (3) the effects that the announcement or pendency of the Merger may have on BWW and its business,
including the risks that as a result (a) BWW's business, operating results or stock price may suffer, (b) BWW's current plans and operations may be disrupted, (c) BWW's ability to retain or recruit key employees may be adversely affected, (d) BWW's business relationships (
including, customers, franchisees and suppliers) may be adversely affected, or (e) BWW's management's or employees» attention may be diverted from other important matters; (4) the effect of limitations that the Merger Agreement places on BWW's ability to operate its business, return capital to
shareholders or engage in alternative transactions; (5) the nature, cost and outcome of pending and future
litigation and other legal proceedings,
including any such proceedings related to the Merger and instituted against BWW and others; (6) the risk that the Merger and related transactions may involve unexpected costs, liabilities or delays; (7) other economic, business, competitive, legal, regulatory, and / or tax factors; and (8) other factors described under the heading «Risk Factors» in Part I, Item 1A of BWW's Annual Report on Form 10 - K for the fiscal year ended December 25, 2016, as updated or supplemented by subsequent reports that BWW has filed or files with the SEC.
This year,
shareholders will have an opportunity to weigh in on the eventual changes amidst a backdrop of continued multi-billion dollar settlements for allegations of misconduct regarding a litany of issues (
including the «London Whale» trading fiasco, evidence of collusion to rig CDS and foreign exchange markets, and continued mortgage - backed security
litigation), along with the Fed and FDIC's decision to label the Company's «living will» proposal as «not credible.»
The firm represents clients in a wide variety of
litigation and appellate matters,
including matters involving real property, real estate finance, construction, development disputes and transactions, intellectual property disputes, business disputes, personal injury, fraud,
shareholder disputes, and adversarial actions in bankruptcy court.
Each share class represents an interest in the same assets of the Funds, has the same rights and is identical in all material respects except that (i) each class of shares may be subject to different (or no) sales loads, (ii) each class of shares may bear different (or no) distribution fees; (iii) each class of shares may have different
shareholder features, such as minimum investment amounts; (iv) certain other class - specific expenses will be borne solely by the class to which such expenses are attributable,
including transfer agent fees attributable to a specific class of shares, printing and postage expenses related to preparing and distributing materials to current
shareholders of a specific class, registration fees paid by a specific class of shares, the expenses of administrative personnel and services required to support the
shareholders of a specific class,
litigation or other legal expenses relating to a class of shares, Trustees» fees or expenses paid as a result of issues relating to a specific class of shares and accounting fees and expenses relating to a specific class of shares and (v) each class has exclusive voting rights with respect to matters relating to its own distribution arrangements.
The investigation and conclusions of the Special Committee may result in claims and proceedings relating to such matters,
including previously disclosed
shareholder and derivative
litigation and actions by the Securities and Exchange Commission and / or other governmental agencies and negative tax or other implications for the Company resulting from any accounting adjustments or other factors.
Andi is an experienced litigator focusing her practice on complex commercial
litigation,
including shareholder and corporate governance disputes, fraud, RICO, land use, construction,
shareholder derivative suits, business torts, supply chain, class actions, product liability, trade secrets and non-compete disputes.
He is regularly instructed on disputes concerning civil fraud and asset tracing, banking and other financial
litigation, and company law disputes of one sort of another (
including shareholder disputes or claims against directors).
Mr. Boyajian helps clients involved in all manner of business disputes,
including litigation of professional liability matters, business torts, breach of contract claims, and
shareholder disputes.
As well recognized Toronto business lawyers provide legal services for all matters in Business Law,
Shareholder Disputes, Partnerships,
Litigation, Corporate Law, legal and strategic expertise
including mergers and acquisitions, public and private company reorganizations, major transactions, corporate governance, directors» & officers» duties & liabilities, disclosure and business structuring.
The Reinartz Law Firm handles a wide range of civil and business matters,
including commercial
litigation, breach of contract,
shareholder and partnership disputes, and more.
Bailey has experience assisting clients with a variety of legal issues in a broad range of areas
including commercial
litigation (i.e.
shareholder disputes and related matters), contractual disputes, negligence, personal injury, construction
litigation, picketing and injunctions, debtor / creditor
litigation, and professional regulatory matters.
Business
litigation includes several types of business - related claims, such as breach of contract, partner disputes,
shareholder disputes, IP enforcement, employment claims, derivative actions, and more.
Represented several close corporations in
shareholder / employee disputes,
including state court
litigation involving salaries, profit distributions and terminations
Raman practices in the areas of civil
litigation including estate, commercial, real estate, debtor & creditor matters, business and
shareholder disputes
including oppression remedies, corporate governance disputes in not - for - profit corporations, and other areas in
litigation.
Chris Groves focuses his practice on a variety of commercial
litigation matters,
including contract disputes, insurance coverage
litigation, bankruptcy adversary proceedings, employment - related class actions, consumer class actions, corporate takeover
litigation,
shareholder derivative
litigation, patent infringement ligation, and license agreement disputes.
The former consists mainly of small - scale
litigation work,
including contentious insolvency business, commercial and minority
shareholder disputes and Companies Court applications, along with advisory work for smaller firms.
With experience in all aspects of commercial disputes,
including shareholder, real estate and construction
litigation, Justin knows when and how to settle and when to go to trial.
Such examples
include, applications for production of records and accounts; defending allegations of unlawful dividends; and an application for rectification of the register in line with the Re Hoicrest
litigation (as a precursor to an unfair prejudice petition by a minority
shareholder).
