Sentences with phrase «income children already»

Myth: Low - income children already have access to publicly funded preschool, and middle - and higher - income families pay for their children to attend preschool.

Schools that serve high - need, low - income children already function as a steppingstone for principals on their way to higher - performing schools.

Myth: Low - income children already have access to publicly funded preschool, and middle - and higher - income families pay for their children to attend preschool.

Not exact matches

For example, corporate dividends payable to minor children are already taxed at the highest marginal rate — essentially removing the incentive to split income.

The fact is, many working families are already living on far less than 70 % of their income when you take out non-discretionary expenses like mortgage payments and the feeding and care of children.

Since 1999, section 120.4 of the Income Tax Act has already cut back on income sprinkling through the so - called «kiddie tax» rules, which makes it difficult to sprinkle income to children under aIncome Tax Act has already cut back on income sprinkling through the so - called «kiddie tax» rules, which makes it difficult to sprinkle income to children under aincome sprinkling through the so - called «kiddie tax» rules, which makes it difficult to sprinkle income to children under aincome to children under age 18.

So far, half of all states have already established a higher «exit income limit» than «entrance income limit» for child care subsidies, says Karen Schulman, director of child care and early learning research at the National Women's Law Center.

However, your government is already on record for its commitment to allow families with children under the age of 18 to split income for tax purposes; to extend the fitness tax credit to adults; to raise the threshold for Tax Free Savings Accounts to $ 10,000; and to reduce government debt.

NDP commitments include a two point cut in the small business tax rate (already implemented by the Conservatives); extension of the accelerated capital cost allowance for two years (already implemented by the Conservatives (but with a different phase in); an innovation tax credit for machinery used in research and development; an additional one cent of gas tax for the provinces for infrastructure; a transit infrastructure fund; increased funding for social housing; a major child care initiative; and, increasing ODA funding to 0.7 per cent of Gross National Income (GNI).

NDP promises include a two point cut in the small business tax rate (already implemented in the budget by the Conservatives); extension of the accelerated capital cost allowance for two years (also already implemented by the Conservatives); an innovation tax credit for machinery used in research and development; an additional one cent of gas tax for the provinces for infrastructure; a transit infrastructure fund; increased funding for social housing; a major child care initiative; increasing ODA funding to 0.7 per cent of Gross National Income (GNI); and restoring the 6 % annual escalator to the Canada Health Transfer.

Mr. Harper has already committed to using some of this fiscal room to allow income splitting for families with children under the age of 18; extending the fitness tax credit to adults; and, increasing the tax - free contribution to savings accounts to $ 10,000.

The Harper government had already promised to use the surpluses to allow income splitting for tax purposes for families with children under the age of 18; to extend the fitness tax credit to adults; and, to reduce debt by $ 3 billion a year.

It's no surprise that parents of young children, says Statistics Canada, now carry debt worth 180 per cent of their after - tax income, well above the already - elevated national average of 161 per cent.

Still, Rabbi Avi Shafran, director of public affairs for Agudath Israel of America, the largest organization of Haredi Jews in the United States, sees the future differently: «There will be an economic crunch, and there already are many two - income families in the community, but no Haredi Jew is starving, or having fewer children because of economic restraints....

Already his lack of income threatens the security and stability of his family, which includes a wife and two children.

So instead of worrying about DeVos, we really should be focusing on: (1) Congressional Republicans, who've already shown great enthusiasm for weakening the nutrition standards for school meals and limiting their accessibility to low - income kids (see my Civil Eats piece, «3 Things You Need to Know About the House School Food Bill «-RRB-; (2) the as - yet - unscheduled confirmation hearing for Agriculture Secretary nominee Sonny Perdue, during which we're likely to get more information on how he views the NSLP; and (3) whoever eventually is appointed Under Secretary for Food, Nutrition and Consumer Services, the USDA official directly in charge of child nutrition programs.

Raising a child with autism is already expensive, and this loss of income is not possible for many families.

Low - income students — who may already be eligible for federal Pell grants and state TAP grants — should be able to benefit from the program, such as through resources to cover costs including fees, transportation, child care and books that too often make college out of reach.

Parents already struggling to get by will find it even harder to afford basics like food and clothing for their children as their income fails to keep pace with spiralling living costs.

«The poorest children are already eligible for free school meals — the main beneficiaries of this new universal benefit will be middle and upper - income households, who really don't need a public subsidy.»

Most African American children, especially those in low - income or single - parent families, enter 1st grade with already large cognitive disadvantages, which then grow in the higher grades.

«These costs have the potential to entrench the inequality which children and young people from lower income families already experience and undermine attempts to close the attainment gap.