Max has also represented participants in more generalized civil and commercial
litigation,
including shareholder and partnership disputes and securities related
litigation.
Our expertise
includes advising officers, boards of directors,
shareholders, and special
litigation committees on a wide range of business disputes,
including fiduciary duties, employment issues with minority and majority
shareholders, executive compensation, corporate freeze - outs, direct and derivative claims by
shareholders, internal investigations and other aspects of corporate governance.
Among others, Mr. Ferdinand's experience
includes, appellate
litigation; bankruptcy adversary proceedings; bid protests, debarments, and appeals; breach of contract and Uniform Commercial Code claims; broker disputes; commercial landlord - tenant actions,
including commercial evictions; condominium association
litigation; consumer fraud and deceptive trade practices act claims; corporate governance; directors» and officers» claims; ethics and professional liability; health law; injunctions; insurance issues; lien claims,
including commercial and residential construction liens; planning board actions; post-judgment collection; restrictive covenants;
shareholder and partnership disputes; and
shareholder derivative claims.
Representation of minority
shareholders in home healthcare franchising companies in various state court
litigation involving breach of fiduciary duty, breach of a
shareholders» agreement, fraud and other tort claims,
including successfully prosecuting charges for violation of court orders freezing millions of corporate funds, resulting in a civil contempt judgment that
included a jail sentence.
He has experience dealing with a variety of commercial, corporate and property
litigation matters in both the County Court and the High Court
including: Commercial contract disputes Disputes arising from business and share sales
including warranty claims
Shareholder and boardroom disputes,... more
His areas of specialty
include banking, corporate and commercial
litigation, business crime defence and
shareholder and investment disputes.
Our New Jersey commercial
litigation lawyers handled a wide range of matters,
including shareholder and partnership disputes, construction
litigation, eminent domain / condemnation proceedings and contract disputes.
He has considerable experience in all manner of business disputes,
including litigation and arbitration in corporate, real estate, construction, and
shareholder cases.
Ferriter Law represents clients in all aspects of
litigation, arbitration, and mediation,
including businesses against businesses, individuals against businesses, commercial and individual lenders, commercial and individual borrowers,
shareholders, boards of directors and managers, suppliers, and investors.
«Darren's strength in
litigation,
including his tenure as an assistant attorney general in Texas, and collective employment law experience make him a natural fit for Littler,» said Earl (Chip) M. Jones III, office managing
shareholder of the Austin office.
Our civil
litigation lawyers represent plaintiffs and defendants
including individuals, partnerships,
shareholders and corporations in the following types of cases:
Class actions and
shareholders» rights
litigation,
including securities class actions, overtime class actions, investor loss class actions, oppression proceedings and derivative actions.
The panel on Ethical and Professional Issues in
Shareholder Disputes and
Litigation included Paul N. Feldman of Feldman Lawyers, Tom Curry of Lenczner Slaght Royce Smith Griffin LLP and David Alderson of Gilbertson Davis LLP, with Lisa C. Munro of Lerners LLP moderating.
Mr. Johnson is a
shareholder at Davis Malm concentrating his practice in the trial and appeal of complex business
litigation in the areas of securities, antitrust, mergers and acquisitions, high technology
including computer software licensing and implementation disputes, real estate development and construction, financing, corporate governance, partnership disputes, insurance coverage, executive employment relations, terminations, and estate disputes.
The deal gives the firm delegated authority to set up insurance for an unlimited number of cases across various fields
including partnership, warranty and
shareholder disputes, property and general commercial
litigation.
US securities
litigation firms
including Pomerantz, Goldberg Law and Bronstein Gewirtz & Grossman have all announced they are investigating potential
shareholder claims in the wake of the west London fire, which killed at least 79 people.
Defense of leading U.S. pharmaceutical and biologic manufacturers in national and international product liability and commercial
litigation involving prescription biologics, nonsteroidal pain medications, diet drugs, statins and other medications,
including class actions, multi-district
litigations, Congressional investigations, criminal proceedings, and
shareholder derivative
litigation
David acts for clients in a wide range of disputes,
including shareholder and partnership disputes, securities
litigation, class action defence, proceedings under the Competition Act, and professional negligence claims.
He also has extensive experience in derivatives
litigation, consumer mass claims, infrastructure and energy projects in Spain and LatAm and general commercial
litigation,
including shareholder disputes and directors» liability.
2015 saw the total value of claims funded by Therium break the $ 5 billion mark with
litigation and arbitration cases in the UK, Europe, Asia - Pacific and in the Americas,
including high profile cases such as the
shareholder group action against Lloyds Banking Group over the acquisition of HBOS at the peak of the financial crisis.
The firm represents both plaintiffs and defendants in business and commercial
litigation matters,
including contract, partnership,
shareholder, real estate, and intellectual property disputes.
His practice focuses on employment and contract
litigation including partnership and
shareholder disputes, debt recovery, and wrongful termination actions.
In addition to representing established corporations, the Firm thrives on representing startups, entrepreneurs,
shareholders of closely held companies, professionals, corporate executives, and sales reps. TMB provides a broad range of services
including advice and counseling, contract drafting, dispute resolution, and
litigation in the following primary areas:
He also handles general commercial
litigation,
including breach of commercial contracts, warranty claims and director,
shareholder and partnership disputes.
Civil
Litigation including contract and business disputes, construction litigation, shareholder disputes and environment
Litigation including contract and business disputes, construction
litigation, shareholder disputes and environment
litigation,
shareholder disputes and environmental claims.