States should address this issue by adopting universal education - choice options for all families (and many state - based programs are already geared specifically to low - income children by virtue of means testing).

These questions include the potential value of having a socially and economically diverse group of children together prior to kindergarten; supporting families with working parents who require full - day care and education for their young children; and where best to serve children with special needs whose early education costs already are fully assumed (regardless of family income) by the public schools (based on the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act [IDEA]-RRB-.

Additionally, research shows that by the time children from lower - income families are two years old, they are already several months behind children from higher - income families in reading and vocabulary development.

Identified Students include those whose families participate in other federal programs such as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), where their incomes have already been thoroughly scrutinized, and those who are identified by other programs as extremely vulnerable, such as programs for homeless and migrant children.

Williams was also concerned about the raising of income caps for the voucher program, as this gradually shifted funding toward families who were already sending their children to private schools.

Yet quality pre-K is especially important for children from disadvantaged backgrounds, who often lack the exposure to literature, reading and numeracy that is common in middle - and upper - income homes: It can help ensure that these kids don't show up to kindergarten already far behind other students.

An attainment gap between those children from low - income families and their peers has already opened up.

Thirty - nine states and the District of Columbia already have received waivers from some of the penalties of NCLB, along with flexibility to use some Title I money funded for low - income children.

In fact, in April 2017, about 300,000 low - income children did not receive school breakfast, despite being eligible for and already enrolled in the program.

On the other hand, free preschool for children from upper income families may have lower economic development benefits, as many of these children are already in high - quality preschool programs paid for by their parents.

The counterpart school, with a heavily low - income student population, typically enrolls children who entered kindergarten already behind and have fewer opportunities to gain this knowledge and vocabulary outside school.

* Recent analyses indicate that environmental factors associated with vocabulary development and emergent literacy skills are already present among children as early as 15 months of age.2 By first grade, unfortunately, the repercussions become all too clear: children from high - income families are likely to know about twice as many words as children from low - income families, putting these children at a significantly higher risk for school failure.3

Title I — using a comprehensive needs assessment process, funding is targeted at meeting the identified needs of children from low - income families and other disadvantaged groups, and for the already identified Priority Schools, supplying additional family and community engagement personnel and specialized training for principals, the first year, and other personnel in the following years based on needs.

This means that low - income children are already behind their peers higher up the income ladder before school even starts.

The state's Republican - controlled government already has one of the nation's largest voucher programs, with 150,000 low - and middle - income students and children with special needs or disabilities receiving tuition assistance at an annual cost of nearly $ 1 billion.

Conservatives reaffirmed their stance that the credits help children from low - income families access school options already available to their peers from higher - income backgrounds.

«This is a huge victory for the Louisiana Scholarship Program, which provides low income families with the same opportunity as more affluent parents already have — the financial resources to send their child to the school of their choice.»

We know that children from low - income homes enter kindergarten already significantly behind their wealthier peers.

Since 1999, section 120.4 of the Income Tax Act has already cut back on income sprinkling through the so - called «kiddie tax» rules, which makes it difficult to sprinkle income to children under aIncome Tax Act has already cut back on income sprinkling through the so - called «kiddie tax» rules, which makes it difficult to sprinkle income to children under aincome sprinkling through the so - called «kiddie tax» rules, which makes it difficult to sprinkle income to children under aincome to children under age 18.

Most families already do some basic income splitting with their children by simply depositing their child tax benefit cheque in a bank account in the child's name.

If you have an extra $ 500 in income as compared to expenses each month, and you have already accounted for what you want to put into savings, you could put this money towards your child's education without affecting your daily lifestyle.

A recent study by Reach Advisors showed that in 366 metropolitan areas of the U.S., women in their 20s who are single and have no children already have a median income that is 8 % higher than men's.

There are many factors that affect this like socio - economic status of the family, income of the parents, number of children in the family, other insurance plans already purchased, etc..

If you don't already have life insurance in place and are to receive alimony or child support after your divorce, you may want to consider protecting this income with a life insurance policy.

Term insurance can provide coverage while people depend upon the insured person's income and support, but for people who live until their retirement, chances are they either accumulated enough savings already to support their spouse, and / or their children are grown and no longer need parental guardian financial support.

i have 1 cr term insurance new adding new plan child policy this plan my salary income 5 lakhs p.a already 1 cr sum assured 20 times over so new policy apply any claim problem?

But back to the responsibility of raising children again and the need for us to re-examine our financial planning and specifically our over 50 or over 60 grandparent life insurance and that part that we may have been planning to or already have let go of, the replacement of our income for our children.

Many low - income fathers already spend much time caring for their children.